Daniel Williams
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2019-0309
All 1 response received
· Deadline: 31 Dec 2019
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
Deficient fundamental nursing care on a general ward led to patient deterioration, exacerbated by a flawed C-diff infection investigation process that failed to examine initial care failures on the transferring ward.
View full coroner's concerns
the course of the inquest the evidence circopinion there is a risk that future deatos revealed matters rise to concern. In circumstances it is my statutory duty te will occur unless action is taken. In the report to you 1) Following surgery Mr Wiliams was left with nurse and vulnerable to infection: a wound which was challenging to Williams was stepped downetora Having been nursed on ITU HDU Mr general nursing ward,
2) nursing care which Mr Williams (GI) ward was found byanamserceivedon general gastrointestinal sometime after Mr Williams' death Trust investigation which took place "deficient in delivering the fundarentalfolo request by myself to be care
3) Whilst still on this general Gl ward Mr back to the HDU unit, Willdams deteriorated and was transferred tested posifive for clostriditm daciollo-ang that fransier a stool sample taken (c-diff). The Guys Thomas' Trust Briony the The leading this During giving The initially The this following The day
4) Alkhough found at inquest that the presence of C-diff Mr Williams ultimately came by his death was not relevant to how potential under investigation of €-diff have residual concerns with the about the process which cases within the Trust from what was told is triggered on discovering the presence of c-diff,
5) At Mr Williams" inquest was told that c-diff infection , Consequently it is infection is potentially fatal out ? clinice)os8q review Whenever latoiy iseoureient deat hospital trusts carry it was linked to c-diff is found in order to determine whether any of care" in the care and treatment of the patients.
6) was told that what should happen following the Sample is that an alert is sent to the infection collection of a positive c-diff the mandatory infection control nurse who then distributes which the patient control data collection form to, inter alia, the ward 0 is currently. That ward and that ward alone investigates focussed on identifying 'any significant deviations then practice . including in the following categories: deficiency from best cleaning, deficiency hand hygiene and or ceeiiceency inn envitioricrobial stewardship; What is not done however; is if the respectver in antimicrobial been transierred from another ward; the patient has recently conditions on the transferring ward. investigation does not extend to the
7) In this case it was the transferring ward where there failings in delivering the fundamentals of were found to have raised significant concerns care and about which the family had at the time. The only reason these failures highlighted was that an investigation was undertakeer were review on 26 September 2018 at which a pre-inquest Wiliams had diedPasmbeesui 08 & €-dhichfereioracontracted aconcerns that M nursing care: The extent of the Trust's contracted as a result of poor conducted significantly after the event: investigation was limited as it was ActION SHOULD BE TAKEN Inmy-opinion action should be taken to prevent future organisation have the power t0 take such action. deaths and believe your
2) nursing care which Mr Williams (GI) ward was found byanamserceivedon general gastrointestinal sometime after Mr Williams' death Trust investigation which took place "deficient in delivering the fundarentalfolo request by myself to be care
3) Whilst still on this general Gl ward Mr back to the HDU unit, Willdams deteriorated and was transferred tested posifive for clostriditm daciollo-ang that fransier a stool sample taken (c-diff). The Guys Thomas' Trust Briony the The leading this During giving The initially The this following The day
4) Alkhough found at inquest that the presence of C-diff Mr Williams ultimately came by his death was not relevant to how potential under investigation of €-diff have residual concerns with the about the process which cases within the Trust from what was told is triggered on discovering the presence of c-diff,
5) At Mr Williams" inquest was told that c-diff infection , Consequently it is infection is potentially fatal out ? clinice)os8q review Whenever latoiy iseoureient deat hospital trusts carry it was linked to c-diff is found in order to determine whether any of care" in the care and treatment of the patients.
6) was told that what should happen following the Sample is that an alert is sent to the infection collection of a positive c-diff the mandatory infection control nurse who then distributes which the patient control data collection form to, inter alia, the ward 0 is currently. That ward and that ward alone investigates focussed on identifying 'any significant deviations then practice . including in the following categories: deficiency from best cleaning, deficiency hand hygiene and or ceeiiceency inn envitioricrobial stewardship; What is not done however; is if the respectver in antimicrobial been transierred from another ward; the patient has recently conditions on the transferring ward. investigation does not extend to the
7) In this case it was the transferring ward where there failings in delivering the fundamentals of were found to have raised significant concerns care and about which the family had at the time. The only reason these failures highlighted was that an investigation was undertakeer were review on 26 September 2018 at which a pre-inquest Wiliams had diedPasmbeesui 08 & €-dhichfereioracontracted aconcerns that M nursing care: The extent of the Trust's contracted as a result of poor conducted significantly after the event: investigation was limited as it was ActION SHOULD BE TAKEN Inmy-opinion action should be taken to prevent future organisation have the power t0 take such action. deaths and believe your
Responses
Action Taken
The Trust's C-diff Action Group reviewed the Trust's C-diff investigation process and revised it to include a stage to check whether the mandatory infection control data forms need to be sent to another ward in addition to the ward where the patient is currently located. (AI summary)
The Trust's C-diff Action Group reviewed the Trust's C-diff investigation process and revised it to include a stage to check whether the mandatory infection control data forms need to be sent to another ward in addition to the ward where the patient is currently located. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Madam Inquest touching the death of Daniel Williams am writing on behalf of Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (the Trust') further to the Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths ('PFD report') dated 24 September 2019 in relation to the above Inquest. will detail the Trust's formal response below. The Trust is grateful to the Court for granting an extension in time for the provision of its response to 26 November 2019 following receipt of the PFD report on October 2019 (by post rather than email)_ Within your PFD report; you expressed your matters of concern as follows: Following surgery Mr Williams was left with a wound which was challenging to nurse and vulnerable to infection. Having initially been nursed on ITUIHDU, Mr Williams was stepped down to a general nursing ward. The nursing care which Mr Williams received on this general gastrointestinal ('GI') ward was found by an internal Trust investigation which took place sometime after Mr Williams' death following request by you to be "deficient in delivering the fundamentals of care" . 3_ Whilst still on this general Gl ward; Mr Williams deteriorated and was transferred back to the HDU unit, The following that transfer a stool sample taken tested positive for clostridium difficile ('c-diff'). Although you found at the conclusion of the inquest hearing that the presence of c-diff was not relevant to how Mr Williams ultimately came by his death; you indicated that youhave residual concerns with the potential under investigation of c-diff cases within the Trust You noted that this derived from what you were told during the hearing about process which Is triggered on discovering the presence of c-diff. Bridge day the
You noted that during the inquest hearing you were told that a c-diff infection Is potentially fatal infection Consequently , it is regulatory requirement that hospital trusts carry out a clinical case review whenever" C-diff is found in order to determine whether' it was Iinked to any "lapses of care" in the care and treatment of hospital patients_ You indicated that you were told that what should happen following the collection of a positive c-diff sample is that an alert is sent to the infection control nurse who then distributes the mandatory infection control data collection form to, inter alia, the ward on which the patient is currently. That ward and that ward alone then investigates focussed on identifying "any significant deviations from best practices _ including in the following categories: deficiency in environmental cleaning, deficiency in hand hygiene andlor deficiency in antimicrobial stewardship. You noted that what is not done, however; is if the respective patient has recently been transferred from another ward, the investigation does not extend to the conditions on the transferring ward. It was noted that in this case it was the transferring ward where there were found to have been failings in delivering the fundamentals of care and about which the family had raised significant concerns at the time, You observed that the only reason these failures were highlighted was that an investigation was undertaken following a pre- inquest review on 26 September 2018 at which Mr Williams' family raised concerns that he had died as a result of a C-diff infection contracted as a result of poor nursing care_ You noted that the extent of the Trust's investigation was limited a8 it was conducted significantly after the event: have liaised with both the Gastrointestinal Unit at St Thomas' Hospital and also the Trust's Infection, Prevention and Control Team ("the IPC team"') in order to coordinate the Trust's formal response to your concerns. will deal with the information received from both areas in the sections below. The Trusf's Gastrointestinal Unit The Gastrointestinal ('GI') Unit is based at St Thomas' Hospital, It is currently a 51 bedded unit which comprises of 2 wards: Page Ward and Northumberland Ward. Page Ward provides care for patients who are undergoing complex Gl surgery following both of the Trust's elective and emergency pathways. Patients within these pathways have a variety of conditions which include: oesophageal cancer; bowel cancer; intestinal failure and inflammatory bowel disease_ Concern 1 Following_surgery_Mr_Williams was left_with wound_which_was_challenging to nurse_and vulnerable_to infection_Having initially been nursed on ITUIHDU Mr Williams was stepped down toa general nursing_ward The patients who we care for on Page Ward are some of the most complex patients within Trust and many of them have significant comorbidities. In recognition of this, and following the Trust's investigation into the care and treatment received by Mr Williams, the Trust has reviewed its Education and Training Programme which is provided to the nurses who work on the GI unit: This programme includes education related to wound care and training on how to work in collaboration with our tissue viability nurses. In addition, the Trust's specialist nurses within the stoma team work closely with the nurses on Ward in order to educate and support them, onan on-going basis, to deliver specialised wound care to patients with complex abdominal wounds and often multiple stomas The stoma team is also utilised to support our patients and the nurses within the critical care environment. the Page
The Trust has created and delivered a specialised induction programme for all our new starters assigned to the Gl unit: This programme Is led by a practice development nurse to ensure that all new nurses on the Gl Unit receive the support and supervision required to cleliver expert nursing care. As part of the Gl unit nursing team's continual development; the Trust provides a Band 5 nursing development programme and a development for the Gl unit's nursing assistants. This is specific to the Trust's GI speciality and includes a session with the stoma team which focuses on wound and stoma care_ To note, any decision to 'stepdown' or transfer patlents to the Gl unit from a critical care setting is multi-disciplinary team decision: A decision such as this will involve the intensivist in charge of the patient's critical care and the surgical team with the overall responsibility for the patient; Once a decision is made to 'stepdown' patient to the GI unit, the Slte Nurse Practitioner is alerted who will then allocate the patient to a bed within either Page Ward or Northumberland Ward: In these circumstances, upon arrival to the relevant ward the patient will be reviewed by the Critical Response Team (CRT') withln 4 hours of the 'stepdown'. This allows the CRT to assess the patient's condition and provides them with an opportunity to liaise with the ward staff to check if have any concerns about their ability to safely deliver care to that patient. The Trust's expectation is that ward staff are empowered to raise concern if the clinical condition of the patient deteriorates at any time or in circumstances where they require any additional support. It is the Trust's expectation that the patient will be reviewed again by the CRT after 24 hours on the ward and also reviewed by the surgical team within 12 hours of their transfer to the ward, Nursing staff are able to contact the CRT or the surgical registrar if they require advice or if one of their patients requires urgent attention; this includes If the patient National Early Warning Score (NEWS) Increases. Concern 2: The nursing_ care which Mr Williams received on _thisgeneral gastrolntestinal ('GL) ward_was_found bY_an internal Trust_investigation_which took_place_sometime_after Mr Williams' death following a request by_YQu to be "deficiont in dolivering the_fundamentals of care" The Trust launched its Fundamentals of Care stahdards ("the standards" in April 2018_ Following its inception, members of staff at the Trust have received training on the standards and am satisfied that they are now embedded into the nursing practice on both Page Ward and Northumberland Ward, All new members of staff at the Trust receive education and training in relation to the standards as part of the Trust's specialised induction programme Staff are also required to complete competency assessment document which includes assessments around hygiene; Infection prevention and control; fluid management and nutrition. All nursing staff on the GI unit; as part of their ongoing development; are required to complete competencies which Include getting the basics of the care correct and delivering excellent fundamental care_ Our registered nurses who carry out the Nurse in Charge role on given shift also receive education and training in order to sufficiently equip them to recognise circumstances when a member of nursing staff might be struggling to deliver effective nursing care and to support them accordingly: The Trust's Directorate Management Team (DMT' is committed to ensuring that fundamental care is the cornerstone of our practice; this is not just within nursing care but also across the wider multi-disciplinary team. Quality rounds take place weekly which are led by the Clinical Director and Head of Nursing; these endeavour to review both patient safety and patient experience on all wards in the Gastro Medicine and Surgical (GMS') Directorate. The Trust has found that engaging with the clinical teams in this way enables its DMT to clearly interact with staff members and offers a forum for staff to voice any concerns hold: In addition, It allows the Trust's DMT to support staff with challenging situations (e.g. an operational issue , staffing issue or a patient with complex needs) that require escalation_ day they they
Both Ward and Northumberland Ward's quality and performance is reviewed on monthly basis via Trust scorecards. Page Ward's scorecard for period October 2018 September 2019 has no reportable c-diff or MRSA infection within it, Ward's hand hygiene audits are monitored on a monthly basis; the audits are compiled by a ward Iink nurse and are also independently reviewed by the Infection; Prevention and Control (IPC) team. For October 2019, compliance with hand hygiene standards was at 91.7%_ The average compliance over the last year currently stands at 85%. Where scores fall below the Trust's expected standard which is RAG rated, Red <70%, Amber >70%, Green >90%, an action plan to improve compliance for a ward area is in place An essential component in delivery of high quality and effective fundamental care is for the Trust to ensure that it has the correct number of nurses allocated to its wards with appropriate skills to deliver care there. Staffing on Page Ward is measured twice daily through the Trust's safe care system. This measures the dependency and acuity of the current patients on the ward and aligns this with number of registered and unregistered nurses 0n duty. This system enables staff to identify any staffing risk by raising a 'red flag'. A 'red flag' is escalated in real time to the ward's Matron and Head of Nursing who are expected to mitigate any staffing risk by either providing support for the ward or by moving staff from another area to work on the ward. The ward's Matron also visits the ward dally to support staff and review any complex patient issues. Out of hours, the Site Nurse Practitioners monitor and respond to any 'red flags' that are raised: In addition to the daily staffing review by the Matron, the Head of Nursing reviews staffing numbers on a weekly basis to identify any shifts where there is a poor skill mix or where the nursing vacancy has not been filled with bank or agency staff; this seeks to mitigate any gaps in staffing in advance rather than on the A Trust wide establishment review takes place twice a year to determine whether the current staffing levels meet the needs of our service, Workforce Performance Indicators are considered (such as; vacancies, sickness and statutory and mandatory training) a8 well as planned staff numbers against actual stalf numbers_ The workforce establishment review in 2018 highlighted the need to increase numbers of senior nursing assistants on Page Ward in order to support the effective delivery of fundamental care These posts have now been recruited into and the staff are now in place on Page Ward. Staffing has therefore increased by 1 whole time equivalent senior nursing assistant on both the and night shift on Page Ward. The Trust's IPC Team The Trust has an established comprehensive programme for the prevention and management of c-difficile. This programme follows best practice guidance from the Department of Health; NHS England and NHIS Improvement Data from the Public Health England 'Data Capture System' (the official reporting portal for c difficile and other reportable infections) indicates that the Trust has the lowest number of cases and the lowest rate of c-difficile amongst its peer organisations. These organisations make up the Shelford Group which is a collaboration between ten of the largest teaching and research NHS hospltal trusts in England. The Trust is generally seen as leading NHS Trust in this area_ For current reporting year to date (1 April 2019 to 30 September 2019), the Trust has reported 20 cases of healthcare-associated (as nationally defined) c-difficile. This is compared with a range of 42 to 135 cases amongst our peer organisations In terms of rate per 100,000 bed days; the Trust's rate for the current reporting year is 6.09. This is compared with a range of rates of 10.57 to 35.67 amongst our peer organisations. For the current reporting year; the Trust has not identified any "lapses in care" (formally defined as a significant failure of antibiotic stewardship or a proven transmission of c-difficile between two patients). Where there is more Page the put the the the day; Key the day the the
than one case of €-difficile in the same clinical area within 28 day period, this is definecl nationally a8 'Period of Increased Incidence and; within the Trust, this woulc result in formal investigation: In addition, within the Trust; all c-difficile isolates are sent for molecular typing to assess for relatedness, L.e. likely transmission: To note, the Trust has not had any evidence of transmission in Mr Williams' case or any other case for this reporting period and for some considerable time before It (at least two years). There have been no outbreaks of C- difficile within the Trust for at least four years Concerns 3 _ 7 regarding clostridium difficile ("c-diff") The Trust's C-diff Action Group, under the chairmanship of pr Simon Goldenberg] has reviewed the Trust's C-diff investigation process a8 a result of Mr Willams' death; The €-diff investigation process has been subsequently revised: It now includes a stage whereby an assessment is made to check whether the mandatory infection control data forms need to be sent to another ward in addition to the ward where the patient is currently located. This is a formal assessment of the need to Include a prior ward stay in c-diff investigation process and to direct the investigation (and the mandatory Infection control data forms) appropriately to a previous ward, The revlsed process now applies to any ward or clinical area on which a c-diff patient has been an inpatient in the seven days prior to c-diff speciman being obtained or onset of symptoms of c-diff: This will now ensure that In scenarios where patient has recently been transferred to a ward from another ward; the c-diff investigation has the opportunity and flexibility to extend to the conditions of the transferring ward. copy of the revised protocol is appended to this letter as Appendix 1_ The Trust remains committed to improving patient care and learning from incidents such a8 Mr Williams' death.
You noted that during the inquest hearing you were told that a c-diff infection Is potentially fatal infection Consequently , it is regulatory requirement that hospital trusts carry out a clinical case review whenever" C-diff is found in order to determine whether' it was Iinked to any "lapses of care" in the care and treatment of hospital patients_ You indicated that you were told that what should happen following the collection of a positive c-diff sample is that an alert is sent to the infection control nurse who then distributes the mandatory infection control data collection form to, inter alia, the ward on which the patient is currently. That ward and that ward alone then investigates focussed on identifying "any significant deviations from best practices _ including in the following categories: deficiency in environmental cleaning, deficiency in hand hygiene andlor deficiency in antimicrobial stewardship. You noted that what is not done, however; is if the respective patient has recently been transferred from another ward, the investigation does not extend to the conditions on the transferring ward. It was noted that in this case it was the transferring ward where there were found to have been failings in delivering the fundamentals of care and about which the family had raised significant concerns at the time, You observed that the only reason these failures were highlighted was that an investigation was undertaken following a pre- inquest review on 26 September 2018 at which Mr Williams' family raised concerns that he had died as a result of a C-diff infection contracted as a result of poor nursing care_ You noted that the extent of the Trust's investigation was limited a8 it was conducted significantly after the event: have liaised with both the Gastrointestinal Unit at St Thomas' Hospital and also the Trust's Infection, Prevention and Control Team ("the IPC team"') in order to coordinate the Trust's formal response to your concerns. will deal with the information received from both areas in the sections below. The Trusf's Gastrointestinal Unit The Gastrointestinal ('GI') Unit is based at St Thomas' Hospital, It is currently a 51 bedded unit which comprises of 2 wards: Page Ward and Northumberland Ward. Page Ward provides care for patients who are undergoing complex Gl surgery following both of the Trust's elective and emergency pathways. Patients within these pathways have a variety of conditions which include: oesophageal cancer; bowel cancer; intestinal failure and inflammatory bowel disease_ Concern 1 Following_surgery_Mr_Williams was left_with wound_which_was_challenging to nurse_and vulnerable_to infection_Having initially been nursed on ITUIHDU Mr Williams was stepped down toa general nursing_ward The patients who we care for on Page Ward are some of the most complex patients within Trust and many of them have significant comorbidities. In recognition of this, and following the Trust's investigation into the care and treatment received by Mr Williams, the Trust has reviewed its Education and Training Programme which is provided to the nurses who work on the GI unit: This programme includes education related to wound care and training on how to work in collaboration with our tissue viability nurses. In addition, the Trust's specialist nurses within the stoma team work closely with the nurses on Ward in order to educate and support them, onan on-going basis, to deliver specialised wound care to patients with complex abdominal wounds and often multiple stomas The stoma team is also utilised to support our patients and the nurses within the critical care environment. the Page
The Trust has created and delivered a specialised induction programme for all our new starters assigned to the Gl unit: This programme Is led by a practice development nurse to ensure that all new nurses on the Gl Unit receive the support and supervision required to cleliver expert nursing care. As part of the Gl unit nursing team's continual development; the Trust provides a Band 5 nursing development programme and a development for the Gl unit's nursing assistants. This is specific to the Trust's GI speciality and includes a session with the stoma team which focuses on wound and stoma care_ To note, any decision to 'stepdown' or transfer patlents to the Gl unit from a critical care setting is multi-disciplinary team decision: A decision such as this will involve the intensivist in charge of the patient's critical care and the surgical team with the overall responsibility for the patient; Once a decision is made to 'stepdown' patient to the GI unit, the Slte Nurse Practitioner is alerted who will then allocate the patient to a bed within either Page Ward or Northumberland Ward: In these circumstances, upon arrival to the relevant ward the patient will be reviewed by the Critical Response Team (CRT') withln 4 hours of the 'stepdown'. This allows the CRT to assess the patient's condition and provides them with an opportunity to liaise with the ward staff to check if have any concerns about their ability to safely deliver care to that patient. The Trust's expectation is that ward staff are empowered to raise concern if the clinical condition of the patient deteriorates at any time or in circumstances where they require any additional support. It is the Trust's expectation that the patient will be reviewed again by the CRT after 24 hours on the ward and also reviewed by the surgical team within 12 hours of their transfer to the ward, Nursing staff are able to contact the CRT or the surgical registrar if they require advice or if one of their patients requires urgent attention; this includes If the patient National Early Warning Score (NEWS) Increases. Concern 2: The nursing_ care which Mr Williams received on _thisgeneral gastrolntestinal ('GL) ward_was_found bY_an internal Trust_investigation_which took_place_sometime_after Mr Williams' death following a request by_YQu to be "deficiont in dolivering the_fundamentals of care" The Trust launched its Fundamentals of Care stahdards ("the standards" in April 2018_ Following its inception, members of staff at the Trust have received training on the standards and am satisfied that they are now embedded into the nursing practice on both Page Ward and Northumberland Ward, All new members of staff at the Trust receive education and training in relation to the standards as part of the Trust's specialised induction programme Staff are also required to complete competency assessment document which includes assessments around hygiene; Infection prevention and control; fluid management and nutrition. All nursing staff on the GI unit; as part of their ongoing development; are required to complete competencies which Include getting the basics of the care correct and delivering excellent fundamental care_ Our registered nurses who carry out the Nurse in Charge role on given shift also receive education and training in order to sufficiently equip them to recognise circumstances when a member of nursing staff might be struggling to deliver effective nursing care and to support them accordingly: The Trust's Directorate Management Team (DMT' is committed to ensuring that fundamental care is the cornerstone of our practice; this is not just within nursing care but also across the wider multi-disciplinary team. Quality rounds take place weekly which are led by the Clinical Director and Head of Nursing; these endeavour to review both patient safety and patient experience on all wards in the Gastro Medicine and Surgical (GMS') Directorate. The Trust has found that engaging with the clinical teams in this way enables its DMT to clearly interact with staff members and offers a forum for staff to voice any concerns hold: In addition, It allows the Trust's DMT to support staff with challenging situations (e.g. an operational issue , staffing issue or a patient with complex needs) that require escalation_ day they they
Both Ward and Northumberland Ward's quality and performance is reviewed on monthly basis via Trust scorecards. Page Ward's scorecard for period October 2018 September 2019 has no reportable c-diff or MRSA infection within it, Ward's hand hygiene audits are monitored on a monthly basis; the audits are compiled by a ward Iink nurse and are also independently reviewed by the Infection; Prevention and Control (IPC) team. For October 2019, compliance with hand hygiene standards was at 91.7%_ The average compliance over the last year currently stands at 85%. Where scores fall below the Trust's expected standard which is RAG rated, Red <70%, Amber >70%, Green >90%, an action plan to improve compliance for a ward area is in place An essential component in delivery of high quality and effective fundamental care is for the Trust to ensure that it has the correct number of nurses allocated to its wards with appropriate skills to deliver care there. Staffing on Page Ward is measured twice daily through the Trust's safe care system. This measures the dependency and acuity of the current patients on the ward and aligns this with number of registered and unregistered nurses 0n duty. This system enables staff to identify any staffing risk by raising a 'red flag'. A 'red flag' is escalated in real time to the ward's Matron and Head of Nursing who are expected to mitigate any staffing risk by either providing support for the ward or by moving staff from another area to work on the ward. The ward's Matron also visits the ward dally to support staff and review any complex patient issues. Out of hours, the Site Nurse Practitioners monitor and respond to any 'red flags' that are raised: In addition to the daily staffing review by the Matron, the Head of Nursing reviews staffing numbers on a weekly basis to identify any shifts where there is a poor skill mix or where the nursing vacancy has not been filled with bank or agency staff; this seeks to mitigate any gaps in staffing in advance rather than on the A Trust wide establishment review takes place twice a year to determine whether the current staffing levels meet the needs of our service, Workforce Performance Indicators are considered (such as; vacancies, sickness and statutory and mandatory training) a8 well as planned staff numbers against actual stalf numbers_ The workforce establishment review in 2018 highlighted the need to increase numbers of senior nursing assistants on Page Ward in order to support the effective delivery of fundamental care These posts have now been recruited into and the staff are now in place on Page Ward. Staffing has therefore increased by 1 whole time equivalent senior nursing assistant on both the and night shift on Page Ward. The Trust's IPC Team The Trust has an established comprehensive programme for the prevention and management of c-difficile. This programme follows best practice guidance from the Department of Health; NHS England and NHIS Improvement Data from the Public Health England 'Data Capture System' (the official reporting portal for c difficile and other reportable infections) indicates that the Trust has the lowest number of cases and the lowest rate of c-difficile amongst its peer organisations. These organisations make up the Shelford Group which is a collaboration between ten of the largest teaching and research NHS hospltal trusts in England. The Trust is generally seen as leading NHS Trust in this area_ For current reporting year to date (1 April 2019 to 30 September 2019), the Trust has reported 20 cases of healthcare-associated (as nationally defined) c-difficile. This is compared with a range of 42 to 135 cases amongst our peer organisations In terms of rate per 100,000 bed days; the Trust's rate for the current reporting year is 6.09. This is compared with a range of rates of 10.57 to 35.67 amongst our peer organisations. For the current reporting year; the Trust has not identified any "lapses in care" (formally defined as a significant failure of antibiotic stewardship or a proven transmission of c-difficile between two patients). Where there is more Page the put the the the day; Key the day the the
than one case of €-difficile in the same clinical area within 28 day period, this is definecl nationally a8 'Period of Increased Incidence and; within the Trust, this woulc result in formal investigation: In addition, within the Trust; all c-difficile isolates are sent for molecular typing to assess for relatedness, L.e. likely transmission: To note, the Trust has not had any evidence of transmission in Mr Williams' case or any other case for this reporting period and for some considerable time before It (at least two years). There have been no outbreaks of C- difficile within the Trust for at least four years Concerns 3 _ 7 regarding clostridium difficile ("c-diff") The Trust's C-diff Action Group, under the chairmanship of pr Simon Goldenberg] has reviewed the Trust's C-diff investigation process a8 a result of Mr Willams' death; The €-diff investigation process has been subsequently revised: It now includes a stage whereby an assessment is made to check whether the mandatory infection control data forms need to be sent to another ward in addition to the ward where the patient is currently located. This is a formal assessment of the need to Include a prior ward stay in c-diff investigation process and to direct the investigation (and the mandatory Infection control data forms) appropriately to a previous ward, The revlsed process now applies to any ward or clinical area on which a c-diff patient has been an inpatient in the seven days prior to c-diff speciman being obtained or onset of symptoms of c-diff: This will now ensure that In scenarios where patient has recently been transferred to a ward from another ward; the c-diff investigation has the opportunity and flexibility to extend to the conditions of the transferring ward. copy of the revised protocol is appended to this letter as Appendix 1_ The Trust remains committed to improving patient care and learning from incidents such a8 Mr Williams' death.
Part of a Series
2 separate reports were issued from this inquest, each sent to different organisations.
-
2014-0009
Sent to: Rotherham, Doncaster and South Humberside NHS Foundation TrustAll responded
This report (2019-0309) is shown above.
Sent To
- St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust
Response Status
Linked responses
1 of 1
56-Day Deadline
31 Dec 2019
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 27 April 2018 this jurisdiction Wiliams'The investigation doficluceq ateneeehaninvestigation Into the death of Daniel conclusion of the inquest at lend of the inquest on 28 August 2019.ahe consequences of neceseary surgicat reatreniams died & a result of the unintended surgical treatment; CiRcuMSTANCES OF THE DETh [acOilliams died at St Thomas' Hospital on 26 recognised complications '0f' gospointest e Novmeer 2017as & result of developing background of very significant medcate surgery (tumor removal) against undenwent resulted large wound complexity. The surgery which Mr Williams was tuholenging t0 nurse and vargerable r infendon Ohe GOtsic: oozing stoma; This the tumor removal subsequently came surgical joins formed following Mr Williams died a8 8 reseq-cenfie afendanacilseaieioe to, further infection. consequences of septic picture_
Copies Sent To
[DATE] [SIGNED BY CORONER]
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Publication of Clinical Standards
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
Patient safety governance
Quality and safety oversight
Trust Compliance Officer
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
Patient safety governance
Quality and safety oversight
Clinical Guidelines Audit
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
Patient safety governance
Quality and safety oversight
Reporting Clinical Practice Changes
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
Patient safety governance
Quality and safety oversight
RQIA Compliance Review Powers
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
Patient safety governance
Quality and safety oversight
Board Awareness of SAI Reports
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
Patient safety governance
Quality and safety oversight
Policy on Learning from SAI Deaths
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
Patient safety governance
Quality and safety oversight
SAI Deaths in Annual Reports
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
Patient safety governance
Quality and safety oversight
Trust Board Review of IHRD Report
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
Patient safety governance
Quality and safety oversight
Expand RQIA Remit and Resources
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
Patient safety governance
Quality and safety oversight
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.