Elisa Fuller
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2019-0481
All 1 response received
· Deadline: 12 Dec 2019
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
Insufficient support and systems hinder junior staff from escalating concerns to seniors, and there is a lack of understanding regarding the essential retention of placentas post-delivery.
View full coroner's concerns
Although I acknowledge that the Trust have put in place systems to address the second concern. In relation to the first concern, further training has been put in place. However there remains work to be done.
(1) Whether there is appropriate support and systems in place to encourage Junior Midwives and Junior Doctors to escalate any concerns they have to more Senior Colleagues, (2) Whether there is sufficient understanding of the need to retain placentas post delivery
Gloucestershire Coroner's Court, Corinium Avenue, Barnwood, Gloucester, GL4 3DJ Tel 01452 305661 for a specified time period prior to disposal.
(1) Whether there is appropriate support and systems in place to encourage Junior Midwives and Junior Doctors to escalate any concerns they have to more Senior Colleagues, (2) Whether there is sufficient understanding of the need to retain placentas post delivery
Gloucestershire Coroner's Court, Corinium Avenue, Barnwood, Gloucester, GL4 3DJ Tel 01452 305661 for a specified time period prior to disposal.
Responses
Action Taken
Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Trust provided a mandatory update day for midwives, including a presentation on lessons learned from inquests. They have also developed a draft policy on placental retention and review, and plan a 'Black Box' event in January 2020 to improve multi-professional learning. (AI summary)
Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Trust provided a mandatory update day for midwives, including a presentation on lessons learned from inquests. They have also developed a draft policy on placental retention and review, and plan a 'Black Box' event in January 2020 to improve multi-professional learning. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Ms Skerrett Elisa Fuller deceased I am writing in response to your letter dated 18 October 2019 in which you raised concerns arising from the evidence heard during this inquest. It is your view that there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken about these concerns. The matters of concern are:
1. Whether there is appropriate support and systems in place to encourage junior midwives and junior doctors to escalate any concerns they have to more senior colleagues
2. Whether there is sufficient understanding of the need to retain placentas post-delivery for a specified time period prior to disposal The Trust's responses are as follows:
1. Whether there is appropriate support and systems in place to encourage junior midwives and junior doctors to escalate any concerns they have to more senior colleagues In addition to the training and practice which midwives and doctors undertake during their professional qualifying courses and degrees, the Trust provides the following events and tools for the support and ongoing education of clinical colleagues about the importance and clear expectations of the need for escalation of all concerns which have the potential to impact upon the safety of patients in our care: Chair: Peter Lachecki Chief Executive: Deborah Lee t 11 'NWW giriStIOSpit.115 BEST CARE FOR EVERYONF
Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust NHS I. Mandatory Update day - Midwives The midwives mandatory update day for 2018 - 2019 included a focussed presentation from the Divisional Risk Manager on lessons learned from recent inquests and clinical incidents. The poster highlights five situations where practice has been improved through embedding learning from incidents. Two of these situations ('Syntocinon' and 'documenting') included reference to the importance of escalating concerns. Attendance level for midwives was
94.4% for the year.
• Enclosure 1 — Midwives Mandatory Update Day Programme 2018/2019
• Enclosure 2 — Poster presented by Risk Manager II. SBAR referral tool - Midwives and Doctors The escalation which is encouraged should be undertaken in the form of the 'SBAR' (Situation/Background/Assessment/Recommendation) referral tool. The tool suggested on Enclosure 2 for the 'Documenting...' case is the 'RSVP' referral tool. This has been replaced in the Trust by the 'SBAR' referral tool, explained in Enclosure 3. In this tool, the reasons for the referral i.e. the escalation and the plan for review of the patient (as a result of the escalation) are formalised in the 'S' and 'R' parts of the tool. This is a structured referral tool widely used nationally, across maternity services.
• Enclosure 3 - SBAR (Situation/Background/Assessment/Recommendation) referral tool III. Rotation Day programme - Midwives This is a programme directed at midwives new to the Trust, recently qualified midwives, those returning to work after a break or midwives moving to work in a new clinical area. These colleagues are required to attend this programme twice during their `preceptorship period'. Preceptorship is the period immediately following qualification, and extra support given in that period is intended to guide the newly qualified practitioner through a successful transition from student status, and to develop their practice through a structured program of support, lasting between 18 months and 2 years. This teaching day covers professional issues including escalation, documentation, time management and professional behaviour such as assertiveness and communication.
• Enclosure 4 - Rotation Day programme June and November 2018; June and December 2019 IV. Practical Obstetric Multi-Professional Training — PROMPT' - Midwives and Doctors This is an emergency skills study day attended by both midwives and medical staff. The PROMPT day included a session looking at 'human factors' i.e. the relationship between human beings and the systems with which they interact and a 60 minute presentation on 'APVW ilur,tio..1)itokilir, uF BEST CARE FOR EVERYONE
Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust NHS 'resilience' both of which can impact on a clinicians ability and attitude to escalation.
Attendance for the year was midwives 96.4% and obstetric doctors 80.6% All drills are delivered with a focus on team work and effective communication. The course is endorsed by the Royal College of Midwives (RCM) and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) with further information available from on the PROMPT website and RCOG.
• Enclosure 5 — PROMPT training programme for 2018-2019 V. Newborn Early Warning Observation charts — documented by Midwives, consulted by Doctors The New Early Warning Observation Chart for Newborn Infants (NEWS chart) has been in use in clinical areas for a number of years and has escalation criteria clearly presented on the reverse of the chart. This has recently been updated as the Newborn Early Warning Trigger and Track chart (NEWTT chart) and includes details of observation frequencies and conditions that trigger an immediate clinical review.. The specific question as to whether the infant is exhibiting 'grunting' is made clearer on the first page; grunting is a sign of respiratory distress and was a feature of this case as it should have been effectively escalated. The NEWTT chart will be launched in all relevant clinical areas on December 30th 2019.
• Enclosure 6 — Newborn early Warning Observation Chart
• Enclosure 7 — Newborn early Warning Trigger and Track chart
2. Whether there is sufficient understanding of the need to retain placentas post delivery At the time of Elisa's birth, the placenta was not retained as it appeared that she was born in good condition. Current guidelines on retention for pathological examination (dated October
2019) indicate that on the basis of prematurity (32 to 36+6 weeks) it "may be desirable" to refer placenta for examination (Appendix A). Elisa was born at 36 weeks, marginally premature, but also with none of the conditions that that require 'essential' referral for placental examination (Appendix A). The policy in place at the time of Elisa'a death required placentas to be retained only if certain criteria were met at the time of birth. Unfortunately Elisa's placenta was not retained as concerns did not become apparent until some hours after birth However, in response to the evidence heard at the inquest from the pathologist that his determination of the cause of death was considerably limited by the absence of the placenta, the Trust has revised its policy on retention of placentas so that all placentas are retained for 24 hours after birth, and are sufficiently identified so that they can be reliably retrieved in the event that there are any subsequent adverse clinical events affecting the baby. J1/ WV, 1(1'4 )It ,11% BEST CARE FOR EVERYONE
Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust NHS The Trust's proposed process for retention of placentas is as follows: o At birth, the placenta is placed in a bag and labelled with the patient's details on a sticker. Patient details are also written on the bag with an indelible pen to safeguard against the loss of the patients identification sticker o The bagged placenta is placed inside the usual human waste disposal container (usually to a maximum of 5 placenta) the lid is NOT sealed. o When the 5`' or last placenta is added to the waste disposal container, a sticky label is placed on the lid with the date and time of when the lid is due to be sealed shut ie 24 hours after the last placenta is placed in the container . o The lid is closed securely 24 hours after the addition of the last placenta. The container is then disposed of. There is no national guidance on how long we should retain a placenta, but a reasonable time might be 24 hours, after which before the waste disposal container can be removed in the usual way. This new procedure is in place in the Trust, supported by teaching sessions on the delivery suite and birthing units. A brief guide to undertaking this procedure, and relevant signage to assist colleagues, has also been developed. The formal Trust policy has yet to be ratified but it is hoped this will be finalised in early 2020.
• Enclosure 8 — Tissue pathway for histopathological examination of the placenta (RCOG October 2019) Finally, I can also add that as a result of the inquest into Elisa's death, the following additional review and learning has taken place, for the clinical staff involved, and for any interested colleagues: a) There has been a 'debrief 'with the midwifery staff to further explore and understand barriers to escalation b) A 'Black Box' event is planned for January 2020 led by the Trust Safety Department. This is a bespoke learning event (originating in the risk management processes of the aviation industry) and will focus on how to better understand and improve multi professional learning from incidents. The aim is to further explore barriers to escalation and what we could do to improve escalation in all care settings across the Trust. c) A "What Matters to you?" event took place on 6th December 2019 to provide an opportunity for staff to further consider and address issues in the working environment that impact on professionals' performance e.g. understanding the roles and responsibilities of the whole team, the need for kind and respectful communication and support from core staff for less experienced staff working in specialist areas such as delivery suite. VVVVW BEST CARE FOR EVERYONE
Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust NHS I am confident that there has been considerable reflection, learning and changes in practice as a result of Elisa's death all of which will significantly contribute to the reduction in the likelihood of such an incident occurring in the future. I hope this response adequately answers your questions but please do not hesitate to return to me if you require any further information
1. Whether there is appropriate support and systems in place to encourage junior midwives and junior doctors to escalate any concerns they have to more senior colleagues
2. Whether there is sufficient understanding of the need to retain placentas post-delivery for a specified time period prior to disposal The Trust's responses are as follows:
1. Whether there is appropriate support and systems in place to encourage junior midwives and junior doctors to escalate any concerns they have to more senior colleagues In addition to the training and practice which midwives and doctors undertake during their professional qualifying courses and degrees, the Trust provides the following events and tools for the support and ongoing education of clinical colleagues about the importance and clear expectations of the need for escalation of all concerns which have the potential to impact upon the safety of patients in our care: Chair: Peter Lachecki Chief Executive: Deborah Lee t 11 'NWW giriStIOSpit.115 BEST CARE FOR EVERYONF
Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust NHS I. Mandatory Update day - Midwives The midwives mandatory update day for 2018 - 2019 included a focussed presentation from the Divisional Risk Manager on lessons learned from recent inquests and clinical incidents. The poster highlights five situations where practice has been improved through embedding learning from incidents. Two of these situations ('Syntocinon' and 'documenting') included reference to the importance of escalating concerns. Attendance level for midwives was
94.4% for the year.
• Enclosure 1 — Midwives Mandatory Update Day Programme 2018/2019
• Enclosure 2 — Poster presented by Risk Manager II. SBAR referral tool - Midwives and Doctors The escalation which is encouraged should be undertaken in the form of the 'SBAR' (Situation/Background/Assessment/Recommendation) referral tool. The tool suggested on Enclosure 2 for the 'Documenting...' case is the 'RSVP' referral tool. This has been replaced in the Trust by the 'SBAR' referral tool, explained in Enclosure 3. In this tool, the reasons for the referral i.e. the escalation and the plan for review of the patient (as a result of the escalation) are formalised in the 'S' and 'R' parts of the tool. This is a structured referral tool widely used nationally, across maternity services.
• Enclosure 3 - SBAR (Situation/Background/Assessment/Recommendation) referral tool III. Rotation Day programme - Midwives This is a programme directed at midwives new to the Trust, recently qualified midwives, those returning to work after a break or midwives moving to work in a new clinical area. These colleagues are required to attend this programme twice during their `preceptorship period'. Preceptorship is the period immediately following qualification, and extra support given in that period is intended to guide the newly qualified practitioner through a successful transition from student status, and to develop their practice through a structured program of support, lasting between 18 months and 2 years. This teaching day covers professional issues including escalation, documentation, time management and professional behaviour such as assertiveness and communication.
• Enclosure 4 - Rotation Day programme June and November 2018; June and December 2019 IV. Practical Obstetric Multi-Professional Training — PROMPT' - Midwives and Doctors This is an emergency skills study day attended by both midwives and medical staff. The PROMPT day included a session looking at 'human factors' i.e. the relationship between human beings and the systems with which they interact and a 60 minute presentation on 'APVW ilur,tio..1)itokilir, uF BEST CARE FOR EVERYONE
Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust NHS 'resilience' both of which can impact on a clinicians ability and attitude to escalation.
Attendance for the year was midwives 96.4% and obstetric doctors 80.6% All drills are delivered with a focus on team work and effective communication. The course is endorsed by the Royal College of Midwives (RCM) and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) with further information available from on the PROMPT website and RCOG.
• Enclosure 5 — PROMPT training programme for 2018-2019 V. Newborn Early Warning Observation charts — documented by Midwives, consulted by Doctors The New Early Warning Observation Chart for Newborn Infants (NEWS chart) has been in use in clinical areas for a number of years and has escalation criteria clearly presented on the reverse of the chart. This has recently been updated as the Newborn Early Warning Trigger and Track chart (NEWTT chart) and includes details of observation frequencies and conditions that trigger an immediate clinical review.. The specific question as to whether the infant is exhibiting 'grunting' is made clearer on the first page; grunting is a sign of respiratory distress and was a feature of this case as it should have been effectively escalated. The NEWTT chart will be launched in all relevant clinical areas on December 30th 2019.
• Enclosure 6 — Newborn early Warning Observation Chart
• Enclosure 7 — Newborn early Warning Trigger and Track chart
2. Whether there is sufficient understanding of the need to retain placentas post delivery At the time of Elisa's birth, the placenta was not retained as it appeared that she was born in good condition. Current guidelines on retention for pathological examination (dated October
2019) indicate that on the basis of prematurity (32 to 36+6 weeks) it "may be desirable" to refer placenta for examination (Appendix A). Elisa was born at 36 weeks, marginally premature, but also with none of the conditions that that require 'essential' referral for placental examination (Appendix A). The policy in place at the time of Elisa'a death required placentas to be retained only if certain criteria were met at the time of birth. Unfortunately Elisa's placenta was not retained as concerns did not become apparent until some hours after birth However, in response to the evidence heard at the inquest from the pathologist that his determination of the cause of death was considerably limited by the absence of the placenta, the Trust has revised its policy on retention of placentas so that all placentas are retained for 24 hours after birth, and are sufficiently identified so that they can be reliably retrieved in the event that there are any subsequent adverse clinical events affecting the baby. J1/ WV, 1(1'4 )It ,11% BEST CARE FOR EVERYONE
Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust NHS The Trust's proposed process for retention of placentas is as follows: o At birth, the placenta is placed in a bag and labelled with the patient's details on a sticker. Patient details are also written on the bag with an indelible pen to safeguard against the loss of the patients identification sticker o The bagged placenta is placed inside the usual human waste disposal container (usually to a maximum of 5 placenta) the lid is NOT sealed. o When the 5`' or last placenta is added to the waste disposal container, a sticky label is placed on the lid with the date and time of when the lid is due to be sealed shut ie 24 hours after the last placenta is placed in the container . o The lid is closed securely 24 hours after the addition of the last placenta. The container is then disposed of. There is no national guidance on how long we should retain a placenta, but a reasonable time might be 24 hours, after which before the waste disposal container can be removed in the usual way. This new procedure is in place in the Trust, supported by teaching sessions on the delivery suite and birthing units. A brief guide to undertaking this procedure, and relevant signage to assist colleagues, has also been developed. The formal Trust policy has yet to be ratified but it is hoped this will be finalised in early 2020.
• Enclosure 8 — Tissue pathway for histopathological examination of the placenta (RCOG October 2019) Finally, I can also add that as a result of the inquest into Elisa's death, the following additional review and learning has taken place, for the clinical staff involved, and for any interested colleagues: a) There has been a 'debrief 'with the midwifery staff to further explore and understand barriers to escalation b) A 'Black Box' event is planned for January 2020 led by the Trust Safety Department. This is a bespoke learning event (originating in the risk management processes of the aviation industry) and will focus on how to better understand and improve multi professional learning from incidents. The aim is to further explore barriers to escalation and what we could do to improve escalation in all care settings across the Trust. c) A "What Matters to you?" event took place on 6th December 2019 to provide an opportunity for staff to further consider and address issues in the working environment that impact on professionals' performance e.g. understanding the roles and responsibilities of the whole team, the need for kind and respectful communication and support from core staff for less experienced staff working in specialist areas such as delivery suite. VVVVW BEST CARE FOR EVERYONE
Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust NHS I am confident that there has been considerable reflection, learning and changes in practice as a result of Elisa's death all of which will significantly contribute to the reduction in the likelihood of such an incident occurring in the future. I hope this response adequately answers your questions but please do not hesitate to return to me if you require any further information
Sent To
- Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Trust
Response Status
Linked responses
1 of 1
56-Day Deadline
12 Dec 2019
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On the 16th February 2018 I commenced an investigation into the death of Elisa Fuller. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on the 10th October 2019. The conclusion of the inquest was a narrative conclusion. The medical cause of death was 1A Cardiac Arrest, 1B Unexplained idiosyncratic reaction to suxamethonium, 2 Prematurity.
Circumstances of the Death
At 10.46 hours on the 9th February 2018 Elisa Fuller was delivered by elective Caesarean section at 36 weeks gestation due to placenta praevia. Elisa showed no evidence of compromise at delivery. From approximately 12.50 hours she began to display emerging symptoms of respiratory distress. Concerns about these symptoms were not escalated to either a Senior Midwife and / or a Senior Paediatrician. No medical review occurred until approximately 16.25 hours. This resulted in Elisa’s admission to the neonatal unit being delayed. However that delay did not contribute to her deteriorating condition. As her condition continued to deteriorate she was intubated. Premedication with morphine and suxamethonium (a muscle relaxant) was prescribed prior to intubation together with atropine. These drugs were administered at approximately 19.27 hours, and immediately thereafter Elisa suffered an idiosyncratic reaction to suxamethonium which triggered a cardiac arrest. Full resuscitation efforts were carried out, to which Elisa did not respond. The underlying cause of her reaction to the relaxant remains unclear. It is likely to be related to a neuromuscular disorder, but no genetic cause has been identified. Resuscitation efforts were ceased at 20.28 hours, and Elisa was pronounced deceased.
Copies Sent To
Clinical Improvements Manager, , NHS England and Improvements, St Chads Court, 213
215 Hagley Road, Birmingham BI6 9RG (reference point 2 in paragraph 5.)
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Executive Director Responsibilities
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
Staff training and development
Duty of Candour implementation
Integrate sentinel event reporting into all NHS trust staff training and communications.
Bristol Heart Inquiry
Staff training and development
Duty of Candour implementation
Training for IPC professionals engineers and clinicians
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
Staff training and development
IPC role specifications and staffing levels
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
Staff training and development
Balancing vulnerability with professional curiosity
Southport Inquiry
Staff training and development
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.