Matthew Jones

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2019-0187
Date of Report 3 June 2019
Coroner Emma Whitting
Response Deadline est. 17 October 2019
All 1 response received · Deadline: 17 Oct 2019
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
A lack of appropriate training for mental health clinicians resulted in poor understanding of non-compliance risks with treatment orders and inadequate multi-agency coordination. Housing was also overlooked in discharge planning.
View full coroner's concerns
The evidence at the Inquest; the evidence revealed: an absence of appropriate training for clinicians and healthcare workers involved in the delivery of mental health services who have responsibility for the care of persons subject to Community Mental Health Treatment Orders (linked to Mental Health Treatment Requirement Care-Plans including treatment by Drug & Alcohol Services); and, as a result; a poor appreciation, including a lack of co-ordinated and multi-agency working; by such clinicians and healthcare workers of the likely risks of non-compliance with treatment linked to Community Mental Health Treatment Orders; and, particularly, of the importance of ensuring that 'housing' is part of any hospital discharge planning:
Responses
Department of Health and Social Care Central Government
Noted
The Department of Health and Social Care acknowledges the concerns around coordinated, multi-agency working for patients on Community Treatment Orders, and refers to existing NICE and Mental Health Act guidance. No specific actions are described beyond signposting existing resources. (AI summary)
View full response
From Nadine Dorries MP Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Mental Heallh, Department Suicide Prevention and Patient Safety of Health & Social Care 39 Vicloria Street London SWIH OEU 020 7210 4850 Our Ref: PFD-1178841 Ms Emma Whitting HM Coroner's Office The Court House Woburn Street Ampthill MK45 2HX th September 2019 Jz Zmma, Thank you for your correspondence of 4 June to Matt Hancock about the death of Matthew Jones: Iam replying as Minister with responsibility for mental health and I am grateful for the additional time in which to do so Firstly, I would like to say how saddened I was to read about Mr Jones'$ death: I can appreciate this must be a very difficult time for his family and friends and [ offer my sincerest condolences: Ihave noted carefully the concerns raised in your report about a lack of recognition among mental health professionals and others of the importance of coordinated, multi-agency working in relation to patients for whom a Community Treatment Order (CTO) is in place. It is not clear the circumstances under which Mr Jones was discharged from Ash Ward at Oakley Court; Luton. However; when discharging a patient from inpatient care, we would expect support to be provided to meet the individual needs of the person concerned: This might include liaison with community services providing treatment under a Mental Health Treatment Requirement' . https: WWW . gov uklgovemmenupublications mental-health-treatment-supporting-integrated-delivery-guidance

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance, Transition between inpatient mental health settings and community or care home settings " advises that before discharging people with mental health needs, health and social care practitioners in the hospital and community should discuss the patient's housing arrangements to ensure are suitable for them and plan accommodation accordingly: Mental health practitioners should carry out a thorough assessment of the person' $ personal, social, safety and practical needs to support discharge. The assessment should include risk of suicide and cover aspects of the person's life including any pre-existing family and social issues and stressors that may have triggered the person's admission, as well as suitability of accommodation The guidance also requires mental health practitioners to give people with serious mental health issues who have recently been homeless, or are at risk of homelessness, intensive, structured support to find and keep accommodation: This support should be started before the patient is discharged and continue after discharge for as as the person needs support to stay in secure accommodation. The support should focus on joint problem-solving, housing and mental health issues. Organisations commissioning and delivering services are expected to take the recommendations within NICE clinical guidelines into account when planning and delivering services. We expect the local NHS to look closely at the circumstances of this case and to take action where necessary to ensure services are safe and ofhigh quality. You may also wish to note that when considering whether a patient should be detained in hospital or receive continuing treatment in the community, the Mental Health Act 1983' provides for three options These are guardianship, leave of absence, and CTOs. Guardianship (section 7 of the Act ) is social care-led and is primarily focused on patients with welfare needs Its purpose is to enable patients to receive care in the community where it cannot be provided without the use of compulsory powers Such care may, Or may not; include specialist medical treatment for mental disorder. A guardian may be a local authority or someone else hups Www nice Qrg uklguidance ngSz hups: www legislation uklukpga/l983/20-contents hups; WWW legislation gov uklukpga/ [983/20 partIV crossheading guardianship they long LOV

approved by a local authority (a "private guardian') Guardians have three specific powers as follows: have the exclusive right to decide where a patient should precedence even over an attorney or deputy appointed under the Mental Capacity Act 20055. The Court of Protection also lacks jurisdiction to determine a place of residence of a patient whilst that patient is subject to guardianship and there is a residence requirement in effect; They can require the patient to attend for treatment; work; training Or education at specific times and places (but cannot use force t0 take the patient there); and They can demand that a doctor; approved mental health professional or another relevant person, has access to the patient at the place where the patient lives. Leave of absence (section 176) is primarily intended to allow a patient detained under the Act to be temporarily absent from hospital where further inpatient treatment as a detained patient is still thought to be necessary: It is suitable for short-term absences for a fixed period or a specific purpose, i.e-, to allow visits to family and to trial more independently; and, A CTO (section 1747) is used where it is necessary for the patient's health Or safety, or for the protection of others, to continue to receive treatment after their discharge from hospital. It seeks to prevent the 'revolving door' scenario and the harm which could arise relapse. It is a more structured system than leave of absence and has more safeguards for patients A feature of the CTO framework is that it is suitable only where there is no reason to think that the patient will need further treatment as a detained inpatient for the time being; but where the responsible clinician needs to be able to recall the patient to hospital if necessary: When considering these options, clinicians should take into account the individual circumstances, and the likely effectiveness, for the patient in question: httpi WWW legislation gov uklukpga/2005 9 contents https: wwwlegisltiongov uklukpgd/1983/20-section/lZ https: WWW legislation gov uklukpga/ 1983/20 section/LZA They live, taking they living from key -

The Mental Health Act Code of Practice8 provides statutory guidance to registered medical practitioners; approved clinicians, managers and staff of providers; and approved mental health professionals on how should carry out functions under the Mental Health Act in practice. It is statutory guidance for registered medical practitioners and other professionals in relation to the medical treatment of patients suffering from mental disorder: All those for whom the Code is statutory guidance must ensure that are familiar with its contents_ Others for whom the Code is helpful in carrying out their duties should also be familiar with its requirements. [ hope that my response is helpful and provides assurance of the national guidance that is available to support mental health professionals and others in managing the transition of patients from inpatient to community care settings, and to ensure their individual needs are met: Thank you for bringing these concerns to my attention. Y~S, Nad_ 2 NADINE DORRIES bttps: WWw_gOv uklgovemmentpublicalions code-of-praclice-mental-health-act-1982 they they
Sent To
  • Department of Health and Social Care
Response Status
Linked responses 1 of 1
56-Day Deadline 17 Oct 2019
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 5 April 2018 the Senior Coroner for Bedfordshire & Luton commenced an investigation was into the death of Mr Matthew Jones, aged 35. The investigation concluded at the end of the Inquest held by me; on 16 May 2019, when my determinations and conclusion were delivered. The medical cause of death was found to be: 1a Cocaine Toxicity The Conclusion of the Inquest was a Narrative Conclusion: The Deceased's death was drug-related but his discharge from hospital to accommodation which was not supported more than minimally, negligibly or trivially contributed to it
Circumstances of the Death
The Deceased had a diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia and polysubstance misuse and was under the care of Probation, Community Mental Health and Drug & Alcohol Support Services: relapse inhis conditions led to him being evicted from his accommodation on 8 February 2018 and it was agreed at & Professionals Meeting on 9 February 2018 that he required supported accommodation. After subsequently suffering threats at his temporary emergency accommodation, he was admitted to Ash Ward, Oakley Court; Bedfordshire, on 20 February 2018 for further treatment Although he remained on Ash Ward until 29 March 2018, neither the Mental Health nor the Housing Teams proactively sought supported accommodation for him and he was discharged from Ash Ward back to temporary accommodation in Luton on the afternoon of 29 March 2018. Shortly after midnight that evening, he was found behaving erratically on a street corner connecting Farley with Whitehall Avenue in Luton and soon after suffered cardiac arrest He was taken by attending paramedics to the Luton Dunstable Hospital but his death was confirmed there_at 03.40 hours Post-mortem Acting Hill examination confirmed a Cocaine blood concentration of 3.0 mga.
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you have the power to take such action.
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Training for IPC professionals engineers and clinicians
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
Staff training and development
IPC role specifications and staffing levels
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
Staff training and development
Operation Encompass cross-border extension
Southport Inquiry
Domestic abuse accommodation support
Autism spectrum disorder police training
Southport Inquiry
Staff training and development
Prevent training on online activity assessment
Southport Inquiry
Staff training and development
Neurodiversity training for Prevent practitioners
Southport Inquiry
Staff training and development
Balancing vulnerability with professional curiosity
Southport Inquiry
Staff training and development
Sharing information about closed Prevent referrals
Southport Inquiry
Staff training and development
Prevent Supervisor training on closure decisions
Southport Inquiry
Staff training and development
Prevent referral training for organisations
Southport Inquiry
Staff training and development

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.