Ruth Milne

PFD Report Partially Responded Ref: 2017-0156
Date of Report 16 May 2017
Coroner Paul Cooper
Response Deadline est. 11 October 2017
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
Concerns about the lack of continuity and appropriateness of GP medical staff, and whether vital recommendations from a 2015 safeguarding report have been fully implemented.
View full coroner's concerns
_ (1) The lack of continuity and the appropriateness of the medical staff despatched by the GP's at Hawthorn Medical Practice, Skegness The Safeguarding report by Johnsione Head of Safeguarding dated November 2015 identified this_ (2) Lincolnshire Police also investigated for an act of criminality _ (3) really need to know ifall the Action Plan, Monitoring and recommendations' (on page 11 &
12) of the safeguarding report have now been implemented and if not why not; Unit 1, Gilbert Drive, Endeavour Park Wyberton Fen; Boston, Lincolnshrire, PEZI 7TQ Tel 01522 553873/553374 Fax 01522 516717 being Leg
Responses
Ruth Milne
18 Jul 2017
Action Taken
Lincolnshire Community Health Services reports on actions taken following a safeguarding report, including establishing leg ulcer clinics, integrating specialist nurses, reviewing caseloads, and providing training on leg ulcer care and safeguarding. An action plan tracker has also been introduced. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Mr Cooper This is the response on behalf of Lincolnshire Community Health Services in respect of the Regulation 28 reportreceived dated 16"h May 2017,with reference to Matters of Concern Point 3. You make reference to the Action Monitoring and Recommendations' of the safeguarding report pages 11 and 12) and the requirement to provide you with information as to whether these have been implemented or not; can report as follows: Ongoing actions Page 11 allnow completel Ambulatory patients to be managed through case management identifying appropriate management through clinics and evaluated through care plan There are now two leg ulcer clinics held 5 a week within Skegness and one clinic held 5 days a week in Mablethorpe. There is also a plan to hold a Saturday clinic from late July to September to provide extra service provision for holiday makers. Provision of care to these patients is evaluated as part of care planning: Integrated support/review with specialist nurses i.e: heart failure, lymphoedema and continence Where an integrated/joint visit is required these take place. Specialist nurses share office accommodation with the community nursing team so there are well established channels of communication between specialist and community staff to ensure patient needs are reviewed ensuring the correct specialists are involved: 3 Review of caseloads and utilisation of ambulatory clinics Clinics are held as identified in point 1. There is also @ caseload review tool that has been implemented since this case which has been implemented across LCHS (please see Appendix A) Chair: Elaine Baylis, QPM Chief Executive: Andrew Morgan Plan, days

Allocation of case managers within the team Each GP practice has an allocated case manager and each case manager is now allocated a a week to go through their caseloads using the tool (Appendix A): This is undertaken patient by patient: Care delivery is checked 'against the pathways in the community catalogue to ensure that the patient is receiving the appropriate care and visits and also identifying if over visiting is an issue: This weekly undertaking ensures cleansing and discharging of patients and also checks that patients are not discharged too early: There have been a lot of recent journal articles on the development of caseload dependency / complexity tools for the community, as until recently many of those developed were for secondary care use: good document from this year is by NHS Improvement 'An improvment resource for the district nursing service' and gives examples of case studies where patient complexity tools have been implemented this followed on the back of the work from NICE and other sources_ As a result LCHS undertook a project looking at the use of a dependency tool. Two senior community nurses were asked to implement this within the teams and its use in plotting visits (Appendix B ) . The action plan is relation this project as you will see is very current and as yet hasn't been signed off as the project is not yet at it's final stage ( Appendix C) 12 Recommendations_Page 11 allnow complete)
17.1 Review of development of true case management within the Skegness community team including the integration of specialist nurses As identified above in points 284
17.2 Team dynamic, to review the current culture f the team including the integration of specialist nurses Review of clinical leadership to the community team and to develop appropriate support mechanisms The Clinical Team Leader (CTL) in post at the time of Mrs Milne's death has now left the With the appointment of a new CTL into that post the team have evolved, progressed and become more cohesive: Communication has enhanced. Clinical and safeguarding supervision takes place on a regular basis and the team recognise when support is required and access that support readily: The team also receive annual level 3 safeguarding training and there is a deputy named nurse for safeguarding allocated to each team to provide the supervision. Adult safeguarding competencies have also been introduced for the band 7 nurses: Monthly operation meetings now take place which include the Heads of Clinical Services, Matrons and Clinical Team Leads As stated previously there is much more integration of specialist nurses as now share office accommodation with the team which facilitates a higher engagement in regular discussion_
17.3 out an in depth review of the teams' activity in relation to the transient population and their term conditions both internal and external to Lincolnshire A piece of work internally has been completed to align population to both a case manager and the rest of the team: In addition, LCHS employed an external consultancy company to look at productivity in the trust as @ whole and this also included work specific to community team'$ activity in relation to population and condition taking into account the transient population footfall. This then resulted in workforce modelling to ensure this reflected patient need. In terms of the Skegness team the staffing model that was proposed by the review has been fully implemented. Chair: Elaine Baylis, QPM Chief Executive: Andrew Morgan day Trust: they Carry long

17.4 Staff needing competencies around lower limb care signing off to be supported by the tissue viability associate nurse Staff can access a "lower limb course and whilst this is highly recommended it is not mandated. All training needs are fed into a centralised training needs analysis, this then informs a competency matrix which identifies which staff require training in @ specific area. If staff do not attend the "lower limb course then training is provided within the workplace and sign off is supported by the tissue viability associate nurse. Staff within the Skegness team have received bespoke training of this nature: There are also two documents that support lower limb care these being The Clinical Guidelines for Assessment and Management of Lower Limb Ulceration within Adult Community Services (Appendix D) Standard Operating Procedure for Use of Handheld Dopplex Vascular Doppler Ultrasound Within Adult Community Services, including competencies (Appendix E) Action plan Lallcompletel The action plan covered 5 specific issues Case management f patients on caseload- covered above at 2&4 Team dynamics covered above at 17.2 Clinical leadership covered above at 17.2 Capacity within the team to respond to transient population with term conditions- covered above at 17.3 Individual Competency in relation to lower limb care- covered above in 17.5 Monitoring arrangements (Page 12) The action plan and outcomes are monitored as identified in report: In addition LCHS have recently introduced an action plan tracker: All actions from an action plan are added to the tracker for monitoring through to completion: stated evidence on the action plan is required in order to be marked as complete. The tracker headings are as below: Date STEIS Recommendation Action Responsible Responsible Target Completed Evidence Link to Comments reported Ref officer for sign off date evidence The tracker is presented at the monthly LCHS Patient Safety and Safeguarding Committee to ensure that target dates are on track and that required evidence is available_ hope that the above response and attached appendices provide the assurance that the recommendations and action plan have been fully implemented and monitored. Chair: Elaine Baylis, QPM Chief Executive: Andrew Morgan The long the Any

If you require any further information in regards to this Regulation 28 report, please do not hesitate to contact me
Sent To
  • Lincolnshire Community Health Service NHS Trust
  • Lincolnshire Register Office
Response Status
Linked responses 1 of 2
56-Day Deadline 11 Oct 2017
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 09/07/2015 commenced an investigation into the death of Ruth Milne, 83 The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 11 May 2017 The conclusion of the inquest was Natural causes The deceased died in the Pilgrim Hospital, Fishtoft; Boston on 10/6/2015. Safeguarding have now identified that continuity of patient care by various nurses attending and the lack of expertise in the weeks immediately preceding her death did not assist. The Inquest focused on the standard of care with family members and other medical staff referring to strong unpleasant odours since January 2015 to death and live maggots seen under her skin by the hospital on the day of her admission that went unnoticed by the GPInurses previously.
Circumstances of the Death
Deceased admitted at 1205hrs on 09/06/2015 with severe sepsis due to both legs skin tissues (legs) being infectious. Her multi organ failure decompensate in septic shock. She received antibiotics IV Cefuroxime and IV Metronidazole and IV fluids without increasing BP She died within 24hrs of admission Death confirmed at 0025hrs has stated in her opinion cause of death was due to 1a Multi-organ failure 1b Septc shock Tc abscess 2 CCF, CKD.
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you Lincolnshire Register Office have the power to take such action:
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Ensure identified GP for children with deliberate harm concerns discharged from hospital.
Laming Inquiry
Care safeguarding systems GP Continuity of Care Breakdown
Single agency for high-risk children
Southport Inquiry
Care safeguarding systems
Working Together guidance on risks to others
Southport Inquiry
Care safeguarding systems
Significance of multiple referrals
Southport Inquiry
Care safeguarding systems
Addressing parental consent manipulation
Southport Inquiry
Care safeguarding systems
Audit of LCC Child and Youth Justice Service
Southport Inquiry
Care safeguarding systems
Training on Child and Youth Justice Service
Southport Inquiry
Care safeguarding systems
Audit of Young Adults Team transition assessments
Southport Inquiry
Care safeguarding systems
Taxi company and school safeguarding arrangements
Southport Inquiry
Care safeguarding systems
Healthcare trust risk information visibility
Southport Inquiry
Care safeguarding systems

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.