1. The two lead investigators from the AAIB stated that neither occupant was wearing a parachute and that parachutes were not supplied but had they done so and abandoned the aircraft at a safe height that would have offered both of them the possibility of survival. The AAIB referred me to leaflet number 90 issued by the CAA relating to static line parachutes and I would advise that further consideration should be given to whether those leaflets should be revised and/or that regulations are introduced making mandatory the provision of parachutes with static lines for aircraft of this nature.

2 That there should be a review taking place of whether regulations should be introduced to make spin recovery training mandatory on specific types of light aircraft before a person can fly that light aircraft and carry out aerobatics.

3. Evidence was given from the AAIB that whilst it was clear that Mr Sandhu had had spin recovery training within the Royal Air Force that spin recovery training had taken place on two different aircraft and not the Slingsby Firefly. Concern has been expressed within the Inquest that in an aircraft well understood to have areas requiring specific handling techniques it should be established that the persons who fly them are trained and proficient in those areas and have the ability to recover the aircraft from an uncontrolled condition.