Christopher Brennan

PFD Report Historic (No Identified Response) Ref: 2016-0433
Date of Report 5 December 2016
Coroner Selena Lynch
Coroner Area London (South)
Response Deadline ✓ from report 1 February 2017
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
The adolescent psychiatric unit lacked specific policies for managing self-harm risks from items, and emergency equipment did not include laryngoscopes, despite their prior successful use in airway obstructions.
View full coroner's concerns
2nd

_ (1) In respect of the in-patient management: that there was no separate policy or guidance, other than a pictorial wall chart, regarding the assessment and management of risks posed by items that might be used to cause self harm_ The complexities of managing these risks on an adolescent in-patient psychiatric unit were not therefore adequately considered, and this led to a lack of clarity and consistency: (2) With regard to resuscitation: the emergency equipment on the unit did not include a laryngoscope_ The item obstructing Christopher's ainway was subsequently used by ambulance personnel using Magill forceps with a laryngoscope and this combination had been successfully used on a previous occasion when Christopher had swallowed a bottle Laryngoscopes are not part of the standardised items on the unit, and are not included in the Resuscitation Council guidance for mental healthcare settings. It has been suggested that this is because they are complex devices that require intense training and competency assessments before staff can use them, and that it may be counterproductive to make them available. However;, in view of the circumstances of Christopher's death, and the apparent pre valence of self harm in adolescent units, the matter is reported for consideration, both in relation to the laryngoscope itself and the access to staff trained in its use_
Sent To
  • Resuscitation Council (UK)
  • South London and Maudsley NHS Trust
Response Status
Linked responses 0 of 2
56-Day Deadline 1 Feb 2017
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Circumstances of the Death
Please see the narrative conclusion set out in paragraph 3, above
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you andlor your organisations have the power to take such action
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Out-of-school settings guidance update
Southport Inquiry
Emergency contingency plans
Police use of unarmed officers in immediate threat
Southport Inquiry
Emergency contingency plans
Second Force Incident Manager support
Southport Inquiry
Emergency contingency plans
NWAS Major Incident declaration procedures
Southport Inquiry
Emergency contingency plans
Pandemic Decision-Making Framework
COVID-19 Inquiry
Emergency contingency plans
Leadership Succession Arrangements
COVID-19 Inquiry
Emergency contingency plans
Central Emergency Taskforces
COVID-19 Inquiry
Emergency contingency plans
Civil Contingencies Act Review
COVID-19 Inquiry
Emergency contingency plans
Devolved Nations COBR Attendance
COVID-19 Inquiry
Emergency contingency plans
Four Nations Pandemic Structure
COVID-19 Inquiry
Emergency contingency plans

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.