Grant Benson and Gordon Davidson

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2015-0102
Date of Report 18 March 2015
Coroner Andrew Tweddle
Response Deadline ✓ from report 14 May 2015
All 2 responses received · Deadline: 14 May 2015
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
Ambulance control failed to accurately locate a severe incident due to inaccurate GPS and a call handler's lack of local knowledge. Inadequate cross-boundary systems prevented effective call transfer or dispatch of a nearby ambulance, causing critical delays.
View full coroner's concerns
Between the time of the impact and him being incapable of further speech the driver had a conversation with an Ambulance Control call handler with a view to securing the attendance of the Emergency Services. This call lasted for several minutes and it is clear from listening to the recording how frantic the driver became as the fire began and took hold. The driver gave quite an accurate description of his approximate location to the call handler but the call handler was unable at any time during the call to accurately locate the whereabouts of the incident. Technological information given by GPS gave an inaccurate location for the incident. The emergency call was routed to Yorkshire Ambulance Service rather than to North East Ambulance Service which would have been based in Newcastle Upon Tyne. The call handler with Yorkshire ambulance Service was based in Wakefield. She had no personal knowledge of the area. Despite having a map in front of her and the assistance of two other members of staff looking over her shoulder and trying to assist it was not possible for an ambulance to be dispatched. The call handler in evidence said that she repeated certain key information to the caller but that is not recorded. She gave evidence that she would have covered the microphone to speak to colleagues in trying to locate the incident. Her evidence was inconsistent. It is accepted in evidence that an option might have been to have sought further and urgent advice from a more local agency, the North East Ambulance Trust or possibly Durham Police or Durham and Darlington Fire Rescue Service. Evidence was given that it is not possible to transfer responsibility for calls from one emergency service to another and the only means of further communication would be by telephone. The evidence was clear that in cross boundary area situations there are inadequate systems in place to secure the best possible response to an incident. It is not possible for one ambulance service to dispatch an ambulance from another ambulance service. Evidence was given that a suitable ambulance had been identified to be sent to this incident based at Richmond North Yorkshire with an estimated journey time of 28 minutes. There was an ambulance station situated in Barnard Castle (and incidentally a Police Station and Fire Station) which is only some 5 minutes or so travelling time away from the incident location. Because of the difficulties in establishing an exact location, at no time did Yorkshire Ambulance have sufficient information to despatch an ambulance. Emergency services only attended the scene of the incident once a further call had been made to the Emergency Services by a member of the public. The evidence in this case was that even if the local Fire Brigade had been promptly summond, an appropriate appliance would not have reached the incident scene sufficiently quickly to have changed the outcome i.e. the death of the driver. The evidence however, reveals system shortcomings which may in other circumstances lead to avoidable deaths taking place and therefore a review by the Emergency Services of a joined up approach could be particularly useful, in addition to a comprehensive review of call handling procedures in difficult circumstances such as these.
Responses
Fire Rescue Service Local Authority / Fire Service
23 Apr 2015
Action Taken
County Durham and Darlington Fire and Rescue Service introduced a new mobilising and communications system in December 2014 and reviewed call handling procedures for adjoining emergency services, updating contact information and communication protocols. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Mr Tweddle, Following the Regulation 28 Report to Yorkshire Ambulance Service dated 19 March 2015, County Durham and Darlington Fire and Rescue Service (CDDFRS) have conducted a review of policies and procedures for liaising with over the border Blue Light Services when incidents occur on or near those adjoining borders. The concerns raised in the Regulation 28 Report have been considered and our comments are below_ Inability to Dispatch Resources without Identifying Exact Location on Mapping System In December 2014 CDDFRS introduced a new state of the art mobilising and communications system into their emergency control room. Prior to the introduction of this system control personnel would extract incident location information callers using interrogation techniques given to them during initial training and induction: The new system with its integral mapping system displays a approximate location of the caller which is based upon the triangulated position of the cell phone in use. This not only allows a fire appliance to be despatched to more accurate location than previously but it also allows the control operator to view the possible location of the incident and use it to extract more accurate information from the caller. Policy dictates that, if control operators are unable to get an exact location the caller, resources must be mobilised to initial location information whilst operators continue to interrogate the caller to gain further information: Should the location displayed on the map indicate that the incident is on or near the border of another emergency service area the fire control operator would inform the appropriate emergency service immediately using priority telephone contact number. FIRE & RESCUE SERVICE Stonewall EQUALITY FRAMEWORK DIVERSIY CBAMAION WWW ddfire gov.uk 'OISABLEQ 4 Tel: (0845) 305 8383 Fax: (0191) 386 6353 Minicom: (0191) 384 7524 Sluz UaV L2 from from JABOU), 8 1

2 Failure to Record AlI Communications Audio , whether it be radio or telephony is recorded at all operator workstations; the recording is activated as soon an operator opens up an audio channel at that workstation. Under normal circumstances emergency calls are monitored by a Supervisor thereby creating a dual record of the call at both operator positions. Recordings are kept indefinitely. Urgent Advice from a More Local Agency County Durham and Darlington FRS have good working relations with adjoining Fire and Rescue Services and would where necessary ask for further advice regarding location information whilst, where appropriate keeping the caller on the line. dictates that control operators must immediately inform other emergency services where it is indicated that their services may be required: Transferring Calls from One Emergency Service to Another Currently it is not technically possible to transfer an emergency call from one emergency service to another. When calls are received in error for another Emergency Service, the Fire Service control room will log the call and take as many details from the caller as possible; at the same time another fire control operator will inform the relevant emergency service. Where necessary, and as appropriate, control operators will continue to speak to callers until it is known that assistance, the attending emergency service, has arrived at the incident: 5 Communications between Emergency Services Although primary communications with other emergency services is via the telephone there are a number of other contact paths available: Airwave radio hailing channels, monitored at all times in the control room (other Fire & Rescue Services) Airwave radio hailing channel (North East Ambulance Service) Airwave radio hailing channel (Durham Constabulary) Email Fax Direct Electronic Incident Transfer (DEIT) between emergency services is not as yet available as computerised mobilising/ incident recording systems within the individual control rooms are not compatible: Investigations into possible solutions are being investigated and pilots are undertaken with various emergency services: CDDFRS are currently in talks with their mobilising system supplier to help deliver this functionality- Dispatching Resources from another Emergency Service Due to the disparate nature of I.T systems in operation in other Fire and Rescue Services it is not possible to directly dispatch their resources In addition, currently there are no protocols in place to view the locations of their resources in order to be able to mobilise them: Effective mutual assistance arrangements are, however, in place with all adjoining Fire and Rescue Services. Review of Call Handling Procedures Following receipt of the Regulation 28 Report CDDFRS have reviewed their call handling procedures for all adjoining Police and Ambulance Emergency Services. Letters have been sent to all adjoining Police Forces and Policy from being

Ambulance Trusts outlining changes to the way calls would be processed in the future, this included exchanging and updating all direct primary access telephone numbers for each adjoining emergency control room: As mentioned previously there are already good communication protocols and effective mutual assistance arrangements in place between each of the five adjoining Fire and Rescue Services, In addition CDDFRS have remote buddy arrangements in place with Leicestershire Fire and Rescue Service who where necessary, take calls for CDDFRS and pass them back to the control via agreed routes. These buddy arrangements only come into force if spate conditions, usually associated with adverse weather conditions, affect the whole of the North East Region.
North East Ambulance Service NHS Trust NHS / Health Body
11 Jun 2015
Action Taken
North East Ambulance Service has reviewed processes and systems for cross-border incidents, passed information to the training department to review call handling procedures and clarified the circumstances under which mutual aid agreements would be used. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Mr Tweddle_ RE: Gordon Nicky Davidson and Grant Thomas Bensondeceased Following from the Regulation 28 report and recommendations sent to Yorkshire Ambulance Service and bordering emergency services. can confirm that the North East Ambulance Service has undertaken a review of our own processes and systems in respect of cross-border incidents. The Regulation 28 Report raised number of concerns , which are shown below alongside the specific response from our review.
1. Inability to dispatch without identifying exact location on mapping system. The Trust uses northings and eastings co-ordinates to map the location of calls alongside a Gazetteer pulling addresses from telephone landlines; Currently it is being reviewed as to the feasibility of increasing the frequency of Gazetteer and map updates for all Ambulance Trusts.
2. Failure to record all communications The Trusts contact centre systems record (NICE call recording system) the following External calls Airwave radio conversations The North East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust is registered, and therefore licensed to provide services, by the Care Quality Commission (Provider ID: RX6OI) For more information visit WWw CgC Org_uk Jun 2015 Way

6_ Is it not possible for one ambulance service to dispatch an ambulance from another ambulance service? Whilst we would not dispatch an ambulance from another service via our systems, we would make direct contact and request that another service dispatch a resource under 'mutual aid' agreements: In the event of an emergency call being on or near a border and the Trusts response time is likely to exceed the target in life threatening cases. The Trust would contact the bordering ambulance service to request assistance. This approach is custom and common practice with our colleagues in Yorkshire, Scotland and the North West: The wider principle of 'interoperability' is a priority for all emergency services and is being driven within ambulance services by the National Ambulance Resilience Unit (NARU) and the Association of Ambulance Chief Executives (ACCE): This work sees regular joint service exercises for which the Trust regularly attend: 7 Review of call handling procedures All relevant information has been passed to our training department to review our call handling procedures and ensure any gaps are identified and acted on We are however confident that the existing procedures are robust.
Sent To
  • Yorkshire Ambulance Service
Response Status
Linked responses 2 of 1
56-Day Deadline 14 May 2015
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 22nd August 2014 I commenced an investigation into the deaths of Grant Thomas Benson, age 21 and Gordon Nicky Davidson, age 26. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 18th March 2015. The conclusion of the inquest was Road Traffic Collision. Gordon N Davidson’s cause of death was given as 1a) Traumatic Injuries related to a Road Traffic Accident and Grant T Benson’s cause of death was given as 1a) Immediate Effects of Fire related to a Road Traffic Accident.
Circumstances of the Death
Both deceased were travelling in a motor vehicle which crashed and hit a tree. The passenger died either at the time of the collision or soon thereafter. The driver survived the initial impact and died in the ensuing fire.
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Police-ambulance terminology interoperability
Southport Inquiry
Emergency responder equipment training
Healthcare trust risk information visibility
Southport Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Ambulance staff training exercise funding
Southport Inquiry
Emergency responder equipment training
Triennial Parliamentary Resilience Reports
COVID-19 Inquiry
Emergency responder equipment training
Statutory Child Rights Impact Assessments
COVID-19 Inquiry
Emergency responder equipment training
Fit-Testing Preparedness
COVID-19 Inquiry
Emergency responder equipment training
Data Systems for High-Risk Individuals
COVID-19 Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Network flexing risk mitigation
Cranston Inquiry
Emergency responder equipment training
Equipment and techniques development
Cranston Inquiry
Emergency responder equipment training
Joint training exercises plan
Cranston Inquiry
Emergency responder equipment training

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.