Eve Cullen
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2015-0002
All 1 response received
· Deadline: 5 Mar 2015
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
Referrals from hospital were not actioned or treated as urgent due to a lack of service-wide definition for "urgent" and no agreed timeframes. The process led to lost opportunities for timely intervention in mental health care.
View full coroner's concerns
The failure to action the referral from the Queen Elizabeth Hospital (2 The failure to treat the 2 referrals on the 14" & 15" July 2014 as urgent (3) The lack of uniform agreement as to what constitutes an 'urgent' referral received evidence from Clinical Lead, for the Redditch & Bromsgrove CMHT who confirmed that there was no evidence on the file that the referral on file had been actioned at all. She confirmed that (as set out in the rool cause analysis which has been prepared) , there is no service wide definition of what might constitute an urgent referral (nor any agreed definition of such terms as 'very urgent', 'immediate' 'routine') and further when referrals are made no suggested timeframe is recorded. She also told me that once the referral is received it is a matter for the psychiatrist as to when the patient is seen, even though the psychiatrisi would not have had any contact with & new patient referred in this way: Although it is impossible to tell whether faster action may have changed the outcome in this case it seems that when 2 mental health professionals ask for a urgent referral but no action is proposed for some 8 days that this amounts to & lost opportunity to intervene ad possible save the life of the patient would ask the to consider that terms such as urgent; 'urgent'. 'routine etc_ should be defined with a view to there being & service wide understanding of whal is expeceted in terms of timely action upon referrals that are made
Responses
Action Taken
Worcestershire Health Care NHS Trust conducted a serious review and acknowledges differences in urgent referral processes across the county. As a result, it is working with North CCGs to introduce a standardised system county-wide and towards performance measures for all referral categories with defined timescales. (AI summary)
Worcestershire Health Care NHS Trust conducted a serious review and acknowledges differences in urgent referral processes across the county. As a result, it is working with North CCGs to introduce a standardised system county-wide and towards performance measures for all referral categories with defined timescales. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Mr Williams Re: the late Eve Cullen Regulation 28: Report to Prevent Future Deaths write further to your letter dated 8 January 2015 in accordance with Regulation 28 of the Coroner's Rules in respect of the late Eve Cullen. confirm that the Trust conducted a serious review of this incident and acknowledge that there have been differences in how urgent referrals have been dealt with by the Trust in different parts of the county: The Trust is commissioned to provide mental health services in Worcestershire by three difference clinical commissioning groups; namely Redditch & Bromsgrove CCG Wyre Forest CCG and South Worcestershire CCG_ In terms of South Worcestershire , there are very clear protocols agreed with the Clinical Commissioning Group identifying the timescales for referrals made by general practitioners and other. professionals and having a standardised system for processing such referrals Unfortunately, it has not to date been the case that the same process applies in respect of the other areas in which the Trust provides services in Worcestershire however we are working with the North CCG's to address this, as it is our ambition to introduce standardised system across the County: The Trust is working towards performance measures for all categories of referrals and will incorporate into policy, which will distinguish between urgent and routine referrals with defined timescales for contact: Whilst there had been discussions in respect of this issue for some time, as a result of you bringing this matter to my attention; confirm that have taken action to improve processes in Redditch and Bromsgrove in respect of the timescales in which urgent referrals are dealt with. confirm that since receiving your correspondence the Trust has written to all general practitioners in Redditch & Bromsgrove on February 2015 identifying protocol for the referral of mental health patients and the timescales in which can be seen: This clarifies that referrals marked urgent should be triaged within 24 hours. The triage process may involve discussion with the referrer, a discussion with the individual andlor a face to face assessment 43 HANOZOJ "WN"H ~4i#' (34 `Za they
The referral will be received by the CMHT worker; who will agree with the referrer a timescale for response All referrals agreed as requiring an urgent response will be seen for a face to face assessment within 24 hours_ The CMHT duty worker will agree with the referrer what actions the CMHT will take and how any outcomes will be reported. The CMHT will contact the patient to discuss the referral and make arrangements for the assessment to be completed Whilst this process has recently been implemented, data is gathered to enable a review to assess effectiveness and to identify any issues. A similar process is being implemented in Wyre Forest. When the assessments of 14 and 15 were referred to the CMHT these were noted as requiring assessment within a week; unfortunately this did not happen within that timescale due to a lack of clarity about timescales_ Whilst I recognise that tragically, these changes have come too late for Mrs Cullen, confirm that will be writing to to outline the information provided to yourself and to offer my apology for the confusion in respect of the referral to the community mental health team in respect of his wife's care_ One issue that do need to raise with you is in respect of the referral from the Queen Elizabeth Hospital dated July 2014 which you did not believe had been actioned by the community mental health team. Having reviewed this matter; it was clarified that the referral dated 4 July 2014 was received by the community mental health team on 11 July 2014. Discussions with the Queen Elizabeth RAID (rapid assessment interface, discharge) confirmed that at the point of the referral urgent follow-up was not indicated, as a result the referral was due to be reviewed by the weekly multidisciplinary team meeting: Clearly, by 14 July 2014 the situation had changed and Mrs Cullen's presentation appeared to be more worrying and this was where there was further opportunity for a fuller assessment, it was due to a lack of clarification about timescales that the assessment unfortunately did not occur prior to Mrs Cullen leaving home on 17 recognise that the Trust did not ensure that you had all the appropriate evidence available at the inquest in respect of the initial involvement of the CMHT. As you are aware the Trust has recently recruited a new Company Secretary who will be leading on inquests, and will be seeking to ensure that you are provided with appropriate information to enable you to conduct a full inquiry into the circumstances of deaths_ am confident that the new system adopted in Redditch and Bromsgrove will bring into line the processes that currently operate in the south of the county and appear to operate in smooth manner. would like to thank you for drawing this matter to my attention and hope that you feel the Trust has addressed the issue appropriately. confirm that will write personally to explaining what action has been taken:
The referral will be received by the CMHT worker; who will agree with the referrer a timescale for response All referrals agreed as requiring an urgent response will be seen for a face to face assessment within 24 hours_ The CMHT duty worker will agree with the referrer what actions the CMHT will take and how any outcomes will be reported. The CMHT will contact the patient to discuss the referral and make arrangements for the assessment to be completed Whilst this process has recently been implemented, data is gathered to enable a review to assess effectiveness and to identify any issues. A similar process is being implemented in Wyre Forest. When the assessments of 14 and 15 were referred to the CMHT these were noted as requiring assessment within a week; unfortunately this did not happen within that timescale due to a lack of clarity about timescales_ Whilst I recognise that tragically, these changes have come too late for Mrs Cullen, confirm that will be writing to to outline the information provided to yourself and to offer my apology for the confusion in respect of the referral to the community mental health team in respect of his wife's care_ One issue that do need to raise with you is in respect of the referral from the Queen Elizabeth Hospital dated July 2014 which you did not believe had been actioned by the community mental health team. Having reviewed this matter; it was clarified that the referral dated 4 July 2014 was received by the community mental health team on 11 July 2014. Discussions with the Queen Elizabeth RAID (rapid assessment interface, discharge) confirmed that at the point of the referral urgent follow-up was not indicated, as a result the referral was due to be reviewed by the weekly multidisciplinary team meeting: Clearly, by 14 July 2014 the situation had changed and Mrs Cullen's presentation appeared to be more worrying and this was where there was further opportunity for a fuller assessment, it was due to a lack of clarification about timescales that the assessment unfortunately did not occur prior to Mrs Cullen leaving home on 17 recognise that the Trust did not ensure that you had all the appropriate evidence available at the inquest in respect of the initial involvement of the CMHT. As you are aware the Trust has recently recruited a new Company Secretary who will be leading on inquests, and will be seeking to ensure that you are provided with appropriate information to enable you to conduct a full inquiry into the circumstances of deaths_ am confident that the new system adopted in Redditch and Bromsgrove will bring into line the processes that currently operate in the south of the county and appear to operate in smooth manner. would like to thank you for drawing this matter to my attention and hope that you feel the Trust has addressed the issue appropriately. confirm that will write personally to explaining what action has been taken:
Sent To
- Worcestershire Health and Care NHS Trust
Response Status
Linked responses
1 of 1
56-Day Deadline
5 Mar 2015
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 19th August 2014 commenced an investigation into the death of Eve Cullen then aged 52 years The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 7ih January 2015. The conclusion of the inquest was open the medical cause of death unascertained
Circumstances of the Death
Mrs Cullen suffered from epileptic seizures following brain surgery in 2011 and had a fluctuating peri ictal confusional state_ In June and July 2014 she had been an in-patient at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Birmingham before discharged home. The psychiatrist at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital made a referral to the Redditch & Bromsgrove Communily Mental Health Team for follow up but this was not actioned by the CMHT. On the and 15" of 2014 Cullen was seen by 2 different psychiatric nurses (one at Birmingham the other at Redditch), both of whom made urgent referrals to the Redditch & Bromsgrove CMHT_ Mrs Cullen was offered an appointment to see the CMHT on the 24" of July 2014. On the 17"h of July Mrs Cullen went missing from her family home whilst, apparantly, in a per ictal confusional state and her body was later discovered in an alleyway on the g" of August 2014. She had clearly been dead for some time_ being being 14"h July Mrs
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you have the power to take such action
Copies Sent To
Signed G U Williams 8th of January 2015 HM Senior Coroner day
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.