George Vickery

PFD Report Historic (No Identified Response) Ref: 2014-0441
Date of Report 13 October 2014
Coroner David Horsley
Response Deadline ✓ from report 8 December 2014
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
The decision to change a patient's treatment location without formally consulting or adequately considering the GP's request for home treatment jeopardised continuity of care.
View full coroner's concerns
_ That the decision to treat Mr Vickery at the clinic rather than in his own home (as had been the case previously) was taken without regard to a request from his GP that he should be treated at home, not at a clinic In my opinion, when assessing how and where a patient should be treated, or when assessing whether any changes should be made as to how and where a patient is treated, Southern Health's Integrated Community Services should formally consult with the Patient's GP and have proper regard to the GP's views on these matters_ Percy leg
Sent To
  • Southern Health NHS Trust
Response Status
Linked responses 0 of 1
56-Day Deadline 8 Dec 2014
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 28h March 2013 commenced an investigation into the death of George Robert Vickery, aged 89. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 6th October 2014. The conclusion of the inquest was: Death due to an Accident.
Circumstances of the Death
George Vickery fell after alighting from an ambulance outside the Oak Park Community Clinic, Havant: He was attending the clinic for treatment: He sustained a broken hip and was taken to Queen Alexandra Hospital in Portsmouth, where he died the next day:
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you [ANDIOR your organisation] have the power to take such action.
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Standardised Advance Care Planning
COVID-19 Inquiry
No person-centred care
Patient-focused correspondence
Paterson Inquiry
No person-centred care
Explaining independent sector differences
Paterson Inquiry
No person-centred care
Reflection period for consent
Paterson Inquiry
No person-centred care
Communicating complaint escalation
Paterson Inquiry
No person-centred care
Mandatory independent complaint resolution
Paterson Inquiry
No person-centred care
Age-Appropriate Hospital Settings
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
No person-centred care
Bedside Display of Responsible Staff
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
No person-centred care
Nurse Attendance at Clinical Interactions
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
No person-centred care
Parental Knowledge in Care Plans
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
No person-centred care

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.