Janet Goodacre

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2014-0408
Date of Report 18 September 2014
Coroner Lydia Brown
Response Deadline ✓ from report 6 November 2014
All 1 response received · Deadline: 6 Nov 2014
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
The Trust submitted an inaccurate and flawed investigation report with incorrect root causes, failing to identify actual service difficulties and delaying communication of these issues.
View full coroner's concerns
University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust (“the Trust”) prepared an Investigation report concerning this death, and this was signed off on 15th January 2014. A copy was duly provided to the Coroner’s office in accordance with the local approved information sharing agreement. On the day of the inquest itself, nearly 9 months later, without any amendments or further communications from the Trust, Evidence was heard that

(1) the Trust acknowledged that the report was factually incorrect (2) That the only 2 “Root causes” identified in the report were incorrect (3) the Clinical Lead (who signed off the Investigation Report) said it was “flawed” and “not helpful”

I am therefore concerned that the Trust is providing inaccurate and misleading investigation reports, and Action Plans based on the erroneous findings that are not only of no assistance, but in fact divert attention away from the actual difficulties in service provision that should be identified. This not only fails to achieve the intention of the investigation, but also has the potential to miss opportunities to prevent future deaths. Furthermore, there was a failure to communicate the Trust knowledge of the Investigation Reports shortcomings until the day of the Inquest itself, and it was clear no attempts had been made to revisit the report to correct the recognized errors.

I request to be advised of any actions that have been taken to improve and oversee the preparation and conclusions of Investigation Reports, and that consideration be given to introduce a system to re-open any reports found to be inadequate or erroneous.
Responses
University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust NHS / Health Body
5 Nov 2014
Action Taken
University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust has established a process where each RCA investigation has a named 'Chair', introduced RCA Oversight training for RCA Chairs, and established a new 'Adverse Events Committee' to review all serious untoward events (SUIs). (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Mrs Mason Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths I acknowledge receipt of the Regulation 28 - PFD report from your office, dated 18th September 2014,in which you request to be advised of any actions that have been taken to improve and oversee the preparation and conclusion of RCA (Root Cause Analysis) Investigation reports; and suggest that consideration be given to introducing a system to re-open any such reports found to be inadequate or erroneous. First, I would like to apologise that, on this occasion, the root cause analysis investigation report was not helpful. I accept that information was presented by clinicians at inquest that was not covered in the RCA report and this must have been frustrating for your assistant deputy who heard this inquest. However, the purpose of these internal patient safety investigations is to learn lessons and implement solutions which prevent recurrence. By their very nature, they often contain differing clinical opinion and judgements. We use the RCA reports as a tool for listening, learning and improving, as well as providing a documented account of the facts for the patient/family. The Trust continually works to improve the quality of the investigations of the RCA reports and we have recently introduced three further measures to assist with this.
1. From April 2014, the Trust has established a process whereby each RCA investigation has a named 'Chair'. This individual is either the Medical Director or Chief Nurse or one of their nominated deputies (i.e. Deputy University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust includes Glenfield Hospital, Leicester General Hospital and Leicester Royal lnfinnary Website: www.leicestershospitals.nhs.uk ·

Medical Director, Director of Safety and Risk, Deputy Chief Nurse). The RCA Chair will review the terms of reference and scope of the investigation; ensure the appropriate investigation team has been established and ensure that an adequate ('SMART') action plan is produced. In addition to the Clinical Management Group (CMG) Director, the RCA Chair will also sign off the report.
2. The Trust has recently purchased external expert RCA training:- Basic RCA training for investigation leads. RCA Masterclass training for senior patient safety investigators. RCA Oversight training for RCA Chairs.
3. The Trust has established a new 'Adverse Events Committee', reporting to the Executive Quality Board, to review all serious untoward events (SU ls). This new Committee will ensure sufficient senior scrutiny is given to the events that cause avoidable death and . harm. A collective understanding of the root causes, the themes and the actions required to reduce similar failings is required to ensure appropriate safety workstreams are in place. The Adverse Events Committee will provide a systematic review of every action plan, tracking all actions to full implementation. With respect to re-opening investigation reports, the Tr.ust does consider any feedback received from Commissioners and may make amendments to such reports if there is compelling evidence to do so. I hope that this provides you with assurance that we strive to provide comprehensive and accurate reports. Although these reports are not written for any legal purposes, either claims or inquests, we are very willing to share them externally should they be useful to you. We always welcome feedback from your office and whilst I fully understand your concern regarding the RCA Investigation in this case, I was a little surprised that it has resulted in a Regulation 28 Report. However, we note your concerns and strive to continue to improve our investigation and reporting processes as detailed above.
Sent To
  • University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
Response Status
Linked responses 1 of 1
56-Day Deadline 6 Nov 2014
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 24 May 2013 I commenced an investigation into the death of Janet Doreen Goodacre, age 88. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 10th September 2014. The cause of death was: 1a Acute Gastrointestinal bleed, 1b. Combination of antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy, 1c. Atrial Fibrillation and acute coronary syndrome, 2. Myocardial infarction: Congestive cardiac failure. The conclusion of the inquest was a narrative conclusion : Mrs Goodacre was admitted to Leicester Royal Infirmary on 1st May 2013 and she remained an in-patient until her death on 21st May 2013. During her stay she developed atrial fibrillation and was started on warfarin, and continued on other medications including deltaparin and aspirin. On the balance of probabilities this combination of medication provoked and then exacerbated a gastro intestinal bleed which led to her death. This was a recognised complication of her necessary medical treatment.
Circumstances of the Death
See Narrative Conclusion above
Copies Sent To
Medical Director NHS England
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Standard form for derogations from guidance
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
No open learning culture
Documentation of technical adviser advice
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
No open learning culture
Training on normalcy bias
Cranston Inquiry
No open learning culture
London Fire Brigade to establish lessons learned process
Grenfell Tower Inquiry
No open learning culture
Publish Guidance and Board Minutes
Infected Blood Inquiry
No open learning culture
Ensure Home Office staff presence and visibility in IRCs
Brook House Inquiry
No open learning culture
Robust debrief systems for multi-agency exercises
Manchester Arena Inquiry
No open learning culture
National systems to record lessons from exercises
Manchester Arena Inquiry
No open learning culture
Obtain comprehensive accounts from commanders
Manchester Arena Inquiry
No open learning culture
Address BTP systemic failings from Volume 1
Manchester Arena Inquiry
No open learning culture

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.