Joanne Oliver
PFD Report
Historic (No Identified Response)
Ref: 2014-0210
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
A severe lack of national guidance for critical patient transfer decisions results in insufficient risk assessment protocols covering patient fitness, staff seniority, journey logistics, and post-transfer care.
View full coroner's concerns
(1) Evidence was given that there is no detailed guidance_trom the Department of 14" The
Health or the Intensive Care Society to assist in the decision to transfer a critically ill patient. Some guidance is given in a document "Guidelines for the transport of the critically ill adult (2011)" but that is focused on the actual transfer of the patient and not the decision whether t0 transfer or not; or when this should take place_ (2) It would be of assistance to doctors making the decision to transfer, and would help them to justify the transfer if it was later questioned, if Guidelines could be given to assist in the preparation of a written risk assessment: The evidence was that the "MEWS Score system" , nOw the "NEW Score system" was never designed with critically iIl patients in mind: (3) risk assessment would need to consider: (a) The multitude of background clinical factors that indicate whether the patient was fit t0 travel (b) The practical tests that should be undertaken to confirm fitness for transfer eg trial of transport ventilator; assessment of biochemical stability when renal replacement therapy is withheld (c) The seniority of the doctors who make that decision, and the numbers of doctors to be involved Whether it is in the best interest of the patient t0 make the transfer The pressures for beds where there as in this case, an epidemic forcing doctors to make difficult decisions on the priority of patients_ The danger that a patient is moved out to allow another one in when the first patient is not fully in a state to be moved. (g) The risk that the doctor responsible for supervising and travelling with the patient may be pressured into agreeing to the transfer (h) The distance and time of the journey The risks of deterioration during that journey time Whether there are risks that the journey time will be extended Whether it is by road or air; and any factors that arise from the mode of transport The equipment and medication available during the transfer (m) The medical staff to accompany the patient and their skills in transferring patients (n) The actions to be taken by the transferring or receiving doctors on receipt of the patient to confirm their stability after transfer; and the timeframe within which this should be undertaken (0) The information that should be given to patients or their next of kin prior to transter such that too are aware of the rationale for transfer and the intrinsic risks (p) The standards of documentation for the decision-making in these circumstances and in the above domains (q) Audit of outcomes of patient transfers (acknowledging that outcomes will not necessarily be collated for those patients deemed unsuitable for transfer for whatever reason)
Health or the Intensive Care Society to assist in the decision to transfer a critically ill patient. Some guidance is given in a document "Guidelines for the transport of the critically ill adult (2011)" but that is focused on the actual transfer of the patient and not the decision whether t0 transfer or not; or when this should take place_ (2) It would be of assistance to doctors making the decision to transfer, and would help them to justify the transfer if it was later questioned, if Guidelines could be given to assist in the preparation of a written risk assessment: The evidence was that the "MEWS Score system" , nOw the "NEW Score system" was never designed with critically iIl patients in mind: (3) risk assessment would need to consider: (a) The multitude of background clinical factors that indicate whether the patient was fit t0 travel (b) The practical tests that should be undertaken to confirm fitness for transfer eg trial of transport ventilator; assessment of biochemical stability when renal replacement therapy is withheld (c) The seniority of the doctors who make that decision, and the numbers of doctors to be involved Whether it is in the best interest of the patient t0 make the transfer The pressures for beds where there as in this case, an epidemic forcing doctors to make difficult decisions on the priority of patients_ The danger that a patient is moved out to allow another one in when the first patient is not fully in a state to be moved. (g) The risk that the doctor responsible for supervising and travelling with the patient may be pressured into agreeing to the transfer (h) The distance and time of the journey The risks of deterioration during that journey time Whether there are risks that the journey time will be extended Whether it is by road or air; and any factors that arise from the mode of transport The equipment and medication available during the transfer (m) The medical staff to accompany the patient and their skills in transferring patients (n) The actions to be taken by the transferring or receiving doctors on receipt of the patient to confirm their stability after transfer; and the timeframe within which this should be undertaken (0) The information that should be given to patients or their next of kin prior to transter such that too are aware of the rationale for transfer and the intrinsic risks (p) The standards of documentation for the decision-making in these circumstances and in the above domains (q) Audit of outcomes of patient transfers (acknowledging that outcomes will not necessarily be collated for those patients deemed unsuitable for transfer for whatever reason)
Sent To
- Intensive Care Society
Response Status
Linked responses
0 of 2
56-Day Deadline
27 Jun 2014
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On Ist February 2011 commenced an investigation into the death of Joanne Elizabeth Oliver; aged 31 _ The investigation concluded at the end of the Inquest without a jury on 3r April 2014. The conclusion of the inquest was: The Cause of death was:
1.a. Multiple Organ Failure
1.b. HINI Influenza (treated) I: Obesity The Conclusion was: Narrative Conclusion Joanne had been a patient at the Freeman Hospital in Newcastle where she had been receiving ECMO treatment for HINI flu, known as swine flu On the 17lh January 2011 Joanne was transferred from the Freeman Hospital to the Manchester Royal infirmary by air ambulance. During the course of the journey her condition deteriorated, but by adjusting her ventilation and medication it was possible to keep her stable She was received as an inpatient into the Intensive Care Unit at Manchester Royal Infirmary where she was ventilated and received medication. Unfortunately her condition deteriorated further and at 8.40 pm she went into cardiac arrest and died at 9.16pm the same day: CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH: Joanne Oliver was aged 31. In early December 2010 she began to suffer from '"flu symptoms and went to see a GP on the 7lh December who diagnosed iower respiratory tract infection, prescribed Amoxicillin and Codydramol and gave safety net advice. On the 13"h December Joanne went to a "walk in" health centre who immediately arranged for her to be admitted to The Royal Oldham Hospital. There she was diagnosed as suffering from HINI , swine 'flu: She was ventilated but her condition worsened and on the 1gh December 2011 she was admitted for ECMO treatment to The Freeman Hospital in Newcastle Shehad a stormy period of treatment but by_the_12 January 2011 she was weaned off like
ECMO. She had improved by Friday January to the extent that it was agreed to repatriate her by road ambulance to the Manchester Royal Infirmary (MRI): That attempt was cancelled because when Joanne was transferred to the transport ventilator she quickly developed respiratory acidosis due to her inability to clear sufficient carbon dioxide, and that in turn induced a supra-ventricular tachycardia. She improved over the following weekend, and arrangements were made to transter her to the MRI on Monday 17ih January 2011 by a specialist team from the NW region led by a consultant in anaesthesia and intensive care , who was skilled in the transfer of critically ill patients. The transfer was to be by helicopter. On the 17lh January her clinical signs indicated that she was stable. She was taken off renal replacement therapy at 11.20am. The consultants and other medical personnel at the Freeman and the Consultant responsible for Joanne's transfer, and who would accompany her; all agreed that she was fit to travel. She was transferred to the travel ventilator and shortly afterwards her blood pressure dropped: The adrenaline was increased and her blood pressure was restored within 5 minutes During the flight to Manchester her end-tidal carbon dioxide level increased which was dealt with by increasing ventilation pressure , and her blood pressure was supported by gradual increases in the rate of adrenaline infusion, additional metaraminol and a bolus of fluid: flight took approximately 1.25 hours At the MRI she was received by an ICU consultant; who took a hand over from the consultant responsible for her transfer and was provided with the Critical Care Transfer Form on which was set out details of Joanne's condition during the flight and the adjustments made to her medications and ventilation. A set of her notes and a Transfer Letter from Newcastle were delivered. She arrived at the MRI at approximately 3pm, and was transferred onto an ITU ventilator which was set slightly higher than the travel ventilator setting to help clear her CO2. It was not possible to take blood from an existing arterial line for blood gas analysis, and blood was not taken from the existing venous lines. The doctor who was looking after Joanne read her file and made notes. He had also other patients t0 look after: By 6pm (3 hours after arrival) a plan was made to insert a new arterial line , but unfortunately that proved difficult and it was not until around 8pm that he was successful: A blood sample for gas analysis was taken and the results at 8.11 pm, showed severe metabolic acidosis with high levels of CO2 and potassium. By that time she had been present at the MRI for 5 hours and off renal replacement therapy for 9 hours. Emergency treatment was given to try t0 reverse this but half an hour later; at 8.40pm, Joanne suffered a cardiac arrest and despite CPR she died at 9.16pm. It was accepted by the MRI that the delay in obtaining blood for gas analysis, and subsequent monitoring; was unacceptable. The transfer from the Freeman t0 the MRI was with a background of pressure on the Freeman that once a patient had completed their ECMO treatment their bed should be released to another patient requiring ECMO treatment "We were in the middle of a swine flu epidemic and there was great demand on ECMO facilities and ICU beds throughout the country"
1.a. Multiple Organ Failure
1.b. HINI Influenza (treated) I: Obesity The Conclusion was: Narrative Conclusion Joanne had been a patient at the Freeman Hospital in Newcastle where she had been receiving ECMO treatment for HINI flu, known as swine flu On the 17lh January 2011 Joanne was transferred from the Freeman Hospital to the Manchester Royal infirmary by air ambulance. During the course of the journey her condition deteriorated, but by adjusting her ventilation and medication it was possible to keep her stable She was received as an inpatient into the Intensive Care Unit at Manchester Royal Infirmary where she was ventilated and received medication. Unfortunately her condition deteriorated further and at 8.40 pm she went into cardiac arrest and died at 9.16pm the same day: CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH: Joanne Oliver was aged 31. In early December 2010 she began to suffer from '"flu symptoms and went to see a GP on the 7lh December who diagnosed iower respiratory tract infection, prescribed Amoxicillin and Codydramol and gave safety net advice. On the 13"h December Joanne went to a "walk in" health centre who immediately arranged for her to be admitted to The Royal Oldham Hospital. There she was diagnosed as suffering from HINI , swine 'flu: She was ventilated but her condition worsened and on the 1gh December 2011 she was admitted for ECMO treatment to The Freeman Hospital in Newcastle Shehad a stormy period of treatment but by_the_12 January 2011 she was weaned off like
ECMO. She had improved by Friday January to the extent that it was agreed to repatriate her by road ambulance to the Manchester Royal Infirmary (MRI): That attempt was cancelled because when Joanne was transferred to the transport ventilator she quickly developed respiratory acidosis due to her inability to clear sufficient carbon dioxide, and that in turn induced a supra-ventricular tachycardia. She improved over the following weekend, and arrangements were made to transter her to the MRI on Monday 17ih January 2011 by a specialist team from the NW region led by a consultant in anaesthesia and intensive care , who was skilled in the transfer of critically ill patients. The transfer was to be by helicopter. On the 17lh January her clinical signs indicated that she was stable. She was taken off renal replacement therapy at 11.20am. The consultants and other medical personnel at the Freeman and the Consultant responsible for Joanne's transfer, and who would accompany her; all agreed that she was fit to travel. She was transferred to the travel ventilator and shortly afterwards her blood pressure dropped: The adrenaline was increased and her blood pressure was restored within 5 minutes During the flight to Manchester her end-tidal carbon dioxide level increased which was dealt with by increasing ventilation pressure , and her blood pressure was supported by gradual increases in the rate of adrenaline infusion, additional metaraminol and a bolus of fluid: flight took approximately 1.25 hours At the MRI she was received by an ICU consultant; who took a hand over from the consultant responsible for her transfer and was provided with the Critical Care Transfer Form on which was set out details of Joanne's condition during the flight and the adjustments made to her medications and ventilation. A set of her notes and a Transfer Letter from Newcastle were delivered. She arrived at the MRI at approximately 3pm, and was transferred onto an ITU ventilator which was set slightly higher than the travel ventilator setting to help clear her CO2. It was not possible to take blood from an existing arterial line for blood gas analysis, and blood was not taken from the existing venous lines. The doctor who was looking after Joanne read her file and made notes. He had also other patients t0 look after: By 6pm (3 hours after arrival) a plan was made to insert a new arterial line , but unfortunately that proved difficult and it was not until around 8pm that he was successful: A blood sample for gas analysis was taken and the results at 8.11 pm, showed severe metabolic acidosis with high levels of CO2 and potassium. By that time she had been present at the MRI for 5 hours and off renal replacement therapy for 9 hours. Emergency treatment was given to try t0 reverse this but half an hour later; at 8.40pm, Joanne suffered a cardiac arrest and despite CPR she died at 9.16pm. It was accepted by the MRI that the delay in obtaining blood for gas analysis, and subsequent monitoring; was unacceptable. The transfer from the Freeman t0 the MRI was with a background of pressure on the Freeman that once a patient had completed their ECMO treatment their bed should be released to another patient requiring ECMO treatment "We were in the middle of a swine flu epidemic and there was great demand on ECMO facilities and ICU beds throughout the country"
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe that the Intensive Care Society has the resources and power to prepare the necessary guidelines referred to and advise your members to comply with the guidelines
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Police-ambulance terminology interoperability
Southport Inquiry
Emergency responder equipment training
Equipment for BA communication in high-rise buildings
Grenfell Tower Inquiry
Emergency responder equipment training
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.