Mark Stephen Smith
PFD Report
Historic (No Identified Response)
Ref: 2013-0268
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
Guidance is needed for emergency services on when to remain on the line with a person who has taken an intentional overdose and is alone.
View full coroner's concerns
_ Consideration to be given to giving guidance on what "where possible" in terms of the above section of OPO6O and whether a supervisor should be consulted before the decision is taken not to stay on the line where a person has taken an intentional overdose and is alone.
Sent To
- London Ambulance Service
Response Status
Linked responses
0 of 1
56-Day Deadline
17 Dec 2013
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 28th of March 2013 | commenced an investigation into the death of Mark Stephen Smith aged 52 years old_ The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 16th October 2013 The conclusion of the inquest was a narrative conclusion Mark Smith having died of Zopiclone and Mirtazapine overdose complicated by ethanol use with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and coronary artery atheroma under paragraph 2 On the 2nd March 2013 Mr Smith telephoned for an ambulance having intentionally taken more of his medication than the dose prescribed by his doctors There was a delay from 8.57 and 53 seconds; when an ambulance should have reached Mr Smith, to 11.18 and 17 seconds when the ambulance arrived to assist Mr Smith_ This reezay was the result of a recognised mismatch between capability and demand and on the March 2013 between 3am and Zpm there were 15 and 20 ambulances short pan-London: This was likely to have contributed to Mr Smith's death:
Circumstances of the Death
Following Mr Smith's call to the London Ambulance Service the Emergency Medical Despatcher obtained the correct determinant for the response ,(a response under 30 minutes). When a call a person threatening suicide and who is alone, as Mr Smith was; the instruction within the operating procedure OPO8O is that the fact that the caller is alone should be documented and the Emergency Medical Despatcher should stay on the line with them where possible: Emergency Medical Despatcher did not note that Mr Smith was alone and did not stay on the line with Mr Smith Had _these steps been taken it may_have been possible to the Day delay taking from The recognise at an earlier stage when Mr Smith; who, although the Emergency Medical Despatcher did not know this, had taken medication that would render him unconscious within 30 to 45 minutes_ This significance of this would be that had Mr Smith fallen unconscious and the Emergency Medical Despatcher had known this the call would have been upgraded to a response within 8 minutes_
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe your organisation have the power to take such action:
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Disclose investigating officers' reports to complainants, subject only to substantial harm test
Macpherson Inquiry
Police media disclosure
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.