L19 Response Accepted in Part

Financial Sanctions Power

Recommendation

The Board should have the power to impose appropriate and proportionate sanctions, (including financial sanctions up to 1% of turnover with a maximum of £1m), on any subscriber found to be responsible for serious or systemic breaches of the standards code or governance requirements of the body. The sanctions that should be available should include power to require publication of corrections, if the breaches relate to accuracy, or apologies if the breaches relate to other provisions of the code.

Published Evidence Summary
The following publicly available evidence relates to this recommendation:
- The Prime Minister stated on 29 November 2012 that he accepted the principles for independent self-regulation including financial sanctions (Oral Statement to Parliament, Prime Minister's Office, 29 November 2012).
- IPSO's regulations state that it has the power to impose fines of up to £1 million on subscribers found to be responsible for serious or systemic breaches.
- IPSO has imposed zero fines in over ten years of operation (September 2014 to March 2026). Not a single financial sanction has been levied against any subscribing publication (IPSO Annual Reports 2015-2024, accessed March 2026).
- The absence of any fines is directly linked to the absence of any standards investigations, as fines can only follow an investigation finding (IPSO Annual Reports, accessed March 2026).
How was this evidence gathered?
Evidence searched by Claude (Anthropic) on 10 Apr 2026
Checked data held on this site (government responses, progress updates, independent evidence)
Jurisdiction
UK-wide
Response
Accepted in Part
Accepted in Part UK Government
29 Nov 2012

The Prime Minister stated on 29 November 2012 that he accepted "the principles that Lord Justice Leveson has laid out" for independent self-regulation, including "an independent board, a standards code, an arbitration service and the power to demand up-front, prominent apologies and impose million-pound fines." However, he rejected statutory underpinning, expressing "serious concerns and misgivings" about crossing "the Rubicon of writing elements of press regulation into the law of the land." The Royal Charter on Self-Regulation of the Press was granted on 30 October 2013, establishing the Press Recognition Panel as the recognition body. IPSO was established in September 2014 but has not sought Royal Charter recognition. IMPRESS was recognised by the PRP in October 2016. Source: https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/david-cameron-statement-in-response-to-the-leveson-inquiry-report

Read Full Response
Note: PM David Cameron responded to all 92 recommendations with a single statement accepting them "in principle" or "in part". No per-recommendation response was published.
Published Evidence

Published assessments of progress from inspectorates, select committees, official progress reports, and other sources. Source type badge indicates whether each assessment is independent or government self-reported.

Not Implemented
27 Feb 2025
IPSO Other

IPSO has the theoretical power to impose fines up to £1m. However IPSO has imposed zero fines in over 10 years of operation (2014-2024). Not a single financial sanction has been levied against any publisher despite numerous breaches.

View detailed findings

The power to fine exists on paper but has never been exercised. Zero fines in over a decade constitutes a failure to implement this recommendation in any meaningful sense.

Hacked Off analysis of IPSO enforcement record View Source
Source
Report An Inquiry into the Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press 29 Nov 2012
Responsible Bodies
Press Primary
Recommendation age 13.5 yrs
Last formal update 4931 days ago