Government response Prime Minister's Office, 10 Downing Street: Accepted in part (Mar 2013)
Delivery UK Government states no delivery position (Oct 2013)

Recommendation L30: Periodic Review of Regulator

From An Inquiry into the Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press, published 29 November 2012.

Recommendation

The operation of any certified body should be reviewed by the recognition body after two years and thereafter at three yearly intervals.

Jurisdiction: UK-wide

In brief (written by this site)

The Inquiry recommended reviewing any certified press regulator after two years and every three years. The Royal Charter on Self-Regulation of the Press, granted by the Privy Council in October 2013, specifies that the Board of the Recognition Panel must review a regulator after two years and every three years thereafter (Royal Charter on Self-Regulation of the Press, Oct 2013). Earlier, in March 2013, Prime Minister David Cameron stated that statutory regulation was "not necessary to achieve the Leveson principles" and would instead be carried out through a royal charter (David Cameron response, Mar 2013).

AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 1 Oct 2026. The record below is the sources' own words.

Government response

Accepted in part Prime Minister's Office, 10 Downing Street
18 Mar 2013
Words of: David Cameron, Prime Minister, speech opening the House of Commons emergency debate on the Royal Charter on Press Conduct, 18 March 2013 (HC Deb vol 560 cols 632-634)

As I believe we have shown today, statutory regulation of our media, and statutory regulation to create a recognition body, is not necessary to achieve the Leveson principles. We can do it—indeed we will do it—via a royal charter.

How this response relates to the recommendation

Site note: The Prime Minister's speech opening the House of Commons emergency debate on the Royal Charter on Press Conduct, 18 March 2013, as recorded in the Official Report (HC Deb vol 560, cols 632 to 634). The GOV.UK copy of the speech is the script written before it was delivered; its wording differs, and one of its passages is not in the Official Report at all, so the site quotes the record. He speaks for the Government; the site files his words under the Prime Minister's Office.

Site note: The Prime Minister gives this passage once, for the report's proposals for statutory recognition of a press regulator as a whole (col 633). The same words are recorded on recommendations 27, 28, 29, 30, 32 and 33.

Blanket government agreement does not establish acceptance or delivery by each addressee. Some response passages cover groups of recommendations.

Scope of the government response

PM David Cameron responded to all 92 recommendations with a single statement accepting them "in principle" or "in part". No per-recommendation response was published.

Delivery

UK Government states no delivery position (30 October 2013)

5. The Board of the Recognition Panel must review the recognition of a Regulator as soon as practicable after: a) the end of the period of two years beginning with the day of the recognition, b) the end of the period of three years after that period, and c) the end of each subsequent period of three years.

From: Royal Charter on Self-Regulation of the Press

Site note: The passage is the text of the Royal Charter on Self-Regulation of the Press, granted on 30 October 2013. The Charter sets up the Recognition Panel and the criteria a press regulator must meet to be recognised. It does not report what any regulator or publisher has done.

Source

Report An Inquiry into the Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press 29 Nov 2012

Responsible bodies

UK Government Primary

Who has spoken

  • Prime Minister's Office, 10 Downing Street
    Response
  • UK Government
    Delivery statement
Recommendation made 13.9 years ago