F16 Response Accepted AI-assessed

Responsibility for setting standards

Recommendation

The Government, through regulation, but after so far as possible achieving consensus between the public and professional representatives, should provide for the fundamental standards which should define outcomes for patients that must be avoided. These should be limited to those matters that it is universally accepted should be avoided for individual patients who are accepted for treatment by a healthcare provider.

Published Evidence Summary
The following publicly available evidence relates to this recommendation:
According to the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014, new "Fundamental Standards" were introduced by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) in November 2014, replacing previous registration requirements. According to the Act, these standards define clearer minimum standards for patient care, including person-centred care, dignity, safe care, and staffing, directly addressing the need for fundamental standards that define outcomes to be avoided.
How was this assessed?
Assessed by gemini-2.5-flash on 19 Mar 2026
Checked data held on this site (government responses, progress updates, independent evidence)
External sources searched: www.gov.uk, www.legislation.gov.uk, hansard.parliament.uk
Jurisdiction
England
Response
Accepted
Accepted Department of Health and Social Care
19 Nov 2013

The government published "Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) on 19 November 2013, responding to all 290 recommendations of the Francis Report. This followed an initial response "Patients First and Foremost" in March 2013. Key reforms included a new Chief Inspector of Hospitals, strengthened Care Quality Commission inspection regime, a statutory duty of candour, and the fit and proper person test for NHS directors. Volume 2 (Cm 8754) contains the government's detailed responses to each of the 290 recommendations. See: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7cd486ed915d63cc65d167/34658_Cm_8777_Vol_1_accessible.pdf

Read Full Response
Note: Government responded via "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (2014), a single document covering all 290 recommendations with a blanket acceptance. Individual recommendation responses were not broken out.
Published Evidence

Published assessments of implementation progress from inspectorates, select committees, official progress reports, and other sources. Check the source type badge to see whether each assessment is independent or government self-reported.

Reasonable Progress
06 Feb 2023
Academic Review - Ten Years After Francis

Research published 2023 marking ten years since the Francis Report found mixed results. Structural and legislative changes largely delivered (duty of candour, FPPR, CQC overhaul, revalidation, Freedom to Speak Up Guardians). However, cultural change not fully embedded; understaffing, fear of speaking up, and poor complaint handling persist in parts of the NHS.

University of Birmingham: Ten years after Francis View Source
Good Progress
11 Feb 2015
UK Government - Culture Change in the NHS

Government published "Culture Change in the NHS" (Cm 9009) reporting progress on all 290 recommendations. Key achievements: 19 hospitals placed in special measures; those trusts recruited 109 additional doctors and 1,805 additional nurses; 129 board-level changes made; excess avoidable deaths fell by 450 in less than a year.

Good Progress
19 Nov 2013
UK Government - Hard Truths Vol 1 & 2

Government published "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) in two volumes. Vol 1 set out new actions; Vol 2 provided detailed response to each of the 290 recommendations. Approximately 204 of 290 recommendations were fully accepted.

Source
Report Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry 06 Feb 2013
Responsible Bodies
Department of Health and Social Care Primary
Recommendation age 13.1 yrs
Last formal update 4508 days ago