F28 Response Accepted

Sanctions and interventions for non-compliance

Recommendation

Zero tolerance: A service incapable of meeting fundamental standards should not be permitted to continue. Breach should result in regulatory consequences attributable to an organisation in the case of a system failure and to individual accountability where individual professionals are responsible. Where serious harm or death has resulted to a patient as a result of a breach of the fundamental standards, criminal liability should follow and failure to disclose breaches of these standards to the affected patient (or concerned relative) and a regulator should also attract regulatory consequences. Breaches not resulting in actual harm but which have exposed patients to a continuing risk of harm to which they would not otherwise have been exposed should also be regarded as unacceptable.

Published Evidence Summary
The following publicly available evidence relates to this recommendation:
- The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014, Regulation 22, created a criminal offence where a registered person fails to comply with a fundamental standard and the failure results in avoidable harm to a service user, or exposes a service user to significant risk of such harm (SI 2014/2936, Regulation 22).
- The Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015, sections 20-21, created separate offences of ill-treatment or wilful neglect by individual care workers (s.20) and by care provider organisations (s.21). These provisions came into force on 13 April 2015 (Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015, c.2, ss.20-21).
- The statutory duty of candour (Regulation 20, SI 2014/2936) requires providers to notify patients of incidents causing harm or death. CQC can take enforcement action for failure to comply with the duty of candour (SI 2014/2936, Regulation 20).
- CQC has powers to cancel or suspend the registration of providers that are incapable of meeting fundamental standards, and to impose urgent conditions where there is a serious risk to life, health or wellbeing (Health and Social Care Act 2008, ss.17, 18, 31).
How was this evidence gathered?
Evidence searched by Claude (Anthropic) on 10 Apr 2026
Checked data held on this site (government responses, progress updates, independent evidence)
Jurisdiction
England
Response
Accepted
Accepted Department of Health and Social Care
19 Nov 2013

The government published "Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) on 19 November 2013, responding to all 290 recommendations of the Francis Report. This followed an initial response "Patients First and Foremost" in March 2013. Key reforms included a new Chief Inspector of Hospitals, strengthened Care Quality Commission inspection regime, a statutory duty of candour, and the fit and proper person test for NHS directors. Volume 2 (Cm 8754) contains the government's detailed responses to each of the 290 recommendations. See: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7cd486ed915d63cc65d167/34658_Cm_8777_Vol_1_accessible.pdf

Read Full Response
Note: Government responded via "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (2014), a single document covering all 290 recommendations with a blanket acceptance. Individual recommendation responses were not broken out.
Published Evidence

Published assessments of progress from inspectorates, select committees, official progress reports, and other sources. Source type badge indicates whether each assessment is independent or government self-reported.

limited_progress
15 Oct 2024
DHSC - Penny Dash Review of CQC

Penny Dash Review (commissioned May 2024) found significant failings at CQC. Health Secretary declared CQC "not fit for purpose". Key findings: one in five services never rated; inspection levels well below pre-pandemic levels; lack of specialist inspector expertise; 5,000 notification-of-concern backlog. CQC consulting on resetting its approach from October 2025.

Review into the operational effectiveness of the … View Source
Reasonable Progress
06 Feb 2023
Academic Review - Ten Years After Francis

Research published 2023 marking ten years since the Francis Report found mixed results. Structural and legislative changes largely delivered (duty of candour, FPPR, CQC overhaul, revalidation, Freedom to Speak Up Guardians). However, cultural change not fully embedded; understaffing, fear of speaking up, and poor complaint handling persist in parts of the NHS.

University of Birmingham: Ten years after Francis View Source
Confirmed Completed
12 Feb 2015
UK Parliament legislation

Sections 20-21 of the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015 (Royal Assent 12 February 2015) created offences of wilful neglect/ill-treatment: Section 20 for individual care workers (max 5 years imprisonment); Section 21 for care provider organisations (unlimited fine). These extended protection beyond mental health and mental capacity contexts to all patients.

View detailed findings

Criminal sanctions for wilful neglect implemented as recommended through the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015.

Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015, sections 20… View Source
Good Progress
11 Feb 2015
UK Government - Culture Change in the NHS

Government published "Culture Change in the NHS" (Cm 9009) reporting progress on all 290 recommendations. Key achievements: 19 hospitals placed in special measures; those trusts recruited 109 additional doctors and 1,805 additional nurses; 129 board-level changes made; excess avoidable deaths fell by 450 in less than a year.

Confirmed Completed
07 Nov 2014
Legislation - CQC Fundamental Standards

New "Fundamental Standards" replaced previous CQC registration requirements from 7 November 2014. Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 introduced clearer minimum standards including: person-centred care (Reg 9), dignity (Reg 10), safe care (Reg 12), staffing (Reg 18), good governance (Reg 17), fit and proper persons (Reg 5), duty of candour (Reg 20).

Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activi… View Source
Confirmed Completed
01 Oct 2014
CQC - New Inspection Regime

CQC overhauled its inspection regime in response to Francis. Professor Sir Mike Richards appointed as first Chief Inspector of Hospitals (July 2013). New methodology based on five key questions (Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive, Well-led) rolled out nationally October 2014. Four-tier ratings introduced (Outstanding/Good/Requires Improvement/Inadequate). Specialist expert-led inspection teams replaced generalist compliance model.

CQC Inspection and Ratings Framework View Source
Good Progress
19 Nov 2013
UK Government - Hard Truths Vol 1 & 2

Government published "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) in two volumes. Vol 1 set out new actions; Vol 2 provided detailed response to each of the 290 recommendations. Approximately 204 of 290 recommendations were fully accepted.

Source
Report Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry 06 Feb 2013
Responsible Bodies
CQC Primary
Recommendation age 13.3 yrs
Last formal update 4577 days ago