ETI-14
Response
Accepted
Utility Diversion Risk Management
Recommendation
While acknowledging utility diversion approaches, promoters should demonstrate adequate risk management proposals without prescriptive requirements regarding MUDFA versus bow wave methods.
Published Evidence Summary
The following publicly available evidence relates to this recommendation:
The Scottish Government accepted this recommendation, stating that it 'already operates in line with best practices for governance and light rail delivery.' This suggests that existing practices are considered sufficient. No specific published evidence of new or updated guidance requiring promoters to demonstrate adequate risk management proposals for utility diversion, without prescriptive requirements for specific methods, has been identified since the inquiry report.
How was this assessed?
Assessed by gemini-2.5-flash on 24 Mar 2026
Checked data held on this site (government responses, progress updates, independent evidence)
External sources searched: www.gov.uk, www.gov.scot, www.legislation.gov.uk, hansard.parliament.uk
This recommendation requires implementation across many organisations. The assessment reflects central policy response, not adoption in individual organisations.
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Response
Accepted
Response
Accepted
Accepted
Scottish Government
02 Nov 2023
The Scottish Government stated it already operates in line with best practices for governance and light rail delivery. Source: Transport Secretary Statement, 2 November 2023.
Progress Timeline
Official Report
02 Nov 2023
Initial status based on Scottish Government and City of Edinburgh Council responses to the Edinburgh Tram Inquiry Report (September 2023).
Responsible Bodies
Scottish Government
Primary
Themes & Tags
Recommendation age
2.6 yrs
Last formal update
874 days ago