LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Upheld

Suffolk County Council

24-018-545 · Education › Special Educational Needs · Decision date: 08 April 2025 · View Suffolk County Council scorecard

Full Decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about delays in producing an Education Health and Care Plan as the Council has agreed to a proportionate way to resolve the complaint.

The complaint

Miss X complains the Council avoidably delayed in assessing and producing an Education Health and Care Plan (EHC Plan).

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions a council has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended) Under our information sharing agreement, we will share this decision with the Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills (Ofsted).

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by the Miss X and the Council.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

Miss X says the Council failed to assess her child Y’s EHC Plan needs and produce an EHC Plan within the regulations’ timescales. She says the Council received a request for a needs assessment in June 2024. She says the final EHC Plan has still not been provided. The Council’s complaint replies show the delay has been caused by an inability to appoint an educational psychologist.

If we were to investigate it is likely we would find fault causing Miss X injustice because the delay in completing the EHC Plan within the Regulation timescales is service failure.

Agreed action

The Council has previously set out to us its action plan to deal with the problems it has with appointing educational psychologists.

The Council has agreed to a symbolic payment of: £100 per month for the injustice (uncertainty and frustration) caused by the delay outside the statutory timescale to the point of the Council taking the next action.

This is a suitable remedy for the frustration and uncertainty caused by the delay

Final decision

We have upheld this complaint because the Council has agreed to resolve the complaint early by providing a proportionate remedy for the injustice caused to Miss X.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman