NHS in England Closed After Initial Enquiries Search on PHSO website

Humber and North Yorkshire Integrated Care Board

P-002280 · Statement · Decision date: 27 November 2023 · View NHS Humber and North Yorkshire ICB scorecard
Complaint (AI summary)
The ICB's contractor refused a suitable wheelchair, and the ICB allegedly made an unnecessary safeguarding referral and pressured Mr A to drop his complaint.
Outcome (AI summary)
Complaint closed. The complaint was outside the time limit for investigation, and no good reason was found to waive this.

Full decision details

The Complaint

3. Mr A complains about the service provided by NRS Wheelchair Services (NRS), contracted by the ICB in 2021.

4. Mr A complains that: - NRS would not give his son an ‘Action 3’ wheelchair, even though it said it was suitable for him - the ICB made a safeguarding referral about Mr A which was unnecessary - the ICB made Mr A drop his complaint by telling him it would not go ahead with the safeguarding referral if he did.

5 Mr A says this caused him stress, fear and worry because he has a safeguarding referral on his record.

6. Mr A wants these outcomes: - the ICB to end its contract with NRS - a financial payment - NRS to pay for the wheelchair that was given to his son by a charity - the safeguarding concern to be recognised as malicious.

Findings

Delay in bringing the complaint

8. The law says a person needs to make their complaint to us within a year of becoming aware of the problem. We cannot investigate complaints brought to us after one year, unless we consider there is a good reason to. We discussed this with Mr A to understand the reasons why he did not complain to us sooner. We also considered the time the ICB took to respond to Mr A.

9. Mr A’s son was assessed and found suitable for two different types of wheelchair in April 2021. Shortly after this, Mr A was told his son was now only suitable for one of the chairs.

10. Mr A made his first complaint to the ICB in June 2021 and the safeguarding referral was made in July. Mr A did not complain to the ICB again until May 2023.

11. Mr A knew about the matters complained about in June 2021. Although we do not know the exact date he found out that only one chair was available, we know he knew by June 2021 because this is when he made his first complaint to NRS. Mr A agreed this was when he realised he had a reason to complain. He knew about the safeguarding referral in July 2021, so we can be certain he was aware of all the matters he complains about by then.

12. To be within our time limit, Mr A needed to complain to us by July 2022. He did not complain to us until May 2023, ten months outside our time limit.

13. Mr A complained to the ICB on 22 May 2023 and it responded on 25 July. The complaint handling took two months and Mr A was then directed to us.

14. We asked Mr A about the delay and what had changed in May 2023 that made him feel able to complain. Mr A explained he felt more confident then.

15. Mr A said that between July 2021 and May 2023 he was scared and worried to bring the complaint, as he felt the ICB would create another ‘malicious’ safeguarding concern against him, and this would affect his ability to see and care for his son.

16. Mr A explained his son’s mother had applied for a court of protection order for their son in April 2023. Mr A stated it was at this time that he realised he should open his complaint, as the safeguarding referral could be used against him in court proceedings and affect his rights of contact with his son.

17. We appreciate this was a worrying time for Mr A. We have not seen anything to say Mr A could not have complained to us sooner. He had already complained about the safeguarding referral in in July 2021. We understand family circumstances prompted his complaint because he feared the impact the safeguarding referral might have on the court order. But, this does not mean he could not have complained to us before then.

Our Decision

1. We have carefully considered Mr A’s complaint about Humber and North Yorkshire Integrated Care Board (the ICB). We are sorry to hear the stress and worry Mr A has experienced throughout his contact with the ICB.

2. The complaint falls outside of our time limit and we have not seen good reason to put this to one side.

Other Decisions About Humber and North Yorkshire Integrated Care Board

P-004076 · 8 Sep 2025
Mr R complains about the lack of NHS-commissioned services for avoidant restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) for his son. He …
Closed After Initial Enquiries
P-002682 · 21 Dec 2023
Ms D complains about the CCG’s assessment and funding of her mother’s care needs from 11 May to 1 November …
Upheld
P-002269 · 11 Oct 2023
Mrs A complains the ICB wrongly decided to send carers instead of paramedics when her husband fell.
Closed After Initial Enquiries
P-001787 · 28 Feb 2023
The legal firm complains the ICB is acting against the National Framework by refusing to do a checklist or decision …
Closed After Initial Enquiries
View all decisions for this organisation →