Care safeguarding systems

Absence of effective systems to protect people from abuse and avoidable harm, including failures in reporting suspected abuse.

342 items 1 source 11 inquiries
Strongest theme matches

Mixed across source types and ranked by classifier confidence plus text match strength.

Indicative ranking
Inquiry recommendation
81match
9 - Suspicion of Deliberate Harm Protocol and guidance
Thirlwall Inquiry
Protocol i. By 31 March 2027, NHS England must produce and distribute a one-page protocol setting out the steps to be taken by managers when concerns or suspicions are raised that a healthcare professional may have deliberately harmed a patient. The Suspicion of Deliberate Harm Protocol must make explicit that: a. It is irrelevant whether the person to...
Matched on terms: care, safeguarding
Inquiry recommendation
70match
4 - Safeguarding and contracts of employment
Thirlwall Inquiry
i. All Trusts must provide safeguarding training to all staff (appropriate to their role and expertise) and Board members, including Non-Executive Directors. This training should include how to deal with concerns and suspicions about deliberate harm caused by staff. ii. By March 2027, every existing contract of employment for work in an NHS hospital must be amended to...
Matched on terms: safeguarding
Inquiry recommendation
61match
45 - Evidence sufficient to secure retention
Orkney Inquiry
Where there is a likelihood of harm continuing to the child if he or she is not retained in care the evidence for a Child Protection Order should be sufficient to give a reasonable expectation of securing such retention after a referral to the Children’s Hearing (16.17).
Matched on terms: care
Inquiry recommendation
57match
FR-10 - Improve DBS Referral Compliance
IICSA
The Inquiry recommends that the UK government takes steps to improve compliance by regulated activity providers with their statutory duty to refer concerns about the suitability of individuals to work with children to the Disclosure and Barring Service, including: all relevant regulators and inspectorates include compliance with the statutory duty to refer to the Disclosure and Barring Service...
Matched on terms: safeguarding
Inquiry recommendation
57match
64 - Welsh independent school standards update
IICSA
The Welsh Government should: update the Independent School Standards as a matter of urgency; update the national minimum standards for boarding schools as a matter of urgency; legislate so that all residential special schools are judged against the quality standards in place for care homes in Wales; ensure that all teachers and learning support staff in independent schools...
Matched on terms: care
Inquiry recommendation
53match
73 - Sheriff powers where consents not given
Orkney Inquiry
Where consents are required for matters of the care of the child, for interviewing or for examination and parental consents are not forthcoming, specific powers should be obtained from the Sheriff (17.3).
Matched on terms: care
Inquiry recommendation
53match
68 - No special forms on removal
Orkney Inquiry
No special forms need be required when a child is removed to a place of safety but where occasion permits the Reception into Care Forms should be completed as far as possible to reflect the information available (16.42).
Matched on terms: care
Inquiry recommendation
53match
48 - Orders from Sheriff or JP
Orkney Inquiry
Child Protection Orders should be obtained either from a Sheriff or a JP but where the case is one of suspected sexual abuse the Order should if practicable be obtained from a Sheriff (16.20).
Matched on classifier match
Inquiry recommendation
53match
63 - Extend TRA jurisdiction to teaching assistants
IICSA
The Department for Education should amend the Teachers' Disciplinary (England) Regulations 2012 to bring all teaching assistants, learning support staff and cover supervisors within the misconduct jurisdiction of the Teaching Regulation Agency. The Department for Education and the Welsh Government should amend Keeping Children Safe in Education and Keeping Learners Safe to: provide more detailed guidance as to...
Matched on terms: safeguarding
Inquiry recommendation
49match
37 - Rewrite section 37(2) removal power
Orkney Inquiry
Section 37(2) of the Social Work (Scotland) Act 1968 should be re-written so as expressly to empower removal of a child where the child is likely to suffer imminent and significant harm of any kind and the removal is necessary for the child’s protection (16.1-6).
Matched on classifier match
Inquiry recommendation
49match
24 - Sheriff power to exclude suspected abuser
Orkney Inquiry
Consideration should be given to empowering a Sheriff to order a suspected abuser to be excluded from contact with a child where abuse is suspected (15.51).
Matched on classifier match
Inquiry recommendation
49match
104 - High risk countries list for travel orders
IICSA
The Home Office should bring forward legislation providing for the establishment and maintenance by the National Crime Agency of a list of countries where children are considered to be at high risk of sexual abuse and exploitation from overseas offenders. This list should be kept under regular review. The list of countries should be made available to the...
Matched on classifier match
Inquiry recommendation
49match
103 - Ratify Lanzarote Convention
IICSA
The Chair and Panel recommend that the UK government ratifies the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of Children against Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse (the 'Lanzarote Convention') without further delay. They also recommend that ratification is followed, again without further delay, by action to implement the Lanzarote Convention. The Chair and Panel recommend that the Home...
Matched on classifier match
Inquiry recommendation
45match
84 - Pilot scheme for enhanced safeguarder role
Orkney Inquiry
A pilot scheme should be run in order to try out an enhanced role of a safeguarder in cases of child protection before further consideration is given to the possible development of a Child’s Advocate (17.17).
Matched on classifier match
Inquiry recommendation
45match
82 - Consider appointing a safeguarder
Orkney Inquiry
In every case when a child is removed under a Child Protection Order the appointment of a safeguarder must be considered at the time of the granting of the Order or if the appointment is not then made at any later stage when the case comes before the Sheriff (17.14-15).
Matched on classifier match
Inquiry recommendation
45match
80 - Independent person to protect child's interests
Orkney Inquiry
In all cases of Child Protection Orders there should be an opportunity for the appointment of an independent person with a role wider than that of the present safeguarder to protect the child’s interests (17.10-12).
Matched on classifier match
Inquiry recommendation
45match
72 - Local authority obligations under section 20
Orkney Inquiry
When a child is removed under a Child Protection Order the local authority should be under the same obligations as are set out in Section 20(1) and (2) of the Act of 1968 (17.1-2).
Matched on classifier match
Inquiry recommendation
45match
71 - Guidance on Interim Protection Orders
Orkney Inquiry
Guidance should be given on the matters to be considered before resort is had to an Interim Protection Order (16.46).
Matched on classifier match
Inquiry recommendation
45match
70 - Intimation of Interim Protection Order application
Orkney Inquiry
The application for an Interim Protection Order should be intimated to the child and to the parent and they should be given an opportunity to object to it (16.45).
Matched on classifier match
Inquiry recommendation
45match
69 - Interim Protection Orders
Orkney Inquiry
A procedure should be introduced for application to the Sheriff to obtain any of a wide range of Orders as may be appropriate in the circumstances either for purposes of investigation or for the immediate protection of a child pending investigation. Such Orders are here referred to as Interim Protection Orders (16.43-44).
Matched on classifier match
Inquiry recommendation
45match
60 - Three day enforcement period
Orkney Inquiry
Child Protection Orders should be enforceable only within a period of three days only from the date of the grant (16.33).
Matched on classifier match
Inquiry recommendation
45match
58 - Supplementary Orders when Order granted
Orkney Inquiry
On the occasion of the grant of a Child Protection Order such authorisations or supplementary Orders as may be appropriate to the circumstances should also be granted (16.31).
Matched on classifier match
Inquiry recommendation
45match
56 - Reporter's power to return the child
Orkney Inquiry
The Reporter’s existing power to have the child returned should continue but should be qualified in its exercise by the proviso that the return of the child would not expose the child to the risk of significant harm (16.29).
Matched on classifier match
Inquiry recommendation
45match
52 - Standard form of application
Orkney Inquiry
A simple standard form should be designed for applications for Child Protection Orders in Scotland (16.24).
Matched on classifier match
Inquiry recommendation
45match
47 - Two sources of evidence not necessary
Orkney Inquiry
Guidance should state for the avoidance of doubt that evidence from two or more separate sources is not a formal necessity for the obtaining of a Child Protection Order (16.19).
Matched on classifier match
Inquiry recommendation
45match
46 - Standard of satisfaction for Sheriff or JP
Orkney Inquiry
The Sheriff or JP granting the Order must be satisfied on the whole material which is placed before him or her that there is reasonable cause to believe that the child is likely to suffer significant harm if the child is not removed (16.18).
Matched on classifier match
Inquiry recommendation
45match
41 - New name for Place of Safety Order
Orkney Inquiry
To avoid confusion a name other than ‘Place of Safety Order’ or the corresponding English Order should be adopted and the title ‘Child Protection Order’ is used for convenience (16.13)
Matched on classifier match
Inquiry recommendation
45match
28 - Local authority child abuse guidelines
Orkney Inquiry
All local authorities should have guidelines for the management of cases of child abuse consistent with and in the context of national guidelines (15.57).
Matched on classifier match
Inquiry recommendation
45match
8 - Treat allegations seriously but test them
Orkney Inquiry
Where allegations are made by a child regarding sexual abuse those allegations should be treated seriously, should not necessarily be accepted as true but should be examined and tested by whatever means are available before they are used as the basis for action (15.23).
Matched on classifier match
Inquiry recommendation
45match
7 - Keep an open mind when investigating
Orkney Inquiry
Those involved in investigating allegations of child sexual abuse must keep an open mind and not fall into the trap of confusing the taking of what a child says seriously with believing what the child has said (15.22).
Matched on classifier match
Inquiry recommendation
45match
FR-12 - Pre-screening by Internet Providers
IICSA
The Inquiry recommends that the UK government makes it mandatory for all regulated providers of search services and user-to-user services to pre-screen for known child sexual abuse material.
Matched on classifier match
Inquiry recommendation
45match
70 - Include clergy in position of trust definition
IICSA
The government should amend Section 21 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 so as to include clergy within the definition of a position of trust. This would criminalise under s16-s20 sexual activity between clergy and a person aged 16-18, over whom they exercise pastoral authority, involving the abuse of a position of trust.
Matched on classifier match
Inquiry recommendation
41match
96 - Refuge provision and definition of places of safety
Orkney Inquiry
Consideration should be given to a possible provision for refuge for children and to a possible amendment of the definition of ‘places of safety’ (17.33).
Matched on classifier match
Inquiry recommendation
41match
92 - Sheriff to resolve disputes on visits
Orkney Inquiry
Any dispute regarding visits by professionals to a child should be resolved by application to the Sheriff (17.30).
Matched on classifier match
Inquiry recommendation
41match
90 - Sheriff to regulate access
Orkney Inquiry
The Sheriff should be empowered to regulate access to a child in a place of safety and should be obliged to consider that matter when the case first comes before him or her after the granting of the Order (17.26-27) with the assistance of a confidential report where appropriate (17.28).
Matched on classifier match
Inquiry recommendation
41match
83 - Powers of curators ad litem
Orkney Inquiry
Where curators ad litem are appointed their specific powers should be stated in the interlocutor of their appointment (17.16).
Matched on classifier match
Inquiry recommendation
41match
81 - Sufficient supply of safeguarders
Orkney Inquiry
All local authorities should explore the sufficiency of their supply of persons able and willing to serve in the capacity of safeguarders and if that supply is deficient should take steps to recruit a greater number and arrange training for them (17.13).
Matched on classifier match
Inquiry recommendation
41match
76 - Constable to intimate removal likewise
Orkney Inquiry
Correspondingly any constable or other person removing a child should give a like intimation to the Social Work Department (17.6).
Matched on classifier match
Inquiry recommendation
41match
75 - Intimate removal to Social Work Department
Orkney Inquiry
Any Order authorising the removal of a child should require the person so authorised to intimate the removal and the whereabouts of the child to the appropriate Social Work Department (17.5).
Matched on classifier match
Inquiry recommendation
41match
74 - Procedures to resolve welfare disputes
Orkney Inquiry
Procedures should be provided for the resolution of any disputes regarding the welfare of the child either by the Sheriff or by the Children’s Hearing, depending on which of them has last given directions regarding the child (17.4).
Matched on classifier match
Inquiry recommendation
41match
59 - Concealing child's address from parent
Orkney Inquiry
Where the address of the child or children should be concealed from the parent a specific Order should be made to that effect at the time of the grant of the Order with or without a limit on the period for such concealment (16.32).
Matched on classifier match
Inquiry recommendation
41match
55 - Immediate opportunity to vary or cancel
Orkney Inquiry
The child and his or her parent or guardian should have an immediate opportunity to have the Order varied or cancelled by the Sheriff (16.28).
Matched on classifier match
Inquiry recommendation
41match
54 - Order to state its grounds
Orkney Inquiry
The Order should contain a brief statement of the grounds on which it was granted in addition to the other necessary details (16.27).
Matched on classifier match
Inquiry recommendation
41match
53 - Written statement of grounds
Orkney Inquiry
At the time of making the application or within forty-eight hours thereafter a written statement of facts setting out the grounds for the perceived risk to the child should be prepared and presented to the Sheriff or JP (16.25) The evidence need not be given on oath or affidavit (16.26).
Matched on classifier match
Inquiry recommendation
41match
51 - Amend Criminal Procedure Act terminology
Orkney Inquiry
Consideration should be given to the possible amendment of Sections 14 and 323 of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1975 so as to bring their terminology into accord with the revised provisions of Section 37(2) of the Act of 1968 (16.23).
Matched on classifier match
Inquiry recommendation
41match
50 - No change to who may remove a child
Orkney Inquiry
No change should be made so far as concerns the definition of the persons who may remove a child to a place of safety (16.22).
Matched on classifier match
Inquiry recommendation
41match
40 - Removal as last resort
Orkney Inquiry
Removal of a child should be recognised as a course to be considered where no alternative exists and the urgency of the risk requires it (16.9). Caution must be exercised (16.10). The gravity of the threat has to be considered (16.11) and the applicant must be satisfied that the situation calls for immediate removal of the child (16.12).
Matched on classifier match
Inquiry recommendation
41match
FR-20 - Age Verification Online
IICSA
The Inquiry recommends (as originally stated in its The Internet Investigation Report, dated March 2020) that the UK government introduces legislation requiring providers of online services and social media platforms to implement more stringent age verification measures.
Matched on classifier match
Inquiry recommendation
41match
FR-11 - Extend Disclosure Regime Overseas
IICSA
The Inquiry recommends (as originally stated in its Children Outside the United Kingdom Phase 2 Investigation Report, dated January 2020) that the UK government introduces legislation permitting the Disclosure and Barring Service to provide enhanced certificates with barred list checks to citizens and residents of England and Wales applying for: work or volunteering with UK-based organisations, where the...
Matched on classifier match
Inquiry recommendation
41match
FR-9 - Greater Use of DBS
IICSA
The Inquiry recommends that the UK government enables any person engaging an individual to work or volunteer with children on a frequent basis to check whether or not they have been barred by the Disclosure and Barring Service from working with children. These arrangements should also apply where the role is undertaken on a supervised basis.
Matched on classifier match