22. When reaching our decision on a complaint, we look at whether the organisation concerned has got something wrong. We do this by comparing what should have happened with what did happen. If what happened fell far short of what should have happened, we call this a failing. When we see evidence of a failing, we next look at whether that failing had a negative impact on the person. If we think it did, we go on to consider what, if anything, the organisation has done to try to put things right.
Residency Status and double taxation relief
23. Mr R considers that if HMRC had not changed his residency status without telling him, he would have been able to draw down his pension lump sum while he was abroad and it would not be liable to UK tax. Instead, he was told to complete a DT form, which he could not do before returning to the UK sooner than planned because of the pandemic.
24. He says he has been working abroad since 2004 and that in around 2008, HMRC agreed that until he told it otherwise, it would class him as non-resident for UK tax purposes. Mr R did not give us any evidence of this agreement.
25. Taxpayers may not have to pay tax twice on their income if the country where they live has a ‘double taxation agreement’ with the UK. The country where Mr R lived and where he used to live and work before has a DT agreement with the UK.
26. We asked HMRC to give us any information about any potential agreement that was in place about Mr R’s residency status from 2004.
27. HMRC told us Mr R left the UK in 2004 to live abroad. He worked for a UK multinational organisation from May 2004 until July 2015 and an NT tax code was applied to his UK income during this time. Mr R returned to the UK in July 2015, but left again shortly afterwards to go to another country. It said Mr R’s circumstances changed when this happened and under the circumstances, he would need to reapply for an NT tax code to be used against any income he got in the UK while he was abroad. This is what it told Mr R in its responses to his complaint.
28. Although an NT tax code applied while Mr R lived in the first foreign country, this changed because of his brief return to the UK before relocating to another foreign country.
29. HMRC has guidance for pension tax. This says:
‘Broadly, overseas resident individuals receiving pension payments from a registered pension scheme are liable to UK income tax unless they are exempted by a double taxation agreement. A double taxation arrangement means an agreement between the UK and any territory outside the UK as set out in sections 2 to 6 Taxation (International and Other Provisions) Act 2010.’
30. As Mr R intended to draw down his pension as a lump sum while he was in the second foreign country, when he contacted HMRC in December 2019 it acted in line with guidance when it told him he needed to complete the DT form. This is because his circumstances changed when he returned to the UK in 2015 and the previous agreement no longer applied. This is why he had to complete the DT form.
31. HMRC acted in line with its guidance when dealing with Mr R’s residency status and it gave him the correct advice when it told him to complete a DT form in December 2019. There is no evidence of an agreement between HMRC and Mr R where he would continue with an NT code even after returning to the UK and moving to another country.
32. We know this will be disappointing for Mr R who has been through a long process to reach this stage. Unfortunately, events meant he had to return to the UK before this could be resolved with the foreign authorities.
NT code
33. Mr R was unfortunately unable to get his DT form approved by the foreign authorities, so HMRC told him to send it a certificate of residence along with a further DT form. He was unable to do this and draw down his pension using an NT code before he returned to the UK for the reasons we have already explained.
34. Mr R returned to the UK and applied for the pension drawdown. He was not able to go back to the country where he lived due to the COVID-19 pandemic and he stayed in the UK. HMRC explained to Mr R that it cannot retrospectively apply the NT code because in the 2019-2020 tax year there was no UK income for it to apply the NT code to. It cannot apply it now, because he no longer lives outside the UK and wants to draw down his pension from within the UK.
35. Mr R’s view is that HMRC knew he was paying tax abroad and it has all the information it needs to apply an NT code. He thinks it was HMRC that caused the delay and this is the reason why he was not able to draw down his pension while he was still living abroad. As we have already explained, we do not agree with this view.
36. Mr R wants HMRC to consider his individual circumstances and appreciate the fact that the COVID-19 pandemic played a part in the reasons why he could not draw down his pension abroad. We think HMRC did acknowledge the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and unfortunately nothing can change the way events played out.
37. We asked HMRC why it cannot retrospectively apply an NT code and whether it has the discretion to do this.
38. HMRC told us that Mr R did not pay any tax in the UK during the 2019-2020 tax year. Applying the code to income he did not have would not benefit him.
39. The code NT applied to Mr R’s earnings while he worked abroad from 2004 until 2015. As already noted, his circumstances changed when he returned to the UK and left again to go abroad and HMRC said he would need to reapply for code NT to apply to any UK income he received while abroad.
40. Mr R wants HMRC to apply an NT code based on what he intended to do while he was abroad. Unfortunately, due to the reasons we have already explained Mr R could not resolve things and draw down his pension before he had to leave the UK because of the pandemic.
41. We found that HMRC was clear about the reasons why he needed a DT form and the reason it cannot apply an NT code. It would not be able to issue an NT code now because he no longer resides abroad so cannot benefit from double taxation relief. If Mr R draws down his pension in the UK, it is subject to the usual tax.
42. From the available evidence, we did not find that HMRC acted outside of the DT guidance. For that reason, we do not uphold the complaint.