Ofsted inspection evidence access
Lack of school access to the evidence base used for Ofsted inspection judgements during complaint processes.
84 items
8 sources
1 inquiry
Source spread
Where this theme appears
Ofsted inspection evidence access has been flagged across 8 independent accountability sources:
1 inquiry rec
4 PFD reports
65 committee recs
2 NAO recs
1 IMB report
3 IMB recs
1 PHSO decision
7 LGO/SPSO decisions
When the same issue appears across inquiries, coroner reports, and regulators independently, it indicates a recurring issue across the public record.
Browse by source
Source-grouped records are useful for tracing where a concern came from. Large sections show the 50 strongest matches for that source; counts still show the full theme total.
PFD Reports (4)
Steffan Bonnot
Concerns: Inadequate and undocumented disclosure of a child's background information to prospective foster carers caused anxiety and posed a risk to informed placement decisions.
Overdue
Ann Maguire
Concerns: There is inconsistent management of weapon risks in schools; OFSTED should make it mandatory for inspectors to review and report on how schools prevent weapons from being brought onto premises.
Response (Ann Maguire): Ofsted will consider giving more focus to protecting pupils and staff from violent attack as part of its review of the inspection framework for education inspections which is expected to …
Responded
Oliver Weston
Concerns: An OFSTED inspection of a children's home was deficient, failing to consider relevant safeguarding information and misinterpreting evidence. Lack of guidance for publishing reports in "exceptional circumstances" led to arbitrary decisions.
Overdue
Ruth Perry
Concerns: Ofsted's inspection system lacks transparency, negatively impacts school leader welfare, and has insufficient training for managing distress or clear channels for raising concerns. Local authority support also lacks formal policy.
Response (Department for Education): The Department for Education will write to all Responsible Bodies setting out their responsibilities and committing to working closely with local authorities and academy trusts to ensure school leaders are …
Response (Ofsted): Ofsted has taken action to ensure inspectors are aware of the support available to school leaders, reinforcing the expectation that they share this information at the beginning of an inspection …
Response (Reading Borough Council): Reading Borough Council, through Brighter Futures for Children Ltd, has consulted with head teachers and will proactively challenge Ofsted inspections on a school's behalf. They have already written to school …
Responded
Committee Recommendations (65) — showing 50 strongest matches
#8 —
Recommendation: We recommend that the Government strengthen accountability for the PE and Sport Premium by introducing clearer national reporting requirements, consistent benchmarking and more robust scrutiny through Ofsted. As a first step, we invite the Government to set out, in its …
Response Pending
#7 —
Recommendation: There is a lack of transparency and accountability around current funding arrangements for PE and school sport. While the PE and Sport Premium has provided valuable, ring‑fenced support for primary schools, inconsistent assessment, limited benchmarking and weak scrutiny by Ofsted …
Response Pending
#22 —
Recommendation: The Department must assign Ofsted a role in quality assuring the delivery of local authority support for EHE and adherence to EHE guidance. This will require the creation of an inspection framework, based on the clarified guidance for local authorities …
Gov response: 26. Ofsted already assess a local authority’s EHE work as part of normal inspections of Children’s Social Care services. Specifically, an inspection would request the following information: The information the local authority uses to monitor …
Under Consideration
#20 —
Recommendation: We recommend that prisons have clear and meaningful KPIs related to education, training and employment which are monitored by Ofsted. The Ministry of Justice must also reform the inspection regime so that Ofsted is able to give a grade for …
Gov response: We accept this recommendation. To ensure we have a system in place that allows for flexible and portable learning, a prisoner’s education journey is already taken into account when considering potential transfers. Of course, where …
Accepted
#13 —
Recommendation: The Department must take greater responsibility for policing the school admissions system to ensure it is working in the interests of looked-after children. There must be a clear sanctions mechanism in place for schools who consistently refuse or delay admissions …
Gov response: 107. As set out in the response to other recommendations above, looked-after children have priority in school admissions and statutory guidance for VSHs states that, when arranging a looked after child’s education placement, schools judged …
Accepted
#11 —
Recommendation: Ofsted should, as part of its inspection criteria, gather data and report on levels of subject take-up and attainment among pupils with different characteristics, such as gender, ethnic background and socio-economic background. The latter could utilise Free School Meals eligibility, …
Gov response: 13. Ofsted plays an important role in ensuring all pupils have access to a broad, ambitious, knowledge-rich curriculum that includes high quality STEM teaching. Through school inspection, inspectors consider the breadth of the curriculum, and …
Accepted
#10 —
Recommendation: The Government should tell us whether it has consulted with Ofsted on levels of uptake and attainment among different groups of children, and whether it has discussed an expansion of its inspection criteria to include a more comprehensive picture of …
Gov response: Ofsted plays an important role in ensuring all pupils have access to a broad, ambitious, knowledge-rich curriculum that includes high quality STEM teaching. Through school inspection, inspectors consider the breadth of the curriculum, and the …
Accepted
#49 — Authorise Ofsted to urgently develop a framework for Multi-Academy Trust (MAT) inspections and capacity plan.
Recommendation: The Department must authorise Ofsted to develop a framework for the inspection of MATs as a matter of urgency and set out a plan for building the appropriate expertise and capacity in this area. Ofsted will need to be appropriately …
Gov response: Many of the recommendations in the Committee’s report fall to the DfE, rather than Ofsted. We welcome Recommendation 28, and the Committee agreeing with our evidence that inspection of MATs is appropriate and inevitable. We …
Not Addressed
#48 — Urge Department to deliver a process for Multi-Academy Trust (MAT) inspection urgently.
Recommendation: We agree with the incoming HMCI that it is “inevitable” that MATs will be inspected, and we are frustrated that repeated calls for trust inspections from this Committee, its predecessors and others have not yet been acted upon by the …
Gov response: Many of the recommendations in the Committee’s report fall to the DfE, rather than Ofsted. We welcome Recommendation 28, and the Committee agreeing with our evidence that inspection of MATs is appropriate and inevitable. We …
Not Addressed
#47 — Review Ofsted's 'inadequate' safeguarding judgement policy, preventing academy orders for minor issues.
Recommendation: In the interim, Ofsted should review its policy on ‘inadequate’ judgements due to ineffective safeguarding and ensure that schools are only being judged ‘inadequate’ in cases where they are fundamentally failing to keep children safe. In cases where the problems …
Gov response: We have acted quickly to re-evaluate our policies and practice to ensure that all of our work reflects this commitment. Since September 2023, and following our response to the coroner, we have made a number …
Accepted
#46 — Require the Department to consult on increasing safeguarding inspection regularity via compliance audits.
Recommendation: The Department should consult on the best approach to increasing the regularity of safeguarding inspections through a less intensive compliance audit. In doing so, Ofsted’s work with schools 55 it should look at whether this should be done by local …
Gov response: Many of the recommendations in the Committee’s report fall to the DfE, rather than Ofsted. We will engage with the DfE on considering new approaches to inspecting safeguarding (Recommendation 26). However, these are matters for …
Not Addressed
#45 — Schools should not be judged inadequate for minor safeguarding administrative errors.
Recommendation: The inquest into the death of Ruth Perry also raised concerns about the policy of judging a school ‘inadequate’ solely due to safeguarding. We accept that this only applies to a small number of schools and that Ofsted has taken …
Gov response: We have acted quickly to re-evaluate our policies and practice to ensure that all of our work reflects this commitment. Since September 2023, and following our response to the coroner, we have made a number …
Accepted
#44 — Ofsted maintains essential role in ensuring schools address serious safeguarding concerns.
Recommendation: Safeguarding is an essential aspect of every school’s work. We agree that there is merit in schools being audited more regularly for compliance with safeguarding procedures, especially as we are recommending that some schools be inspected less frequently than is …
Gov response: We have acted quickly to re-evaluate our policies and practice to ensure that all of our work reflects this commitment. Since September 2023, and following our response to the coroner, we have made a number …
Accepted
#43 — Ensure Ofsted inspectors fully account for school context, disadvantaged pupils, and SEND in judgements.
Recommendation: Ofsted must ensure that inspectors are fully taking a school’s size and context into account in reports and judgements, in particular the numbers of pupils from disadvantaged groups and those with SEND, and other relevant factors such as recruitment and …
Gov response: Sir Martyn made clear his determination to see context considered more in our work at the launch of the Big Listen. We want to make sure our judgements about schools consider the context within which …
Not Addressed
#42 — Ofsted fails to adequately consider challenges for schools with disadvantaged and SEND pupils.
Recommendation: We were concerned by the suggestion that Ofsted does not sufficiently take into account the challenges faced by schools with high numbers of disadvantaged pupils or those with SEND. We appreciate that the 2019 inspection framework aimed to improve the …
Gov response: Sir Martyn made clear his determination to see context considered more in our work at the launch of the Big Listen. We want to make sure our judgements about schools consider the context within which …
Not Addressed
#41 — Undertake research to understand and reduce inspection-related workload pressures on school staff.
Recommendation: The Department and Ofsted must go further than simply ‘myth-busting’: they must undertake a programme of research to fully understand the causes of inspection- related workload pressure and assess what changes would be genuinely helpful in reducing this. The new …
Gov response: A key element of the Big Listen, as a programme of research, is to hear more about the impact of inspection (as referred to in Recommendation 24). We know that inspection puts pressure on the …
Partially Accepted
#40 — Inspection-related workload pressures on teachers and leaders remain despite Ofsted's 'myth-busting'.
Recommendation: It is clear that many teachers and school leaders are struggling with workload pressures in their roles, which are exacerbated by perceptions of what Ofsted expects to see in inspections. There are also concerns that the new framework has caused …
Gov response: A key element of the Big Listen, as a programme of research, is to hear more about the impact of inspection (as referred to in Recommendation 24). We know that inspection puts pressure on the …
Not Addressed
#39 — Publish evaluation of the Education Inspection Framework, adapting for primary, special, and small schools.
Recommendation: Ofsted must publish their planned evaluation of the Education Inspection Framework as soon as possible. In this evaluation, Ofsted should review the implementation of the new framework, in particular looking at the impact it has had on primary schools, special …
Gov response: In reference to Recommendation 23, we intend to publish the findings from our evaluation of the education inspection framework, as part of our response to the Big Listen. The Big Listen will allow us to …
Not Addressed
#38 — New framework unsuitable for primary, special, and small schools due to requirements.
Recommendation: There is also widespread concern that the new framework is less suitable for primary and special schools, particularly smaller schools, who are finding it more difficult to meet its requirements. We appreciate that any change to the framework causes additional …
Gov response: In reference to Recommendation 23 [which directly matches Committee Rec #39], we intend to publish the findings from our evaluation of the education inspection framework, as part of our response to the Big Listen. The …
Not Addressed
#37 — New Education Inspection Framework causes inconsistency and concerns about imposed curriculum views.
Recommendation: There is broad support for the move away from a data-driven approach to one that is more focused on curriculum in the new Education Inspection Framework. However, there appear to be problems with how this has worked in practice, in …
Gov response: In reference to Recommendation 23 [which directly matches Committee Rec #39], we intend to publish the findings from our evaluation of the education inspection framework, as part of our response to the Big Listen. The …
Not Addressed
#36 — Publish separate complaints data for each sector, including per inspection and upheld rates.
Recommendation: In its annual report and accounts, Ofsted should publish separate complaints data for each sector in their remit, including data on the number and percentage of complaints per inspection, whether these relate to conduct or judgements, and the percentage of …
Gov response: As an inspectorate that is committed to working with the sectors we inspect, it is really important to us that schools are able to raise complaints when they have concerns. It is also important that …
Partially Accepted
#35 — Allow schools access to the evidence base for inspection judgements during complaints.
Recommendation: Ofsted must allow schools to gain access to the evidence base used to reach a judgement when making a complaint, making redactions to ensure that confidentiality and protection of the identity of individuals is maintained where this is necessary.
Gov response: A transparent inspection process is one where both the school and the inspection team can see how the evidence gathered connects clearly to the inspection outcome. Inspections must be – and be seen to be …
Not Addressed
#34 — Conduct in-depth review of the complaints process to ensure independent challenge for schools.
Recommendation: The Department for Education and Ofsted should conduct an in-depth review of the complaints process to ensure that there is an efficient and independent process for schools to challenge the findings as well as the conduct of an inspection. In …
Gov response: We have introduced a revised, more responsive complaints process, which includes better communication between schools and senior Ofsted staff during inspection, if needed (in line with Recommendation 20). ... We are also ... continuing to …
Not Addressed
#33 — Ofsted's complaints process lacks transparency and access to evidence for schools.
Recommendation: Schools have also told us that the complaints process is hampered by a lack of access to inspectors’ notes and documents that have been used to reach a conclusion. While we understand that there are considerations around confidentiality regarding these …
Gov response: A transparent inspection process is one where both the school and the inspection team can see how the evidence gathered connects clearly to the inspection outcome. Inspections must be – and be seen to be …
Partially Accepted
#32 — Ofsted's complaints process is ineffective and lacks sufficient independent oversight.
Recommendation: We have received substantial evidence suggesting that Ofsted’s complaints process is not seen to be working and amounts to Ofsted “marking their own homework”. The changes announced in Ofsted’s consultation on the process are welcome, and we particularly welcome the …
Gov response: We have introduced a revised, more responsive complaints process, which includes better communication between schools and senior Ofsted staff during inspection, if needed (in line with Recommendation 20). ... We are also ... continuing to …
Not Addressed
#31 — Improve transparency and accountability of Regional Directors' work and provide parliamentary reports.
Recommendation: The Department must improve the transparency and accountability of the work of the Regional Directors. At a minimum, it should provide an annual report to Parliament setting out the scope, detail and impact of their work and make Regional Directors …
Gov response: Many of the recommendations in the Committee’s report fall to the DfE, rather than Ofsted. We will engage with the DfE on inspection grades (Recommendation 14), on ensuring the consequences of inspection are proportionate (Recommendation …
Not Addressed
#30 — Conduct a full audit of school improvement support and expedite provision post-judgement.
Recommendation: The Department must conduct a full audit of the support available to schools to help them improve, reviewing whether the amount of support is sufficient and what more is needed. In the interim, the Department should ensure that all schools …
Gov response: Many of the recommendations in the Committee’s report fall to the DfE, rather than Ofsted. We will engage with the DfE on inspection grades (Recommendation 14), on ensuring the consequences of inspection are proportionate (Recommendation …
Not Addressed
#29 — Inadequate scrutiny of the regional system for school improvement and Regional Directors.
Recommendation: It is essential that there is proper scrutiny of the regional system of school improvement. We do not agree with the former Schools Minister’s view that it is sufficient to scrutinise Regional Directors solely through parliamentary scrutiny of ministers.
Gov response: Many of the recommendations in the Committee’s report fall to the DfE, rather than Ofsted. We will engage with the DfE on inspection grades (Recommendation 14), on ensuring the consequences of inspection are proportionate (Recommendation …
Not Addressed
#28 — Insufficient and delayed support available for schools following negative inspection judgements.
Recommendation: We have heard that there is not enough support for schools to improve following a negative inspection judgement, and that the support available does not always arrive as quickly as is needed. We recognise that the role of school improvement …
Gov response: Many of the recommendations in the Committee’s report fall to the DfE, rather than Ofsted. We will engage with the DfE on inspection grades (Recommendation 14), on ensuring the consequences of inspection are proportionate (Recommendation …
Not Addressed
#27 — Review and strengthen support mechanisms for school leaders' wellbeing during and after inspections.
Recommendation: The Department and Ofsted should review the support mechanisms available to school leaders during and following an inspection and ensure that these are as strong as possible to support the wellbeing of school leaders. Ofsted must publish a clear policy, …
Gov response: We recognise that inspection and regulation can sometimes be challenging for providers, and we welcome the Committee’s focus on the mental health and well-being of those we inspect and regulate. We share a determination to …
Accepted
#26 — Assess proportionality of academy orders imposed on schools with consecutive 'requires improvement' ratings.
Recommendation: The Department should assess whether the decision to impose academy orders on schools that have received ‘requires improvement’ ratings on more than one occasion 52 Ofsted’s work with schools is proportionate. As a first step, it should ensure that Regional …
Gov response: Many of the recommendations in the Committee’s report fall to the DfE, rather than Ofsted. We will engage with the DfE on inspection grades (Recommendation 14), on ensuring the consequences of inspection are proportionate (Recommendation …
Not Addressed
#25 — High-stakes inspection system causes significant stress and job insecurity for school leaders.
Recommendation: The ‘high-stakes’ nature of the current system is clearly causing a significant amount of stress and worry for school leaders. In particular, there is an overwhelming fear among headteachers that they risk losing their job following a less than ‘good’ …
Gov response: Many of the recommendations in the Committee’s report fall to the DfE, rather than Ofsted. We will engage with the DfE on inspection grades (Recommendation 14), on ensuring the consequences of inspection are proportionate (Recommendation …
Not Addressed
#24 — Require Ofsted and DfE to publish full school inspection judgements on their websites.
Recommendation: As a first step, Ofsted and Department for Education websites should always show the full list of judgements, not just the overall judgement, and encourage schools to do the same on their websites and published materials.
Gov response: We are also working on a number of new policies and practices. These include: • making changes to our website to show the full range of judgements, not just overall effectiveness grades (in line with …
Accepted
#23 — Develop an alternative to single-word overall judgements for complex school performance assessments.
Recommendation: The Department and Ofsted should work together as a priority to develop an alternative to the current single-word overall judgement that better captures the complex nature of a school’s performance, and ensure that these changes interact effectively with Department policies. …
Gov response: Many of the recommendations in the Committee’s report fall to the DfE, rather than Ofsted. We will engage with the DfE on inspection grades (Recommendation 14), on ensuring the consequences of inspection are proportionate (Recommendation …
Not Addressed
#22 — Ofsted's single-word judgements are widely criticised for oversimplifying school performance.
Recommendation: Evidence from groups representing teachers, school leaders, parents and pupils was highly critical of Ofsted’s single-word overall judgements. There is much concern that they simplify the complex environment of a school and the many efforts of its leadership and staff …
Gov response: Many of the recommendations in the Committee’s report fall to the DfE, rather than Ofsted. We will engage with the DfE on inspection grades (Recommendation 14 in the Committee's report), on ensuring the consequences of …
Not Addressed
#19 — Publish more data for researchers and all inspector training materials for transparency.
Recommendation: Ofsted must ensure that it is publishing as much information as possible to maximise the transparency of its work. In particular, it must make more data available to key educational research organisations to allow for high-quality research to be conducted. …
Gov response: We will publish all training materials unless there is a strong reason why we should not. For example, the important mental health training our inspectors received is the property of an external organisation. A great …
Partially Accepted
#18 — Improve Ofsted's transparency by publishing comprehensive information and data wherever possible.
Recommendation: We have heard that access to training materials gives school leaders working as inspectors a disproportionate advantage over those who do not, and that Ofsted does not make enough data available to qualified researchers. While we accept that Ofsted publishes …
Gov response: We will publish all training materials unless there is a strong reason why we should not. For example, the important mental health training our inspectors received is the property of an external organisation. A great …
Partially Accepted
#9 — Consider increasing school inspection notice period to approximately five working days.
Recommendation: Ofsted should consider the case for a small increase in the notice period given to schools—we heard suggestions that around five working days would be appropriate. The notice period should remain relatively short in order to limit the pressure on …
Gov response: The Big Listen will play a crucial role as we reflect on our approach to notice periods. Again, we expect to hear a diversity of views from those we inspect and those on whose behalf …
Accepted
#8 — Current short inspection notice period causes operational difficulties and increased stress for schools.
Recommendation: We have heard a range of views as to the appropriate notice period for inspections and accept that this is an issue that is difficult to fully resolve. While we do not believe that there should be a return to …
Gov response: The Big Listen will play a crucial role as we reflect on our approach to notice periods. Again, we expect to hear a diversity of views from those we inspect and those on whose behalf …
Not Addressed
#7 — Support Ofsted in making a case for additional Treasury funding for in-depth inspections.
Recommendation: In the longer term, the Department should support Ofsted in making a strong case to the Treasury for additional funding to carry out more in-depth inspections, without compromising on frequency or the principle that all schools are subject to periodic …
Gov response: We very much welcome the Committee’s commitment to supporting us in asking for additional funding for more in-depth inspections (through Recommendation 4). We know how vital inspection is: the sooner we can diagnose weaknesses and …
Accepted
#6 — Reduce Ofsted inspection frequency for schools to enable greater depth and better risk assessment.
Recommendation: In the shorter term, the Department should work with Ofsted to enable the inspectorate to reduce the frequency of inspections to approximately five to six years for ‘good’ and ‘outstanding’ schools and three to four years for schools judged ‘requires …
Gov response: One area where we expect we will hear a diversity of views is on the frequency and length of inspections. This reflects the balance we need to strike between holding schools to account and reducing …
Not Accepted
#5 — Current inspection length inadequate, prompting case for reduced frequency to increase depth.
Recommendation: There is broad agreement that inspections are not currently long enough to cover the full framework and give an accurate picture of a school’s performance. We accept that, in a context of finite funding, any increase to the length of …
Gov response: One area where we expect we will hear a diversity of views is on the frequency and length of inspections. This reflects the balance we need to strike between holding schools to account and reducing …
Not Addressed
#4 — Require Ofsted to urgently address seven concerns from Ruth Perry's coroner's report and report progress.
Recommendation: The serious nature of a Prevention of Future Deaths report will not be lost on the new HMCI. We expect him to make every effort to address the coroner’s report fully. Ofsted should review the seven areas of concern set …
Gov response: Since we gave evidence to the Committee, we have responded in full to the coroner’s Prevention of Future Deaths Report. In our response to the coroner’s report, we made it clear that we would continue …
Partially Accepted
#3 — Ensure HMCI listens to diverse sector views and Ofsted reflects on necessary improvements.
Recommendation: In his “Big Listen” with the sector, the new HMCI must ensure that he is listening to a wide range of views, including those of teachers, school and trust leaders, governors, parents, and pupils. In doing this, he must ensure …
Gov response: An important part of our response to both the coroner and the Committee (and in particular Recommendation 1), is our Big Listen, which we formally launched on Friday 8 March 2024. This is an opportunity …
Accepted
#18 — Change Ofsted's PSHE evaluation to thematic reviews, not just personal development metrics.
Recommendation: Ofsted must change the way in which PSHE is evaluated during inspection. Instead of being assessed through Ofsted’s personal development metric, PSHE should be assessed through thematic reviews in the same way as other core curriculum subjects. (Paragraph 83) Online …
Gov response: Ofsted, a separate government department and independent inspectorate, is responsible for its education inspection framework and school inspection handbook. Ofsted’s school inspection handbook has a focus on whether schools provide a broad and balanced curriculum …
Not Addressed
#21 —
Recommendation: We heard that there is a lack of consistency in the approach local authorities take to support EHE. Departmental guidance is ambiguous and does not provide the necessary clarity on what is expected of them. Ofsted told us that for …
Gov response: 26. Ofsted already assess a local authority’s EHE work as part of normal inspections of Children’s Social Care services. Specifically, an inspection would request the following information: The information the local authority uses to monitor …
Under Consideration
#19 —
Recommendation: The current prison inspection regime does not give enough weight to the quality of education. The award of a single grade to the establishment makes it difficult to see the origin of the failure, therefore making it difficult to act …
Gov response: We reject this recommendation. We agree that education provision and education inspection findings should be taken seriously and have an increased focus within the prison regime. We fully agree that Ofsted inspections should have impact …
Not Accepted
#9 —
Recommendation: We welcome Ofsted’s recent report examining science education in primary and secondary schools. However, some contributors to our inquiry suggested that given the importance of inspection, it could do more to encourage diversity and inclusion in STEM education.
Gov response: 13. Ofsted plays an important role in ensuring all pupils have access to a broad, ambitious, knowledge-rich curriculum that includes high quality STEM teaching. Through school inspection, inspectors consider the breadth of the curriculum, and …
Accepted
#21 — Increase length and depth of analysis in inspection reports for parents and schools.
Recommendation: As part of our recommended increase to the length and depth of inspections, we also recommend that Ofsted increase the length and depth of analysis provided in inspection reports to ensure that they are genuinely useful in providing parents and …
Gov response: We know how important our reports are to parents, government, Parliament and schools themselves. However, given the funding we receive, we decided in 2019 to focus the inspector time we have available first and foremost …
Not Addressed
#20 — Ofsted inspection reports are too short, formulaic, and lack useful information for schools.
Recommendation: There is widespread agreement amongst schools, governing bodies and other organisations that inspection reports are too short and formulaic and do not provide enough useful information, particularly for schools. Targeting the reports at a parent audience means that schools do …
Gov response: We know how important our reports are to parents, government, Parliament and schools themselves. However, given the funding we receive, we decided in 2019 to focus the inspector time we have available first and foremost …
Not Addressed
NAO Audit Recommendations (2)
Support for pupils with special educational needs and disabilities in England
The Department should work with Ofsted to identify what more can be done to make inspections of mainstream schools, in particular short inspections, provide more assurance specifically about SEND provision that is easily accessible and clear to parents
Accepted
Support for children’s education during the early stages of the Covid-19 pandemic
c) work with Ofsted to reintroduce arrangements for obtaining independent assurance about schools’ provision, while recognising the additional pressures that schools are under during the pandemic;
Accepted
IMB Recommendations (3)
North East Midlands, Yorkshire & Humber STHF (2024)
We recommend that Border Force provide IMB access to port case files with immediate effect, which would restore our access to records and documents to the fully transparent arrangement that had existed for our Board prior to late 2023.
Home Office
London STHF (2024)
The Board would like a small group, accompanied by a higher officer, to visit the CWAs, as agreed in writing by BF last year, and now request that this is an unannounced visit rather than one scheduled in advance.
Home Office
New Hall (2023)
A strategy to meet the OFSTED recommendations following a disappointing inspection.
Governor / Director
LGO / SPSO Decisions (7)
25-016-332 — Oxfordshire County Council
Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about the Council’s involvement in a school’s Ofsted inspection. This is because the law prevents us from investigation what happens in schools.
LGO (Local Government & …
Education
Dec 2025
25-005-028 — Corpus Christi Catholic High School
Summary: Ms X complained about how a school admission appeal panel handled her appeal for a place for her son at his preferred secondary school. The panel is at fault for the way it handled the appeal and documented its decision making. This means we cannot be satisfied the process …
LGO (Local Government & …
Education
Upheld
Sep 2025
21-009-677 — Suffolk County Council
Summary: there were problems with the evidence the Council presented at Ms M's appeal for a place at a school, but the problems do not call the Panel’s decision not to admit Ms M’s son into question.
LGO (Local Government & …
Education
Not Upheld
Feb 2022
23-018-427 — London Borough of Wandsworth
Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint as it is outside our jurisdiction. We cannot look at complaints about what happens in schools. The rest of Miss X’s concerns need to be put to the Council before we will consider them.
LGO (Local Government & …
Education
Apr 2024
24-011-374 — London Borough of Redbridge
Summary: We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint about the Council not providing information he requested about a school catchment area. This is because it is reasonable for Mr B to complain to the Information Commissioner.
LGO (Local Government & …
Other Categories
Sep 2024
24-021-867 — London Borough of Waltham Forest
Summary: Ms X complained that the Independent Admission Appeals Panel failed to properly consider her appeal for a school place for her child. There was fault in the way the Panel considered Ms X’s appeal and reached its decision. The Council will apologise to Ms X for the avoidable frustration …
LGO (Local Government & …
Education
Upheld
Aug 2025
24-008-649 — The Bemrose School
Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about an unsuccessful appeal for a school place. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault.
LGO (Local Government & …
Education
Oct 2024