Fifth report: No prosperity without justice: the UK’s relationship with Iran
Select Committee
Foreign Affairs Committee
HC 415
16 December 2020
Government Response (AI assessment · 35 of 35 classified)
Accepted
14
Acknowledged
14
Deferred
1
Rejected
3
Government response
Ninth Special Report: No prosperity without justice: the UK’s relationship with Iran: Government Response to Committee’s Fifth Report Ninth · published 26 Feb 2021
Recommendations & Conclusions
14 results
54
Conclusion
Acknowledged
In 2019, the FCDO commissioned a review into the department’s handling of complex consular cases.
Conclusion
In 2019, the FCDO commissioned a review into the department’s handling of complex consular cases. The review was conducted by Dame Judith MacGregor and focused on how the department balances the needs of the individual with the needs of the …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government notes the committee's summary of the MacGregor Review, reaffirms its commitment to implementing the review's key findings and recommendations, and expects to provide updates through ongoing engagement with the Committee.
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
View Details
57
Recommendation
Acknowledged
The FCDO’s current approach to consular disputes is clearly not working.
Recommendation
The FCDO’s current approach to consular disputes is clearly not working. The Key Performance Indicator remains the unconditional and timely release of detained nationals. In this, the range of tools on offer is entirely ineffectual and requires revision. The FCDO …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government notes the committee's views, agrees on the importance of working with allies, and states it will continue to discuss with partners how best to raise arbitrary detention cases, while reiterating ongoing efforts for consular access and medical care.
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
View Details
59
Conclusion
Acknowledged
The FCDO has rightly stated that the detention of British and dual nationals by Iran...
Conclusion
The FCDO has rightly stated that the detention of British and dual nationals by Iran falls outside the parameters of the Convention which was clearly designed for the specific purpose of combatting individual hostage-takers, rather than state-backed actors.134 Nevertheless, witnesses …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government notes the committee's observation, reiterates its rejection of dual British nationals being used as diplomatic leverage, and states it will continue to consider the 1979 Convention and use international fora to call out arbitrary detention.
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
View Details
60
Conclusion
Acknowledged
Witnesses involved with some of the higher-profile detentions of UK and dual nationals by Iran...
Conclusion
Witnesses involved with some of the higher-profile detentions of UK and dual nationals by Iran were keen to highlight the benefits which might be gained in defining the term. Charlie Loudon from REDRESS, which has acted on behalf of Nazanin …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government notes the committee's point, affirms its stance against dual nationals being used as diplomatic leverage, and states it will continue to use international fora and discuss with likeminded countries to raise concerns about arbitrary detention, without committing to new frameworks or definitions.
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
View Details
61
Conclusion
Acknowledged
Charlie Loudon was measured in characterising other countries as more or less successful than the...
Conclusion
Charlie Loudon was measured in characterising other countries as more or less successful than the UK and noted that while that might appear to be an accurate assessment, “There is a lack of authoritative publicly available data on the different …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government notes the committee's observations, asserting it does not accept dual British nationals being used as diplomatic leverage, and will continue to use UN and international fora to call out such behavior and discuss cases of arbitrary detention.
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
View Details
64
Conclusion
Acknowledged
Our predecessor Committee reported on the UK’s sanctions policy after Brexit and explored the possibility...
Conclusion
Our predecessor Committee reported on the UK’s sanctions policy after Brexit and explored the possibility of using Magnitsky sanctions against human rights abusers.146 The Foreign Secretary announced the UK’s first round of Magnitsky-style sanctions in July 2020 against nationals of …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government noted the committee's observation, stating they already impose sanctions against Iranians under a separate human rights regime and the Global Human Rights Sanctions regime, and will continue to consider future designations without speculating on specific targets.
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
View Details
65
Recommendation
Acknowledged
Iran’s human rights record and selective commitment to upholding international law is a threat to...
Recommendation
Iran’s human rights record and selective commitment to upholding international law is a threat to the rules based international system generally, and a key challenge faced when aiding detained nationals specifically. The FCDO has admirably used international fora to exert …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government notes the recommendation, highlighting existing UK sanctions regimes against Iranians involved in human rights violations, and states it will continue to consider future sanctions designations without speculating on specific individuals.
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
View Details
68
Recommendation
Acknowledged
Engagement with Iran should not be an end goal in and of itself.
Recommendation
Engagement with Iran should not be an end goal in and of itself. Rather, engagement should seek to encourage Iran to play a positive, constructive and predictable role as a regional power, which uses international norms, respect for human rights …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agreed with the committee's conclusion, affirming that the UK-Iran bilateral relationship is a key policy tool and that the UK will continue to keep the diplomatic door open and send clear messages regarding engagement, nuclear compliance, and Iran's regional role.
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
View Details
1
Conclusion
Acknowledged
Para 15
Disunity in addressing the nuclear issue, especially between the US and the E3, has not...
Conclusion
Disunity in addressing the nuclear issue, especially between the US and the E3, has not served the UK’s interests. Instead, it has disincentivised Iranian engagement with the West and presented an opportunity for Russia and China to pursue their respective …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledged the observation, stating it shares the strategic aim of preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, emphasizes the importance of aligned international diplomatic effort, and welcomes President Biden's commitment to re-enter the JCPoA.
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
View Details
2
Conclusion
Acknowledged
Para 19
A significant weakness of UN Security Council Resolution 2231 was its failure to prohibit Iran...
Conclusion
A significant weakness of UN Security Council Resolution 2231 was its failure to prohibit Iran from developing ballistic missiles capable of delivering nuclear warheads. In a treaty fundamentally designed to deliver non-proliferation assurances, it is entirely reasonable that the JCPOA …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledges the committee's point about UNSCR 2231 being a compromise, expresses serious concerns about Iran's ballistic missile program, and urges Iran to abide by existing resolutions, without committing to place new binding restrictions as the committee suggested would be reasonable.
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
View Details
3
Recommendation
Acknowledged
Para 21
Iran could be more forthcoming when granting access for IAEA inspections.
Recommendation
Iran could be more forthcoming when granting access for IAEA inspections. Additionally, Iran has publicly stated it would not allow inspection of military sites, despite such visits falling within the terms of the JCPOA. These actions undermine political confidence in …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government noted the recommendation and agreed on the importance of IAEA access, outlining its clear stance that Iran must comply and its efforts to express concern and urge Iran to continue provisional implementation of the Additional Protocol, but did not commit to introducing additional penalties or provisions.
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
View Details
5
Conclusion
Acknowledged
Para 24
Given the historically covert nature of Iran’s nuclear programme, the lack of good faith it...
Conclusion
Given the historically covert nature of Iran’s nuclear programme, the lack of good faith it has shown in supporting the free and timely inspection efforts of the IAEA, and recent evidence indicating the military dimensions to its nuclear efforts of …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government noted the committee's conclusion, clarifying that Iran's program is currently subject to the most comprehensive IAEA monitoring under the JCPoA, with increased inspector access, and reiterated that Iran must fully cooperate.
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
View Details
15
Recommendation
Acknowledged
Para 57
The FCDO’s current approach to consular disputes is clearly not working.
Recommendation
The FCDO’s current approach to consular disputes is clearly not working. The Key Performance Indicator remains the unconditional and timely release of detained nationals. In this, the range of tools on offer is entirely ineffectual and requires revision. The FCDO …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government notes the committee's views, agrees on the importance of working with allies, and commits to continuing discussions and pressing Iran for consular access and release of detained nationals, while emphasizing actions are taken in the best interests of detainees.
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
View Details
17
Recommendation
Acknowledged
Iran’s human rights record and selective commitment to upholding international law is a threat to...
Recommendation
Iran’s human rights record and selective commitment to upholding international law is a threat to the rules based international system generally, and a key challenge faced when aiding detained nationals specifically. The FCDO has admirably used international fora to exert …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government noted the recommendation, explained its existing sanctions regimes, and stated it would continue to consider future designations without speculating on specific targets, thus not explicitly committing to prioritising Iranian human rights abusers for the next round of Magnitsky sanctions.
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
View Details