The Scrutiny of International Treaties and other international agreements in the 21st century

Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee Closed Inquiry
Opened: 11 May 2022 Closed: 24 May 2024 Parliament page
The Committee is conducting an inquiry into how treaties and other international arrangements (such as Memorandums of Understanding) could be effectively scrutinised in the UK, now that the UK has left the EU. Our particular focus is on the House of Commons.
11 Recommendations
21 Conclusions
1 Report
8 Oral sessions
1 Letter
8 Events
Activity timeline 19 events
Oral evidence sessions 8 sessions
The Scrutiny of International Treaties and other international agreements in the 21st century
David Rutley MP · Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office Leonie Lambert · Department for Business and Trade Nigel Huddleston MP · HM Treasury Paul Berman · Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
The Scrutiny of International Treaties and other international agreements in the 21st century
Dr Mario Mendez · Queen Mary University of London Professor Emily Jones · Blavatnik School of Government, University of Oxford Professor Holger Hestermeyer · Kings College London
The Scrutiny of International Treaties and other international agreements in the 21st century
Angus MacNeil MP · Member of the House of Commons The Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town · Member of the House of Lords
The Scrutiny of International Treaties and other international agreements in the 21st century
Clare Adamson MSP · Scottish Parliament Huw Irranca-Davies MS · Senedd Cymru / Welsh Parliament Mick Antoniw MS · Welsh Government Rt Hon Angus Robertson MSP · Scottish Government
The Scrutiny of International Treaties and other international agreements in the 21st century
Penelope Nevill · Kings College London Professor Richard Gardiner · University College London (UCL)
The Scrutiny of International Treaties and other international agreements in the 21st century
Professor Lorand Bartels MBE · Trade and Agriculture Commission Professor Malgosia Fitzmaurice · Queen Mary University of London
The Scrutiny of International Treaties and other international agreements in the 21st century
Rt Hon Lord Frost CMG · Cabinet Office
The Scrutiny of International Treaties and other international agreements in the 21st century
Alexander Horne · Durham University Arabella Lang · Public Law Project Jill Barrett · Queen Mary University of London
Recommendations & Conclusions
3 results
17 Conclusion Deferred
Second Report - Parliamentary Scru…
House of Lords should ideally scrutinise treaties before House of Commons approval vote.
We believe that adequate time should be available for both Houses to conduct meaningful scrutiny of treaties. However, it is a matter for the House of Lords how it chooses to arrange its business, both in its committees and chamber. … Read more
Government Response
The government deflects responsibility, stating it is for the House of Commons to consider establishing a sifting committee for treaties, and draws attention to comparable setups in Australia and New Zealand.
28 Recommendation Deferred
Second Report - Parliamentary Scru…
Strengthen international agreement scrutiny in Commons committees and establish a new bespoke committee.
The current arrangements in Parliament for the scrutiny of international agreements are not commensurate with their constitutional importance. The House of Lords has taken steps to address this constitutional lacuna with the establishment of the International Agreements Committee. By contrast, … Read more
Government Response
The government partially agrees on the principle of parliamentary accountability for treaties but rejects recommendations for parliamentary approval of treaties and largely deflects the specific recommendations for new scrutiny mechanisms to Parliament itself.
29 Recommendation Deferred
Second Report - Parliamentary Scru…
Review additional resources required for effective scrutiny of international agreements in Commons.
Effective scrutiny of international agreements requires both policy expertise and expertise in international agreements and law. We recommend that a review is carried out to consider whether and what additional resource is required to support effective scrutiny of international agreements … Read more
Government Response
The government partially agrees but deflects the recommendation for a review of parliamentary resources, stating that how Parliament chooses to scrutinise treaties and whether to introduce new functions is a matter for Parliament itself.
Government Response AI assessment · 32 of 11 classified

Total 11 recs + 21 conclusions
Correspondence 1 letter
14 May 2024 From committee Letter to Rt Hon Penny Mordaunt MP, Leader of the House of Commons on the Sifting Committee for International Agreements, dated 14.5.24
Parliament page