Resetting government programmes

Public Accounts Committee Closed Inquiry
Opened: 29 Mar 2023 Closed: 18 Nov 2023 Parliament page
Both the National Audit Office and Public Accounts Committee have examined a number of government programmes which have needed a “reset” for various reasons. The Committee will question two panels of witnesses on programmes that have required resets for any reason such as a reset to what the programme is … Read more
6 Recommendations
19 Conclusions
1 Report
1 Oral session
1 Event
Activity timeline 4 events
5 Jun
2023
5 Jun
2023
Formal meeting (oral evidence session) · The Grimond Room, Portcullis House
Oral evidence sessions 1 session
Resetting Programmes
Conrad Smewing · HM Treasury Dr David Marsh · Ministry of Defence Jim Barton · HM Prisons and Probation Service Matthew Lodge · Department for Transport Neil Couling CBE · Department of Work and Pensions Nick Smallwood · Infrastructure and Projects Authority
Recommendations & Conclusions
2 results
14 Conclusion Not Addressed
Seventy-First Report - Resetting g…
Ethnic diversity on government programme boards and within departments requires further improvement.
We asked SROs about the diversity of their programme boards, which could help establish an effective, open and constructive environment. For Universal Credit, the SRO explained how, over time, the Board had included women and men in almost equal number … Read more
Government Response
The government agrees with the observation but its response focuses on the IPA's work to promote a culture of learning and psychological safety, and a review by June 2024 on enhancing transparency, rather than directly addressing diversity on programme boards or ethnic diversity.
HM Treasury
View details
15 Conclusion Not Addressed
Seventy-First Report - Resetting g…
Non-executive directors and external challenge provide crucial robust oversight for government programmes.
We were interested to hear about the role of non-executive directors in creating an environment supportive of challenge and diverse thinking. The SRO for Universal Credit explained how it was useful having a non-executive director chairing the Programme Board.49 The … Read more
Government Response
The government agrees with the observation but its response focuses on the IPA's work to promote a culture of learning and psychological safety, and a review by June 2024 on enhancing transparency, rather than directly addressing the specific role of non-executive directors or external skills.
HM Treasury
View details
Government Response AI assessment · 25 of 6 classified

Total 6 recs + 19 conclusions