UK Inquiry Tracker

Immigration Enforcement

Public Accounts Committee Closed Inquiry

Opened: 15 Jun 2020 Closed: 2 Dec 2020 Parliament page

The Home Office is responsible for preventing abuse of immigration rules, tracking immigration offenders and increasing compliance with immigration law. A series of NAO reports have identified some of the long-standing challenges it faces in managing enforcement activity, removing foreign national offenders and overseeing the immigration detention system and facilities. … Read more The Home Office is responsible for preventing abuse of immigration rules, tracking immigration offenders and increasing compliance with immigration law. A series of NAO reports have identified some of the long-standing challenges it faces in managing enforcement activity, removing foreign national offenders and overseeing the immigration detention system and facilities. The Immigration Enforcement directorate also depends on effective collaboration with other parts of the wider border and immigration system, as well as law enforcement and international partners. The NAO’s report ‘Immigration enforcement’ examines whether the Department is achieving its aim to reduce the size of the illegal population and the harm it causes, and doing so in a way that delivers value for money. It finds that the Home Office does not know how many people currently reside in the UK illegally: its last estimate, made 15 years ago in 2005, was around 430,000 people. More recent estimates from other organisations suggest that number might have doubled. While the Home Office collects a large amount of performance data on its activities, these do not allow it to demonstrate the impact of its work or policies. For example, the NAO found that the Home Office is unable to assess whether its measures to prevent people from accessing government funded services – the “No Recourse to Public Funds” policy that is a central plank of the “hostile environment” - have any meaningful impact on how likely a person is to return to their country of origin. The Home Office is stopping increasing numbers of people from entering the country illegally, but it doesn’t know if this is because it’s catching more of these attempts or there are simply more attempts. The Home Office returned, or helped to return, just over 13,100 people without leave to remain in the year to November 2019, of which 5,600 people returned voluntarily: although the numbers returning voluntarily have dropped from an average of 1,200 a month in 2015 to approximately 460 a month in 2019. The other 7,400 were enforced removals, of which 5,000 were foreign national offenders, but that was less than half - 48% -of the planned enforced removals for that period, often as a result of late legal challenges to removal. As a result, the Home Office released 14,900, or 62%, of immigration detainees from immigration removal centres last year. It believes many of these late legal challenges are used to delay removal but did not provide any evidence that it has tried to actively understand and manage these challenges. The Home Office is currently considering its response to the Windrush review and has commissioned a review of the wider border and immigration system. The NAO argues that these reviews give the Home Office an opportunity to address many of the issues identified in its report. On Monday 13 July the Committee will question officials from the Home Office on the performance of its core immigration enforcement activity, to establish what progress the Department has made in dealing with these enduring, ongoing challenges. If you have evidence on the questions raised in this inquiry please submit it here by 5.30pm on Thursday 9 July 2020. Show less

5 Recommendations

18 Conclusions

1 Report

1 Oral session

4 Letters

1 Event

Activity timeline 7 events

22 Mar
2021

Correspondence

Correspondence from Matthew Rycroft CBE, Permanent Secretary Home Office, re Recommendation 4, Immigration Enforcement, dated 15 March 2021

16 Mar
2021

Correspondence

Correspondence from Matthew Rycroft CBE, Permanent Secretary Home Office, re Immigration Enforcement, dated 10 March 2021

13 Jan
2021

Correspondence

Correspondence from Sir Philip Barton, Permanent Under-Secretary of State, Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office, re Windrush Compensa…

13 Jan
2021

Correspondence

Correspondence from Matthew Rycroft, Permanent Secretary, re Immigration enforcement, dated 17 December 2020

18 Nov
2020

Report published

Treasury minutes: Government response to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Seventeenth report from Session 2019-21

18 Sep
2020

Report published

Seventeenth Report - Immigration enforcement

13 Jul
2020

Oral evidence

Immigration Enforcement

Oral evidence sessions 1 session

13 Jul 2020

View on parliament.uk

Immigration Enforcement

Matthew Rycroft CBE · Home Office Shona Dunn · Home Office Tyson Hepple · Home Office

Reports 1 report · click to expand

Title	HC No.	Published	Items	Response
Seventeenth Report - Immigration enforcement	HC 407	18 Sep 2020	23	Responded

Recommendations & Conclusions

18 results

2 Recommendation Accepted

Seventeenth Report - Immigration e…

The Department relies upon a disturbingly weak evidence base to assess the impact of its...

The Department relies upon a disturbingly weak evidence base to assess the impact of its immigration enforcement activity. The lack of reliable evidence on what works prevents it from planning and prioritising its activities effectively. The Department accepts that it … Read more

Government Response

The government agrees and has a comprehensive, long-term plan to invest in data analytics, enhance Immigration Enforcement's analytical capability, and transform it into a data-led organization by 2025, with an implementation target of March 2021.

HM Treasury

Immigration Enforcement

Activity timeline 7 events

Oral evidence sessions 1 session

Reports 1 report · click to expand

Recommendations & Conclusions

The Department relies upon a disturbingly weak evidence base to assess the impact of its...

The culture and make-up of the Department have left it poorly placed to appreciate the...

The Department’s failure to develop an end-to-end understanding of the immigration system leads to problems...

The Department described the different forms of harm that occur from immigration crime.

We asked the Department about the financial impact of providing public services to people who...

The NAO reported that Immigration Enforcement uses management information to assess the performance of individual...

We asked how the Department allocated resources across the immigration system and heard that this...

During the evidence session, the Department failed to provide a specific answer to questions about...

The Committee of Public Accounts has found previously that the Department did not use its...

We asked the Department to account for the plummeting number of people it returns to...

The NAO reported that Immigration Enforcement could make better use of its analytical functions and...

The Department accepted that the Windrush lessons learned review had come exceptionally close to declaring...

We asked whether Immigration Enforcement should focus on in-country immigration enforcement rather than having to...

The Department told us that it works with different parts of the public sector and...

We asked what the Department could learn from its analysis of late asylum claims to...

The Department reiterated its commitment to implementing the 30 recommendations of the Windrush lessons learned...

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Department extended the visas of all individuals for whom it...

The Department told us that it has high hopes for its modernisation and transformation projects.

Government Response AI assessment · 23 of 5 classified

Correspondence 4 letters