7 Not Addressed

As well as call volumes, we asked whether the AIRE service had underestimated the length...

Conclusion
As well as call volumes, we asked whether the AIRE service had underestimated the length of each call. The Department had historical data that suggested calls would take between 12 and 17 minutes. In contrast, Migrant Help based its bid for the AIRE service on an average call length of four minutes, and the Department accepted the bid on this basis.12 As a result, the AIRE helpline did not have the capacity to deal with the number of calls it received, answering only one-fifth of the calls it received between September 2019 and January 2020.13 We received written evidence from Asylum Matters, which told us that many asylum seekers and their caseworkers had lost confidence in AIRE and simply stopped calling.14 The Department explained that as the AIRE provider accumulated more data from issue reporting, its call speed has got quicker.15 In its written evidence to us, Migrant Help also told us that it had carried out a large recruitment and training programme.16 The Department explained that the performance of the AIRE service had since improved, and it was now regularly meeting 11 of its 12 key performance indicators. 9 Q 117 10 Qq 126–128; C&AG’s Report paras 17, 4.11 11 Qq 71, 86–87 12 Qq 92, 94–95; C&AG’s Report, para 2.13 13 Q 71; C&AG’s Report, para 12 14 ASY0006 - Asylum Matters 15 Q 92 16 ASY0001 - Migrant Help Asylum accommodation and support transformation programme 11 The Department said that in July 2020, the AIRE service answered 95% of calls within 60 seconds, against a target of 90%.17 The cost of the new service
Government Response Summary
The government's response, despite stating agreement with a 'recommendation,' discusses considering future models for asylum seeker accommodation and improving current contracts, including recovering from pandemic impacts. It does not specifically address the committee's observations regarding the AIRE service's call capacity, underestimated call length, or its stated improvements.
Government Response
Not Addressed
HM Government Not Addressed
3.1 The Government agrees with the Committee’s recommendation. Target implementation date: July 2021 3.2 The department is considering a wide range of options for potential future models for accommodating asylum seekers, and the time that will be needed for their design and implementation. This is in tandem with, and being informed by, ongoing work to improve the operation of the current contracts. 3.3 The NAO review of the asylum contracts commenced on the day the last contract went live. The project anticipated a short period of stabilisation followed by continuous improvement across the lives of the contract. The contracts are being closely managed to ensure they do provide the benefits that were envisaged. The impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic have led to unanticipated challenges for the contracts, so the department is working with providers to recover from that and will focus on delivering the contracts as they were designed. 3.4 The expiration and review dates for these contracts are in the department’s procurement and project pipeline. Decisions will be made, in the timelines recommended, on the scale of change required and the length of time for a project to deliver that change.
Addressee Bodies
HM Treasury
Timeline
Recommendation age 5.7 yrs
Report published 20 Nov 2020