Sixteenth Report - Managing cross-border travel during the COVID-19 pandemic
Select Committee
Public Accounts Committee
HC 29
26 July 2022
Government response
Treasury minutes: Government response to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Sixteenth report from Session 2022-23 · published 14 Oct 2022
Recommendations & Conclusions
5 results
1
Conclusion
Acknowledged
On the basis of a report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, we took evidence...
Conclusion
On the basis of a report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, we took evidence from the Cabinet Office, the Home Office, the Department for Transport (DfT), and the Department of Health & Social Care (DHSC), about the latest phase …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledges the report and provides administrative details about the evidence taken and publication date.
HM Treasury
View Details
13
Conclusion
Acknowledged
We asked the Department about the support it had provided the aviation industry during the...
Conclusion
We asked the Department about the support it had provided the aviation industry during the pandemic. DfT told us that government had provided up to £8 billion of support to the aviation industry during the pandemic, but recognised that this …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government references its response to the Transport Select Committee, stating that the default approach will be to use the least stringent measures to minimize the impact on travel as far as possible when responding to COVID-19 variants.
HM Treasury
View Details
26
Conclusion
Acknowledged
In addition to not tracking costs, government did not formally set out what it regarded...
Conclusion
In addition to not tracking costs, government did not formally set out what it regarded as successful implementation of the cross-border travel measures, nor its measurement of success.45 We therefore asked the Cabinet Office how it knew whether measures were …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees with the recommendation and states that throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, departments considered the efficacy of policies implemented, and those lessons learned continue to inform contingency planning.
HM Treasury
View Details
28
Conclusion
Acknowledged
The NAO reported that the circumstances in which government had to implement the traffic light...
Conclusion
The NAO reported that the circumstances in which government had to implement the traffic light system had often been a crisis response requiring government to move at pace.49 The Cabinet Office explained that the system was a response to the …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees with the committee's observation, stating that lessons learned inform contingency planning, COVID-19 surveillance is retained, and future responses will focus on pharmaceutical interventions, while wider pandemic scenarios are being developed.
HM Treasury
View Details
29
Conclusion
Acknowledged
We found in our report on Government preparedness for the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons for government...
Conclusion
We found in our report on Government preparedness for the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons for government on risk that government would have been better prepared for COVID-19 if it had applied learning from previous incidents and exercises.52 The NAO reported that, …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees with the committee and states that lessons learned continue to inform contingency planning across government, including for future public health threats. They retained COVID-19 surveillance and set out an overarching contingency strategy based on pharmaceutical interventions.
HM Treasury
View Details