Fifty-Third Report - Covid 19: supporting the vulnerable during lockdown
Select Committee
Public Accounts Committee
HC 938
21 April 2021
Government response
Treasury minutes: Government response to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Fifty-third report from Session 2019-21 · published 2 Sep 2021
Recommendations & Conclusions
14 results
2
Recommendation
Accepted
DHSC and NHS Digital took too long to identify all clinically extremely vulnerable people.
Recommendation
DHSC and NHS Digital took too long to identify all clinically extremely vulnerable people. Individuals were not formally eligible for the central support of food boxes and medicines delivery offered through the shielding programme until they were on the Shielded …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government commits to learning lessons from identifying CEV people and improving national data use. Work is underway on a national GP dataset and digitising the health service with shared care records, which will be detailed in a forthcoming draft data strategy for health and social care.
HM Treasury
View Details
3
Recommendation
Accepted
Huge local variation strongly suggests that GPs were inconsistent when judging who was clinically extremely...
Recommendation
Huge local variation strongly suggests that GPs were inconsistent when judging who was clinically extremely vulnerable and should therefore be advised to shield and be eligible for support. As well as NHS Digital using national data to identify clinically vulnerable …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees there was huge local variation and commits to conducting further analysis to understand the drivers and identify lessons for the future, with findings to be provided to the Committee by October 2021.
HM Treasury
View Details
4
Recommendation
Accepted
Government chose a centrally-directed system to support clinically vulnerable people as it did not have...
Recommendation
Government chose a centrally-directed system to support clinically vulnerable people as it did not have confidence all local authorities and supermarkets could meet people’s needs, particularly for food. MHCLG spoke with some local authorities and supermarkets early on to assess …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government disagreed that a centrally-directed system was chosen due to lack of confidence in local authorities, highlighting councils as crucial partners. They stated that councils received funding, demonstrated good performance, and MHCLG continues to work closely with them and keep funding under review to ensure their capacity and resilience.
HM Treasury
View Details
8
Conclusion
Accepted
DHSC told us it recognised that advising people to stay inside and away from society...
Conclusion
DHSC told us it recognised that advising people to stay inside and away from society does have risks as well as benefits. Of those surveyed, some 36% reported worsening mental health and wellbeing while shielding.14 Charities also told us of …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledges the difficulties faced by non-clinically vulnerable groups and highlights existing support services such as priority supermarket referrals and NHS Volunteer Responders, committing to consider future preparedness measures for such groups.
HM Treasury
View Details
9
Conclusion
Accepted
The list of medical conditions that the chief medical officers developed to define clinically extremely...
Conclusion
The list of medical conditions that the chief medical officers developed to define clinically extremely vulnerable people was shared with NHS Digital on 18 March 2020. DHSC tasked NHS Digital to use patient data to identify those affected and create …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government disagrees with the conclusion that identification took too long but states it is committed to learning lessons and that work is already underway to develop a strategic national GP dataset, digitize the health service, and publish a data strategy.
HM Treasury
View Details
12
Conclusion
Accepted
DHSC acknowledged that there are advantages with NHS data systems—such as having large amounts of...
Conclusion
DHSC acknowledged that there are advantages with NHS data systems—such as having large amounts of data—and disadvantages, for example challenges in connecting and using legacy systems.24 We asked NHS Digital what would help to identify patients earlier. NHS Digital told …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government stated that work is already underway, with NHS Digital developing a national GP dataset for faster access to information and working on digitising health records and shared care. These developments will be outlined in a forthcoming data strategy for health and social care.
HM Treasury
View Details
13
Conclusion
Accepted
NHSE&I asked GPs and hospital doctors to add or remove people from the list, based...
Conclusion
NHSE&I asked GPs and hospital doctors to add or remove people from the list, based on their clinical judgement, and as their patients’ conditions or treatments changed over time.26 However, the extent to which the list grew between 12 April …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees to provide a detailed explanation for the local variation in the shielded patient list growth and identify lessons for a consistent clinical approach, committing to send these findings to the Committee by October 2021.
HM Treasury
View Details
14
Conclusion
Accepted
NHSE&I was not responsible for managing any local variations and did not challenge local clinical...
Conclusion
NHSE&I was not responsible for managing any local variations and did not challenge local clinical decisions.28 DHSC has told us that NHSE&I and NHS Digital considered that ultimately additions were a decision for local clinicians. It noted that the approach …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees to provide a detailed explanation for the local variation in the shielded patient list growth and identify lessons for a consistent clinical approach, committing to send these findings to the Committee by October 2021.
HM Treasury
View Details
15
Conclusion
Accepted
NHS Digital told us that for the people whom it had identified and added centrally...
Conclusion
NHS Digital told us that for the people whom it had identified and added centrally to the list, in line with the clinical criteria set by the chief medical officers, there is very little variation by area.30 DHSC acknowledged that …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees to provide a detailed explanation for the local variation in the shielded patient list growth and identify lessons for a consistent clinical approach, committing to send these findings to the Committee by October 2021.
HM Treasury
View Details
16
Conclusion
Accepted
We asked DHSC if it had created a postcode lottery of support, and if people...
Conclusion
We asked DHSC if it had created a postcode lottery of support, and if people with certain conditions in some areas, would have different support to people in other areas with the same conditions.32 DHSC told us that it did …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government disagreed that there was huge local variation, stating that most areas fell within expected distributions, while acknowledging six areas added more people than expected. They committed to conducting further analysis to understand this variation and identify lessons, with findings to be reported to the Committee by October 2021.
HM Treasury
View Details
17
Recommendation
Accepted
Government quickly needed to ensure that those shielding had reliable access to food, medicines and...
Recommendation
Government quickly needed to ensure that those shielding had reliable access to food, medicines and care. It chose a national system of support run by central government.36 MHCLG considered that a centralised offer was more likely to guarantee delivery of …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government accepts the recommendation and states it has tested future delivery confidence with councils, finding them confident to rapidly stand up shielding support, and continues to work closely with them while keeping funding under review.
HM Treasury
View Details
20
Conclusion
Accepted
This locally-led model focused on providing eligible people with priority access to book supermarket deliveries,...
Conclusion
This locally-led model focused on providing eligible people with priority access to book supermarket deliveries, rather than Government providing standard food parcels.48 Defra told us that almost everybody that signed up for food box support was matched and prioritised by …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government states it agrees with the recommendation (likely an implicit one regarding local authority capacity) and considers it implemented. MHCLG has tested future delivery confidence with councils and continues to work closely with them to ensure support for CEV individuals.
HM Treasury
View Details
24
Conclusion
Accepted
The DWP contact centre relied on telephone numbers in NHS patient records to call clinically...
Conclusion
The DWP contact centre relied on telephone numbers in NHS patient records to call clinically vulnerable people who had not yet registered their needs. In some 375,000 cases out of the 800,000 people that the contact centre could not get …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledges the issue of inaccurate contact details and states NHSX is leading a program to improve patient contact details and ensure the NHS Number is the primary identifier. DHSC and NHS Digital will report back with details of ongoing work and plans.
HM Treasury
View Details
26
Conclusion
Accepted
DHSC told us it is trying to improve contact information by asking clinically extremely vulnerable...
Conclusion
DHSC told us it is trying to improve contact information by asking clinically extremely vulnerable people to ensure their GP records are up to date and will continue to update the records as patients improve their record keeping with their …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government stated that during the shielding program, DHSC used letters to encourage CEV people to update their GP contact details to facilitate communication, aligning with the committee's observation.
HM Treasury
View Details