Defending Democracy

National Security Strategy (Joint Committee) Open Inquiry
Opened: 24 Feb 2025 Parliament page
20 Recommendations
3 Conclusions
1 Report
4 Oral sessions
11 Letters
4 Events
Activity timeline 17 events
15 Jul
2026
Report published
23 Jun
2026
Correspondence
18 Mar
2026
Report published
16 Mar
2026
Correspondence
16 Mar
2026
Correspondence
24 Feb
2026
Correspondence
9 Feb
2026
Oral evidence
9 Feb
2026
Correspondence
12 Jan
2026
Oral evidence
21 Oct
2025
Correspondence
8 Sep
2025
Oral evidence
17 Jul
2025
Correspondence
Oral evidence sessions 4 sessions
9 Feb 2026
View on parliament.uk
Graeme Biggar CBE · National Crime Agency Rachael Herbert · National Crime Agency
12 Jan 2026
View on parliament.uk
Dr Sam Power · University of Bristol Duncan Hames · Transparency International UK Natasha Powell · Kraken Digital Asset Exchange Tom Keatinge · RUSI
8 Sep 2025
View on parliament.uk
The NSS - Political finance (inc. crypto)
Dr Susan Hawley · Spotlight on Corruption Ian Taylor · CryptoUK Jackie Killeen · Electoral Commission Peter Geoghegan · openDemocracy Vijay Rangarajan · Electoral Commission
17 Mar 2025
View on parliament.uk
Defending Democracy
Dan Jarvis MP · Home Office Nanyamka Brown · Department for Science, Innovation and Technology Shaun Hipgrave · Home Office The Baroness Jones of Whitchurch · Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Title HC No. Published Items Response
3rd Report - Political finance and foreign influence HC 720 18 Mar 2026 23 Responded
Recommendations & Conclusions
13 results
Clear
5 Recommendation Accepted
3rd Report - Political finance and…
Crypto donations pose an unnecessary and unacceptably high risk to the integrity of the political...
Crypto donations pose an unnecessary and unacceptably high risk to the integrity of the political finance system and public trust in it. We accept that future regulations may institutionalise the use of alternative payment systems for use in donations. At … Read more
Government Response
The government wholeheartedly agrees with the committee's conclusion and has accepted the recommendation to introduce an immediate moratorium on cryptoasset donations to political parties, effective from March 25, 2026, until sufficient safeguards are in place.
Cabinet Office
View details
6 Recommendation Accepted
3rd Report - Political finance and…
Crypto also poses wider upstream risks to the integrity of political finance: donors can convert...
Crypto also poses wider upstream risks to the integrity of political finance: donors can convert ‘dirty’ foreign crypto funds into ‘clean’ UK fiat and then donate it without arousing much suspicion. A ‘last mile’ ban on crypto donations is therefore … Read more
Government Response
The government wholeheartedly agrees and has accepted a recommendation from the Rycroft Review to introduce an immediate moratorium on cryptoasset donations, which will apply from March 25, 2026.
Cabinet Office
View details
7 Recommendation Accepted
3rd Report - Political finance and…
The Government should introduce a binding moratorium on crypto donations as an amendment to the...
The Government should introduce a binding moratorium on crypto donations as an amendment to the Representation of the People Bill. This moratorium should remain in place until the Electoral Commission has issued statutory guidance on crypto donations which applies to … Read more
Government Response
The government wholeheartedly accepts the recommendation to introduce a binding moratorium on crypto donations, confirming that it will apply to all such donations from 25 March 2026, with a 30-day period for returning or forfeiting previous donations.
Cabinet Office
View details
8 Recommendation Accepted
3rd Report - Political finance and…
The Representation of the People Bill contains inexplicable deficiencies on corporate donations.
The Representation of the People Bill contains inexplicable deficiencies on corporate donations. We support limiting donations to those carrying out meaningful activity in the UK. However, the Bill contains a loophole, which would allow companies to donate the upper limit … Read more
Government Response
The government agrees with the concern about a loophole in corporate donations allowing multiple contributions and has accepted recommendations to fix it. It is introducing a new requirement for donors to submit a declaration to ensure companies do not evade rules on donation limits.
Cabinet Office
View details
9 Recommendation Accepted
3rd Report - Political finance and…
The Government should amend Part 4 of the Representation of the People Bill to specify...
The Government should amend Part 4 of the Representation of the People Bill to specify that limits on corporate donations apply to the total amount per company, rather than per recipient. (Recommendation, Paragraph 77) 39 Criminal liability for acting as … Read more
Government Response
The government agrees with the concern regarding corporate donation limits and has accepted in full a similar recommendation from the Rycroft review, also introducing a declaration requirement for donors above a set threshold.
Cabinet Office
View details
10 Conclusion Accepted
3rd Report - Political finance and…
The Representation of the People Bill does not include strong enough safeguards to prevent UK...
The Representation of the People Bill does not include strong enough safeguards to prevent UK subsidiaries donating on behalf of foreign parent companies or wealthy individuals. There are further loopholes enabling donors to receive large sums of foreign money in … Read more
Government Response
The government agrees with the concern regarding corporate donation limits and has accepted a similar Rycroft review recommendation in full, also introducing a declaration requirement for donors above a set threshold to prevent evasion.
Cabinet Office
View details
11 Recommendation Accepted
3rd Report - Political finance and…
We welcome the Government’s commitment to commence Section 54A of the Political Parties, Elections and...
We welcome the Government’s commitment to commence Section 54A of the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act. But the provisions need more work to adequately address concerns about donors acting as conduits for foreign money. We are sceptical about simply … Read more
Government Response
The government commits to commencing Section 54A PPERA before the end of this Parliament, introducing a declaration requirement, a new due diligence requirement, and amending the threshold to prevent foreign or impermissible donations.
Cabinet Office
View details
12 Recommendation Accepted
3rd Report - Political finance and…
The Government should amend the Representation of the People Bill to introduce an alternative version...
The Government should amend the Representation of the People Bill to introduce an alternative version of Section 54A in primary legislation. This would create a critical mechanism to implement much needed changes. (Recommendation, Paragraph 92)
Government Response
The government agrees with the objective and will commit to commencing Section 54A PPERA before the end of Parliament, introducing a declaration requirement for donations above a set threshold, and amending the S54A threshold.
Cabinet Office
View details
14 Recommendation Accepted
3rd Report - Political finance and…
The alternative version of Section 54A should specify that the relevant persons are liable if...
The alternative version of Section 54A should specify that the relevant persons are liable if they fail to act on ‘reasonable grounds to suspect’ that a false declaration or otherwise impermissible donation is being facilitated. Such changes would bring the … Read more
Government Response
The government agrees with the objective and will commence Section 54A PPERA before the end of Parliament, introducing a declaration requirement for donations with criminal liability for false declarations, and a new due diligence requirement for donors.
Cabinet Office
View details
15 Recommendation Accepted
3rd Report - Political finance and…
The alternative version of Section 54A should specify that a regulated recipient may not accept...
The alternative version of Section 54A should specify that a regulated recipient may not accept a donation where there is ‘reasonable grounds to suspect’ that it derives from an impermissible foreign source, or has been provided in connection with an … Read more
Government Response
The government agrees with the objective and will commence Section 54A PPERA before the end of Parliament, introducing a declaration requirement for donations above a set threshold, establishing criminal liability for false declarations, and amending the S54A threshold.
Cabinet Office
View details
17 Recommendation Accepted
3rd Report - Political finance and…
The Government should review options to reduce the risk of foreign money entering UK political...
The Government should review options to reduce the risk of foreign money entering UK political finance via individual donors whose primary long- term residence is overseas. For example, individual donors whose primary residence is overseas could be required to have … Read more
Government Response
The government agrees with the concern and will introduce a £100,000 annual cap on donations from overseas electors, effective from March 2026, alongside a minimum residency period for individuals returning to the UK.
Cabinet Office
View details
18 Conclusion Accepted
3rd Report - Political finance and…
We welcome the proposed improvement to the Electoral Commission’s data sharing powers under Clause 69.
We welcome the proposed improvement to the Electoral Commission’s data sharing powers under Clause 69. (Conclusion, Paragraph 107)
Government Response
The government acknowledges the importance and confirms it is taking forward measures through the Representation of the People Bill to extend the Electoral Commission's data sharing and receiving powers. It states it will amend the Bill accordingly, though some tools require further consideration.
Cabinet Office
View details
19 Conclusion Accepted
3rd Report - Political finance and…
The Electoral Commission needs new powers to ask for information about whether the source of...
The Electoral Commission needs new powers to ask for information about whether the source of funds used in political donations is permissible. This is vital to ensuring effective deterrence and enabling the regulator to identify risks of foreign money. At … Read more
Government Response
The government recognizes the importance of equipping the Electoral Commission and will extend its powers to require information disclosure outside of formal investigations and enable information sharing with relevant public authorities.
Cabinet Office
View details
Government Response AI assessment · 23 of 20 classified
Accepted 13
Accepted in Part 4
Acknowledged 3
Deferred 2
Rejected 1
Total 20 recs + 3 conclusions
Correspondence 11 letters
23 Jun 2026 The Electoral Commission's response to the Committee's report on political finance and foreign influence, dated 20 May 2026
Parliament page
16 Mar 2026 To committee Response from the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government relating to political finance, dated 9 March
Parliament page
16 Mar 2026 From committee Letter to the Commissioner, Metropolitan Police relating to Political finance, dated 12 February, and their response, dated 5 March 2026
Parliament page
24 Feb 2026 To committee Letter from the Chair to the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government relating to political finance, dated 23 February 2026
Parliament page
9 Feb 2026 To committee Letter from the Chair to Vijay Rangarajan, Chief Executive, Electoral Commission, dated 21 January 2026, relating to political finance, and the response, dated 5 February 2026
Parliament page
21 Oct 2025 Correspondence from Dan Jarvis MBE MP, Security Minister relating to the Defending Democracy Taskforce, dated 15 October 2025
Parliament page
17 Jul 2025 Correspondence to Dan Jarvis MBE MP, Security Minister relating to the Defending Democracy Taskforce, dated 16 July 2025
Parliament page
1 May 2025 From committee Letter to Ofcom on Defending Democracy and the Online Safety Act, dated 28 March 2025
Parliament page
1 May 2025 To committee Letter from Ofcom on Defending Democracy and the Online Safety Act, dated 23 April 2025
Parliament page
1 May 2025 Correspondence to Dan Jarvis MBE MP, Security Minister following oral evidence held on 17 March on Defending Democracy, dated 28 March 2025
Parliament page
1 May 2025 Correspondence from Dan Jarvis MBE MP, Security Minister following oral evidence held on 17 March on Defending Democracy, dated 16 April 2025
Parliament page