40
Accepted in Part
The Government’s reforms to the Strategic Priorities Grant should consider whether to reintroduce the Strategically...
Recommendation
The Government’s reforms to the Strategic Priorities Grant should consider whether to reintroduce the Strategically Important and Vulnerable Subjects programme that existed in the 1990s and 2000s and as proposed by the Royal Astronomical Society and Universities UK. Funding through the grant could cover both high-cost subjects (which the Government has said it wants to prioritise) and strategically important subjects not currently eligible for teaching grants (e.g. modern languages). The diversity of the higher education sector should be reflected by targeting such grants at areas or types of institution where cold-spots are at risk of developing, to ensure the provision of high-cost and strategically important subjects across the country and at institutions with varying entry standards. (Recommendation, Paragraph 202) 116 International Students: Impact of the Government’s reforms
Government Response Summary
The government partially accepts the recommendation, stating it is reforming the Strategic Priorities Grant to target high-cost and strategically important subjects. It will consider regional provision and collaborate with the Office for Students on access improvements, though it does not commit to reintroducing the specific programme mentioned.
Government Response
Accepted in Part
Government Response
Accepted in Part
HM Government
Accepted in Part
PARTIALLY ACCEPT We want to embrace the diversity of the sector, recognising each provider’s unique contribution, and encouraging them to capitalise on their comparative advantage. As set out in the Post-16 Skills White Paper, we are reforming the Strategic Priorities Grant (SPG) to ensure that high-cost subject funding is more effectively targeted towards priority provision that supports future skills needs and the Industrial Strategy. As part of the reform work, we will carefully consider where funding is best targeted taking into consideration factors such as cost and strategic importance. We recognise the importance of ensuring the continued provision of strategically important subjects across the higher education sector, including in areas where provision may be at risk. We are working with the Office for Students to explore improvements to access and regional collaboration, as set out in the Post-16 Skills White Paper, to help support provision across the country. We expect that the Office for Students will consult the sector on the allocation of SPG funding later this year.
Source
Committee
Education Committee
Report
9th Report - Higher Education and Funding: Threat of Insolvency and International Students
12 May 2026
HC 807
Addressee Bodies
Department for Education
Timeline
Recommendation age
0.2 yrs
Report published
12 May 2026