Reports & recommendations

55 recommendations from 5 reports, each with the government response on the record. Filter by government response, report, nation or delivery status.

Title Volume Publication Date Recommendations Links
Module 1: Resilience and Preparedness 1 18 Jul 2024 10
Module 2: Core Decision-Making 2 20 Nov 2025 19
Module 3: Impact on Healthcare Systems
Original edition: Version 1 — NO-COMMENTS original Report page first published 19 March 2026.
Version 1.1 — current corrected edition (Corrslip-2) Correction slip dated 13 May 2026; page metadata modified 14 May 2026. The page modification is not a formal republication date. Open current edition · Search this held text
3 19 Mar 2026 10
Module 4: Vaccines and Therapeutics 4 16 Apr 2026 5
Module 5: Procurement 5 14 Jul 2026 11
Every Story Matters: Economic Response Listening Exercise 24 Nov 2025 0
Every Story Matters: Impact on Society - Key Workers Listening Exercise 16 Feb 2026 0
Every Story Matters: Test, Trace and Isolate Listening Exercise 12 May 2025 0
Every Story Matters: Impact on Society - Bereavement Listening Exercise 03 Mar 2026 0
Every Story Matters: Final Record Listening Exercise 05 Mar 2026 0
Every Story Matters: Impact on Society - Mental Health and Wellbeing Listening Exercise 16 Feb 2026 0
Every Story Matters: Adult Social Care Sector Listening Exercise 30 Jun 2025 0
Every Story Matters: Children and Young People Listening Exercise 29 Sep 2025 0
Every Story Matters: Healthcare Listening Exercise 09 Sep 2024 0
Every Story Matters: Vaccines and Therapeutics Listening Exercise 14 Jan 2025 0

Recommendations (3)

COVID-M1.10
Under consideration

Independent Statutory Resilience Body

Recommendation
The UK government should, in consultation with the devolved administrations, create a statutory independent body for whole-system civil emergency preparedness and resilience. The new body should be given responsibility for: providing independent, strategic advice to the UK government and devolved …
In brief (written by this site)

The Inquiry recommended creating an independent statutory resilience body for civil emergencies. In April 2026, Dan Jarvis, for the Cabinet Office, stated that convening independent panels to scrutinise whole-system risks forms the government's response, though the Minister did not mention creating a statutory body (Dan Jarvis, Apr 2026). In March 2026, the National Preparedness Commission stated that the recommendation had been rejected and questioned whether ad hoc panels would adequately substitute for an independent scrutinising body (House of Lords National Resilience Committee, Mar 2026; House of Lords National Resilience Committee, Mar 2026). The department had previously stated in July 2025 that a statutory body was not necessary because it could not outsource responsibility for response plans (Cabinet Office, Jul 2025; Cabinet Office, Jul 2025).

UK Government · 16 Jan 2025 Under consideration
Words of: UK Government (Cabinet Office), UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 1 Report (CP 1240), January 2025
Since the pandemic, significant strategic and material changes have been made to the way in which the UK and devolved governments handle crises. Considerable progress has been made against the longer-term programme to build a more resilient UK. The UK and devolved governments now have greater access to strategic expert advice and challenge. The government recognises the need to go further, to ensure the system benefits from fresh thinking and new perspectives. Local Resilience Forums (LRFs) will be key in this, given they provide critical knowledge and expertise by bringing multi agency partnerships together to plan, prepare for and recover …
Read full response to COVID-M1.10 (opens in a new tab)
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View details of COVID-M1.10
COVID-M2.9
Under consideration

NI Emergency Powers Review

Recommendation
The Northern Ireland Executive and UK government (in consultation with the Irish government where necessary) should review the structures and delegated powers of government in Northern Ireland to consider: the empowerment of the First Minister and deputy First Minister jointly …
In brief (written by this site)

The Northern Ireland Executive stated in March 2026 that the recommendation remained under consideration, explaining that it was working to enhance civil service redeployment powers while engaging with an Assembly committee on ministerial emergency powers (Northern Ireland Executive response, Mar 2026). The UK Government (Cabinet Office) stated in March 2026 that local parties should consider any institutional changes, though it stood ready to discuss proposals and consult the Irish government (Cabinet Office response, Mar 2026). The record holds no update since the UK Government (Cabinet Office)'s response of March 2026 (Cabinet Office response, Mar 2026).

UK Government · 25 Mar 2026 Under consideration
Words of: UK Government (Cabinet Office), UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 2 Report (CP 1534), 25 March 2026
We remain steadfastly committed to supporting devolution in Northern Ireland and to learning the lessons from the Inquiry, both to protect citizens and to help prepare us for the future. The Module 2 report has clearly shown that improvements are required of all governments, including the Northern Ireland Executive, in how they respond to future crises. While we acknowledge that power-sharing has its challenges, we are clear that all governments must work in the best interests of everyone across the UK. The UK Government notes the findings of the Inquiry that the Northern Ireland Executive’s decision-making in response to the …
Read full response to COVID-M2.9 (opens in a new tab)

Northern Ireland Executive · 18 Mar 2026 Under consideration
Words of: Northern Ireland Executive, Executive Response to the Covid-19 Module 2 Report March 2026, 18 March 2026
Remains under consideration This recommendation consists of three elements, the first being the ability to the empower the First Minister and deputy First Minister jointly to direct the work of other ministers and departments during an emergency. The third element relates to ensuring that decision-making normally subject to ministerial approval during an emergency when power-sharing arrangements are suspended are provided for. These recommendations are complex and need to be considered in the context of existing civil contingencies arrangements and the regime applied at the time to any emergency. They should, therefore, be addressed alongside Recommendations 10 and 12, which deal …
Read full response to COVID-M2.9 (opens in a new tab)
Northern Ireland Executive (Primary)
View details of COVID-M2.9
COVID-M3.7
Under consideration

ICU Resource Allocation Framework

Recommendation
The UK government and devolved administrations should publish a UK-wide framework setting out ethical and operational principles to guide the allocation of adult intensive care resources in the extreme event that they are saturated during a pandemic. That framework must: …
In brief (written by this site)

The Department of Health and Social Care stated in September 2026 that it will explore developing principles to guide adult intensive care allocation during pandemic saturation, but noted that formulating a plan and timeline will take longer than six months (Department of Health and Social Care and Cabinet Office response, Sep 2026). That month, the Scottish Government accepted the recommendation in principle and confirmed work with the other nations, while health advisers and ministers in Wales likewise committed to developing a UK-wide framework (Scottish Government response, Sep 2026; Welsh Government response, Sep 2026). The department stated it will provide an update in May 2027 through the inquiry implementation dashboard, and the record holds no update since the Welsh Government's response of September 2026 (Department of Health and Social Care and Cabinet Office response, Sep 2026; Welsh Government response, Sep 2026).

Welsh Government · 17 Sep 2026 Noted
Words of: Welsh Government, UK Covid-19 Inquiry Module 3 report (Impact of Covid-19 pandemic on healthcare systems across the UK): Welsh Government response, 17 September 2026
7.1 The Welsh Government recognises the importance of having clear ethical and operational principles to guide decision‑making in the extreme situation that adult intensive care services become saturated during a pandemic. Any framework would need to support clinicians, protect patients’ rights, promote fair and consistent decisions and maintain public confidence. 7.2 At the start of the Covid‑19 pandemic, the NHS in Wales used the 2017 All‑Wales Critical Care Escalation Guidance. This guidance, set out how intensive care units should respond to increasing pressure. However, it did not set out how decisions should be made if demand became greater than the …
Read full response to COVID-M3.7 (opens in a new tab)

Scottish Government · 17 Sep 2026 Accepted in part
Words of: Scottish Government, UK Covid-19 Inquiry Module 3 report: Scottish Government response, page 8, 17 September 2026
The Scottish Government accepts this recommendation in principle and is now working with the other three UK nations to agree a plan to meet this recommendation. This will involve developing an ethical framework of principles that will help guide clinical decision making in intensive care in extreme circumstances beyond usual ‘surge’ levels. It is important to note that this is intended to be used only as a last resort, and that the actions under Recommendations 5 and 6, if effective, should prevent the need for these principles to be put into practice. We are clear that these principles should be …
Read full response to COVID-M3.7 (opens in a new tab)

Department of Health and Social Care · 14 Sep 2026 Under consideration
Words of: UK government (Department of Health and Social Care), UK government response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 3 report (CP 1664), 14 September 2026
The government will explore developing a recognised set of principles to be applied when considering the allocation of adult intensive care resources in the extreme event that they are saturated during a pandemic. However, as there are complex and nuanced policy considerations, it will take the government longer than 6 months to develop a plan and timeline for completing this work. We are considering how to approach this work and what would best suit the existing health systems across the UK. We will provide an update in May 2027 through the UK Covid-19 Inquiry implementation dashboard.
Read full response to COVID-M3.7 (opens in a new tab)
Department of Health and Social Care (Primary)
View details of COVID-M3.7