UK COVID-19 Inquiry

Ongoing

COVID-19 Inquiry

Chair Baroness Heather Hallett Judge / Judiciary
Established 28 Apr 2022
Commissioned by Cabinet Office Commissioned by the Prime Minister

Public inquiry examining the UK's response to and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, and learning lessons for the future. The inquiry is examining preparedness, decision-making, health and social care, vaccines, and the impact on different communities.

4 years, 1 month Duration (ongoing)
£192m Total Cost
Government Response

Total Recommendations 44
Data last updated: 16 Apr 2026
Data verified: 26 May 2026 (import)
How to read this

Government Response tracks what the government said it would do (accepted, rejected, etc.).

Full methodology

9 debates 110 questions 36 statements since Jul 2020
Written Ministerial Statement UK COVID-19 Inquiry response costs for Quarter 3 25/26
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour)
20 May 2026
Written Ministerial Statement UK COVID-19 Inquiry response costs for Quarter 3 25/26
Nick Thomas-Symonds (Labour)
20 May 2026
Written Question Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme
Ian Roome (Liberal Democrat)
19 May 2026
Written Ministerial Statement UK Covid-19 Inquiry Module 4 Report
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
16 Apr 2026
Written Ministerial Statement UK Covid-19 Inquiry Module 4 Report
Sir Keir Starmer (Labour)
16 Apr 2026
View all 254 mentions →
12 May 2021
Inquiry Announced

Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced a statutory public inquiry.

Source
15 Dec 2021
Chair Appointed

Baroness Hallett appointed as Chair.

28 Jun 2022
Terms of Reference Set

Terms of Reference finalised after consultation.

Source
04 Oct 2022
Preliminary Hearing

First preliminary hearing held.

13 Jun 2023
Module 1 Hearings Begin

Module 1 examining preparedness and resilience began.

03 Oct 2023
Module 2 Hearings

Module 2 examining core UK decision-making.

15 Jan 2024
Module 2 Devolved Nations

Hearings examining Scottish, Welsh and NI decision-making.

18 Jul 2024
Module 1 Report Published

First report on pandemic preparedness published.

Source
09 Sep 2024
Module 3: Healthcare

Module 3 examining impact on healthcare systems began.

31 Dec 2025
Further Modules Planned

Modules on vaccines, care sector, and other topics planned through 2026.

Total Inquiry Cost (Cumulative) £192,035,000
Cost Breakdown (to Sep 2025)
Inquiry Legal Costs £59,430,000 Panel remuneration & Counsel to the Inquiry
Core Participant Legal Costs £51,405,000 Legal funding for core participants
Panel £835,000
Staff £27,758,000
Other £52,607,000
Cumulative figures from FY25-26 Q2 report. Staff costs = Inquiry Secretariat only (Permanent/Contingent staff tracked separately in some years but not in cumulative). Other includes: Every Story Matters, Modules, Operational and Cross-cutting, and miscellaneous.
Cost History
Period Total Inquiry Legal CP Legal Source
Sep 2025 £19,012,000 £10,892,000 £8,471,000
Sep 2025 (cum.) £192,035,000 £59,430,000 £51,405,000
Mar 2025 £66,723,000 £18,704,000 £20,470,000
Mar 2024 £80,889,000 £20,453,000 £19,335,000
Mar 2023 £25,625,000 £9,210,000 £3,129,000

Recommendations (44)

COVID-M1.1
Accepted
Simplify Emergency Preparedness Structures
Recommendation
The governments of the UK, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland should each simplify and reduce the number of structures with responsibility for preparing for and building resilience to whole-system civil emergencies. The core structures should be: a single Cabinet-level or … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The government accepted this recommendation in its response published 16 January 2025, agreeing that clear governance is needed to build resilience across the UK (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 1 Report, Cabinet Office, 16 January 2025).
- The Prime Minister established the National Security Council (Resilience) as a single Cabinet-level committee in July 2024, chaired by the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, with the Health Secretary as a standing member (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 1 Report, Cabinet Office, 16 January 2025).
- A Resilience Steering Board was created at Director level, meeting monthly, with senior officials from devolved governments attending (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 1 Report, Cabinet Office, 16 January 2025).
- The July 2025 implementation update marked this recommendation as CLOSED, confirming governance for catastrophic risks had been refreshed with co-chaired risk boards and increased meeting frequency (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M1.2
Accepted in Part
Cabinet Office Leadership for Emergencies
Recommendation
The UK government should: abolish the lead government department model for whole-system civil emergency preparedness and resilience; and require the Cabinet Office to lead on preparing for and building resilience to whole-system civil emergencies across UK government departments, including monitoring … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The government accepted this recommendation with modification in its response published 16 January 2025, retaining the Lead Government Department model but expanding the Cabinet Office role for catastrophic risks (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 1 Report, Cabinet Office, 16 January 2025).
- The government stated the Lead Government Department model "remains essential because departments with day-to-day responsibility are best positioned to manage risks" (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 1 Report, Cabinet Office, 16 January 2025).
- The Amber Book was published in April 2025, embedding the Cabinet Office leadership role, and central operational plans for each catastrophic risk were created (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- The July 2025 implementation update marked this recommendation as IN PROGRESS, with Lead Government Department Expectations guidance due by end of 2025 (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M1.3
Accepted
Improved Risk Assessment Approach
Recommendation
The UK government and devolved administrations should work together on developing a new approach to risk assessment that moves away from a reliance on single reasonable worst-case scenarios towards an approach that: assesses a wider range of scenarios representative of … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The government accepted this recommendation in its response published 16 January 2025, agreeing with the need to improve risk assessment beyond single reasonable worst-case scenarios (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 1 Report, Cabinet Office, 16 January 2025).
- The National Risk Register was updated in January 2025 with a dynamic assessment model enabling more frequent risk evaluations (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- A Risk Vulnerability Tool was developed for analysing societal vulnerabilities and disproportionate impacts, and a Risk and Insight Navigator platform was in testing (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- The first-ever public analysis of 26 chronic risks was published in July 2025 (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- The July 2025 implementation update marked this recommendation as IN PROGRESS, with an NSRA methodology review beginning late 2025 and a pilot of alternative risk assessment approaches with the Royal Academy of Engineering (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M1.4
Accepted in Part
UK-wide Civil Emergency Strategy
Recommendation
The UK government and devolved administrations should together introduce a UK-wide whole-system civil emergency strategy (which includes pandemics) to prevent each emergency and also to reduce, control and mitigate its effects. The strategy should: be adaptable; include sections dedicated to … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The government accepted this recommendation with modification in its response published 16 January 2025, rejecting a single unified UK strategy as "unwieldy" but committing to a common strategic approach through coordinated sector-specific strategies (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 1 Report, Cabinet Office, 16 January 2025).
- The Autumn 2024 budget announced £460 million for pandemic preparedness (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 1 Report, Cabinet Office, 16 January 2025).
- The Resilience Action Plan was published on 8 July 2025 (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- The July 2025 implementation update marked this recommendation as IN PROGRESS, with a pandemic preparedness strategy targeted for autumn 2025 and a DHSC respiratory response plan due summer 2025 (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M1.5
Accepted
Pandemic Data Systems and Research
Recommendation
The UK government, working with the devolved administrations, should establish mechanisms for the timely collection, analysis, secure sharing and use of reliable data for informing emergency responses, in advance of future pandemics. Data systems should be tested in pandemic exercises. … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The government accepted this recommendation in its response published 16 January 2025, agreeing that data and research are crucial to pandemic preparedness (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 1 Report, Cabinet Office, 16 January 2025).
- The National Situation Centre, established in 2021, had mapped and ingested over 700 datasets covering 85% of NSRA risks (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 1 Report, Cabinet Office, 16 January 2025).
- The Biothreats Radar was launched on the National Situation Centre platform for human, plant and animal health scanning (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- The NHS Research Secure Data Environment had 504 projects delivered, in progress or in pipeline as of March 2025, and NHS DigiTrials had 1.35 million citizens consented into 7 clinical trials as of May 2025 (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- The July 2025 implementation update marked this recommendation as IN PROGRESS, with data-sharing MOUs with devolved governments agreed but pending signing (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M1.6
Accepted
Triennial Pandemic Exercises
Recommendation
The UK government and devolved administrations should together hold a UK-wide pandemic response exercise at least every three years. The exercise should: test the UK-wide, cross-government, national and local response to a pandemic at all stages, from the initial outbreak … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The government accepted this recommendation in its response published 16 January 2025, programming a Tier 1 ministerial-level pandemic exercise for 2025 (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 1 Report, Cabinet Office, 16 January 2025).
- Exercise PEGASUS was scheduled for September–November 2025, involving all four nations (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- A National Exercising Programme was established with annual Tier 1 exercises planned for 2026–2030 (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- The July 2025 implementation update marked this recommendation as IN PROGRESS (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- No published report on the completion or findings of Exercise PEGASUS has been identified as of March 2026.
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M1.7
Accepted
Publish Exercise Reports and Lessons
Recommendation
For all civil emergency exercises, the governments of the UK, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland should each (unless there are reasons of national security for not doing so): publish an exercise report summarising the findings, lessons and recommendations, within three … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The government accepted this recommendation in its response published 16 January 2025, committing to publish findings from Tier 1 exercises unless there are justifiable national security reasons not to (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 1 Report, Cabinet Office, 16 January 2025).
- The UK Resilience Academy was launched in April 2025 with an Exercising Hub (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- A cross-government Lessons Management framework was under development, with guidance recommending publication within 3 months but acknowledging governance may extend timelines to approximately 12 months (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- The July 2025 implementation update marked this recommendation as IN PROGRESS, with a UK-wide online repository for exercise information still to be created (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M1.8
Accepted in Part
Triennial Parliamentary Resilience Reports
Recommendation
The governments of the UK, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland should each produce and publish reports to their respective legislatures at least every three years on whole-system civil emergency preparedness and resilience. The reports should include as a minimum: the … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The government accepted this recommendation in its response published 16 January 2025, committing to annual statements to Parliament on civil contingency risk (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 1 Report, Cabinet Office, 16 January 2025).
- The Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster delivered the 2025 Annual Statement to Parliament on risk and resilience on 8 July 2025 (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- The UK Biological Security Strategy implementation report was published in July 2025 (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- The July 2025 implementation update marked this recommendation as CLOSED, with annual Parliamentary statements on risk and resilience confirmed as ongoing (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M1.9
Accepted
External Red Teams for Resilience
Recommendation
The governments of the UK, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland should each introduce the use of red teams in the Civil Service to scrutinise and challenge the principles, evidence, policies and advice relating to preparedness for and resilience to whole-system … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The government accepted this recommendation in its response published 16 January 2025, agreeing that red teams are an effective means to scrutinise and challenge emergency preparedness (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 1 Report, Cabinet Office, 16 January 2025).
- Five of eight planned expert advisory groups had been established, with the remaining three expected by early 2026 (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- The Crisis Management Excellence Programme had trained over 2,100 civil servants, with ministerial training initiated in July 2025 (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- The July 2025 implementation update marked this recommendation as IN PROGRESS, with a red teaming pilot planned for the 2025/26 Capabilities Assessment and broader red teaming capability development due autumn 2026 (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M1.10
Under Consideration
Independent Statutory Resilience Body
Recommendation
The UK government should, in consultation with the devolved administrations, create a statutory independent body for whole-system civil emergency preparedness and resilience. The new body should be given responsibility for: providing independent, strategic advice to the UK government and devolved … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The government rejected the creation of a new statutory independent body as recommended, instead proposing an alternative approach through strengthened existing advisory mechanisms (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 1 Report, Cabinet Office, 16 January 2025).
- The government stated it "will always remain responsible and accountable for policy and resource allocation" and determined an independent statutory body was unnecessary given existing expert advisory structures (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 1 Report, Cabinet Office, 16 January 2025).
- As an alternative, the UK Resilience Academy will convene expert panels chaired by external figures to scrutinise whole-system risk preparedness, with findings to be published alongside government responses (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- The July 2025 implementation update marked this recommendation as IN PROGRESS, with a pilot process running in the second half of 2025 and panel operations commencing from April 2026 (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M2.1
Not Applicable
NI CMO Independence
Recommendation
The Department of Health (Northern Ireland) should reconstitute the role of the Chief Medical Officer for Northern Ireland as an independent advisory role. The Chief Medical Officer for Northern Ireland should not have managerial responsibilities within the Department of Health … Read more
Published evidence summary
- This recommendation is addressed to the Department of Health (Northern Ireland), not the UK government.
- The UK government stated in its Module 2 response (25 March 2026) that this recommendation is not for it to respond to (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 2 Report, CP 1534, 25 March 2026).
- No published response from the Northern Ireland Department of Health has been identified.
Department of Health NI (Primary) Northern Ireland Executive (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M2.2
Accepted
Devolved Nations SAGE Attendance
Recommendation
The Government Office for Science (GO-Science) should invite the governments of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland to nominate a small number of representatives to attend meetings of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) from the outset of any future … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The UK government stated in its Module 2 response (25 March 2026) that GO-Science has already made the required changes to address this recommendation (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 2 Report, CP 1534, 25 March 2026).
- According to the response, the three Chief Scientific Advisers of the devolved governments will be invited to SAGE from the outset of any future emergency, with participant or observer status decided by the Government Chief Scientific Adviser.
- Chief Medical Officers and Chief Veterinary Officers of the devolved governments will also be invited where relevant.
- These arrangements have not yet been tested in a real emergency activation since the policy change. No independent verification of the operational readiness of these arrangements has been published.
Government Office for Science (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M2.3
Accepted
UK-wide Expert Register
Recommendation
The Government Office for Science (GO-Science) should develop and maintain a register of experts across the four nations of the UK who would be willing to participate in scientific advisory groups, covering a broad range of potential civil emergencies. Read more
Published evidence summary
- The UK government stated in its Module 2 response (25 March 2026) that GO-Science already maintains an expert register for SAGE (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 2 Report, CP 1534, 25 March 2026).
- GO-Science committed to refreshing expert selection processes during 2026, including practical steps to support greater diversity.
- The response describes open calls for applications as a 'longer-term ambition' rather than a current commitment, citing resource implications and the need for flexible selection processes.
- No independent assessment of the current register's breadth or diversity has been published.
Government Office for Science (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M2.4
Accepted
Publish Technical Advice During Emergencies
Recommendation
During a whole-system civil emergency, the UK government and devolved administrations should each routinely publish technical advice on scientific, economic and social matters at the earliest opportunity, as well as the minutes of expert advisory groups – except where there … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The UK government stated in its Module 2 response (25 March 2026) that it agrees with the importance of publishing technical advice during emergencies (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 2 Report, CP 1534, 25 March 2026).
- The Amber Book was updated in April 2025 and sets out a national framework for crisis response, including provisions for scientific and technical advice (Managing Crisis in Central Government, Cabinet Office, April 2025).
- GO-Science and Cabinet Office published updated SAGE guidance in 2024 stating that SAGE papers and minutes will be published 'as and when appropriate' in future emergencies.
- The GOV.UK/PREPARE website provides public-facing emergency preparedness guidance.
- The response notes that full disclosure may not always be appropriate, leaving discretion with the government of the day.
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M2.5
Accepted
Advisory Group Terms of Appointment
Recommendation
The Government Office for Science (GO-Science), the Scottish Government, the Welsh Government and the Department of Health (Northern Ireland) should each develop standard terms of appointment for all participants in scientific advisory groups. These terms should include: clarity around the … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The UK government stated in its Module 2 response (25 March 2026) that GO-Science already provides support to SAGE participants including guidance documents, wellbeing services, and security advice (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 2 Report, CP 1534, 25 March 2026).
- GO-Science committed to reviewing and updating terms, conditions and support for participants by 2027.
- The response states GO-Science will develop guidance on compensation for participants whose time commitment results in significant absence from substantive roles.
- The 2027 deadline has not yet passed; no updated terms have been published.
Government Office for Science (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M2.6
Accepted
Enact Socio-economic Duty
Recommendation
The UK government should bring into force in England section 1 of the Equality Act 2010, implementing the socio-economic duty. The Northern Ireland Assembly and Northern Ireland Executive should consider an equivalent provision within section 75 of the Northern Ireland … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The UK government stated in its Module 2 response (25 March 2026) that it is working toward commencement of the socio-economic duty under section 1 of the Equality Act 2010 (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 2 Report, CP 1534, 25 March 2026).
- The response states that statutory guidance is being drafted and engagement with listed public bodies is underway.
- Section 1 of the Equality Act 2010 remains uncommenced in England as of March 2026, though it has been commenced in Scotland (since April 2018) and Wales (since March 2021).
- No commencement date or draft statutory guidance has been published.
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M2.7
Under Consideration
Statutory Child Rights Impact Assessments
Recommendation

The UK government should introduce legislation to place child rights impact assessments on a statutory footing in England. The Northern Ireland Executive should consider an equivalent provision.

Published evidence summary
- The UK government stated in its Module 2 response (25 March 2026) that it does not intend to introduce legislation to make child rights impact assessments (CRIAs) a statutory requirement at this time (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 2 Report, CP 1534, 25 March 2026).
- The response states the government considers that mandating CRIAs risks making them a 'mechanical recitation of points' rather than a meaningful tool.
- The government indicated it will consider findings from the Module 8 report (on children and young people) when published.
- The Department for Education is working with Cabinet Office to incorporate children's interests into crisis planning.
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M2.8
Accepted
Vulnerable People Framework
Recommendation
The UK government, Scottish Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Executive should each agree a framework that identifies people who would be most at risk of becoming infected by and dying from a disease and those who are most likely … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The UK government stated in its Module 2 response (25 March 2026) that it agrees with the importance of identifying and protecting those most at risk (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 2 Report, CP 1534, 25 March 2026).
- DHSC published a Pandemic Preparedness Strategy on 25 March 2026, which includes commitments on vulnerability frameworks.
- Cabinet Office published updated guidance on identifying vulnerable people in emergencies in April 2025 (Identifying and supporting persons who are vulnerable in an emergency, Cabinet Office, April 2025).
- The UK Government Resilience Action Plan was published in July 2025.
- The National Situation Centre has created a Risk Vulnerability Tool to estimate vulnerable populations.
- NHS England's Core20PLUS5 framework is in use to address healthcare inequalities.
- DHSC has committed to reviewing existing guidance to identify gaps, but this review is still underway.
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M2.9
Under Consideration
NI Emergency Powers Review
Recommendation
The Northern Ireland Executive and UK government (in consultation with the Irish government where necessary) should review the structures and delegated powers of government in Northern Ireland to consider: the empowerment of the First Minister and deputy First Minister jointly … Read more
Published evidence summary
- This recommendation is primarily addressed to the Northern Ireland Executive and UK government jointly.
- The UK government stated in its Module 2 response (25 March 2026) that it believes the Northern Ireland Executive and parties should consider how necessary changes should be made (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 2 Report, CP 1534, 25 March 2026).
- The response notes the Assembly and Executive Review Committee is currently considering whether the institutions require wider reform.
- The UK government stated it will stand ready to discuss proposals for changes to the Strand One institutions.
- No specific legislative or structural changes have been announced.
Northern Ireland Executive (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M2.10
Accepted
Pandemic Decision-Making Framework
Recommendation
The UK government and devolved administrations should set out in future pandemic preparedness strategies how decision-making will work in a future pandemic. This should include provision for COBR to be used as the initial response structure and set out how … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The UK government stated in its Module 2 response (25 March 2026) that it has developed risk-specific operational plans for pandemics including a Concept of Operations setting out decision-making arrangements (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 2 Report, CP 1534, 25 March 2026).
- DHSC published a Pandemic Preparedness Strategy on 25 March 2026.
- The Amber Book, updated April 2025, provides a default model recommending two Cabinet committees (Strategy and Operations) for pandemic response (Managing Crisis in Central Government, Cabinet Office, April 2025).
- The response states COBR would be used for initial response, with transition to a taskforce model for enduring response.
- Devolved governments would be invited to participate in COBR and taskforce meetings.
- The Minister for Women and Equalities will be engaged in decision-making on vulnerable groups.
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M2.11
Accepted
Leadership Succession Arrangements
Recommendation
The UK government and the devolved administrations should each establish formal arrangements for covering the roles of Prime Minister and First Minister (and in Northern Ireland, deputy First Minister) as applicable during a whole-system civil emergency, should the incumbent be … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The UK government stated in its Module 2 response (25 March 2026) that it accepts the recommendation and the Prime Minister will put in place appropriate arrangements (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 2 Report, CP 1534, 25 March 2026).
- No details were provided on the specific form these contingency arrangements will take.
- No published documentation of formal succession or deputisation arrangements for the Prime Minister during emergencies has been identified.
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M2.12
Accepted
Central Emergency Taskforces
Recommendation
The response to a future whole-system civil emergency should be coordinated via central taskforces in each of the UK, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, with responsibility for the commissioning and synthesis of advice, coordination of a single data picture and … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The UK government stated in its Module 2 response (25 March 2026) that it has revised crisis management governance processes (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 2 Report, CP 1534, 25 March 2026).
- The Amber Book, updated April 2025, sets out principles for establishing and running a taskforce for protracted crises (Managing Crisis in Central Government, Cabinet Office, April 2025).
- Operational plans for a pandemic taskforce have been drafted within the Cabinet Office Pandemic Concept of Operations.
- Exercise Pegasus (Autumn 2025) tested key elements of a taskforce model, including devolved government liaison officers.
- The Pandemic Concept of Operations has not been published; Exercise Pegasus post-exercise report is expected Winter 2026.
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M2.13
Not Applicable
NI Executive Confidentiality Duty
Recommendation

The Executive Office should amend the Ministerial Code to impose a duty of confidentiality on ministers that prohibits the disclosure of the individual views of ministers expressed during meetings of the Northern Ireland Executive Committee.

Published evidence summary
- This recommendation is addressed to the Northern Ireland Executive Office, not the UK government.
- The UK government stated in its Module 2 response (25 March 2026) that this recommendation is not for it to respond to (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 2 Report, CP 1534, 25 March 2026).
- No published response from the Northern Ireland Executive Office has been identified.
The Executive Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M2.14
Accepted
Accessible Emergency Communications
Recommendation
The UK government and the devolved administrations should each develop action plans for how government communications will be made more accessible during a pandemic. As a minimum, these should include making provision for the translation of government press conferences into … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The UK government stated in its Module 2 response (25 March 2026) that it has implemented measures to improve crisis communications (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 2 Report, CP 1534, 25 March 2026).
- The GCS Crisis Communications Operating Model was updated in 2023 (Crisis Communications Operating Model, Government Communication Service, 2023).
- New crisis communication planning guidance was issued to departments in 2024 (Crisis Comms Planning Guide, Government Communication Service, 2024).
- A BSL interpretation protocol has been established in accordance with the BSL Act 2022.
- A central New Media Unit was launched in the Cabinet Office.
- Communication teams participated in Exercise Pegasus (September-October 2025).
- No independent assessment of the accessibility or effectiveness of these measures has been published.
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M2.15
Accepted in Part
Parliamentary Scrutiny of Emergency Powers
Recommendation
The UK government and devolved administrations should ensure that the draft affirmative procedure is the standard process for enacting substantial and wide-ranging powers in a civil emergency, such as a pandemic, under primary public health legislation. Any departure from this … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The UK government stated in its Module 2 response (25 March 2026) that it agrees the legislative response to emergencies should be subject to parliamentary oversight (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 2 Report, CP 1534, 25 March 2026).
- The 2025 Guide to Making Legislation includes a Delegated Powers Toolkit setting out considerations for delegated powers (Guide to Making Legislation, Cabinet Office, 2025).
- The response does not commit to making the draft affirmative procedure the standard process, stating that different emergencies may require different legislative approaches on a case-by-case basis.
- No specific commitment to mandatory sunset clauses or bimonthly ministerial reporting has been made.
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M2.16
Accepted
Civil Contingencies Act Review
Recommendation
The UK government should undertake a review of the Civil Contingencies Act 2004 to assess its potential role in managing future civil emergencies, including pandemics, and whether it could be employed as an interim emergency framework until more specific legislation … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The UK government stated in its Module 2 response (25 March 2026) that it agrees the Civil Contingencies Act 2004 should be reviewed (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 2 Report, CP 1534, 25 March 2026).
- The next Post Implementation Review of the CCA 2004 Regulations is due to be laid in Parliament by March 2027.
- The government stated it will use this review to explore the applicability of Part 2 emergency powers to pandemics, including potential adjustments to safeguards such as the triple lock test.
- The review has not yet been completed or published.
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M2.17
Accepted in Part
Public Emergency Information Portal
Recommendation
The UK government, Scottish Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Executive should develop an online portal for use in future civil emergencies, where members of the public can access information on the legal restrictions that apply in their area and … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The UK government stated in its Module 2 response (25 March 2026) that it agrees with the aim of making restrictions and guidance accessible but does not agree with the proposed approach of a single online portal (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 2 Report, CP 1534, 25 March 2026).
- The response cites information ownership constraints: different communication channels are owned by different bodies, and devolved governments have specific responsibilities.
- The government points to GOV.UK, GOV.UK/Prepare, and the Resilience Direct platform as existing tools.
- Work with devolved governments on crisis communications coordination is planned for 2026, including co-producing shared principles for aligning communications.
- No single repository for restrictions and guidance has been developed.
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M2.18
Accepted
Devolved Nations COBR Attendance
Recommendation
The UK government should invite the devolved administrations, as a matter of standard practice, to nominate relevant ministers and officials to attend COBR meetings in the event of relevant whole-system civil emergencies that have the potential to have UK-wide effects. Read more
Published evidence summary
- The UK government stated in its Module 2 response (25 March 2026) that it agrees devolved government representatives should be invited to COBR (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 2 Report, CP 1534, 25 March 2026).
- The Amber Book, updated April 2025, states devolved government ministers and officials are invited to relevant meetings including COBR (Managing Crisis in Central Government, Cabinet Office, April 2025).
- The response states invitations remain on a case-by-case basis at the discretion of the Chair, rather than as a matter of standard practice as the Inquiry recommended.
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M2.19
Accepted
Four Nations Pandemic Structure
Recommendation
While intergovernmental relations should be facilitated through COBR in the initial months of any future pandemic, the UK government and devolved administrations should ensure that a specific four-nations structure, concerning pandemic response, is stood up at the same time as … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The UK government stated in its Module 2 response (25 March 2026) that it agrees a clear four-nations structure is needed during the transition from COBR to enduring pandemic response (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 2 Report, CP 1534, 25 March 2026).
- A review of intergovernmental relations was published jointly by the UK and devolved governments in 2022, establishing structures and ways of working adopted by all four governments.
- Cabinet Office collaborated with devolved governments on operational planning for the COBR-to-taskforce transition in preparation for Exercise Pegasus.
- Devolved government ministers and officials will be invited to COBR and taskforce Cabinet Committee meetings.
- The Exercise Pegasus post-exercise report, expected Winter 2026, has not yet been published.
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M3.1
No Published Response
IPC Structures and Transmission Risk
Recommendation
The UK government must ensure that there is a body (equivalent to the UK Infection Prevention and Control Cell) in place ready to be convened at the outset of any future pandemic, to consider and draft infection prevention and control … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The Module 3 report was published on 19 March 2026.
- No formal government response to Module 3 recommendations has been published as of March 2026.
- The report was published less than 2 weeks ago at the time of this assessment.
Department of Health and Social Care (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M3.2
No Published Response
Visiting Restrictions Guidance
Recommendation
The UK government, Scottish Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Executive should publish guidance for the implementation of visiting restrictions in hospitals in the event of a future pandemic. The guidance should identify the circumstances in which visiting restrictions should … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The Module 3 report was published on 19 March 2026.
- No formal government response to Module 3 recommendations has been published as of March 2026.
- The report was published less than 2 weeks ago at the time of this assessment.
Department of Health and Social Care (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M3.3
No Published Response
Fit-Testing Preparedness
Recommendation
The UK government, Scottish Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Executive should work with employers, including health boards and trusts, to review the availability of qualified fit testers and take steps to increase the number of fit testers accordingly. Availability … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The Module 3 report was published on 19 March 2026.
- No formal government response to Module 3 recommendations has been published as of March 2026.
- The report was published less than 2 weeks ago at the time of this assessment.
Department of Health and Social Care (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M3.4
No Published Response
Data Systems for High-Risk Individuals
Recommendation
The UK government, Scottish Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Executive must ensure that health data and digital systems have the capability to identify individuals at high risk of morbidity or mortality from a pandemic disease quickly and accurately in … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The Module 3 report was published on 19 March 2026.
- No formal government response to Module 3 recommendations has been published as of March 2026.
- The report was published less than 2 weeks ago at the time of this assessment.
Department of Health and Social Care (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M3.5
No Published Response
Scale Up Urgent and Emergency Care
Recommendation
The UK government, Scottish Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Executive, in conjunction with organisations responsible for delivering services, should plan for surge capacity in urgent and emergency care during a pandemic. Plans must ensure that there is sufficient workforce … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The Module 3 report was published on 19 March 2026.
- No formal government response to Module 3 recommendations has been published as of March 2026.
- The report was published less than 2 weeks ago at the time of this assessment.
Department of Health and Social Care (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M3.6
No Published Response
Scale Up Hospital Capacity
Recommendation
The UK government, Scottish Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Executive should work with trusts and health boards to ensure that pandemic plans include practical steps to rapidly scale up hospital capacity to treat acutely unwell patients. This should include … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The Module 3 report was published on 19 March 2026.
- No formal government response to Module 3 recommendations has been published as of March 2026.
- The report was published less than 2 weeks ago at the time of this assessment.
Department of Health and Social Care (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M3.7
No Published Response
ICU Resource Allocation Framework
Recommendation
The UK government and devolved administrations should publish a UK-wide framework setting out ethical and operational principles to guide the allocation of adult intensive care resources in the extreme event that they are saturated during a pandemic. That framework must: … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The Module 3 report was published on 19 March 2026.
- No formal government response to Module 3 recommendations has been published as of March 2026.
- The report was published less than 2 weeks ago at the time of this assessment.
Department of Health and Social Care (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M3.8
No Published Response
Recording Healthcare Worker Deaths
Recommendation
The UK government, Scottish Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Executive should work with their respective public health agencies and healthcare employers to develop nation-specific mechanisms to collect, analyse and publish data systematically on the deaths of healthcare workers in … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The Module 3 report was published on 19 March 2026.
- No formal government response to Module 3 recommendations has been published as of March 2026.
- The report was published less than 2 weeks ago at the time of this assessment.
Department of Health and Social Care (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M3.9
No Published Response
Standardised Advance Care Planning
Recommendation
The UK government, Scottish Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Executive, working with trusts and health boards, should establish and promote one standardised process across the UK (such as ReSPECT, the Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment) for … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The Module 3 report was published on 19 March 2026.
- No formal government response to Module 3 recommendations has been published as of March 2026.
- The report was published less than 2 weeks ago at the time of this assessment.
Department of Health and Social Care (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M3.10
No Published Response
Healthcare Worker Support
Recommendation
The UK government, Scottish Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Executive, working with healthcare employers and professional bodies, should put in place plans to deliver effective support for healthcare workers at scale from the outset of a pandemic. Plans should … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The Module 3 report was published on 19 March 2026.
- No formal government response to Module 3 recommendations has been published as of March 2026.
- The report was published less than 2 weeks ago at the time of this assessment.
Department of Health and Social Care (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M4.1
No Response
Establish Pharmaceutical Expert Advisory Panel
Recommendation
The UK government should establish a standing pharmaceutical expert advisory panel, in consultation with the Department of Health and Social Care and the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology. The panel should include ministers, civil servants and representatives from industry … Read more
Published evidence summary
No formal government response has been recorded for this recommendation. No independent verification has been carried out.
Department of Health and Social Care (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M4.2
No Published Response
Formalise Community Vaccine Equity Networks
Recommendation
The UK government, Scottish Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Executive should maintain networks with local communities to produce targeted vaccination strategies and communications. To achieve this: The Scottish Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Executive should establish local community … Read more
Published evidence summary
Government response: No Published Response. Status: Pending. No independent verification has been carried out.
UK Health Security Agency (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M4.3
No Published Response
Improve Vaccine Uptake Monitoring and Evaluation
Recommendation
Each of the four UK public health or health security agencies should work together to: maintain accurate, UK-wide insight into the state of vaccine uptake and hesitancy; and understand the measures proven to be effective in increasing uptake across the … Read more
Published evidence summary
Government response: No Published Response. Status: Pending. No independent verification has been carried out.
UK Health Security Agency (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M4.4
No Published Response
Proportionate Access to Linked Healthcare Records
Recommendation
The UK government and devolved administrations should work together, with their respective health delivery services, to facilitate and coordinate regulatory bodies' access to healthcare records in order to make the post-authorisation safety monitoring of new vaccines and therapeutics more efficient. … Read more
Published evidence summary
Government response: No Published Response. Status: Pending. No independent verification has been carried out.
Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M4.5
No Response
Reform Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme
Recommendation
The UK government must reform the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme as soon as possible. The reform should include as a minimum: increasing the £120,000 payment, at least in line with inflation to date; subsequently applying annual increases in line with … Read more
Published evidence summary
No formal government response has been recorded for this recommendation. No independent verification has been carried out.
Department for Work and Pensions (Primary)
View Details