UK COVID-19 Inquiry

Ongoing

COVID-19 Inquiry

Chair Baroness Heather Hallett Judge / Judiciary
Established 28 Apr 2022
Commissioned by Cabinet Office Commissioned by the Prime Minister

Public inquiry examining the UK's response to and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, and learning lessons for the future. The inquiry is examining preparedness, decision-making, health and social care, vaccines, and the impact on different communities.

Live tracking hearings, witnesses and documents synced daily from the inquiry website Open live tracker Search evidence
4 years, 3 months Duration (ongoing)
£213.7m Total Cost
Government Response

Total Recommendations 55
Data last updated: 16 Jul 2026
Data verified: 14 Jul 2026 (Claude)
How to read this

Government Response tracks what the government said it would do (accepted, rejected, etc.).

Full methodology

9 debates 98 questions 36 statements since Jul 2020
Written Question Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme
Sir Christopher Chope (Conservative)
03 Jun 2026
Written Question Covid-19 Inquiry
Jess Asato (Labour)
01 Jun 2026
Written Ministerial Statement UK COVID-19 Inquiry response costs for Quarter 3 25/26
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour)
20 May 2026
Written Ministerial Statement UK COVID-19 Inquiry response costs for Quarter 3 25/26
Nick Thomas-Symonds (Labour)
20 May 2026
Written Question Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme
Ian Roome (Liberal Democrat)
19 May 2026
View all 242 mentions →
12 May 2021
Inquiry announced

Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced a statutory public inquiry.

Source
15 Dec 2021
Chair Appointed

Baroness Hallett appointed as Chair.

28 Jun 2022
Terms of Reference published

Terms of Reference finalised after consultation.

Source
04 Oct 2022
Preliminary Hearing

First preliminary hearing held.

13 Jun 2023
Module 1 hearings open

Module 1 examining preparedness and resilience began.

03 Oct 2023
Module 2 Hearings

Module 2 examining core UK decision-making.

15 Jan 2024
Module 2 Devolved Nations

Hearings examining Scottish, Welsh and NI decision-making.

18 Jul 2024
Module 1 report published

First report on pandemic preparedness published.

Source
09 Sep 2024
Module 3: Healthcare

Module 3 examining impact on healthcare systems began.

20 Nov 2025
Module 2 report published

The Inquiry published its report on core UK decision-making and political governance (Modules 2, 2A, 2B and 2C).

Source
31 Dec 2025
Further Modules Planned

Modules on vaccines, care sector, and other topics planned through 2026.

05 Mar 2026
Hearings conclude

The Inquiry concluded its public hearings with Module 10, after 32 preliminary and 242 public hearing days involving 663 witnesses.

Source
19 Mar 2026
Module 3 report published

The Inquiry published its report on the impact of the pandemic on healthcare systems in the four nations (Module 3).

Source
16 Apr 2026
Module 4 report published

The Inquiry published its report on vaccines and therapeutics (Module 4).

Source
14 Jul 2026
Module 5 report published

The Inquiry published its report on procurement (Module 5).

Source
Total Inquiry Cost (Cumulative) £213,708,000
Cost Breakdown (to Mar 2026)
Inquiry Legal Costs £67,344,000 Panel remuneration & Counsel to the Inquiry
Core Participant Legal Costs £54,773,000 Legal funding for core participants
Panel £1,081,000
Staff £32,535,000
Safeguarding £15,584,000
Other £42,391,000
Hearings concluded 5 March 2026 (end of Module 10). Figures exclude VAT. Most expensive UK inquiry ever. Chair £1.1m; Counsel & Solicitors £67.3m; Section 40 (CP legal) £54.8m; Secretariat £32.5m; Every Story Matters/engagement £15.6m; Modules £8.9m; Operational £29.5m; Other £3.9m.
Cost History
Period Total Inquiry Legal CP Legal Source
Mar 2026 (cum.) £213,708,000 £67,344,000 £54,773,000
Sep 2025 £19,012,000 £10,892,000 £8,471,000
Mar 2025 £66,723,000 £18,704,000 £20,470,000
Mar 2024 £80,889,000 £20,453,000 £19,335,000
Mar 2023 £25,625,000 £9,210,000 £3,129,000

Recommendations (10)

COVID-M1.1
Accepted
Simplify Emergency Preparedness Structures
Recommendation
The governments of the UK, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland should each simplify and reduce the number of structures with responsibility for preparing for and building resilience to whole-system civil emergencies. The core structures should be: a single Cabinet-level or … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The available evidence indicates partial implementation across the relevant administrations. The UK Government recorded its governance work as closed, while the July 2026 Scottish update describes continuing regular Cabinet reporting rather than a finished one-off action.
- The government accepted this recommendation in its response published 16 January 2025, agreeing that clear governance is needed to build resilience across the UK (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 1 Report, Cabinet Office, 16 January 2025).
- The Prime Minister established the National Security Council (Resilience) as a single Cabinet-level committee in July 2024, chaired by the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, with the Health Secretary as a standing member (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 1 Report, Cabinet Office, 16 January 2025).
- A Resilience Steering Board was created at Director level, meeting monthly, with senior officials from devolved governments attending (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 1 Report, Cabinet Office, 16 January 2025).
- The July 2025 implementation update marked this recommendation as CLOSED, confirming governance for catastrophic risks had been refreshed with co-chaired risk boards and increased meeting frequency (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- The Scottish Government reported that its Cabinet received a written update on risk, resilience and preparedness in March 2026 and would continue to receive regular updates (Module 1 Progress Update, Scottish Government, 16 July 2026).
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M1.2
Accepted in Part
Cabinet Office Leadership for Emergencies
Recommendation
The UK government should: abolish the lead government department model for whole-system civil emergency preparedness and resilience; and require the Cabinet Office to lead on preparing for and building resilience to whole-system civil emergencies across UK government departments, including monitoring … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The government accepted this recommendation with modification in its response published 16 January 2025, retaining the Lead Government Department model but expanding the Cabinet Office role for catastrophic risks (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 1 Report, Cabinet Office, 16 January 2025).
- The government stated the Lead Government Department model "remains essential because departments with day-to-day responsibility are best positioned to manage risks" (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 1 Report, Cabinet Office, 16 January 2025).
- The Amber Book was published in April 2025, embedding the Cabinet Office leadership role, and central operational plans for each catastrophic risk were created (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- The July 2025 implementation update marked this recommendation as IN PROGRESS, with Lead Government Department Expectations guidance due by end of 2025 (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M1.3
Accepted
Improved Risk Assessment Approach
Recommendation
The UK government and devolved administrations should work together on developing a new approach to risk assessment that moves away from a reliance on single reasonable worst-case scenarios towards an approach that: assesses a wider range of scenarios representative of … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The available evidence indicates partial implementation across the UK. Scotland reported its action delivered and closed in May 2026, while the latest cited UK Government update still recorded wider methodology work as in progress.
- The government accepted this recommendation in its response published 16 January 2025, agreeing with the need to improve risk assessment beyond single reasonable worst-case scenarios (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 1 Report, Cabinet Office, 16 January 2025).
- The National Risk Register was updated in January 2025 with a dynamic assessment model enabling more frequent risk evaluations (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- A Risk Vulnerability Tool was developed for analysing societal vulnerabilities and disproportionate impacts, and a Risk and Insight Navigator platform was in testing (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- The first-ever public analysis of 26 chronic risks was published in July 2025 (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- The July 2025 implementation update marked this recommendation as IN PROGRESS, with an NSRA methodology review beginning late 2025 and a pilot of alternative risk assessment approaches with the Royal Academy of Engineering (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- The Scottish Government reported to the Inquiry chair that its action on this recommendation had been delivered and closed (Module 1 Progress Update, Scottish Government, 16 July 2026).
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M1.4
Accepted in Part
UK-wide Civil Emergency Strategy
Recommendation
The UK government and devolved administrations should together introduce a UK-wide whole-system civil emergency strategy (which includes pandemics) to prevent each emergency and also to reduce, control and mitigate its effects. The strategy should: be adaptable; include sections dedicated to … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The available evidence indicates partial implementation across the UK. Scotland reported its action delivered and closed, while the latest cited UK Government update still recorded the wider strategy work as in progress.
- The government accepted this recommendation with modification in its response published 16 January 2025, rejecting a single unified UK strategy as "unwieldy" but committing to a common strategic approach through coordinated sector-specific strategies (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 1 Report, Cabinet Office, 16 January 2025).
- The Autumn 2024 budget announced £460 million for pandemic preparedness (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 1 Report, Cabinet Office, 16 January 2025).
- The Resilience Action Plan was published on 8 July 2025 (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- The July 2025 implementation update marked this recommendation as IN PROGRESS, with a pandemic preparedness strategy targeted for autumn 2025 and a DHSC respiratory response plan due summer 2025 (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- The Scottish Government reported to the Inquiry chair that its action on this recommendation had been delivered and closed (Module 1 Progress Update, Scottish Government, 16 July 2026).
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M1.5
Accepted
Pandemic Data Systems and Research
Recommendation
The UK government, working with the devolved administrations, should establish mechanisms for the timely collection, analysis, secure sharing and use of reliable data for informing emergency responses, in advance of future pandemics. Data systems should be tested in pandemic exercises. … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The available evidence indicates partial implementation across the UK. Scotland reported its action delivered and closed, while the latest cited UK Government update still recorded data-sharing and related work as in progress.
- The government accepted this recommendation in its response published 16 January 2025, agreeing that data and research are crucial to pandemic preparedness (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 1 Report, Cabinet Office, 16 January 2025).
- The National Situation Centre, established in 2021, had mapped and ingested over 700 datasets covering 85% of NSRA risks (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 1 Report, Cabinet Office, 16 January 2025).
- The Biothreats Radar was launched on the National Situation Centre platform for human, plant and animal health scanning (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- The NHS Research Secure Data Environment had 504 projects delivered, in progress or in pipeline as of March 2025, and NHS DigiTrials had 1.35 million citizens consented into 7 clinical trials as of May 2025 (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- The July 2025 implementation update marked this recommendation as IN PROGRESS, with data-sharing MOUs with devolved governments agreed but pending signing (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- The Scottish Government reported to the Inquiry chair that its action on this recommendation had been delivered and closed (Module 1 Progress Update, Scottish Government, 16 July 2026).
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M1.6
Accepted
Triennial Pandemic Exercises
Recommendation
The UK government and devolved administrations should together hold a UK-wide pandemic response exercise at least every three years. The exercise should: test the UK-wide, cross-government, national and local response to a pandemic at all stages, from the initial outbreak … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The available evidence indicates partial implementation across the UK. Scotland reported its action delivered and closed, while the latest cited UK Government update still recorded the exercising programme as in progress.
- The government accepted this recommendation in its response published 16 January 2025, programming a Tier 1 ministerial-level pandemic exercise for 2025 (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 1 Report, Cabinet Office, 16 January 2025).
- Exercise PEGASUS was scheduled for September–November 2025, involving all four nations (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- A National Exercising Programme was established with annual Tier 1 exercises planned for 2026–2030 (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- The July 2025 implementation update marked this recommendation as IN PROGRESS (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- The Scottish Government reported to the Inquiry chair that its action on this recommendation had been delivered and closed (Module 1 Progress Update, Scottish Government, 16 July 2026).
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M1.7
Accepted
Publish Exercise Reports and Lessons
Recommendation
For all civil emergency exercises, the governments of the UK, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland should each (unless there are reasons of national security for not doing so): publish an exercise report summarising the findings, lessons and recommendations, within three … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The available evidence indicates that implementation is in progress. Exercise Pegasus evaluation was under way and both the Scottish and UK reports were due later in 2026; the publication and lessons-management elements were therefore not complete.
- The government accepted this recommendation in its response published 16 January 2025, committing to publish findings from Tier 1 exercises unless there are justifiable national security reasons not to (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 1 Report, Cabinet Office, 16 January 2025).
- The UK Resilience Academy was launched in April 2025 with an Exercising Hub (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- A cross-government Lessons Management framework was under development, with guidance recommending publication within 3 months but acknowledging governance may extend timelines to approximately 12 months (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- The July 2025 implementation update marked this recommendation as IN PROGRESS, with a UK-wide online repository for exercise information still to be created (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- The Scottish Government stated that Scottish and UK evaluations of Exercise Pegasus were under way and that both reports were due later in 2026 (Module 1 Progress Update, Scottish Government, 16 July 2026).
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M1.8
Accepted in Part
Triennial Parliamentary Resilience Reports
Recommendation
The governments of the UK, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland should each produce and publish reports to their respective legislatures at least every three years on whole-system civil emergency preparedness and resilience. The reports should include as a minimum: the … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The available official evidence indicates that this recommendation has been implemented. Both the UK and Scottish Governments recorded their actions as delivered or closed, with annual parliamentary reporting established as an ongoing process.
- The government accepted this recommendation in its response published 16 January 2025, committing to annual statements to Parliament on civil contingency risk (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 1 Report, Cabinet Office, 16 January 2025).
- The Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster delivered the 2025 Annual Statement to Parliament on risk and resilience on 8 July 2025 (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- The UK Biological Security Strategy implementation report was published in July 2025 (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- The July 2025 implementation update marked this recommendation as CLOSED, with annual Parliamentary statements on risk and resilience confirmed as ongoing (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- The Scottish Government reported to the Inquiry chair that its action on this recommendation had been delivered and closed (Module 1 Progress Update, Scottish Government, 16 July 2026).
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M1.9
Accepted
External Red Teams for Resilience
Recommendation
The governments of the UK, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland should each introduce the use of red teams in the Civil Service to scrutinise and challenge the principles, evidence, policies and advice relating to preparedness for and resilience to whole-system … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The available evidence indicates that implementation is in progress. Expert groups, training and pilot work had begun, but the cited updates still described red-team resources and wider capability as under development.
- The government accepted this recommendation in its response published 16 January 2025, agreeing that red teams are an effective means to scrutinise and challenge emergency preparedness (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 1 Report, Cabinet Office, 16 January 2025).
- Five of eight planned expert advisory groups had been established, with the remaining three expected by early 2026 (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- The Crisis Management Excellence Programme had trained over 2,100 civil servants, with ministerial training initiated in July 2025 (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- The July 2025 implementation update marked this recommendation as IN PROGRESS, with a red teaming pilot planned for the 2025/26 Capabilities Assessment and broader red teaming capability development due autumn 2026 (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- The Scottish Government reported that it was working with NHS Highland to develop red-team resources for civil contingencies (Module 1 Progress Update, Scottish Government, 16 July 2026).
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M1.10
Under Consideration
Independent Statutory Resilience Body
Recommendation
The UK government should, in consultation with the devolved administrations, create a statutory independent body for whole-system civil emergency preparedness and resilience. The new body should be given responsibility for: providing independent, strategic advice to the UK government and devolved … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The available evidence indicates partial implementation through differing approaches. Scotland reported its action delivered and closed; the UK Government rejected the proposed statutory body and was still implementing an alternative scrutiny model.
- The government rejected the creation of a new statutory independent body as recommended, instead proposing an alternative approach through strengthened existing advisory mechanisms (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 1 Report, Cabinet Office, 16 January 2025).
- The government stated it "will always remain responsible and accountable for policy and resource allocation" and determined an independent statutory body was unnecessary given existing expert advisory structures (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 1 Report, Cabinet Office, 16 January 2025).
- As an alternative, the UK Resilience Academy will convene expert panels chaired by external figures to scrutinise whole-system risk preparedness, with findings to be published alongside government responses (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- The July 2025 implementation update marked this recommendation as IN PROGRESS, with a pilot process running in the second half of 2025 and panel operations commencing from April 2026 (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- The Scottish Government reported to the Inquiry chair that its action on this recommendation had been delivered and closed; the UK Government had adopted an alternative approach and still recorded its work as in progress (Module 1 Progress Update, Scottish Government, 16 July 2026).
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details