UK COVID-19 Inquiry

Ongoing

COVID-19 Inquiry

Chair Baroness Heather Hallett Judge / Judiciary
Established 28 Apr 2022
Commissioned by Cabinet Office Commissioned by the Prime Minister

Public inquiry examining the UK's response to and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, and learning lessons for the future. The inquiry is examining preparedness, decision-making, health and social care, vaccines, and the impact on different communities.

4 years, 1 month Duration (ongoing)
£192m Total Cost
Government Response

Total Recommendations 44
Data last updated: 16 Apr 2026
Data verified: 26 May 2026 (import)
How to read this

Government Response tracks what the government said it would do (accepted, rejected, etc.).

Full methodology

9 debates 110 questions 36 statements since Jul 2020
Written Ministerial Statement UK COVID-19 Inquiry response costs for Quarter 3 25/26
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour)
20 May 2026
Written Ministerial Statement UK COVID-19 Inquiry response costs for Quarter 3 25/26
Nick Thomas-Symonds (Labour)
20 May 2026
Written Question Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme
Ian Roome (Liberal Democrat)
19 May 2026
Written Ministerial Statement UK Covid-19 Inquiry Module 4 Report
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
16 Apr 2026
Written Ministerial Statement UK Covid-19 Inquiry Module 4 Report
Sir Keir Starmer (Labour)
16 Apr 2026
View all 254 mentions →
12 May 2021
Inquiry Announced

Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced a statutory public inquiry.

Source
15 Dec 2021
Chair Appointed

Baroness Hallett appointed as Chair.

28 Jun 2022
Terms of Reference Set

Terms of Reference finalised after consultation.

Source
04 Oct 2022
Preliminary Hearing

First preliminary hearing held.

13 Jun 2023
Module 1 Hearings Begin

Module 1 examining preparedness and resilience began.

03 Oct 2023
Module 2 Hearings

Module 2 examining core UK decision-making.

15 Jan 2024
Module 2 Devolved Nations

Hearings examining Scottish, Welsh and NI decision-making.

18 Jul 2024
Module 1 Report Published

First report on pandemic preparedness published.

Source
09 Sep 2024
Module 3: Healthcare

Module 3 examining impact on healthcare systems began.

31 Dec 2025
Further Modules Planned

Modules on vaccines, care sector, and other topics planned through 2026.

Total Inquiry Cost (Cumulative) £192,035,000
Cost Breakdown (to Sep 2025)
Inquiry Legal Costs £59,430,000 Panel remuneration & Counsel to the Inquiry
Core Participant Legal Costs £51,405,000 Legal funding for core participants
Panel £835,000
Staff £27,758,000
Other £52,607,000
Cumulative figures from FY25-26 Q2 report. Staff costs = Inquiry Secretariat only (Permanent/Contingent staff tracked separately in some years but not in cumulative). Other includes: Every Story Matters, Modules, Operational and Cross-cutting, and miscellaneous.
Cost History
Period Total Inquiry Legal CP Legal Source
Sep 2025 £19,012,000 £10,892,000 £8,471,000
Sep 2025 (cum.) £192,035,000 £59,430,000 £51,405,000
Mar 2025 £66,723,000 £18,704,000 £20,470,000
Mar 2024 £80,889,000 £20,453,000 £19,335,000
Mar 2023 £25,625,000 £9,210,000 £3,129,000

Recommendations (5)

COVID-M1.2
Accepted in Part
Cabinet Office Leadership for Emergencies
Recommendation
The UK government should: abolish the lead government department model for whole-system civil emergency preparedness and resilience; and require the Cabinet Office to lead on preparing for and building resilience to whole-system civil emergencies across UK government departments, including monitoring … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The government accepted this recommendation with modification in its response published 16 January 2025, retaining the Lead Government Department model but expanding the Cabinet Office role for catastrophic risks (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 1 Report, Cabinet Office, 16 January 2025).
- The government stated the Lead Government Department model "remains essential because departments with day-to-day responsibility are best positioned to manage risks" (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 1 Report, Cabinet Office, 16 January 2025).
- The Amber Book was published in April 2025, embedding the Cabinet Office leadership role, and central operational plans for each catastrophic risk were created (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- The July 2025 implementation update marked this recommendation as IN PROGRESS, with Lead Government Department Expectations guidance due by end of 2025 (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M1.4
Accepted in Part
UK-wide Civil Emergency Strategy
Recommendation
The UK government and devolved administrations should together introduce a UK-wide whole-system civil emergency strategy (which includes pandemics) to prevent each emergency and also to reduce, control and mitigate its effects. The strategy should: be adaptable; include sections dedicated to … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The government accepted this recommendation with modification in its response published 16 January 2025, rejecting a single unified UK strategy as "unwieldy" but committing to a common strategic approach through coordinated sector-specific strategies (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 1 Report, Cabinet Office, 16 January 2025).
- The Autumn 2024 budget announced £460 million for pandemic preparedness (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 1 Report, Cabinet Office, 16 January 2025).
- The Resilience Action Plan was published on 8 July 2025 (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- The July 2025 implementation update marked this recommendation as IN PROGRESS, with a pandemic preparedness strategy targeted for autumn 2025 and a DHSC respiratory response plan due summer 2025 (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M1.8
Accepted in Part
Triennial Parliamentary Resilience Reports
Recommendation
The governments of the UK, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland should each produce and publish reports to their respective legislatures at least every three years on whole-system civil emergency preparedness and resilience. The reports should include as a minimum: the … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The government accepted this recommendation in its response published 16 January 2025, committing to annual statements to Parliament on civil contingency risk (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 1 Report, Cabinet Office, 16 January 2025).
- The Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster delivered the 2025 Annual Statement to Parliament on risk and resilience on 8 July 2025 (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- The UK Biological Security Strategy implementation report was published in July 2025 (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
- The July 2025 implementation update marked this recommendation as CLOSED, with annual Parliamentary statements on risk and resilience confirmed as ongoing (Module 1 Implementation Update, Cabinet Office, 8 July 2025).
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M2.15
Accepted in Part
Parliamentary Scrutiny of Emergency Powers
Recommendation
The UK government and devolved administrations should ensure that the draft affirmative procedure is the standard process for enacting substantial and wide-ranging powers in a civil emergency, such as a pandemic, under primary public health legislation. Any departure from this … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The UK government stated in its Module 2 response (25 March 2026) that it agrees the legislative response to emergencies should be subject to parliamentary oversight (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 2 Report, CP 1534, 25 March 2026).
- The 2025 Guide to Making Legislation includes a Delegated Powers Toolkit setting out considerations for delegated powers (Guide to Making Legislation, Cabinet Office, 2025).
- The response does not commit to making the draft affirmative procedure the standard process, stating that different emergencies may require different legislative approaches on a case-by-case basis.
- No specific commitment to mandatory sunset clauses or bimonthly ministerial reporting has been made.
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M2.17
Accepted in Part
Public Emergency Information Portal
Recommendation
The UK government, Scottish Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Executive should develop an online portal for use in future civil emergencies, where members of the public can access information on the legal restrictions that apply in their area and … Read more
Published evidence summary
- The UK government stated in its Module 2 response (25 March 2026) that it agrees with the aim of making restrictions and guidance accessible but does not agree with the proposed approach of a single online portal (UK Government Response to the Covid-19 Inquiry Module 2 Report, CP 1534, 25 March 2026).
- The response cites information ownership constraints: different communication channels are owned by different bodies, and devolved governments have specific responsibilities.
- The government points to GOV.UK, GOV.UK/Prepare, and the Resilience Direct platform as existing tools.
- Work with devolved governments on crisis communications coordination is planned for 2026, including co-producing shared principles for aligning communications.
- No single repository for restrictions and guidance has been developed.
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details