UK COVID-19 Inquiry

Ongoing

COVID-19 Inquiry

Chair Baroness Heather Hallett Judge / Judiciary
Established 28 Apr 2022
Commissioned by Cabinet Office Commissioned by the Prime Minister

Public inquiry examining the UK's response to and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, and learning lessons for the future. The inquiry is examining preparedness, decision-making, health and social care, vaccines, and the impact on different communities.

3 years, 11 months Duration (ongoing)
£192m Total Cost
Government Response

Total Recommendations 39
Data last updated: 19 Mar 2026
Data verified: 23 Mar 2026 (import)
How to read this

Government Response tracks what the government said it would do (accepted, rejected, etc.).

Full methodology

9 debates 104 questions 22 statements since Jul 2020
Written Ministerial Statement UK Covid-19 Inquiry Module 3 Report
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
19 Mar 2026
Written Ministerial Statement UK Covid-19 Inquiry Module 3 Report
Sir Keir Starmer (Labour)
19 Mar 2026
Written Question Covid-19 Inquiry
Baroness Lister of Burtersett (Labour)
05 Mar 2026
Early Day Motion Covid Day of Reflection 2026
Josh Babarinde (Liberal Democrat)
02 Mar 2026
Written Question Mental Health: Children
Josh Fenton-Glynn (Labour)
24 Feb 2026
View all 234 mentions →
Title Volume Publication Date Recs Links
Module 1: Resilience and Preparedness 1 18 Jul 2024 10
Module 2: Core Decision-Making 2 20 Nov 2025 19
Module 3: Impact on Healthcare Systems 3 19 Mar 2026 10
Every Story Matters Listening Exercise 30 Nov 2023 0
12 May 2021
Inquiry Announced

Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced a statutory public inquiry.

Source
15 Dec 2021
Chair Appointed

Baroness Hallett appointed as Chair.

28 Jun 2022
Terms of Reference Set

Terms of Reference finalised after consultation.

Source
04 Oct 2022
Preliminary Hearing

First preliminary hearing held.

13 Jun 2023
Module 1 Hearings Begin

Module 1 examining preparedness and resilience began.

03 Oct 2023
Module 2 Hearings

Module 2 examining core UK decision-making.

15 Jan 2024
Module 2 Devolved Nations

Hearings examining Scottish, Welsh and NI decision-making.

18 Jul 2024
Module 1 Report Published

First report on pandemic preparedness published.

Source
09 Sep 2024
Module 3: Healthcare

Module 3 examining impact on healthcare systems began.

31 Dec 2025
Further Modules Planned

Modules on vaccines, care sector, and other topics planned through 2026.

Total Inquiry Cost (Cumulative) £192,035,000
Cost Breakdown (to Sep 2025)
Inquiry Legal Costs £59,430,000 Panel remuneration & Counsel to the Inquiry
Core Participant Legal Costs £51,405,000 Legal funding for core participants
Panel £835,000
Staff £27,758,000
Other £52,607,000
Cumulative figures from FY25-26 Q2 report. Staff costs = Inquiry Secretariat only (Permanent/Contingent staff tracked separately in some years but not in cumulative). Other includes: Every Story Matters, Modules, Operational and Cross-cutting, and miscellaneous.
Cost History
Period Total Inquiry Legal CP Legal Source
Sep 2025 £19,012,000 £10,892,000 £8,471,000
Sep 2025 (cum.) £192,035,000 £59,430,000 £51,405,000
Mar 2025 £66,723,000 £18,704,000 £20,470,000
Mar 2024 £80,889,000 £20,453,000 £19,335,000
Mar 2023 £25,625,000 £9,210,000 £3,129,000

Recommendations (18)

COVID-M1.10
Under Consideration
Independent Statutory Resilience Body
Recommendation
The UK government should, in consultation with the devolved administrations, create a statutory independent body for whole-system civil emergency preparedness and resilience. The new body should be given responsibility for: providing independent, strategic advice to the UK government and devolved … Read more
Published evidence summary
The UK government rejected the creation of a new statutory independent body for civil emergency preparedness, opting instead for an alternative approach. The UK Resilience Academy is convening expert panels, chaired by external figures, to scrutinise whole-system risk preparedness, with a pilot process running in the second half of 2025 and panels expected to commence thereafter (Official government response, 16 Jan 2025; Implementation update, 8 Jul 2025).
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M2.2
Under Consideration
Devolved Nations SAGE Attendance
Recommendation
The Government Office for Science (GO-Science) should invite the governments of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland to nominate a small number of representatives to attend meetings of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) from the outset of any future … Read more
Published evidence summary
The COVID-19 Inquiry's Module 2 report, published on 2025-11-20, recommended that the Government Office for Science invite devolved administrations to nominate representatives to attend SAGE meetings from the outset of future emergencies. As of 2026-03-18, no government response to this recommendation has been publicly received, and no policy changes regarding SAGE attendance have been identified in the provided official sources.
Government Office for Science (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M2.3
Under Consideration
UK-wide Expert Register
Recommendation
The Government Office for Science (GO-Science) should develop and maintain a register of experts across the four nations of the UK who would be willing to participate in scientific advisory groups, covering a broad range of potential civil emergencies. Read more
Published evidence summary
The COVID-19 Inquiry's Module 2 report, published on 2025-11-20, recommended that the Government Office for Science develop and maintain a UK-wide register of experts for scientific advisory groups. As of 2026-03-18, no government response to this recommendation has been publicly received, and no such expert register has been identified as developed in the provided official sources.
Government Office for Science (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M2.5
Under Consideration
Advisory Group Terms of Appointment
Recommendation
The Government Office for Science (GO-Science), the Scottish Government, the Welsh Government and the Department of Health (Northern Ireland) should each develop standard terms of appointment for all participants in scientific advisory groups. These terms should include: clarity around the … Read more
Published evidence summary
The COVID-19 Inquiry's Module 2 report, published on 2025-11-20, recommended that GO-Science and devolved health departments develop standard terms of appointment for participants in scientific advisory groups. As of 2026-03-18, no government response to this recommendation has been publicly received, and no such standard terms have been identified as developed in the provided official sources.
Government Office for Science (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M2.6
Under Consideration
Enact Socio-economic Duty
Recommendation
The UK government should bring into force in England section 1 of the Equality Act 2010, implementing the socio-economic duty. The Northern Ireland Assembly and Northern Ireland Executive should consider an equivalent provision within section 75 of the Northern Ireland … Read more
Published evidence summary
The COVID-19 Inquiry's Module 2 report, published on 2025-11-20, recommended that the UK government bring into force section 1 of the Equality Act 2010 (the socio-economic duty) in England, and that the Northern Ireland Executive consider an equivalent provision. As of 2026-03-18, no government response to this recommendation has been publicly received, and no legislative action has been identified in the provided official sources.
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M2.7
Under Consideration
Statutory Child Rights Impact Assessments
Recommendation

The UK government should introduce legislation to place child rights impact assessments on a statutory footing in England. The Northern Ireland Executive should consider an equivalent provision.

Published evidence summary
The COVID-19 Inquiry's Module 2 report, published on 2025-11-20, recommended that the UK government introduce legislation for statutory child rights impact assessments in England, with the Northern Ireland Executive considering an equivalent. As of 2026-03-18, no government response to this recommendation has been publicly received, and no such legislation has been identified in the provided official sources.
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M2.8
Under Consideration
Vulnerable People Framework
Recommendation
The UK government, Scottish Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Executive should each agree a framework that identifies people who would be most at risk of becoming infected by and dying from a disease and those who are most likely … Read more
Published evidence summary
The COVID-19 Inquiry's Module 2 report, published on 2025-11-20, recommended that the UK government and devolved administrations agree a framework to identify and mitigate risks for vulnerable people during future pandemics. As of 2026-03-18, no government response to this recommendation has been publicly received, and no such framework has been identified as agreed in the provided official sources.
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M2.9
Under Consideration
NI Emergency Powers Review
Recommendation
The Northern Ireland Executive and UK government (in consultation with the Irish government where necessary) should review the structures and delegated powers of government in Northern Ireland to consider: the empowerment of the First Minister and deputy First Minister jointly … Read more
Published evidence summary
The COVID-19 Inquiry's Module 2 report, published on 2025-11-20, recommended that the Northern Ireland Executive and UK government review the structures and delegated powers of government in Northern Ireland for emergency management. As of 2026-03-18, no government response to this recommendation has been publicly received, and no such review has been identified as undertaken in the provided official sources.
Northern Ireland Executive (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M2.10
Under Consideration
Pandemic Decision-Making Framework
Recommendation
The UK government and devolved administrations should set out in future pandemic preparedness strategies how decision-making will work in a future pandemic. This should include provision for COBR to be used as the initial response structure and set out how … Read more
Published evidence summary
No government response has been received for this recommendation as of today's date, 2026-03-18. The Module 2 report was published on 20 November 2025.
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M2.11
Under Consideration
Leadership Succession Arrangements
Recommendation
The UK government and the devolved administrations should each establish formal arrangements for covering the roles of Prime Minister and First Minister (and in Northern Ireland, deputy First Minister) as applicable during a whole-system civil emergency, should the incumbent be … Read more
Published evidence summary
No government response has been received for this recommendation as of today's date, 2026-03-18. The Module 2 report was published on 20 November 2025.
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M2.12
Under Consideration
Central Emergency Taskforces
Recommendation
The response to a future whole-system civil emergency should be coordinated via central taskforces in each of the UK, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, with responsibility for the commissioning and synthesis of advice, coordination of a single data picture and … Read more
Published evidence summary
No government response has been received for this recommendation as of today's date, 2026-03-18. The Module 2 report was published on 20 November 2025.
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M2.13
Under Consideration
NI Executive Confidentiality Duty
Recommendation

The Executive Office should amend the Ministerial Code to impose a duty of confidentiality on ministers that prohibits the disclosure of the individual views of ministers expressed during meetings of the Northern Ireland Executive Committee.

Published evidence summary
No government response has been received for this recommendation as of today's date, 2026-03-18. The Module 2 report was published on 20 November 2025.
The Executive Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M2.14
Under Consideration
Accessible Emergency Communications
Recommendation
The UK government and the devolved administrations should each develop action plans for how government communications will be made more accessible during a pandemic. As a minimum, these should include making provision for the translation of government press conferences into … Read more
Published evidence summary
The COVID-19 Inquiry's Module 2 report, published on 2025-11-20, recommended that the UK government and devolved administrations develop action plans for accessible emergency communications, including British Sign Language translation for press conferences. As of 2026-03-18, no government response to this specific recommendation has been publicly received, and no related action plans have been identified in the provided official sources.
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M2.15
Under Consideration
Parliamentary Scrutiny of Emergency Powers
Recommendation
The UK government and devolved administrations should ensure that the draft affirmative procedure is the standard process for enacting substantial and wide-ranging powers in a civil emergency, such as a pandemic, under primary public health legislation. Any departure from this … Read more
Published evidence summary
The COVID-19 Inquiry's Module 2 report, published on 2025-11-20, recommended that the draft affirmative procedure be the standard for enacting substantial emergency powers under primary public health legislation. As of 2026-03-18, no government response to this recommendation has been publicly received, and no legislative changes or policy statements addressing this procedure have been identified in the provided official sources.
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M2.16
Under Consideration
Civil Contingencies Act Review
Recommendation
The UK government should undertake a review of the Civil Contingencies Act 2004 to assess its potential role in managing future civil emergencies, including pandemics, and whether it could be employed as an interim emergency framework until more specific legislation … Read more
Published evidence summary
The COVID-19 Inquiry's Module 2 report, published on 2025-11-20, recommended a review of the Civil Contingencies Act 2004 for its role in future civil emergencies. As of 2026-03-18, no government response to this recommendation has been publicly received, and no review of the Act specifically in response to this recommendation has been identified in the provided official sources.
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M2.17
Under Consideration
Public Emergency Information Portal
Recommendation
The UK government, Scottish Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Executive should develop an online portal for use in future civil emergencies, where members of the public can access information on the legal restrictions that apply in their area and … Read more
Published evidence summary
The COVID-19 Inquiry's Module 2 report, published on 2025-11-20, recommended the development of an online portal for public access to legal restrictions and guidance during civil emergencies. As of 2026-03-18, no government response to this recommendation has been publicly received, and no such portal development has been identified in the provided official sources.
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M2.18
Under Consideration
Devolved Nations COBR Attendance
Recommendation
The UK government should invite the devolved administrations, as a matter of standard practice, to nominate relevant ministers and officials to attend COBR meetings in the event of relevant whole-system civil emergencies that have the potential to have UK-wide effects. Read more
Published evidence summary
The COVID-19 Inquiry's Module 2 report, published on 2025-11-20, recommended that the UK government invite devolved administrations to nominate ministers and officials to attend COBR meetings during relevant whole-system civil emergencies. As of 2026-03-18, no government response to this recommendation has been publicly received, and no policy changes regarding COBR attendance have been identified in the provided official sources.
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details
COVID-M2.19
Under Consideration
Four Nations Pandemic Structure
Recommendation
While intergovernmental relations should be facilitated through COBR in the initial months of any future pandemic, the UK government and devolved administrations should ensure that a specific four-nations structure, concerning pandemic response, is stood up at the same time as … Read more
Published evidence summary
The COVID-19 Inquiry's Module 2 report, published on 2025-11-20, recommended the establishment of a specific four-nations pandemic structure to operate alongside the transition away from COBR. As of 2026-03-18, no government response to this recommendation has been publicly received, and no such structure has been identified as established in the provided official sources.
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View Details