Faye Allen

PFD Report Partially Responded Ref: 2019-0147
Date of Report 29 April 2019
Coroner Alison Mutch
Response Deadline est. 23 September 2019
1 of 2 responded · Over 2 years old
Response Status
Responses 1 of 2
56-Day Deadline 23 Sep 2019
Over 2 years old — no identified published response
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Coroner's Concerns
During the course of the inquest the issue of the availability of Faye 2nd paramedics and other medical assistance was considered. The inquest was referred to the National Ambulance Service Guidance for preparing an Emergency Plan specifically Annex B which feeds into the Purple Guide; The annex and its tables set out staffing levels that are recommended for different event types. However; it became clear during the evidence that the recommended levels of staffing could be interpreted in different ways and that for example fist aiders deployed in areas other than the medical cabin area were being counted as part of the resource This meant that the actual staff directly deployed to deal with medical issues in medical area could vary widely and be significantly below the numbers set out in the tables
Responses
Responses
20 Jun 2019
Response received
View full response
Dear Ms Mutch RE: ALLEN Further to my letter dated Ihe 17t May 2019, write to provide you with a further update regarding our efforts lo address the concems raised in your Regulation 28 Report and letter t0 me of the 29* of April 2019. To date, the following work has been completed. A national review has been completed, examining content and provisions conlained within the guidance document enlitled 'National Ambulance Service Guidance for Preparing an Emergency Plan' with particular reference t0 the provisions contained within Annex B5 have briefed our parent body; NHS England, on your report and OUr planned actions. My Compliance & Quallty Team have drafted & number of amendments lo be included wilhin the guidance document to add clarity and address the specific concems raised within Regulation 28 report fndings The next stage will be for Ihat draft lext lo g0 out (0 consullation with relevant stakeholders We will then make the necessary changes and aim to publish a revised version of the guidance before the end of September 2019. Yours sincerely; Ike 8Pin Kelth Prior Director National Ambulance Resilience Unit Reg,28 ALLEN | 18/06/19 NARU-C+a CCIKP | Faye the findings the Page

Hcalh and Salely HSE Exccutivc Alison Mutch OBE HM Senior Coroner Coroners Court Mount Tabor St Health and Safety Executive Stockport Redgrave Court SKI 3AG Merton Road Bootle Merseyside L2o 7HS 4th June 2019 Dear Ms Mutch; Thank you for your letter dated 2gth May toL which has been passed t0 me as Head of HSE's First Ald at Work policy to respond. The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) leads on national occupational health and safety policy for the entertainments and lelsure sector; whilst Local Authorties are responsible for enforcing the law at individual events, such as festivals, in their geographical area. In addition to health and safety law, some events may also require licenses from local authorities Festival organlsers have responsibilities under Section 3 of the Health and Safety at Work etc: Act 1974 (HSWA) to ensure, so far as Is reasonably practicable; the safety and health of members of the public affected by their business. HSE guidance strongly recommends guidance that employers include non-employees in the first aid provisions; however; the speciiic requirements of the First Aid at Work Regulatlons 1981 apply only to the provision of first aid for employees: Both the National Ambulance Service Guidance (NARU) Annex B and Section 5 of the Purple Guide relating to medical provision operate a score and matrix system, but the figures are for guidance only and individual circumstances may require the figures to be modified from the tabular expectation depending on the event risk assessment: The key to any event is the pre-preparation and assessment of risk and this will include the medical provision: The purple guide is a live event specific document whereas the NARU document is for a wider focus of events: The numbers and arrangements of medical provision will depend on several factors such as crowd size, expected crowd behaviour; expected druglalcohol use and venue size (e.g. a Warehouse venue will require different planning and medical provision to that of a large festival site) it is for the organiser to

ensure adequate provision during the set-up, duration and breakdown of the event: The interpretation of need for many aspects of a large event, Including medical provision, Is the duty of organisers and the specifics of such planning will vary from site to site as will the suitability of roles and locations of the relevant tiers of medical provision Identifed . The Purple Guide is industry owned guidance; ad as such is open t0 inlerpretation and of course wilst good practice there is no legal duty to follow this if following assessment; the organlsers, as with any industry, decide t0 put in place different provision or practkes. Of course, such provision must be able t0 be shown to be as safe if not more s0 than that hekd within the guidance: HSE has ralsed your concems with representatives from the entertainment industry: We wili also arrange for your comments regarding general emergency planning procedures In place at this event, along with a copy of this letter to be sent to relevant Local Authority bodles, who have licensing and enforcement responslbilities for such activities
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and / believe you have the power to take such action:
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 3r May 2016 | commenced an investigation into the death of Faye Allen: The investigation concluded on the 5th March 2019 and the conclusion was one of Drug-Related Death
Circumstances of the Death
On 1st May 2016 Allen attended an event, at the Victoria Warehouse. Once in the event she consumed MDMA that had been brought into the venue by another person: At 03.47 she was clearly unwell and taken to the medical porta cabin arriving at about 04.02. Observations showed she was clearly unwell. At 04.33 an ambulance was called. One arrived at 04.54. As Faye Allen was being transported to the Manchester Royal Infirmary, she went into respiratory arrest On arrival at Manchester Royal Infirmary, unsuccessful attempts were made to resuscitate her: She died at Manchester Royal Infirmary on May
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Effective Communication and Reporting
Edinburgh Tram Inquiry
Ineffective Staff Deployment
Collaborative Delivery
Edinburgh Tram Inquiry
Ineffective Staff Deployment
Staffing Guidance
Edinburgh Tram Inquiry
Ineffective Staff Deployment
Resolve paramedic-driver shortage in mass casualties
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Ineffective Staff Deployment
Ensure Airwave Tactical Advisors availability
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Ineffective Staff Deployment
Review NWAS Tactical Advisor rostering coverage
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Ineffective Staff Deployment
Review HART mobilisation policies
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Ineffective Staff Deployment
Allocate best-trained operators to Major Incident roles
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Ineffective Staff Deployment
24-hour qualified command structure rostering
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Ineffective Staff Deployment
Require trained CMP manager for covert monitoring posts
Jermaine Baker Inquiry
Ineffective Staff Deployment

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.