Thomas Ithell
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2024-0035
All 1 response received
· Deadline: 18 Mar 2024
Response Status
Responses
1 of 1
56-Day Deadline
18 Mar 2024
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Coroner’s Concerns
During the course of the evidence it was identified that:-
1. There was no Datix raised by anyone when the error (Mr Ithell being lost to follow up) was identified, either at the time of the appointment on 22 October 2022 when the error was identified or at any point thereafter;
2. There has been no investigation by the Health Board into how Mr Ithell came lost for follow up after his appointment on 5 November 2021;
3. There have been no assurances as to what, if any, changes and learning have been identified other than a tracking system for PSA monitoring;
4. Evidence was heard at the Inquest that time restraints on hospital staff had meant that Datix was not completed and that the system was not user-friendly.
I have raised a number of Prevention of Future Death reports with the Health Board previously around investigation processes. I remain incredibly concerned that where matters are not raised in accordance with internal Health Board processes that assurances given to me previously in Prevention of Future Death Reports cannot be supported. Furthermore, I am concerned that Datix reports will not be raised if time constraints prevents such, where the Health Board themselves often identify the Datix reporting system as the initiation of governance / investigation processes.
1. There was no Datix raised by anyone when the error (Mr Ithell being lost to follow up) was identified, either at the time of the appointment on 22 October 2022 when the error was identified or at any point thereafter;
2. There has been no investigation by the Health Board into how Mr Ithell came lost for follow up after his appointment on 5 November 2021;
3. There have been no assurances as to what, if any, changes and learning have been identified other than a tracking system for PSA monitoring;
4. Evidence was heard at the Inquest that time restraints on hospital staff had meant that Datix was not completed and that the system was not user-friendly.
I have raised a number of Prevention of Future Death reports with the Health Board previously around investigation processes. I remain incredibly concerned that where matters are not raised in accordance with internal Health Board processes that assurances given to me previously in Prevention of Future Death Reports cannot be supported. Furthermore, I am concerned that Datix reports will not be raised if time constraints prevents such, where the Health Board themselves often identify the Datix reporting system as the initiation of governance / investigation processes.
Responses
Response received
View full response
Dear Ms Robertson,
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS Thomas Grenville Hammersley Ithell
I am writing in response to the Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths dated 22 January 2024, issued by yourself to Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, following the inquest touching upon the death of Mr Thomas Ithell, who sadly died on 20 November
2022.
I would like to begin with offering my deepest condolences to the family and friends of Mr Ithell.
In the notice you highlighted your concerns as follows:
There was no Datix raised by anyone when the error (Mr Ithell being lost to follow up) was identified, either at the time of the appointment on 22 October 2022 when the error was identified or at any point thereafter; There has been no investigation by the Health Board into how Mr Ithell came lost for follow up after his appointment on 5 November 2021; There have been no assurances as to what, if any, changes and learning have been identified other than a tracking system for PSA monitoring; Evidence was heard at the Inquest that time restraints on hospital staff had meant that Datix was not completed and that the system was not user-friendly.
I will firstly address the concerns around incident reporting and investigation including the Datix system (points 1, 2 and 4 from above).
I can confirm that an Incident Report has now been raised in regards to the error identified and a Make it Safe Rapid Review was undertaken. This review was completed on 05 March 2023. A decision was made to conduct a full investigation and this is underway at present. The incident has been confirmed as a Nationally Reportable Incident (NRI). The investigation report is due to be completed by 09 May 2024 and will include a full action plan to address any areas of learning.
Dyddiad / Date: 18 March 2024 Kate Robertson HM Assistant Coroner North Wales (East and Central) Coroner's Office County Hall Wynnstay Road Ruthin LL15 1YN Bloc 5, Llys Carlton, Parc BusnesLlanelwy, Llanelwy, LL17 0JG
---------------------------------- Block 5, Carlton Court, St Asaph Business Park, St Asaph, LL17 0JG
I am aware you have raised your concerns with regards to incident reporting and management previously. Since those earlier concerns, a revised training programme has been put in place for our Datix incident reporting system. This includes training offered by our Quality Systems Team on the Datix system twice monthly, training specifically on incident reporting and reviewing delivered by our Patient Safety Team weekly, and local training delivered by our locally based quality teams (in our East Integrated Health Community for example, there are weekly dates offered). This range of training means there is a mix of opportunities for staff to access training. A number of training videos and “how to guides” are available on our staff intranet.
Another area of concern you have raised previously, and which is relevant here, is the flow of information from the Independent Medical Examiner Service into our incident process. I fully acknowledge this is an areas of concern. As a result of the concerns, the Mortality Review Team have met with the Patient Safety Team and changes are being made. These changes mean that the Mortality Review Team will review every new form with concerns received from the Medical Examiner Services to identify if an existing incident review is underway in which case the records in Datix will be linked and the incident reviewer and divisional leadership team will be notified. If no incident review is underway, the Mortality Review Team will take the concerns to the daily incident review meeting led by the Patient Safety Team at which time a decision can be made to trigger the incident process. This new process is commencing in March 2024 and will be embedded fully into our practice in the coming months, which will ensure the flow of information from the Medical Examiner into the incident process.
I can also advise that the Patient Safety Team have reviewed the incident process and intend to make changes to that process from April 2024. The team have been working with services to co-design the changes taking into account feedback from front line clinicians and looking at best practice across Wales. Over the coming months, we plan further reviews into this process with support from the NHS Wales National Executive Quality Team.
In respect of clinical time, our staff do face significant challenges in balancing all of the required duties whilst providing patient centred care. We are fully mindful of the pressures they face and we will always support them to ensure safety critical tasks are completed. This includes reporting incidents on the Datix system.
The Datix system is a national system, officially known as the Once for Wales Concerns Management System. It is designed and managed nationally in a service hosted by the Welsh Risk Pool, part of the NHS Wales Shared Services Partnership. The current version of the system was implemented in April 2022. The move to a single, national system was an expectation set by Welsh Government. Therefore every member of staff across NHS Wales, in every Health Board and Trust, uses this system.
The design and development of the system has been led an on all-Wales basis and has clinical and non-clinical staff input. Each module, such as the incident module, is aligned to a national network who lead on the design and development of that module and
facilitate any requests for change and enhancement made by staff and services across Wales.
Within the Health Board, in November 2023, we formed a new Quality Systems Group to provide greater oversight of our quality systems in a more integrated approach. This group’s remit includes collecting, assessing and acting upon user feedback. Over the coming months we will be conducting a survey of our staff experiences in using the Datix system and we will use these findings to make recommendations nationally on improvements or enhancements to the system (recognising any changes we suggest will be subject to all-Wales agreement).
I will now address point 3 of your concerns, regarding PSA monitoring.
Following the Make it Safe Rapid Review, a number of immediate actions have been agreed. These actions have included validating patients awaiting a clinical decision on the pathway and follow up waiting list.
Awareness of the pathway has also been raised with other specialities.
A suggestion has also been raised with the Digital, Data and Technology Department to consider whether an alert can be built into the electronic patient administration system to identify patients without a follow up appointment.
As mentioned earlier, a full investigation is underway and we expect that a detailed action plan will be developed in response to its findings. This report and action plan will be subject to scrutiny by the East Integrated Health Community directors and will receive final approval and sign off by a Clinical Executive Director.
I hope this letter provides you with the assurance you need that actions have been taken
– and assurance that further investigation is underway.
Once again, I offer my deepest condolences to the family and friends of Mr Ithell for their loss.
REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS Thomas Grenville Hammersley Ithell
I am writing in response to the Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths dated 22 January 2024, issued by yourself to Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, following the inquest touching upon the death of Mr Thomas Ithell, who sadly died on 20 November
2022.
I would like to begin with offering my deepest condolences to the family and friends of Mr Ithell.
In the notice you highlighted your concerns as follows:
There was no Datix raised by anyone when the error (Mr Ithell being lost to follow up) was identified, either at the time of the appointment on 22 October 2022 when the error was identified or at any point thereafter; There has been no investigation by the Health Board into how Mr Ithell came lost for follow up after his appointment on 5 November 2021; There have been no assurances as to what, if any, changes and learning have been identified other than a tracking system for PSA monitoring; Evidence was heard at the Inquest that time restraints on hospital staff had meant that Datix was not completed and that the system was not user-friendly.
I will firstly address the concerns around incident reporting and investigation including the Datix system (points 1, 2 and 4 from above).
I can confirm that an Incident Report has now been raised in regards to the error identified and a Make it Safe Rapid Review was undertaken. This review was completed on 05 March 2023. A decision was made to conduct a full investigation and this is underway at present. The incident has been confirmed as a Nationally Reportable Incident (NRI). The investigation report is due to be completed by 09 May 2024 and will include a full action plan to address any areas of learning.
Dyddiad / Date: 18 March 2024 Kate Robertson HM Assistant Coroner North Wales (East and Central) Coroner's Office County Hall Wynnstay Road Ruthin LL15 1YN Bloc 5, Llys Carlton, Parc BusnesLlanelwy, Llanelwy, LL17 0JG
---------------------------------- Block 5, Carlton Court, St Asaph Business Park, St Asaph, LL17 0JG
I am aware you have raised your concerns with regards to incident reporting and management previously. Since those earlier concerns, a revised training programme has been put in place for our Datix incident reporting system. This includes training offered by our Quality Systems Team on the Datix system twice monthly, training specifically on incident reporting and reviewing delivered by our Patient Safety Team weekly, and local training delivered by our locally based quality teams (in our East Integrated Health Community for example, there are weekly dates offered). This range of training means there is a mix of opportunities for staff to access training. A number of training videos and “how to guides” are available on our staff intranet.
Another area of concern you have raised previously, and which is relevant here, is the flow of information from the Independent Medical Examiner Service into our incident process. I fully acknowledge this is an areas of concern. As a result of the concerns, the Mortality Review Team have met with the Patient Safety Team and changes are being made. These changes mean that the Mortality Review Team will review every new form with concerns received from the Medical Examiner Services to identify if an existing incident review is underway in which case the records in Datix will be linked and the incident reviewer and divisional leadership team will be notified. If no incident review is underway, the Mortality Review Team will take the concerns to the daily incident review meeting led by the Patient Safety Team at which time a decision can be made to trigger the incident process. This new process is commencing in March 2024 and will be embedded fully into our practice in the coming months, which will ensure the flow of information from the Medical Examiner into the incident process.
I can also advise that the Patient Safety Team have reviewed the incident process and intend to make changes to that process from April 2024. The team have been working with services to co-design the changes taking into account feedback from front line clinicians and looking at best practice across Wales. Over the coming months, we plan further reviews into this process with support from the NHS Wales National Executive Quality Team.
In respect of clinical time, our staff do face significant challenges in balancing all of the required duties whilst providing patient centred care. We are fully mindful of the pressures they face and we will always support them to ensure safety critical tasks are completed. This includes reporting incidents on the Datix system.
The Datix system is a national system, officially known as the Once for Wales Concerns Management System. It is designed and managed nationally in a service hosted by the Welsh Risk Pool, part of the NHS Wales Shared Services Partnership. The current version of the system was implemented in April 2022. The move to a single, national system was an expectation set by Welsh Government. Therefore every member of staff across NHS Wales, in every Health Board and Trust, uses this system.
The design and development of the system has been led an on all-Wales basis and has clinical and non-clinical staff input. Each module, such as the incident module, is aligned to a national network who lead on the design and development of that module and
facilitate any requests for change and enhancement made by staff and services across Wales.
Within the Health Board, in November 2023, we formed a new Quality Systems Group to provide greater oversight of our quality systems in a more integrated approach. This group’s remit includes collecting, assessing and acting upon user feedback. Over the coming months we will be conducting a survey of our staff experiences in using the Datix system and we will use these findings to make recommendations nationally on improvements or enhancements to the system (recognising any changes we suggest will be subject to all-Wales agreement).
I will now address point 3 of your concerns, regarding PSA monitoring.
Following the Make it Safe Rapid Review, a number of immediate actions have been agreed. These actions have included validating patients awaiting a clinical decision on the pathway and follow up waiting list.
Awareness of the pathway has also been raised with other specialities.
A suggestion has also been raised with the Digital, Data and Technology Department to consider whether an alert can be built into the electronic patient administration system to identify patients without a follow up appointment.
As mentioned earlier, a full investigation is underway and we expect that a detailed action plan will be developed in response to its findings. This report and action plan will be subject to scrutiny by the East Integrated Health Community directors and will receive final approval and sign off by a Clinical Executive Director.
I hope this letter provides you with the assurance you need that actions have been taken
– and assurance that further investigation is underway.
Once again, I offer my deepest condolences to the family and friends of Mr Ithell for their loss.
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 6 December 2022 an investigation was commenced into the death of Thomas Grenville Hammersley Ithell (DOB 24/4/45) who died on 20 November 2022. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 17 January 2024. The conclusion of the inquest was natural causes.
Circumstances of the Death
The circumstances of the death are as follows :-
Thomas Ithell was aged 77 at the time of his death on 20 November 2022. He was diagnosed with prostate cancer in September 2017 and biopsies revealed bilateral adenocarcinoma of the prostate. He underwent radiotherapy in 2018 and hormone deprivation treatment. From April 2021 onwards his PSA levels increased periodically. In October 2021 his level was 5.5ng/ml having been 1.5ng/m lin April 2021 and 2.7ng/m in July 2021 indicating a recurrence of the cancer and likely incurable. Thomas Ithell was reluctant to undergo further hormone treatment as he found tolerating the side effects difficult. He did not then have his PSA levels tested after November 2021 and was not reviewed at all due to becoming missed to follow up. After he had been seen by the nurse practitioner on 5 November 2021 the letter written by the nurse practitioner for advice from the consultant did not reach the consultant. He was reviewed by a consultant on 22 October 2022 after an urgent suspected cancer GP referral following routine set of blood tests in September 2022, some 10 months later. Mr Ithell died in hospital on 20 November 2022 having been admitted with shortness of breath, the malignancy having caused his death.
|
Thomas Ithell was aged 77 at the time of his death on 20 November 2022. He was diagnosed with prostate cancer in September 2017 and biopsies revealed bilateral adenocarcinoma of the prostate. He underwent radiotherapy in 2018 and hormone deprivation treatment. From April 2021 onwards his PSA levels increased periodically. In October 2021 his level was 5.5ng/ml having been 1.5ng/m lin April 2021 and 2.7ng/m in July 2021 indicating a recurrence of the cancer and likely incurable. Thomas Ithell was reluctant to undergo further hormone treatment as he found tolerating the side effects difficult. He did not then have his PSA levels tested after November 2021 and was not reviewed at all due to becoming missed to follow up. After he had been seen by the nurse practitioner on 5 November 2021 the letter written by the nurse practitioner for advice from the consultant did not reach the consultant. He was reviewed by a consultant on 22 October 2022 after an urgent suspected cancer GP referral following routine set of blood tests in September 2022, some 10 months later. Mr Ithell died in hospital on 20 November 2022 having been admitted with shortness of breath, the malignancy having caused his death.
|
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes with this PFD
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Improve complaints handling
Morecambe Bay Investigation
Complaint record keeping failures
Feedback not integrated
Documentation of technical adviser advice
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
Complaint record keeping failures
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.