Leonardo Machado
PFD Report
Partially Responded
Ref: 2025-0611
56 days overdue · 4 responses outstanding
Sent To
Response Status
Responses
1 of 5
56-Day Deadline
30 Jan 2026
56 days past deadline — 4 responses outstanding
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Coroner’s Concerns
1. During the inquest evidence was heard that: i. There is significant national concern about the “rental” of food delivery licences to under 18s. In general terms, food delivery platforms place age restrictions on those who can obtain a licence to deliver food. However, there appears to be no oversight of the rental of these licences to those under the age limit. This places children in a vulnerable position: lone working, often at night, riding electric or motorised scooters, mopeds or motorcycles and delivering to individuals that are not known to the drivers.
2. I have concerns with regard to the following: i. There appears to be no or limited oversight of the practice of “renting” a food delivery licence to children under 18 years of age, which I heard is a national issue;
ii. As a consequence, children are working in the food delivery economy, which involves lone working at night, with deliveries being made to the home addresses of private individuals, placing the children in a vulnerable position;
iii. That placing children in a lone working environment at night and on the roads on electric or motorised scooters, mopeds or motorcycles also increases the risks of them coming to harm through a road traffic collision, leading to a risk of death.
2. I have concerns with regard to the following: i. There appears to be no or limited oversight of the practice of “renting” a food delivery licence to children under 18 years of age, which I heard is a national issue;
ii. As a consequence, children are working in the food delivery economy, which involves lone working at night, with deliveries being made to the home addresses of private individuals, placing the children in a vulnerable position;
iii. That placing children in a lone working environment at night and on the roads on electric or motorised scooters, mopeds or motorcycles also increases the risks of them coming to harm through a road traffic collision, leading to a risk of death.
Responses
The HSE acknowledges the issues, clarifies that road traffic accidents are primarily for Police, and highlights ongoing government-industry efforts to tighten controls on delivery permits and the upcoming Employment Rights Act 2025 aimed at addressing system weaknesses.
AI summary
View full response
Dear Mr Allen Regulation 28 - Prevention of Future Deaths
Thank you for your letter and Prevention of Future Deaths report of 5th December 2025, addressed to HSE’s Chief Executive, , and arising from the inquest into the unfortunate death of Mr Machado whilst using a ‘rented’ Uber Eats licence. has asked me to respond to you in my capacity as HSE’s Deputy Director for Technical Support and Engagement This was essentially a road traffic accident, and you acknowledge that excessive speed was the causative factor in Mr Machado losing control of the motorcycle he was riding. However, you also raise concerns around the rental or sharing of permits for these platforms, the employment of minors and lone working. In leading the response, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) has sought the views of several other governmental organisations, and these are included in our response below which viewed together describe a comprehensive framework of guidance and legislation. However, that does not mean that we are complacent, and you will also note proposals to improve on the current situation. Riding and driving for work: In respect of the road traffic accident itself, HSE views that road traffic accidents are generally a matter for the Police to investigate and enforce, rather than HSE, using the most applicable legislation. This is set out in Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 - Section 3.
The Department for Transport (DfT) commented that the safety of anyone driving or riding on our roads is a priority, and that includes those who drive for work. The government expects that employers or engagers of anyone driving or riding for work to ensure that they are as safe as possible on our roads. DfT worked closely with the HSE to update the joint DfT/HSE guidance on work related road safety. The revised guidance, published in September 2021 and called Driving and riding safely for work, clearly sets out what commercial organisations and their workers, whether employees
or self-employed, must do to manage work-related road safety by reference to their obligations under law.
DfT has also announced as part of the Road Safety Strategy that it will pilot a National Work-Related Road Safety Charter for businesses that require people to drive or ride for them. The aim of the Charter is to help employers to reduce work-related road risk and improve safety for all road users by promoting good practice, and to improve compliance with current legislation and guidance. It will include the use of Heavy Goods Vehicles (HGV)s, Light Goods Vehicles (LGVs), cars, motorcycles, e-cycles and cycles. The pilot will run for two years and will be monitored and fully evaluated.
The tragic death of Leonardo Cardoso Machado has raised several important concerns. DfT is committed to making our roads safer and we are ready to work with others to achieve this. Road safety is a shared responsibility, and DfT’s strategy reflects that. It considers action needed by government, local authorities, industry, emergency services and communities to tackle the causes of collisions and save lives. By investing in infrastructure, education, and enforcement, DfT are taking decisive steps to make our roads safer for everyone.
Sharing of permits The sharing of permits between licence owners and “substitutes” is a contractual issue and not an area HSE has any control over. The Department for Business and Trade (DBT) are the more appropriate governmental body, and they have addressed the practice of “renting” food delivery licences to under 18’s and the concerns that this raises. Food delivery companies do often allow account holders to use other people to carry out work for them under their account. This practice is sometimes referred to as substitution or sending a substitute. The ability for someone who is self-employed to subcontract work is a key feature of self-employment and is a lawful commercial arrangement. It is not something that is regulated or licensed by government in food delivery, or many other sectors where this practice can be found. As the report notes, most food delivery firms require that all riders and their substitutes are at least 18 years old. The government has been working closely with food delivery firms so that they increase the use of facial verification checks and fraud detection technology to ensure only registered account holders and their registered substitutes can work off their platforms. Employment of Minors: HSE has some high-level guidance on the employment of young people under the age of 18: Young people at work: Overview - HSE. The Department for Education state that the restrictions on child employment in the Children and Young Person’s Act 1933 apply to children who are of compulsory school age. Therefore, these restrictions would not apply in the case of Leonardo Cardoso Machado who, as a 17-year-old, would be classed as a ‘young worker’.
However, we note from the response from Uber Eats UK Limited to the coroner on 18 November 2025, that their terms and conditions include requirements that persons under the age of 18 are prohibited from having a delivery licence or to act as a substitute. Lone Working: It is well known and established that lone working can present a risk to workers, and this should form part of an employer’s risk assessment. This includes the requirement to assess risks and should consider ways in which the work can be organised to minimise the potential for harm. Relevant training, supervision, monitoring and support should be provided for lone workers. HSE specifically considers lone workers in providing guidance and this covers both the employers of lone workers and the lone workers themselves; Lone working - HSE.
However, HSE acknowledges that there are practical limits to what can be done in the driver delivery sector because work like this inevitably involves working alone, to deadlines, often at night and with the attendant road risks.
Lastly, a great deal of work is going on between government and the food delivery industry to tighten control and reduce abuse of legitimate systems such as substitution, for example this initiative Delivery firms to bolster rider security checks to stop illegal working - GOV.UK.
The new Employment Rights Act 2025 is also aimed to address weakness of current system - Employment Rights Act 2025: overview factsheet
I trust that this response from HSE, along with the contributions from the other governmental departments, gives you confidence and reassurance that the issues raised in his report are actively being addressed.
Thank you for your letter and Prevention of Future Deaths report of 5th December 2025, addressed to HSE’s Chief Executive, , and arising from the inquest into the unfortunate death of Mr Machado whilst using a ‘rented’ Uber Eats licence. has asked me to respond to you in my capacity as HSE’s Deputy Director for Technical Support and Engagement This was essentially a road traffic accident, and you acknowledge that excessive speed was the causative factor in Mr Machado losing control of the motorcycle he was riding. However, you also raise concerns around the rental or sharing of permits for these platforms, the employment of minors and lone working. In leading the response, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) has sought the views of several other governmental organisations, and these are included in our response below which viewed together describe a comprehensive framework of guidance and legislation. However, that does not mean that we are complacent, and you will also note proposals to improve on the current situation. Riding and driving for work: In respect of the road traffic accident itself, HSE views that road traffic accidents are generally a matter for the Police to investigate and enforce, rather than HSE, using the most applicable legislation. This is set out in Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 - Section 3.
The Department for Transport (DfT) commented that the safety of anyone driving or riding on our roads is a priority, and that includes those who drive for work. The government expects that employers or engagers of anyone driving or riding for work to ensure that they are as safe as possible on our roads. DfT worked closely with the HSE to update the joint DfT/HSE guidance on work related road safety. The revised guidance, published in September 2021 and called Driving and riding safely for work, clearly sets out what commercial organisations and their workers, whether employees
or self-employed, must do to manage work-related road safety by reference to their obligations under law.
DfT has also announced as part of the Road Safety Strategy that it will pilot a National Work-Related Road Safety Charter for businesses that require people to drive or ride for them. The aim of the Charter is to help employers to reduce work-related road risk and improve safety for all road users by promoting good practice, and to improve compliance with current legislation and guidance. It will include the use of Heavy Goods Vehicles (HGV)s, Light Goods Vehicles (LGVs), cars, motorcycles, e-cycles and cycles. The pilot will run for two years and will be monitored and fully evaluated.
The tragic death of Leonardo Cardoso Machado has raised several important concerns. DfT is committed to making our roads safer and we are ready to work with others to achieve this. Road safety is a shared responsibility, and DfT’s strategy reflects that. It considers action needed by government, local authorities, industry, emergency services and communities to tackle the causes of collisions and save lives. By investing in infrastructure, education, and enforcement, DfT are taking decisive steps to make our roads safer for everyone.
Sharing of permits The sharing of permits between licence owners and “substitutes” is a contractual issue and not an area HSE has any control over. The Department for Business and Trade (DBT) are the more appropriate governmental body, and they have addressed the practice of “renting” food delivery licences to under 18’s and the concerns that this raises. Food delivery companies do often allow account holders to use other people to carry out work for them under their account. This practice is sometimes referred to as substitution or sending a substitute. The ability for someone who is self-employed to subcontract work is a key feature of self-employment and is a lawful commercial arrangement. It is not something that is regulated or licensed by government in food delivery, or many other sectors where this practice can be found. As the report notes, most food delivery firms require that all riders and their substitutes are at least 18 years old. The government has been working closely with food delivery firms so that they increase the use of facial verification checks and fraud detection technology to ensure only registered account holders and their registered substitutes can work off their platforms. Employment of Minors: HSE has some high-level guidance on the employment of young people under the age of 18: Young people at work: Overview - HSE. The Department for Education state that the restrictions on child employment in the Children and Young Person’s Act 1933 apply to children who are of compulsory school age. Therefore, these restrictions would not apply in the case of Leonardo Cardoso Machado who, as a 17-year-old, would be classed as a ‘young worker’.
However, we note from the response from Uber Eats UK Limited to the coroner on 18 November 2025, that their terms and conditions include requirements that persons under the age of 18 are prohibited from having a delivery licence or to act as a substitute. Lone Working: It is well known and established that lone working can present a risk to workers, and this should form part of an employer’s risk assessment. This includes the requirement to assess risks and should consider ways in which the work can be organised to minimise the potential for harm. Relevant training, supervision, monitoring and support should be provided for lone workers. HSE specifically considers lone workers in providing guidance and this covers both the employers of lone workers and the lone workers themselves; Lone working - HSE.
However, HSE acknowledges that there are practical limits to what can be done in the driver delivery sector because work like this inevitably involves working alone, to deadlines, often at night and with the attendant road risks.
Lastly, a great deal of work is going on between government and the food delivery industry to tighten control and reduce abuse of legitimate systems such as substitution, for example this initiative Delivery firms to bolster rider security checks to stop illegal working - GOV.UK.
The new Employment Rights Act 2025 is also aimed to address weakness of current system - Employment Rights Act 2025: overview factsheet
I trust that this response from HSE, along with the contributions from the other governmental departments, gives you confidence and reassurance that the issues raised in his report are actively being addressed.
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On the 19th April 2023, an investigation was commenced into the death of Leonardo Cardoso Machado, born on the 13th July 2005.
The investigation concluded at the end of the Inquest on the 11th September 2025.
The Medical Cause of Death was:
1a Traumatic Head and Neck Injuries
1b
1c The conclusion of the Inquest as recorded by the jury empanelled to hear the Inquest was that Leonardo Cardoso Machado died at Lindsay Road near junction with St Aldhelm's Rd, Poole, Dorset on 16th April 2023. On balance of probability the fact the Police attempted to effect a traffic stop at the County Gates Gyratory caused Leo to "make off" at high speed through the red traffic lights to continue to travel at speed along Lindsay Rd. The excessive speed of the motorbike driven by Leo was the causative factor in the collision causing Leo to lose control at the bend in the road and drive into the railings on Lindsay Rd. The cause of death was traumatic head and neck injuries caused by the road traffic collision.
The investigation concluded at the end of the Inquest on the 11th September 2025.
The Medical Cause of Death was:
1a Traumatic Head and Neck Injuries
1b
1c The conclusion of the Inquest as recorded by the jury empanelled to hear the Inquest was that Leonardo Cardoso Machado died at Lindsay Road near junction with St Aldhelm's Rd, Poole, Dorset on 16th April 2023. On balance of probability the fact the Police attempted to effect a traffic stop at the County Gates Gyratory caused Leo to "make off" at high speed through the red traffic lights to continue to travel at speed along Lindsay Rd. The excessive speed of the motorbike driven by Leo was the causative factor in the collision causing Leo to lose control at the bend in the road and drive into the railings on Lindsay Rd. The cause of death was traumatic head and neck injuries caused by the road traffic collision.
Circumstances of the Death
Leo was 17 years of age at the time of his death. Leo “rented” an “Uber Eats” delivery licence, though he was too young to obtain such a licence himself. As a result of the rented licence, Leo was able to earn money as a food delivery driver. In the early hours of 16th April 2023 Leo was riding a 599cc Yamaha sports bike with an “Uber Eats” delivery box attached to the rear. He was not licenced to use such a motorcycle, which requires a full category A driving licence, with the licence holder being 21 years of age or older. Leo had been stationary on the motorcycle at a red light when approached by police. He made off at speed and subsequently lost control of the motorcycle, colliding with metal railings and sustaining injuries that caused his death.
Copies Sent To
Chief Constable for Dorset Police
Independent Office for Police Conduct
Dorset Child Death Overview Panel At the request of the Home Office, the initial recipient of the original report to prevent future deaths dated 23rd September 2025, the following have also been sent a copy of the report
of the Department for Business and Trade
of the Department of Transport
of the Health and Safety Executive
of the Department for Education
of the Home Office
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes with this PFD
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Action plan to address staff desensitisation and secondary trauma
Brook House Inquiry
DWP policy impact assessment
Address barriers to detainee complaints including fear of repercussions
Brook House Inquiry
DWP policy impact assessment
Improve Professional Standards Unit investigation procedures and training
Brook House Inquiry
DWP policy impact assessment
Enhance Professional Standards Unit independence and seniority
Brook House Inquiry
DWP policy impact assessment
Update whistleblowing DSO with anonymous reporting mechanisms
Brook House Inquiry
DWP policy impact assessment
Strengthen Independent Monitoring Board statutory footing and responsiveness
Brook House Inquiry
DWP policy impact assessment
Improve HMIP and IMB evidence gathering and reporting processes
Brook House Inquiry
DWP policy impact assessment
Review CCTV monitoring SIA licence requirements
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Unregulated recreation safety
Establish standard for event healthcare services
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Unregulated recreation safety
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.