Keith Nottle

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2022-0189
Coroner Gordon Clow
All 2 responses received
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
Mental health crisis triage bypasses specialist assessment, relying on telephone workers' limited judgment. There was a lack of care coordination for complex patients and unclear multi-disciplinary team decision-making.
View full coroner's concerns
Evidence was heard regarding the operation of a triage for patients who may be experiencing a mental health crisis. A practice had developed of bypassing specialist mental health assessment by means of telephone workers making their own judgments about the level of risk a person presents to themselves and others, and a judgment about whether or not they require urgent mental health assessment and / or treatment, based on a very limited criteria. This had the result of only a very small proportion of potentially unwell patients being considered by a person with qualifications to assess and treat mental health. This was a culture and practice which stood in conflict with the procedure the Trust had in writing for the role of the telephone workers. I was also concerned regarding the apparent lack of involvement of a care co-ordinator at the Trust, given that a variety of agencies and persons were involved in seeking to assist and treat Mr Nottle. Lastly, I was concerned that there was evidence of a lack of clarity of thinking within the multi-disciplinary team in relation to the decision to discharge Mr Nottle and the apparent recalcitrance of the multi-disciplinary team in relation to repeated re-referrals into the service. This may be linked with the lack of care co-ordination or may be a cultural or practice issue within the operation of the multi-disciplinary team. It is requested that consideration be given to:­
1. Clarifying the role of telephone workers and the steps necessary to ensure that the government guidance regarding access to mental health services is followed so far as is possible within the available resources;
2. Steps to ensure that, for individuals with complex mental health needs involving a range of providers, there is co-ordination of care to ensure that appropriate care is in place and, where necessary, a consistent approach is taken to patients by different organisations or teams working with the patient; and
3. Review of the multi-disciplinary team’s decision-making process in light of the issues identified by Mr Nottle’s circumstances.
Responses
Turning Point Other
9 Aug 2022
Action Taken
Turning Point has reviewed and refreshed helpline worker roles, agreed a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) with Nottinghamshire Healthcare Trust, ensured staff familiarity with the SOP, introduced additional monitoring and audits, and agreed a competency framework. (AI summary)
View full response
Turning Point The Exchange 3 New York Street Manchester M1 4HN T

F

CHIEF EXECUTIVE: LORD VICTOR ADEBOWALE CBE TURNING POINT IS A REGISTERED CHARITY, NO. 234887, A REGISTERED SOCIAL LANDLORD AND A COMPANY LIMITED BY GUARANTEE NO. 793558 (ENGLAND & WALES) REGISTERED OFFICE: STANDON HOUSE, 21 MANSELL STREET, LONDON, E1 8AA. T:020 7481 7600 F:020 7481 7620 www.turning-point.co.uk 9th August 2022 Prevention of Future Deaths Notice for Keith Nottle – Turning Point Response It is our understanding that Turning Point is only being asked to give consideration to paragraph 1 in section 5 of the regulation 28 report, jointly with Nottinghamshire Healthcare Trust; we have discussed this with colleagues from the Trust and they agree with this interpretation of the report. We have reviewed and refreshed the key factors in the role of the helpline (telephone) workers with colleagues in Nottinghamshire Healthcare Trust, including when and how referrals are escalated to the Crisis Team, training, supervision, monitoring and audit. We are also working with commissioners and the Trust to refresh the service specification. We have met with our colleagues from Nottinghamshire Healthcare Trust on a number of occasions and agreed a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for the flow of referrals from the helpline workers to the Crisis Team. This SOP is in line with the service specification and national guidance regarding access to mental health services. We have met with the team of helpline workers and their team leader and ensured that they are familiar with the detail of the SOP. We have introduced additional monitoring and audits to ensure that all helpline workers are following the SOP and any variance is addressed in a timely way. The audits will check a sample of cases each month against the SOP and our additional monitoring incudes regular listening in to the calls by a manager or team leader. We have also agreed a competency framework to provide assurance that our staff are confident in their ability to handle calls and the escalation process regarding risk, amongst other areas. We, alongside our colleagues in the Trust, are also introducing a new digital telephony system which will give both organisations better insight into call activity. We believe that these steps will effectively address the concerns that were raised regarding ‘culture and practice’ in the helpline service.
NHS Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS / Health Body
Action Planned
Nottinghamshire Healthcare is undertaking a comprehensive review of its Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment service, which is currently underway and will lead to an improvement plan by 30 November 2022. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Mr. Clow,

Please find below the organisational response to the recently received Preventing Future Deaths Report, following the unfortunate death of Mr. Nottle. In responding, we have worked closely in conjunction with Turning Point. The Matters of concern raised within the report:

1. Clarifying the role of telephone workers and the steps necessary to ensure that the government guidance regarding access to mental health services is followed so far as is possible within the available resources.

Nottinghamshire Healthcare and Turning Point are jointly commissioned by Nottingham and Nottinghamshire Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) to provide a 24-hour Urgent Access Mental Health telephone service. The purpose of the telephone line is to provide support, advice and triage across Nottingham and Nottinghamshire to people requesting help with any aspect of mental health. This includes practical immediate support and guidance or assistance to navigate any further support needed; and immediate transfer to Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment (CRHT) staff if required. The first point of contact are Recovery Workers employed by Turning Point and co-located in the City Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment (CRHT) team office at Highbury Hospital. The staff are co- located so that they may have immediate assistance from CRHT staff if required. The Turning Point Team Leader and CRHT staff have the ability to listen in to calls if necessary. This is carried out via a dual listening device that allows a second set of headphones to be plugged in. The UK Mental Health Triage Scale (Appendix 1) is utilised to guide staff as to when a call should be transferred directly to a CRHT member of staff During the evidence at the inquest the Turning Point staff member stated that Turning Point staff may be placed on the line within their first week of starting work, after shadowing a small number of shifts. It was also stated that there are frequent times when calls are not transferred to CRHT in line with the UK Mental Health Triage Scale Private and Confidential

Mr. Clow HM Assistant Coroner for Nottingham and Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Coroner’s Office The Council House Old Market Square Nottingham NG1 2DT Reference:

E-mail:

Date: 3 August 2022.

The Resource, Duncan Macmillan House, Porchester Road, Nottingham NG3 6AA Chair: , Chief Executive:

In order to respond to the PFD senior members of Adult Mental Health and the Deputy Director for Mental Health Services have met with national and local senior staff from Turning Point. We have sought assurance from Turning Point regarding the training that staff receive. All staff complete the Turning Point Mental Health Foundation Programme which includes mandatory e-learning modules alongside face-to-face training sessions facilitated by the Turning Point Learning and Development Team. The Recovery Workers also undertake a competency assessment to ensure they have a high level of competence in managing calls, using correct systems and utilising appropriate escalation protocols in relation to risk and safety management. The competency assessment has been updated in light of this inquest. The updated competency assessment is attached (Appendix 2). As well as the Turning Point training, staff also receive a face-to-face training session from the CRHT staff as part of their induction. This is based on the Trust’s e-learning package for risk assessment and management. We have been assured by Turning Point that in her evidence regarding transfers to CRHT the staff member was referring to June 2021 when the Urgent Access line was first set up, where there were some initial issues with the transfer of calls. The local guidance for the UK Mental Health Triage Scale has been reviewed with a more robust escalation process should there be any difficulty encountered in transfer of a call. The Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) (Appendix 3) for the Urgent Access line has been reviewed and shared with all relevant staff via email and also during supervision and team meetings. A new digital telephony system is being introduced into the Trust which will provide greater insight into call activity. All calls will be recorded which will enable the roll out of regular audit. It is anticipated that the telephony system will be operational by Mid-August 2022. An audit system is being introduced whereby telephone recordings of a sample of telephone calls will be listened to monthly and utilised for audit and training purposes. This will include monitoring if the calls are being handled in accordance with the SOP and taking remedial action if needed.

2. Steps to ensure that, for individuals with complex mental health needs involving a range of providers, there is co-ordination of care to ensure that appropriate care is in place and, where necessary, a consistent approach is taken to patients by different organisations or teams working with the patient; and

3. Review of the multi-disciplinary team’s decision-making process in light of the issues identified by Mr Nottle’s circumstances.

Our response to issues 2 and 3 will be taken together as these represent issues in regard to the decision making within the LMHT. We acknowledge that the team conflated the two issues of Mr Nottle living remotely and a clinical decision as to whether secondary care services were the right place for Mr Nottle to receive his care. There was not a comprehensive care plan, there was a lack of

The Resource, Duncan Macmillan House, Porchester Road, Nottingham NG3 6AA Chair:

Chief Executive:

liaison with the GP, with Mr Nottle’s parents and with Mr Nottle himself. In addition, multiple re- referrals of Mr Nottle to the team were not acted upon. These concerns highlighted that expected systems and protocols had not been complied with and therefore indicated that a poor culture has developed within the team which has led to poor decision making and, at times, a loss of compassion. In order to address these issues of culture and practice within the team a programme of Quality Assurance work is planned. This will consist of a Culture Review and a Quality Standards review. The Culture Review will be based on the closed culture indicators set out by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) (Appendix 4). This commences on 3rd August 2022 over a 3-month period. During this period there will be regular contacts by the Quality Assurance team to monitor improvement. The Quality Standards review, led by the Quality Assurance Team, will take place on 19th September
2022. This will look at the 5 key areas and fundamental standards of the CQC, namely is the service Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well Led. Both of these reviews will include:
• a thematic review of serious incidents and complaints involving the team
• live observation of Multi-Disciplinary team meetings and decisions which are made with in the meetings. This will involve how referrals are managed and how discharge decisions are taken
• review of care plans including involvement of patients and carers, and where multiple out of hours calls are made to the CRHT
• Views of staff, service users and carers about the service

The Person-Centred Care audit tool (Appendix 5) will be another key element of this review. Following both these reviews an improvement plan will be developed to assist the team in making required changes in a supportive and achievable manner. The improvement plan will be monitored to completion on a monthly basis, overseen by the local management team (Service Manager, Operational Manager and Matron). Once considered complete, the improvement plan will be presented at the Quality and Risk meeting and signed off by the General Manager. An audit will then be developed and carried out twelve months later in order to understand the efficacy of changes made. I hope the information above provides the assurance that we have and continue to consider your recommendations seriously, that we are actively seeking to clarify and improve the services we provide by implementing the actions outlined. The Trust will be able to share the findings of the review and initial improvement plan with you by 30 November 2022 and agreement made at that point in relation to any further updates on progress of the implementation of the plan you may wish to receive.
Sent To
  • Nottinghamshire Healthcare Trust and Turning Point
Response Status
Linked responses 2 of 1
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 23 July 2021 I commenced an investigation into the death of Keith Andrew NOTTLE aged 48. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 13 June 2022. The conclusion of the inquest was that Mr Nottle’s death was by accident, on the basis of him having taken an overdose as a cry for help, or to secure secondary mental health treatment, but which caused his death.
Circumstances of the Death
Mr Nottle experienced a protracted period of poor mental health. He was successfully treated for symptoms of psychosis but many other aspects of his complex mental health difficulties were resistant to treatments provided. On or shortly before 5 July 2021 Mr Nottle took an overdose of two of his prescribed medications. He was discovered by emergency services to be extremely unwell and conveyed to hospital. Despite all appropriate treatment being afforded, Mr Nottle died on 5 July 2021 from the effects of the overdose of medication. Mr Nottle’s mental health and wellbeing had deteriorated in the period leading up to his death. He was experiencing symptoms which may have been the early signs of a relapse into psychosis. He had been upset with the decision to discharge him from the local mental health team at the time that he returned to independent living, a decision upon which he had not been consulted and which had not been communicated directly to him. Both Mr Nottle’s family and a number of other agencies sought to secure the re-engagement of the local mental health team in the months that followed. All referrals were refused. Mr Nottle’s GP was not provided with details of Mr Nottle’s diagnosis, advice as to how to manage Mr Nottle’s psychiatric medications, or of circumstances in which Mr Nottle should be referred back to the local mental health team. There were missed opportunities to intervene and assess Mr Nottle in the period leading up to his death. It is not possible to determine whether or not this would have changed the outcome. At this time, Mr Nottle was experiencing a range of other social stressors including his isolation arising from the pandemic restrictions, his difficulties with accessing employment, and his return to independent living. He had experienced significant psychological difficulties which had not proved amenable to treatement. Any or all of these factors may have played a part in his decision making. It is also possible that his decision making became affected by delusional thoughts and beliefs. Mr Nottle’s behaviour in taking a substantial overdose of his prescribed medication was either a cry for help or an attempt to secure the involvement of additional specialist mental health services. He did not intend his own death.
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Standardised Advance Care Planning
COVID-19 Inquiry
No person-centred care
Patient-focused correspondence
Paterson Inquiry
No person-centred care
Explaining independent sector differences
Paterson Inquiry
No person-centred care
Reflection period for consent
Paterson Inquiry
No person-centred care
Communicating complaint escalation
Paterson Inquiry
No person-centred care
Mandatory independent complaint resolution
Paterson Inquiry
No person-centred care
Age-Appropriate Hospital Settings
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
No person-centred care
Bedside Display of Responsible Staff
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
No person-centred care
Nurse Attendance at Clinical Interactions
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
No person-centred care
Parental Knowledge in Care Plans
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
No person-centred care

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.