Oliver Weston

PFD Report Historic (No Identified Response) Ref: 2021-0422
Date of Report 20 December 2021
Coroner Dr James Adeley
Response Deadline ✓ from report 1 March 2022
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
An OFSTED inspection of a children's home was deficient, failing to consider relevant safeguarding information and misinterpreting evidence. Lack of guidance for publishing reports in "exceptional circumstances" led to arbitrary decisions.
View full coroner's concerns
[BRIEF SUMMARY OF MATTERS OF CONCERN] (1) there was no documented evidence as to whether a monitoring or inspection visit was required following the death of a looked after child (2) the preplanning of the visit was deficient in that there was no indication that the four potential episodes of known to OFSTED were a key line of enquiry (3) the safeguarding documentation, which was entirely relevant, was not considered by the inspector (4) other significant information indexed in the file, such as an annual psychological review, was not considered by the inspector (5) in almost every instance where OFSTED was critical of the Home it was either found to be based on insufficiency of enquiry, misinterpretation of the available evidence or drawing unsupportable conclusions from the available documentation resulting in OFSTED accepting that

Coroner's Court, 2 Faraday Court, Faraday Drive, Fulwood, Preston, Lancashire, PR2 9NB

none of the breaches of the Regulations could be sustained against the Home. (6) on review by an inspector familiar with the home and a senior manager, a lack of critical appraisal failed to detect any of the deficiencies in the inspection. A critical appraisal might have been expected as the previous OFSTED rating of the Home was "outstanding" and no concerns were raised in the Regulation 44 reports (7) there is a discretion not to publish an OFSTED if there are "exceptional circumstances" which was relied upon by the senior manager in not publishing this report. OFSTED has provided no guidance to senior managers as to what constitutes "exceptional circumstances" which in this instance was taken to include the death of a child: in almost all other looked after child deaths, the death of the child was not sufficient to constitute "exceptional circumstances". A lack of guidance leaves senior managers to apply arbitrary criteria as to whether or not a report should be published (8) following an unannounced monitoring visit where the manager of the Home and the Responsible Individual were not present, no attempt was made to clarify any matters of concern with such individuals
Sent To
  • OFSTED
Response Status
Linked responses 0 of 1
56-Day Deadline 1 Mar 2022
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 4th June 2021 I commenced an investigation into the death of Oliver Brassington Weston, 17 years of age. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest Thursday, 16 December 2021 . The conclusion of the inquest was:

"Oliver Brassington Weston died on the evening of Friday, 22 March 2019 at Cumbria View House by the . Oliver's intentions were unclear as to was applied but it was an impulsive act."
Circumstances of the Death
Oliver Brassington Weston was a looked after child placed in a home by Stockton Borough Council. On one and 14 February 2019 Oliver undertook

. On the evening of 22 March 2019 Oliver, in an impulsive act,

.
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Allow Advisory Board to monitor individual compensation cases
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Weak Government Accountability & Scrutiny
Publish Advisory Board meeting reports within 21 days
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Weak Government Accountability & Scrutiny
Make monitoring full and fair compensation a core Board duty
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Weak Government Accountability & Scrutiny
Increase Advisory Board membership if needed for capacity
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Weak Government Accountability & Scrutiny
Seek court directions for GLO compensation in bankruptcy cases
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Weak Government Accountability & Scrutiny
Publish proposals for equal tax treatment of compensation payments
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Weak Government Accountability & Scrutiny
Amend Limitation Act to extend GLO deadline if needed
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Weak Government Accountability & Scrutiny
Set agreed closing date for Horizon Shortfall Scheme applications
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Weak Government Accountability & Scrutiny
Respond to recommendations by 10 October 2025
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Weak Government Accountability & Scrutiny
Establish standing public body to administer future redress schemes
Post Office Horizon Inquiry
Weak Government Accountability & Scrutiny

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.