Archie Hexall

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2015-0081
Date of Report 5 March 2015
Coroner Philip Barlow
Response Deadline est. 30 April 2015
All 1 response received · Deadline: 30 Apr 2015
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
A communication breakdown between midwives led to critical information about a newborn's respiratory distress being lost, with temporary notes not retained and parents left uninformed.
View full coroner's concerns
(1) About 25 minutes after his birth Archie was noted to be grunting and he then developed nasal flaring,both of which are potential signs of respiratory distress He was midwife berformed alset of observations, including oxygen saturations, and she also noticed vomiting, grunting and nasai flaring: The evjdence at thetinquest was that Iwrote the observations on a piece of paper because the medical records were not immediately available (her observations were performed shortly after the birth of Archie s brother who required resuscitation). Midwife later transcribed; these results into the medical records, However; the evidence Was that midwife= was not aware of the vomiting, grunting and nasal flaring noticed by midwife although midwife Ibelieves she did pass this information on verbally During this period attention may understandably have been focussed on Archie's brother: However; am concerned that the important information about further possible signs of respiratory distress was somehow lost in the communication between the two midwives the piece of paper on which the observations were recorded was not retained, am concerned that this should have been retained in the medical records.

(2) No-one informed Archie's parents of the concerns about Archie's breathing: After returning to delivery suite was left alone with Archie for a period of between and 10 miputes. During this Inoted that Archie's breathing was irregular: My finding at the inquest was that if he had known of the midwives' concernszhe Wolld have raised the alarm sooner, although it was not possible to say the evidence whether this would have altered the outcome_ Ido of course understand that a balance needs to be maintained between sharing relevant information with parents and causing unnecessary alarm: However sharing relevant information potentially enables parents to make important contributions to their child's care and my concern is that this opportunity was lost in this case_
Responses
Lewisham Greenwich NHS Trust NHS / Health Body
17 Apr 2015
Action Taken
Lewisham Greenwich NHS Trust has implemented actions, including a 'learning from incidents' policy requiring staff to document and handover clear information and a review of handover documentation. They have also used initiatives such as Goldfish Bowl and Whose Shoes? to improve communication between staff and service users. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Dr Barlow Re: Regulation 28 to Prevent Future Deaths report re Archie Hexall am writing in response to your Prevention of Future Deaths (PFD) Report dated 6th March 2015 received following the inquest into the death of baby Archie Hexall. Your report informed me that at the inquest it was established that Archie, the eldest of twins had been born on 24th March 2013 at Queen Elizabeth Hospital Woolwich by forceps delivery in seemingly good condition. About 2 hours later he suffered a respiratory arrest. He was found to have had extensive brain haemorrhage and hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy, although the underlying cause of these remains unknown_ He was transferred to SCBU then to St Thomas' Hospital where he died on 29 March 2013 at the age of 5 days. Breakdowns in communication between healthcare professionals and with Archie's parents contributed to the delay in recognising Archie's deteriorating condition: The Trust undertook a Serious Incident investigation following the incident You further expressed concern that future deaths could occur should the following issues not be acted upon: Communication had been lost during handover between two midwives, contributed to by the fact that notes of observations of Archie's condition at the time had been written on a loose piece of paper then later transcribed into the clinical notes once had become available. Not all the observations were transcribed they

across and it appears that important information about possible further signs of respiratory distress had been lost. The loose piece of paper was not retained in the medical records and you were concerned that it ought to have been: 2 ~ The midwife who had noted some concerns about Archie's breathing had not expressed these concerns to his father; had Archie's father been aware of the concerns he would have raised the alarm earlier when he later noticed that Archie's breathing had become more irregular: It is important that clinicians share relevant information with parents to enable them to make important contributions to their child's care; such an opportunity was lost in this case am now writing to set out what we have done within the Trust; and indeed were already in the process of doing in relation to communication issues, to act upon these concerns, and reduce the likelihood of avoidable harm to future patients_ have been assisted in this response byl IHead of Midwifery for our Maternity Service which is now run across two hospital sites (Queen Elizabeth Hospital Woolwich and University Hospital Lewisham) making up the current Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust: Documentation This issue was raised by the PFD report in relation to loose paper being used to document observations contemporaneously and later transcribed into the clinical notes. In this case the observations taken from Archie were transcribed into the clinical notes by a different person to the member of staff who had performed the observations; All members of staff have been reminded that any loose documentation must be secured into the main clinical notes even if written on a small piece of paper: 2 - Wider Communication issues Communication is recognised by the Maternity service as a vital component to the care we deliver. Communication both between teams of professionals and between professionals and families for whom we are caring can be challenging at times, especially during emergency and complex situations. It is however recognised as very important

Just 5 This daily communication meeting is held daily (Monday to Friday) and is attended by all staff working in the maternity unit that day: Issues such as recent clinical incidents, complaints and user feedback are discussed. After Action Reviews An AAR is held following incidents, complaints or when a complex case has gone very well; to help learn lessons and share good practice The maternity unit is working hard to embed the AAR technique in everyday working life to encourage learning to be initiated by front line staff. Midwifery Mandatory Training Communication issues are presented and discussed at the mandatory training days. In addition all staff attend training on communication in various forms_ Conflict resolution training is also a Trust mandatory training element and there is strong focus on communication skills and strategies_ SBAR Work is currently underway to embed the use of this communication tool (Situation, Background, Assessment; Recommendation) within the maternity service. This is a simple tool used by many NHS organisations to ensure that communication between healthcare professionals is clear and concise, and to support effective escalation of situations when necessary_ This technique is already underway in the Children's Division, the Maternity Service, and has been incorporated into a wider Trust initiative under the umbrella of the national Sign Up To Safety campaign and our pledge to reduce harm to the 'deteriorating patient' . Progress will be monitored at the Trust's Quality and Safety Committee where quarterly updates will be presented by the pledge leads_ This committee is chaired by the Trust's Deputy Medical Director for Quality and Safety: May express on their behalf to Archie's parents the condolences of the staff involved, and hope that too will be reassured that the Trust is trying hard to improve communication with parents within the Maternity Service, and thank them for their contribution to raising awareness of these important issues_ they

Within the maternity service there are several forms of training and updating for both obstetric and midwifery staff to ensure that communication skill remains high on our agenda: Within the medical workforce the consultants undergo a yearly appraisal. One domain assessed is communication with colleagues and other health professionals. In addition it is now mandatory that a 360 degree appraisal is completed every three years The appraisal focuses on working relationships as well as communication. Communication skills are addressed as part of junior medical staff training with 380 degree feedback being mandatory two years_ Several communication workshops have been held over the past few years both multidisciplinary and involving women and their partners who have used our service. Feedback from service users is considered a important part of learning: Some other initiatives which have been used to improve communication between staff and service users include: Goldfish Bowl This initiative has been held three times within our Trust with excellent feedback from those who attended, Members of the multidisciplinary team are invited to listen to the experience of women who have used the service. These may be positive or negative experiences. After this the audience discuss who women felt about the care received and what improvements could be made_ 'Whose Shoes?' This was piloted by Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust as an initiative across London to improve women's experience of maternity services Again audience is multidisciplinary and each small group includes one or two service users. There is debate about how care is delivered; the impact of the language we use, and how we involve families in their care_ Following the event pledges are made by those attending as to what will change This event was held in November 2014, and second session is planned for spring / summer 2015. Joint Teaching Session Biannual joint teaching sessions are held for midwives and medical staff on communication skills These sessions are facilitated by a consultant obstetrician and a supervisor of midwives, every very they the they -

hope that this information about the initiatives that have been started since Archie's death provide you with assurance that the Trust is actively different techniques to help improve communication both within and between clinical teams and between clinicians and patients and their carers. We have also raised awareness about the importance of retaining all clinical documentation. The Trust is also actively participating in the national Sign Up to Safety campaign with a Trust wide initiative to reduce avoidable harm from failure to identify and act on the deteriorating patient
Sent To
  • Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust
Response Status
Linked responses 1 of 1
56-Day Deadline 30 Apr 2015
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 10 April 2013 commenced an investigation into the death of Archie Haxell, age 5 days; The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 27 February 2015. The conclusion of the inquest was that the medical cause of death was extensive brain haemorrhage and hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy: The narrative verdict was as follows: About 2 hours after his birth at Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Archie Haxell suffered respiratory arrest: He was found to have had extensive brain haemorrhage and hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy although the underlying cause of these remains unknown: He was transferred to St Thomas' Hospital where he died on 29 March 2013. Breakdowns in communication between healthcare professionals and with Archie's parents contributed to the delay in recognising Archie's deteriorating condition:
Circumstances of the Death
The circumstances are also set out in the Trusts serious incident investigation report dated 12 August 2013. Briefly Archie was the eldest of twins and was born in seemingly good condition in theatre by forceps delivery on 24 March 2013. About 2 hours after his birth Archie suffered a respiratory arrest He was transferred to SCBU and then to St Thomas' where he died at the age of 5 days.
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you andlor your organisation have the power to take such action;
Inquest Conclusion
About 2 hours after his birth at Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Archie Haxell suffered respiratory arrest: He was found to have had extensive brain haemorrhage and hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy although the underlying cause of these remains unknown: He was transferred to St Thomas' Hospital where he died on 29 March 2013. Breakdowns in communication between healthcare professionals and with Archie's parents contributed to the delay in recognising Archie's deteriorating condition:
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Healthcare trust risk information visibility
Southport Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Data Systems for High-Risk Individuals
COVID-19 Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Patient Records Audit
Infected Blood Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Separate SIO and Family Liaison Officer roles
Daniel Morgan Panel
Emergency family notification
On-Call Consultant Display
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
Staff rota communication
Blood Test Result Documentation
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Recording Clinical Discussions
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
GP Notification of Death Circumstances
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
Emergency family notification
Improve perinatal mortality recording
Morecambe Bay Investigation
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Detainee Capture and Condition Records
Al-Sweady Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.