James Clarke
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2014-0398
All 1 response received
· Deadline: 5 Nov 2014
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
Carers provided seriously inadequate supervision, failing to check a vulnerable patient with a tracheotomy overnight, and received only theoretical training without practical application.
View full coroner's concerns
This Office is open Monday to Thursday 8am to 4pm. Friday 8am to 3pm riding cycle, him,
A.M. CORONER 10 September 2014 Continuation My concerns are that two carers having been employed, the expectation was that one would be with James constantly. The written instructions from the care home said "Call is to check James throughout the night and carry out tracheotomy care/suction if necessary". Whilst there was no further explanation of what "throughout the night" meant, the evidence I had was that the carers sat in a room on the other side of the corridor to James' s bedroom, were watching television and playing computer games and talking did not check him between L.a.m and 4a.m. and again did not check him between 4.10 a.m and 6.a.m and only then because his peg feed alarm sounded. He was found dead at that stage The carers had had theoretical training, but no practical training had been given to them by the care company who employed them: Their employers were Complete Care Services, which is the name of CCS: Central Limited of West Midlands House, Gypsy Lane, Willenhall, Wolverhampton, West Midlands WV13 2HA and [ was told that the company are registered with the Care Quality Commission. was concerned that the standard of care provided for James was seriously and that if that standard of care was reflected in the care given to others, to whom CCS provided services, then there may be a risk to other members of the public
A.M. CORONER 10 September 2014 Continuation My concerns are that two carers having been employed, the expectation was that one would be with James constantly. The written instructions from the care home said "Call is to check James throughout the night and carry out tracheotomy care/suction if necessary". Whilst there was no further explanation of what "throughout the night" meant, the evidence I had was that the carers sat in a room on the other side of the corridor to James' s bedroom, were watching television and playing computer games and talking did not check him between L.a.m and 4a.m. and again did not check him between 4.10 a.m and 6.a.m and only then because his peg feed alarm sounded. He was found dead at that stage The carers had had theoretical training, but no practical training had been given to them by the care company who employed them: Their employers were Complete Care Services, which is the name of CCS: Central Limited of West Midlands House, Gypsy Lane, Willenhall, Wolverhampton, West Midlands WV13 2HA and [ was told that the company are registered with the Care Quality Commission. was concerned that the standard of care provided for James was seriously and that if that standard of care was reflected in the care given to others, to whom CCS provided services, then there may be a risk to other members of the public
Responses
Action Planned
The CQC will note the report and use it to inform the next inspection of Complete Care Services, focusing on their processes and training provision. They are also implementing new fundamental standards under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. (AI summary)
The CQC will note the report and use it to inform the next inspection of Complete Care Services, focusing on their processes and training provision. They are also implementing new fundamental standards under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Mr Balmain Re: Inquest into the death of James Dwayne Clarke I apologise for the delay in responding to your letter dated 10 September 2014, but as you are aware in order to inform a fully considered response to your report we have sought additional details about the inquest given that we were an interested person in the proceedings. We were very sad to read about the death of Mr Clarke and the circumstances in which he died. Thank you for your report and the requirement for us to review what actions should be taken to try to prevent the occurrence or continuation of such circumstances in the future. Please treat this letter as the formal response of the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to your report dated 10 September 2014. In your report and pursuant to the requirements of Regulation 28 of the Regulations, you require the CQC to provide details of any action that has been taken or which is proposed to be taken in response to the concerns highlighted in your report, or an explanation as to why no action is proposed if appropriate. In terms of background and context, the provision of care to Mr Clarke at the time of his death was provided through an organisation Complete Care Services, trading as CCS Central Limited, West Midlands House, Gypsy Lane, Willenhall, Wolverhampton, West Midlands WV1 3 2HA. This organisation was registered with the CQC under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 in October 2010. The organisation was registered to provide the regulated activity “personal care” from a location in Gypsy Lane, Willenhall. In April 2012 the organisation voluntarily de-registered the location in Gypsy Lane, Willenhall and applied to register to provide the same regulated activity from a location in Stafford Street, Willenhall. 1
We have had a number of changes in structures and personnel since the time of Mr Clarke’s death, so I am somewhat reliant on information from our computer record systems to provide the following information. We were notified of the death of Mr Clarke by the local authority on 11 April 2011. This was logged on our system as information of concern. The record was closed on 21 April 2011 without any record of activity taken by CQC, the local authority or the police. The inspector who held this provider on their portfolio recalls that they were aware that a safeguarding investigation was to proceed. We hold no further records of that or its outcome. In terms of actions that we have undertaken, in May 2011 we carried out a responsive inspection unannounced. This was the service’s first inspection under the Health and Social Care Act 2008. This would have focused on the issues considered relevant at the point of inspection and any information of concern that we held. We inspected against four of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2010. These were:
• Regulation 9 which relates to how the provider protects the care and welfare of people using the service
• Regulation 10 which relates to how the provider assesses and monitors the quality of their service provision
• Regulation 11 which relates to the arrangements that the provider has in place to safeguard people from abuse (which includes neglect and acts of omission)
• Regulation 17 which relates to the arrangements the provider has to deal with complaints At that inspection it was our judgement that the provider was compliant with Regulation 11, and had appropriate arrangements in place to protect people from abuse. However, it was found that risk assessments were not up to date so the provider was required to improve these. Since that time, we have inspected the organisation’s location at Stafford Street and found it to be compliant with all regulations inspected. There have been no concerns sufficient to trigger further responsive inspections or regulatory action. As your office has confirmed, CQC were not informed about the inquest proceedings and we were not invited to contribute or respond at that time. Our inspection in May 2011 found that there were shortfalls in the provider’s approach to assessing and mitigating risk to people using services. Our inspections since then 2
(although to a different location and therefore different legal entity) have not found any shortfalls. I hope that you find this of some reassurance. In April 2015 CQC will adopt the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014, known as the “fundamental standards’. The changes in the regulations have emerged from the Robert Francis recommendations that there should be very obvious standards below which care must not fall. Regulation 9 will ensure that people receive care and treatment that is personalised for them and meets their needs; Regulation 12 is intended to prevent people from receiving unsafe care and treatment, and prevent avoidable harm or risk of harm. These regulations in particular will require providers to ensure that care is planned and delivered in a way that makes it crystal clear to care staff what is required of them, and that staff are experienced, trained and competent in the areas where they are providing that care. In implementing the new fundamental standards, our inspection processes have been developed. We will conduct longer, more in-depth inspections with a team approach designed to “get under the skin” of care services. We have key lines of enquiry which are explored and reported on consistently. Each care service will be rated either Outstanding, Good, Requires Improvement or Inadequate. We will continue to use our enforcement powers where services do not deliver safe services. We will ensure that your report is noted and informs the next ratings inspection that takes place of Complete Care Services; although the information is now a little dated the issues are well worth a further examination of their processes and training provision. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you require any further information. I am the Head of Inspection for the Black Country and would be happy to hear from you about this or any other situation of concern, and would welcome a meeting if you would like to hear more about CQC and our current activity in your area. With best wishes
We have had a number of changes in structures and personnel since the time of Mr Clarke’s death, so I am somewhat reliant on information from our computer record systems to provide the following information. We were notified of the death of Mr Clarke by the local authority on 11 April 2011. This was logged on our system as information of concern. The record was closed on 21 April 2011 without any record of activity taken by CQC, the local authority or the police. The inspector who held this provider on their portfolio recalls that they were aware that a safeguarding investigation was to proceed. We hold no further records of that or its outcome. In terms of actions that we have undertaken, in May 2011 we carried out a responsive inspection unannounced. This was the service’s first inspection under the Health and Social Care Act 2008. This would have focused on the issues considered relevant at the point of inspection and any information of concern that we held. We inspected against four of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2010. These were:
• Regulation 9 which relates to how the provider protects the care and welfare of people using the service
• Regulation 10 which relates to how the provider assesses and monitors the quality of their service provision
• Regulation 11 which relates to the arrangements that the provider has in place to safeguard people from abuse (which includes neglect and acts of omission)
• Regulation 17 which relates to the arrangements the provider has to deal with complaints At that inspection it was our judgement that the provider was compliant with Regulation 11, and had appropriate arrangements in place to protect people from abuse. However, it was found that risk assessments were not up to date so the provider was required to improve these. Since that time, we have inspected the organisation’s location at Stafford Street and found it to be compliant with all regulations inspected. There have been no concerns sufficient to trigger further responsive inspections or regulatory action. As your office has confirmed, CQC were not informed about the inquest proceedings and we were not invited to contribute or respond at that time. Our inspection in May 2011 found that there were shortfalls in the provider’s approach to assessing and mitigating risk to people using services. Our inspections since then 2
(although to a different location and therefore different legal entity) have not found any shortfalls. I hope that you find this of some reassurance. In April 2015 CQC will adopt the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014, known as the “fundamental standards’. The changes in the regulations have emerged from the Robert Francis recommendations that there should be very obvious standards below which care must not fall. Regulation 9 will ensure that people receive care and treatment that is personalised for them and meets their needs; Regulation 12 is intended to prevent people from receiving unsafe care and treatment, and prevent avoidable harm or risk of harm. These regulations in particular will require providers to ensure that care is planned and delivered in a way that makes it crystal clear to care staff what is required of them, and that staff are experienced, trained and competent in the areas where they are providing that care. In implementing the new fundamental standards, our inspection processes have been developed. We will conduct longer, more in-depth inspections with a team approach designed to “get under the skin” of care services. We have key lines of enquiry which are explored and reported on consistently. Each care service will be rated either Outstanding, Good, Requires Improvement or Inadequate. We will continue to use our enforcement powers where services do not deliver safe services. We will ensure that your report is noted and informs the next ratings inspection that takes place of Complete Care Services; although the information is now a little dated the issues are well worth a further examination of their processes and training provision. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you require any further information. I am the Head of Inspection for the Black Country and would be happy to hear from you about this or any other situation of concern, and would welcome a meeting if you would like to hear more about CQC and our current activity in your area. With best wishes
Sent To
- Care Quality Commission
Response Status
Linked responses
1 of 1
56-Day Deadline
5 Nov 2014
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 4uh and 5th September 2014 commenced an investigation into the death of JAMES
Circumstances of the Death
On 15th March 2014 Mr. Clarke was motorcycle unsuitable for the road on 15th March 2009. He collided with the rear of another motor fell off and collided with a car: He was not wearing a crash helmet: He became paraplegic and had tracheotomy tube: He was discharged home eventually: Carers were employed at home to care for particularly at night: Two carers employed at night did not notice that his tracheotomy tube had become blocked resulting in death
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Practical hands-on training and experience
Mid Staffs Inquiry
No person-centred care
Staff training and development
Mandate specific communication skills training for professionals caring for children and parents
Bristol Heart Inquiry
No person-centred care
Staff training and development
Integrate patient-professional partnership principles into all healthcare professional education and training
Bristol Heart Inquiry
No person-centred care
Staff training and development
Prioritise non-clinical skills in healthcare professional education and development
Bristol Heart Inquiry
No person-centred care
Staff training and development
Make communication skills education essential for all healthcare professionals
Bristol Heart Inquiry
No person-centred care
Staff training and development
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.