Railway related deaths

PFD Category
Reports: 103 Areas: 39 Earliest: Nov 2013 Latest: 5 Feb 2026

72% response rate (above 62% average). 36% of classified responses show concrete action taken. Reports fell 30% from 10 (2023) to 7 (2024).

PFD Reports
23 results
Amanda Hitch
Historic (No Identified Response)
2023-0535 19 Dec 2023 Essex
British Transport Police Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
Concerns summary Critical suicidal intent information was missed due to thematic clinical record display and a failure to use structured risk management tools. British Transport Police's multi-agency support plan also failed to communicate railway station attendances, especially from unstaffed stations.
Fraser Moore
Historic (No Identified Response)
2023-0497 4 Dec 2023 Inner South London
Department for Transport Network Rail
Concerns summary Inadequate CCTV coverage beyond station platforms and failure to immediately transmit footage to Route Control rooms increase the risk of undetected incidents in busy stations.
Benjamin Hazelden
Historic (No Identified Response)
2024-0026 26 Sep 2023 North East Kent
NHS England NHS Kent and Medway Clinical Commission…
Concerns summary There are severe limitations in suitable specialist placements for young autistic adults with self-harm risks. Past unit closures have created a critical shortage of beds, leading to inappropriate care settings or discharge without adequate support.
Ben Shipley
Historic (No Identified Response)
2023-0140 27 Apr 2023 West Yorkshire Western
NHS England and NHS Improvement
Concerns summary A systemic delay in securing mental health beds means patients assessed for Section 2 are often left in A&E for hours, unable to be legally detained and without appropriate specialist care.
Melanie Elms
Historic (No Identified Response)
2022-0079 7 Mar 2022 County of Surrey
Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foun…
Concerns summary The patient's care package was not adequately followed, critical risk assessments prior to leave were insufficient or unrecorded, and there was no proper missing person plan in place.
Steven Regoli
Historic (No Identified Response)
2021-0273 17 Aug 2021 Essex
NHS England Essex Partnership University NHS Founda…
Concerns summary Inadequate systems existed for providing in-depth mental health support to patients with anxiety and non-engagement issues, leaving families as the sole caregivers and preventing necessary intervention.
James Fennell
Historic (No Identified Response)
2019-0391 19 Nov 2019 Berkshire
South Western Railways Office of Rail and Road
Concerns summary Wokingham Station has insufficient and poorly located signage for the live third rail, with no warnings visible from main platform areas or tactile paving, despite high footfall and significant electrocution risk.
Ryan Williams
Historic (No Identified Response)
2018-0341 6 Nov 2018 Bedfordshire & Luton
Network Rail
Concerns summary Unsupervised, unmanned stations pose a risk, as vulnerable individuals can remain on premises for extended periods without any oversight or means of intervention.
Darren Urquhart
Historic (No Identified Response)
2018-0291 10 Sep 2018 Hertfordshire
Network Rail
Concerns summary Inadequate railway anti-trespass measures, including poor trespass mat placement, missing platform gates, and insufficient fencing, create a risk of future deaths from track access.
Bernard Ovu
Historic (No Identified Response)
2017-0425 27 Nov 2017 London (East)
London Underground
Concerns summary Lack of clear written procedures for lone staff dealing with trespassers, inconsistent practice, and difficult access to CCTV for verification contributed to confusion and unconfirmed assumptions.
Lucy Goldstone
Historic (No Identified Response)
2017-0168 26 May 2017 Manchester (City)
Department for Transport Department of Health and Social Care
Concerns summary There are no Automated Electronic Defibrillators (AEDs) available on trams or at tram stops across the Metrolink network.
George Dicker
Historic (No Identified Response)
2017-0083 13 Mar 2017 London (North)
RSSB
Concerns summary There is no alarm or warning system to alert railway signallers when a person accesses the tracks via a gate at the end of a platform.
Derek Thomas
Historic (No Identified Response)
2017-0016 27 Jan 2017 Hampshire (North East)
HM Principal Inspector of Railways
Concerns summary The unmanned and unprotected railway crossing relies solely on a distant train horn for warning, with previously obscured visibility contributing to safety risks.
Thomas Coyne
Historic (No Identified Response)
2017-0207 19 Jan 2017 Cheshire
Northern Rail
Concerns summary Inadequate CCTV coverage at the station and the absence of physical barriers at platform ends allowed unmonitored access to the tracks, posing a serious safety risk.
Lauris Kodors
Historic (No Identified Response)
2016-0357 13 Sep 2016 London (North)
RSSB
Concerns summary The RSSB Rule Book inadequately permits stopping trains only when a person threatens damage to the train, not when a person is in danger from an approaching train.
Richard Hinchliffe
Historic (No Identified Response)
2016-0234 24 Jun 2016 London Inner (South)
Network Rail
Concerns summary Concerns include inadequate security of railway platform barriers and a lack of monitoring for a passenger asleep on the platform for an extended period at a 24-hour staffed station.
Lewis Ghessen
Historic (No Identified Response)
2015-0213 9 Jun 2015 London (North)
Rail Safety and Standards Board
Concerns summary The RSSB Rule Book is flawed as it only permits stopping trains to prevent damage, not to protect individuals in danger from a train.
Elliott Bignall
Historic (No Identified Response)
2015-0111 23 Mar 2015 West Sussex
Network Rail
Concerns summary The railway foot crossing was poorly lit with inadequate signage, posing a danger to pedestrians who might not see or hear approaching high-speed trains, especially if distracted.
Aaron Plowman
Historic (No Identified Response)
2014-0411 19 Sep 2014 London (Inner South)
Network Rail
Concerns summary Unblocked access points to commercial unit roofs under railway arches allow unauthorized persons to climb from the street, posing a safety risk.
William France
Historic (No Identified Response)
2014-0409 18 Sep 2014 Somerset (West)
Network Rail
Concerns summary Railway crossing barriers malfunctioned due to a single-arm treddle, causing long delays. Drivers also faced obstructed visibility and a poorly located emergency telephone.
Emma Lifsey
Historic (No Identified Response)
2014-0204 7 May 2014 Nottinghamshire
Network Rail
Concerns summary Outdated, dim level crossing lights, inadequate research into sun glare, and a dangerously slow pace of upgrading equipment pose a significant ongoing risk to safety.
Malcolm Potter
Historic (No Identified Response)
2014-0082 27 Feb 2014 Cambridgeshire (South & West)
Network Rail
Concerns summary The pedestrian crossing's warning light system is inadequately positioned and not synchronized for multiple trains, creating a significant re-crossing risk on a busy commuter line.
Andrew Phrydas
Historic (No Identified Response)
2013-0301 15 Nov 2013 London Inner North
London Underground
Concerns summary London Underground lacked a process for simultaneous dual-line shutdown at intersecting stations and failed to alert the train driver directly and effectively when a person was on the track.