Railway related deaths
PFD Category
Reports: 103
Areas: 39
Earliest: Nov 2013
Latest: 5 Feb 2026
72% response rate (above 62% average). 36% of classified responses show concrete action taken. Reports fell 30% from 10 (2023) to 7 (2024).
PFD Reports
23 resultsAmanda Hitch
Historic (No Identified Response)
2023-0535
19 Dec 2023
Essex
British Transport Police
Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
Concerns summary
Critical suicidal intent information was missed due to thematic clinical record display and a failure to use structured risk management tools. British Transport Police's multi-agency support plan also failed to communicate railway station attendances, especially from unstaffed stations.
Fraser Moore
Historic (No Identified Response)
2023-0497
4 Dec 2023
Inner South London
Department for Transport
Network Rail
Concerns summary
Inadequate CCTV coverage beyond station platforms and failure to immediately transmit footage to Route Control rooms increase the risk of undetected incidents in busy stations.
Benjamin Hazelden
Historic (No Identified Response)
2024-0026
26 Sep 2023
North East Kent
NHS England
NHS Kent and Medway Clinical Commission…
Concerns summary
There are severe limitations in suitable specialist placements for young autistic adults with self-harm risks. Past unit closures have created a critical shortage of beds, leading to inappropriate care settings or discharge without adequate support.
Ben Shipley
Historic (No Identified Response)
2023-0140
27 Apr 2023
West Yorkshire Western
NHS England and NHS Improvement
Concerns summary
A systemic delay in securing mental health beds means patients assessed for Section 2 are often left in A&E for hours, unable to be legally detained and without appropriate specialist care.
Melanie Elms
Historic (No Identified Response)
2022-0079
7 Mar 2022
County of Surrey
Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foun…
Concerns summary
The patient's care package was not adequately followed, critical risk assessments prior to leave were insufficient or unrecorded, and there was no proper missing person plan in place.
Steven Regoli
Historic (No Identified Response)
2021-0273
17 Aug 2021
Essex
NHS England
Essex Partnership University NHS Founda…
Concerns summary
Inadequate systems existed for providing in-depth mental health support to patients with anxiety and non-engagement issues, leaving families as the sole caregivers and preventing necessary intervention.
James Fennell
Historic (No Identified Response)
2019-0391
19 Nov 2019
Berkshire
South Western Railways
Office of Rail and Road
Concerns summary
Wokingham Station has insufficient and poorly located signage for the live third rail, with no warnings visible from main platform areas or tactile paving, despite high footfall and significant electrocution risk.
Ryan Williams
Historic (No Identified Response)
2018-0341
6 Nov 2018
Bedfordshire & Luton
Network Rail
Concerns summary
Unsupervised, unmanned stations pose a risk, as vulnerable individuals can remain on premises for extended periods without any oversight or means of intervention.
Darren Urquhart
Historic (No Identified Response)
2018-0291
10 Sep 2018
Hertfordshire
Network Rail
Concerns summary
Inadequate railway anti-trespass measures, including poor trespass mat placement, missing platform gates, and insufficient fencing, create a risk of future deaths from track access.
Bernard Ovu
Historic (No Identified Response)
2017-0425
27 Nov 2017
London (East)
London Underground
Concerns summary
Lack of clear written procedures for lone staff dealing with trespassers, inconsistent practice, and difficult access to CCTV for verification contributed to confusion and unconfirmed assumptions.
Lucy Goldstone
Historic (No Identified Response)
2017-0168
26 May 2017
Manchester (City)
Department for Transport
Department of Health and Social Care
Concerns summary
There are no Automated Electronic Defibrillators (AEDs) available on trams or at tram stops across the Metrolink network.
George Dicker
Historic (No Identified Response)
2017-0083
13 Mar 2017
London (North)
RSSB
Concerns summary
There is no alarm or warning system to alert railway signallers when a person accesses the tracks via a gate at the end of a platform.
Derek Thomas
Historic (No Identified Response)
2017-0016
27 Jan 2017
Hampshire (North East)
HM Principal Inspector of Railways
Concerns summary
The unmanned and unprotected railway crossing relies solely on a distant train horn for warning, with previously obscured visibility contributing to safety risks.
Thomas Coyne
Historic (No Identified Response)
2017-0207
19 Jan 2017
Cheshire
Northern Rail
Concerns summary
Inadequate CCTV coverage at the station and the absence of physical barriers at platform ends allowed unmonitored access to the tracks, posing a serious safety risk.
Lauris Kodors
Historic (No Identified Response)
2016-0357
13 Sep 2016
London (North)
RSSB
Concerns summary
The RSSB Rule Book inadequately permits stopping trains only when a person threatens damage to the train, not when a person is in danger from an approaching train.
Richard Hinchliffe
Historic (No Identified Response)
2016-0234
24 Jun 2016
London Inner (South)
Network Rail
Concerns summary
Concerns include inadequate security of railway platform barriers and a lack of monitoring for a passenger asleep on the platform for an extended period at a 24-hour staffed station.
Lewis Ghessen
Historic (No Identified Response)
2015-0213
9 Jun 2015
London (North)
Rail Safety and Standards Board
Concerns summary
The RSSB Rule Book is flawed as it only permits stopping trains to prevent damage, not to protect individuals in danger from a train.
Elliott Bignall
Historic (No Identified Response)
2015-0111
23 Mar 2015
West Sussex
Network Rail
Concerns summary
The railway foot crossing was poorly lit with inadequate signage, posing a danger to pedestrians who might not see or hear approaching high-speed trains, especially if distracted.
Aaron Plowman
Historic (No Identified Response)
2014-0411
19 Sep 2014
London (Inner South)
Network Rail
Concerns summary
Unblocked access points to commercial unit roofs under railway arches allow unauthorized persons to climb from the street, posing a safety risk.
William France
Historic (No Identified Response)
2014-0409
18 Sep 2014
Somerset (West)
Network Rail
Concerns summary
Railway crossing barriers malfunctioned due to a single-arm treddle, causing long delays. Drivers also faced obstructed visibility and a poorly located emergency telephone.
Emma Lifsey
Historic (No Identified Response)
2014-0204
7 May 2014
Nottinghamshire
Network Rail
Concerns summary
Outdated, dim level crossing lights, inadequate research into sun glare, and a dangerously slow pace of upgrading equipment pose a significant ongoing risk to safety.
Malcolm Potter
Historic (No Identified Response)
2014-0082
27 Feb 2014
Cambridgeshire (South & West)
Network Rail
Concerns summary
The pedestrian crossing's warning light system is inadequately positioned and not synchronized for multiple trains, creating a significant re-crossing risk on a busy commuter line.
Andrew Phrydas
Historic (No Identified Response)
2013-0301
15 Nov 2013
London Inner North
London Underground
Concerns summary
London Underground lacked a process for simultaneous dual-line shutdown at intersecting stations and failed to alert the train driver directly and effectively when a person was on the track.