F13 Response Accepted

The nature of standards

Recommendation

Standards should be divided into: Fundamental standards of minimum safety and quality – in respect of which non-compliance should not be tolerated. Failures leading to death or serious harm should remain offences for which prosecutions can be brought against organisations. There should be a defined set of duties to maintain and operate an effective system to ensure compliance; Enhanced quality standards – such standards could set requirements higher than the fundamental standards but be discretionary matters for commissioning and subject to availability of resources; Developmental standards which set out longer term goals for providers – these would focus on improvements in effectiveness and are more likely to be the focus of commissioners and progressive provider leadership than the regulator. All such standards would require regular review and modification.

Published Evidence Summary
The following publicly available evidence relates to this recommendation:
- The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 introduced fundamental standards divided into regulatory requirements enforceable by CQC, including person-centred care (Reg 9), dignity (Reg 10), safe care (Reg 12), good governance (Reg 17), and duty of candour (Reg 20) (SI 2014/2936, in force from 1 April 2015).
- Regulation 22 of the 2014 Regulations created a criminal offence for providers who fail to provide care in a way that results in avoidable harm or a significant risk of harm (SI 2014/2936, Regulation 22).
- The three-tier standards framework recommended by Francis (fundamental, enhanced, developmental) was broadly reflected in the government's approach: fundamental standards enforced by CQC; quality standards set by NICE and monitored by commissioners; and aspirational standards in the NHS Outcomes Framework (Hard Truths Vol 2, Cm 8754, Department of Health, November 2013).
- The CQC describes its fundamental standards as "the standards below which your care must never fall," covering 14 areas of care quality (CQC, Fundamental Standards).
How was this evidence gathered?
Evidence searched by Claude (Anthropic) on 10 Apr 2026
Checked data held on this site (government responses, progress updates, independent evidence)
Jurisdiction
England
Response
Accepted
Accepted Department of Health and Social Care
19 Nov 2013

The government published "Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) on 19 November 2013, responding to all 290 recommendations of the Francis Report. This followed an initial response "Patients First and Foremost" in March 2013. Key reforms included a new Chief Inspector of Hospitals, strengthened Care Quality Commission inspection regime, a statutory duty of candour, and the fit and proper person test for NHS directors. Volume 2 (Cm 8754) contains the government's detailed responses to each of the 290 recommendations. See: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7cd486ed915d63cc65d167/34658_Cm_8777_Vol_1_accessible.pdf

Read Full Response
Note: Government responded via "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (2014), a single document covering all 290 recommendations with a blanket acceptance. Individual recommendation responses were not broken out.
Published Evidence

Published assessments of progress from inspectorates, select committees, official progress reports, and other sources. Source type badge indicates whether each assessment is independent or government self-reported.

limited_progress
15 Oct 2024
DHSC - Penny Dash Review of CQC

Penny Dash Review (commissioned May 2024) found significant failings at CQC. Health Secretary declared CQC "not fit for purpose". Key findings: one in five services never rated; inspection levels well below pre-pandemic levels; lack of specialist inspector expertise; 5,000 notification-of-concern backlog. CQC consulting on resetting its approach from October 2025.

Review into the operational effectiveness of the … View Source
Reasonable Progress
06 Feb 2023
Academic Review - Ten Years After Francis

Research published 2023 marking ten years since the Francis Report found mixed results. Structural and legislative changes largely delivered (duty of candour, FPPR, CQC overhaul, revalidation, Freedom to Speak Up Guardians). However, cultural change not fully embedded; understaffing, fear of speaking up, and poor complaint handling persist in parts of the NHS.

University of Birmingham: Ten years after Francis View Source
Confirmed Completed
01 Jul 2022
Legislation - Integrated Care Boards (Health and Care Act 2022)

Clinical Commissioning Groups replaced by 42 Integrated Care Boards from 1 July 2022 under Health and Care Act 2022. ICBs have broader responsibilities for population health, bringing together NHS organisations, local authorities and partners. Implements some Francis recommendations on commissioning integration.

Health and Care Act 2022 View Source
Good Progress
11 Feb 2015
UK Government - Culture Change in the NHS

Government published "Culture Change in the NHS" (Cm 9009) reporting progress on all 290 recommendations. Key achievements: 19 hospitals placed in special measures; those trusts recruited 109 additional doctors and 1,805 additional nurses; 129 board-level changes made; excess avoidable deaths fell by 450 in less than a year.

Confirmed Completed
27 Nov 2014
UK Parliament legislation

Fundamental standards of minimum safety and quality enacted as Regulations 8-20A of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014, in force from 1 April 2015. Three tiers of standards (fundamental, enhanced, developmental) broadly implemented as Francis recommended. Regulation 22 creates criminal offences for breaches causing harm.

View detailed findings

Fundamental standards implemented through legislation with criminal liability for serious breaches, as recommended.

Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activi… View Source
Confirmed Completed
07 Nov 2014
Legislation - CQC Fundamental Standards

New "Fundamental Standards" replaced previous CQC registration requirements from 7 November 2014. Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 introduced clearer minimum standards including: person-centred care (Reg 9), dignity (Reg 10), safe care (Reg 12), staffing (Reg 18), good governance (Reg 17), fit and proper persons (Reg 5), duty of candour (Reg 20).

Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activi… View Source
Confirmed Completed
01 Oct 2014
CQC - New Inspection Regime

CQC overhauled its inspection regime in response to Francis. Professor Sir Mike Richards appointed as first Chief Inspector of Hospitals (July 2013). New methodology based on five key questions (Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive, Well-led) rolled out nationally October 2014. Four-tier ratings introduced (Outstanding/Good/Requires Improvement/Inadequate). Specialist expert-led inspection teams replaced generalist compliance model.

CQC Inspection and Ratings Framework View Source
Good Progress
19 Nov 2013
UK Government - Hard Truths Vol 1 & 2

Government published "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) in two volumes. Vol 1 set out new actions; Vol 2 provided detailed response to each of the 290 recommendations. Approximately 204 of 290 recommendations were fully accepted.

Source
Report Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry 06 Feb 2013
Responsible Bodies
Department of Health and Social Care Primary
Recommendation age 13.3 yrs
Last formal update 4576 days ago