12
Accepted in Part
The Government should provide greater clarity on the progress made in implementing the One Hundred...
Recommendation
The Government should provide greater clarity on the progress made in implementing the One Hundred Year Partnership Agreement between the UK and Ukraine, including specific information on the operation and intent of Article 7, combatting foreign information manipulation and interference. It should also set out what discussions, if any, have taken place with Ukraine regarding potential amendments to the Agreement in the event that a peace settlement with Russia is reached. (Recommendation, Paragraph 76)
Government Response Summary
The government commits to providing a verbal briefing session to the Committee on its international approach to countering foreign information manipulation and interference, which partially addresses the request for clarity on the UK-Ukraine Partnership Agreement.
Government Response
Accepted in Part
Government Response
Accepted in Part
HM Government
Accepted in Part
57. The global information environment is becoming increasingly contested. The information threats we face do not respect borders – the same malign actors employ similar tactics to target the UK and our international partners alike. 58. Responding to this challenge requires close coordination with partners across regions to identify malign information activity, tackle the networks responsible for this activity at source, and to strengthen our collective resilience. The FCDO has therefore been scaling up our response across geographies most affected by this activity. 59. The Government has so far prioritised action to tackle Russian FIMI targeting the UK and our European partners, in particular Ukraine, given the acuteness of the threat of Russian information warfare. However, the FCDO is also engaged in strengthening resilience to hostile information activity in Latin America. This includes utilising our internal analytical capabilities to monitor and identify FIMI activity in the region, alongside engagement with regional partners to strengthen their resilience to information threats. For example, the UK has funded civil society initiatives to strengthen media literacy and fact- checking skills, so organisations can spot false narratives and support democratic debate. The UK has likewise engaged directly with governments in the region to raise awareness of the threat. 5 https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-sanctions-russian-spies-at-the-heart-of-putins- malicious-regime 60. This Government remains steadfast in our commitment to countering and reducing the impact of hostile information activity affecting our partners. We agree to update the Committee through a verbal briefing session on our international approach to monitoring, diplomatic engagement, and resilience building efforts in response to FIMI.
Source
Committee
Foreign Affairs Committee
Report
4th Report - Disinformation diplomacy: How malign actors are seeking to undermine democracy
27 Mar 2026
HC 703
Addressee Bodies
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
Timeline
Recommendation age
0.3 yrs
Report published
27 Mar 2026