Sixth Report - Reproducibility and Research Integrity
Select Committee
Science, Innovation and Technology Committee
HC 101
10 May 2023
Recommendations
11 results
10
Accepted in Part
Para 72
Require universities to model reproducibility culture and implement protected research time policy
Recommendation
Research institutions should model a culture of reproducibility by managing inordinate pressures on academics and encouraging the prioritisation of reproducibility in research outputs. This extends to encouraging openness around mistakes and their correction. In collaboration with the Higher Education Sector, …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government partially accepts the recommendation, stating it does not require a formal response from the government on some aspects. It highlights UKRI's extensive existing work to shift incentives in the research system, including changes to the REF process and a £4.5 million commitment to the UK Reproducibility Network (UKRN), to promote research integrity and reproducibility.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
View Details
11
Accepted in Part
Para 76
Develop dedicated funding and career paths for statistical experts and software developers
Recommendation
Statistical experts and software developers are insufficiently recognised and renumerated within the university research sector. Funders and universities should develop dedicated funding for the presence of statistical experts and software developers in research teams. In tandem, universities should work on …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government partially accepts the recommendation, agreeing on the need for better recognition of statistical experts and software developers and citing existing UKRI initiatives. However, it states there is insufficient evidence that new dedicated funding streams would be more beneficial than integrating support into existing funds.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
View Details
15
Accepted in Part
Para 88
Implement a trial funding programme for 'slower' science and consult researchers on grant sufficiency
Recommendation
Short-term research grants place restrictive limitations on researchers, which can be to the detriment of research integrity and reproducibility. UKRI should consult with a representative sample of researchers to understand whether their grants allow them sufficient time and funding to …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government partially accepts the recommendation, stating UKRI already funds a range of long-term projects and believes changing incentives is crucial beyond just grant length. While committed to continuing stakeholder work and experimenting with funding approaches, it does not explicitly commit to a new consultation with researchers or a dedicated trial funding programme for 'slower' science.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
View Details
17
Accepted in Part
Para 98
Implement 100% open access policies for scientific outputs by UKRI and funders by 2025
Recommendation
The trend towards blanket open access in the communication of scientific outputs is positive. UKRI and other research funders should continue to implement open access policies until this figure reaches 100%, by the end of 2025 at the latest.
Government Response Summary
The government partially accepts the recommendation, supporting the aspiration for 100% open access and detailing UKRI's existing policy and its expansion to monographs from January 2024. However, it notes complexities in implementation requiring action from various stakeholders, implying a lack of commitment to the specific 2025 deadline.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
View Details
18
Accepted in Part
Para 101
Mandate researchers to share open-source data and code alongside all published outputs
Recommendation
Currently, research outputs are frequently published without an associated link through to their open-source data and code. This prevents other researchers assessing work for its reproducibility. In all bar the most exceptional ethical and legal situations, researchers should share their …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The UKRI open access policy seeks to ensure that research articles, monographs, book chapters and edited collections that acknowledge its funding are made freely accessible. UKRI welcomes and supports the aspiration for 100% of UK research articles to be open access.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
View Details
19
Accepted in Part
Para 104
Mandate deposition of research data in open-access repositories and encourage FAIR principles
Recommendation
Journals should collectively encourage researchers to employ the FAIR (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reuse of digital assets) principles within their research and should mandate the deposition of research data in open- access repositories alongside the publication of research outputs.
Read more
Government Response Summary
The UKRI open access policy seeks to ensure that research articles, monographs, book chapters and edited collections that acknowledge its funding are made freely accessible. UKRI welcomes and supports the aspiration for 100% of UK research articles to be open access.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
View Details
21
Accepted in Part
Para 115
Develop a pilot programme to fund replication studies, learning from NWO's model
Recommendation
Providing adequate funding for replication studies is an important precondition for ensuring researchers have the resources necessary to conduct them. UKRI should learn from its Dutch equivalent, NWO, by developing a pilot programme to fund replication studies.
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government partially accepts, stating UKRI will learn from NWO's pilot but does not commit to developing its own. They highlight existing funding mechanisms for replication studies and will consider increasing focus on metascience through a new caucus.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
View Details
23
Accepted in Part
Require publishers to support academics reporting issues and ensure timely research corrections and retractions
Recommendation
Publishers have a vital role in the maintenance of the scholarly record. Publishers should support academics who report issues with published research in their journals and should commit to timely publication of research error corrections and retractions where necessary—in our …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government welcomes the support from the Committee for increasing the use of registered reports to enhance reproducibility, however further evaluation of the costs and benefits of registered report partnership models is needed.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
View Details
25
Accepted in Part
Para 131
Review Research Excellence Framework criteria, ensuring transparency and considering 'originality' removal.
Recommendation
The Future Research Assessment Programme (FRAP) is consulting on reforms for the assessment of UK higher education research. It should review the Research Excellence Framework assessment criteria to assure that transparency is a prerequisite of top- scoring research. It should …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government partially accepts, stating that decisions on the next Research Excellence Framework (REF) fall to funding bodies, but the new framework will include assessment of integrity, openness, transparency, and research reproducibility, with detailed criteria developed in 2024.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
View Details
26
Accepted in Part
Para 133
Assess researchers on broader academic contributions, mandating 'resume for researchers' format by 2025.
Recommendation
Researchers should be assessed on the broader contributions to their academic field, including time spent conducting voluntary peer review and promoting reproducibility and research integrity. Funders, led by UKRI, should move towards the exclusive use of the ‘resume for researchers’ …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government partially accepts, declining to commit all funders to the exclusive use of the R4RI format by 2025. However, UKRI is committed to adopting R4RI across its own funding opportunities by the end of 2023 and is working with other funders to encourage broader adoption.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
View Details
27
Accepted in Part
Para 142
Publish peer review comments to improve transparency and deter paper mills.
Recommendation
Peer review should not be viewed as a binary measure of quality versus unreliability for published papers. There is a wide range of competency, depth, and rigour in the analyses carried out during peer review as time-poor academics often do …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government partially accepts the recommendation by welcoming the support for increasing the use of registered reports to enhance reproducibility, but notes that further evaluation of the costs and benefits of registered report partnership models is needed.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
View Details