4th Report - Legislative Scrutiny: Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill

Select Committee
Human Rights (Joint Committee) HC 789 20 June 2025
Report Status Response document linked Recorded deadline: 20 Aug 2025

Missing links do not establish that no response was published. A linked document does not verify responses to individual findings.

Conclusions & Recommendations 118 items (33 recs)
Source View on Parliament website

No response data available yet.

Government response
4th Special Report - Legislative Scrutiny: Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill: Government Response · published 12 Sep 2025
Read the government response ↗ Response on the tracker

Recommendations & Conclusions

118 results
68 Recommendation
recommendation The Government should ensure that clause 18 is sufficiently clear and circumscribed, reflects the...
Recommendation
recommendation The Government should ensure that clause 18 is sufficiently clear and circumscribed, reflects the legitimate aim it is intended to achieve, and is proportionate to that aim. In particular, a mental element should be introduced to ensure that only … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
69 Conclusion
Clauses 19–26 introduce new search, seizure and retention powers in relation to electronic devices.
Conclusion
Clauses 19–26 introduce new search, seizure and retention powers in relation to electronic devices. The Government’s objective is to allow for the recovery of information from migrants arriving irregularly that may relate to the offence of assisting unlawful migration or … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
70 Conclusion
The new powers are exercisable when an immigration officer or a police constable who has...
Conclusion
The new powers are exercisable when an immigration officer or a police constable who has received authorisation from a superintendent (“authorised officer”) has reasonable grounds to suspect that a relevant person is in possession of a relevant article that relates … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
71 Conclusion
Searches of a person may involve the search of the person’s mouth and may require...
Conclusion
Searches of a person may involve the search of the person’s mouth and may require the removal of outer clothing.107 Reasonable force may be used.108 The Bill also allows officers to retain data for as long as they deem “necessary”,109 … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
72 Conclusion
The new powers appear to be a response to a decision of the High Court...
Conclusion
The new powers appear to be a response to a decision of the High Court in 2022, which held that the Home Secretary had acted unlawfully by having an unpublished blanket policy to search for, and seize, mobile phones from … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
73 Conclusion
The new powers would interfere with rights under Article 8 and Article 1 of Protocol...
Conclusion
The new powers would interfere with rights under Article 8 and Article 1 of Protocol 1, which are incorporated into domestic law by the Human Rights Act, because they would allow access to private information (stored electronically) and would interfere … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
74 Conclusion
The European Court has held that legislation applying to search and seizure must afford adequate...
Conclusion
The European Court has held that legislation applying to search and seizure must afford adequate and effective safeguards against abuse and arbitrariness.112 Further, section 37 of the Data Protection Act 2018 requires that personal data processed for law enforcement purposes … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
75 Conclusion
There are various safeguards within the clause that help to protect against arbitrary and excessive...
Conclusion
There are various safeguards within the clause that help to protect against arbitrary and excessive interferences. There is a requirement of reasonable suspicion that, although low, does place a limit on when the powers can be exercised. The powers are … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
76 Conclusion
Whilst the powers of search and seizure in these clauses are likely to be ‘in...
Conclusion
Whilst the powers of search and seizure in these clauses are likely to be ‘in accordance with the law’ and in pursuit of the legitimate aim of crime prevention, there are questions as to necessity and proportionality. Liberty argues that … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
77 Conclusion
Open Rights Group notes: “[o]ur concern is that these clauses risk invasive digital searches.
Conclusion
Open Rights Group notes: “[o]ur concern is that these clauses risk invasive digital searches. The broad definition of “relevant articles” and the broad authority to search persons for electronic devices, especially the power to access, copy, and use data stored … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
78 Conclusion
Migrant Rights Network also notes the risk of disproportionality: “[m] obile phone seizures have also...
Conclusion
Migrant Rights Network also notes the risk of disproportionality: “[m] obile phone seizures have also had limited success in other countries where the practice is commonplace, like Germany: 73% of data extracted from asylum seekers’ phones is unusable. As a … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
79 Conclusion
Jesuit Refugee Services have supported numerous individuals whose phones were seized.
Conclusion
Jesuit Refugee Services have supported numerous individuals whose phones were seized. They told us that: “[r]emoval of the phones meant people were unable to contact friends and family. Many young people arrive in the UK alone after a traumatising journey, … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
80 Conclusion
Whilst the Home Office may issue guidance about the use of the powers and training...
Conclusion
Whilst the Home Office may issue guidance about the use of the powers and training that will be required for authorised officers exercising those powers, any such guidance is not available for Parliamentary scrutiny during the passage of this Bill.
Ministry of Justice
View Details
81 Recommendation
conclusion We are concerned that there is a risk that the new powers of search,...
Recommendation
conclusion We are concerned that there is a risk that the new powers of search, seizure and retention, in practice, may lead to a blanket policy to search, and possibly seize and retain, items such as mobile phones from asylum … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
82 Conclusion
Under clause 34, an authorised person119 may take biometric information from a person (including children)...
Conclusion
Under clause 34, an authorised person119 may take biometric information from a person (including children) if the Government is in the process of facilitating their exit from a third country and they would need leave to enter the UK. This … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
83 Conclusion
Clause 35 provides that the information must then be passed to the Secretary of State,...
Conclusion
Clause 35 provides that the information must then be passed to the Secretary of State, who can keep and use it for purposes relating to immigration, nationality, law enforcement or national security. The information cannot be kept for longer than … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
84 Conclusion
For collection and retention of biometric information to comply with Article 8 ECHR, the way...
Conclusion
For collection and retention of biometric information to comply with Article 8 ECHR, the way the information will be used must be reasonably foreseeable, and the collection and retention must pursue a legitimate aim in a proportionate manner. There must … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
85 Conclusion
The ECHR memorandum124 explains that the purpose of the power is to allow individuals’ identity...
Conclusion
The ECHR memorandum124 explains that the purpose of the power is to allow individuals’ identity to be checked without needing them to make an immigration application, so the UK authorities can identify people of concern and make sure resources are … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
86 Conclusion
However, clause 35(7) provides that if the information is used to identify a person for...
Conclusion
However, clause 35(7) provides that if the information is used to identify a person for the purposes of facilitating their departure from another state or territory, and the information is transferred to a third country or international organisation for that … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
87 Conclusion
With regard to children, Open Rights Group notes that collecting biometric data from children over...
Conclusion
With regard to children, Open Rights Group notes that collecting biometric data from children over 16 without consent could violate child protection standards: “According to the guidance of the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) on processing sensitive personal data under the … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
88 Conclusion
ILPA notes that EU law specifically prohibits the transfer of personal data to a third...
Conclusion
ILPA notes that EU law specifically prohibits the transfer of personal data to a third country or international organisation for law enforcement purposes, “if there is a real risk that, as a result of such a transfer, the data subject … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
89 Recommendation
conclusion We are concerned that clause 35(7) and (8), deeming transfer of personal data to...
Recommendation
conclusion We are concerned that clause 35(7) and (8), deeming transfer of personal data to third countries and international organisations to be necessary for important reasons of public interest, inappropriately disapplies the normal safeguards in data protection legislation when data … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
90 Conclusion
The Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Act 2024 (“SORA”) was passed after the Supreme...
Conclusion
The Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Act 2024 (“SORA”) was passed after the Supreme Court held that the Government’s policy of removing asylum seekers to Rwanda, under the Migration and Economic Development Partnership (MEDP), was unlawful.128 SORA was enacted … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
91 Conclusion
The central provisions of SORA: confirm that the Republic of Rwanda is a safe third...
Conclusion
The central provisions of SORA: confirm that the Republic of Rwanda is a safe third country for the purposes of removal; require any court or tribunal to conclusively treat Rwanda as a safe for the purposes of asylum and removal; … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
92 Conclusion
The Safety of Rwanda Bill sought to establish through legislative means that Rwanda was a...
Conclusion
The Safety of Rwanda Bill sought to establish through legislative means that Rwanda was a safe country despite the Supreme Court’s conclusion that it was not.129 A statement under section 19(1)(b) of the HRA was made when the Bill was … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
93 Conclusion
conclusion Clause 37 of the Bill would repeal SORA in its entirety.
Conclusion
conclusion Clause 37 of the Bill would repeal SORA in its entirety. This is consistent with the current Government’s manifesto commitment to abandon the Rwanda policy. Repeal of SORA will remove the significant incompatibilities identified in the predecessor JCHR’s report. … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
94 Conclusion
The Illegal Migration Act 2023 (IMA) introduced significant changes to the UK’s asylum system.
Conclusion
The Illegal Migration Act 2023 (IMA) introduced significant changes to the UK’s asylum system. In summary, it imposed a duty on the Secretary of State to make arrangements to remove any person who enters the UK irregularly and has not … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
95 Conclusion
Clause 38 of the Bill repeals most of the provisions of the IMA.
Conclusion
Clause 38 of the Bill repeals most of the provisions of the IMA. However, a number of provisions will not be repealed: a. Section 12, expanding powers of immigration detention (in force) b. Section 29, strengthening the disqualification from modern … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
96 Conclusion
The Explanatory Notes to the Bill notes that these provisions are not subject to repeal...
Conclusion
The Explanatory Notes to the Bill notes that these provisions are not subject to repeal due to their “operational benefit”.133
Ministry of Justice
View Details
97 Conclusion
The JCHR’s predecessor committee raised concerns in relation to some of the above-mentioned provisions.
Conclusion
The JCHR’s predecessor committee raised concerns in relation to some of the above-mentioned provisions. We remain concerned by section 12, section 29, section 59 and section 62 IMA. Section 12 IMA: immigration detention
Ministry of Justice
View Details
98 Conclusion
The Government currently has the power to detain individuals for an indefinite period of time...
Conclusion
The Government currently has the power to detain individuals for an indefinite period of time pending their deportation and removal from the UK. With the exceptions of children and pregnant women,134 there are no statutory time limits on immigration detention. Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
99 Conclusion
Section 12 IMA modified the common law position to provide that it is for the...
Conclusion
Section 12 IMA modified the common law position to provide that it is for the Secretary of State, and not the courts, to determine what constitutes a reasonable period of detention. The previous Committee concluded that this change would result … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
100 Conclusion
Professor Sarah Singer told us: “[t]his is an example of the expansive power that is...
Conclusion
Professor Sarah Singer told us: “[t]his is an example of the expansive power that is being given to the Home Secretary and the reduction of judicial scrutiny. If the judiciary is not able to scrutinise a detention decision for reasonableness … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
101 Conclusion
Academics Dr Sabina Garahan and Dr Matthew Gillet argue, “by allowing detention for such period...
Conclusion
Academics Dr Sabina Garahan and Dr Matthew Gillet argue, “by allowing detention for such period as ‘in the opinion of the Secretary of State’ is reasonably necessary, section 12(1)(b) conflicts with fundamental standards 133 Explanatory notes, para.44 134 There is … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
102 Conclusion
Others argue that it may be having little to no effect in practice.
Conclusion
Others argue that it may be having little to no effect in practice. Medical Justice and Bail for Immigration Detainees submit that, in the context of applications before the High Court for release of detainees, “the Home Secretary often does … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
103 Recommendation
recommendation Section 12 of the Illegal Migration Act modifies the common law position, making it...
Recommendation
recommendation Section 12 of the Illegal Migration Act modifies the common law position, making it for the Secretary of State, and not the courts, to determine what is a reasonable period of detention. We agree with our predecessor Committee and … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
104 Conclusion
Section 29 of the IMA is not yet in force.
Conclusion
Section 29 of the IMA is not yet in force. Upon commencement, it would amend section 63 of the Nationality and Borders Act 2022, which sets out disqualifications to providing a recovery period139 to a potential victim of modern slavery … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
105 Conclusion
It also mandates that, unless there are ‘compelling circumstances’, non- British victims would be disqualified...
Conclusion
It also mandates that, unless there are ‘compelling circumstances’, non- British victims would be disqualified from protection if they have been sentenced to a period of imprisonment of any length. They will be denied a recovery and reflection period and … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
106 Conclusion
Sarah Dineley, Deputy Chief Crown Prosecutor at the CPS, stated: “[i]t is vital that, wherever...
Conclusion
Sarah Dineley, Deputy Chief Crown Prosecutor at the CPS, stated: “[i]t is vital that, wherever possible, victims of trafficking are identified before any decisions are made on charge and prosecution; this is particularly important where the suspect is a child … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
107 Conclusion
Whilst survivors of modern slavery should be able to access the ‘Section 45’ defence,142 created...
Conclusion
Whilst survivors of modern slavery should be able to access the ‘Section 45’ defence,142 created to prevent the criminalisation of survivors for offences they were compelled to commit as a result of their exploitation, After Exploitation points out that “its … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
108 Conclusion
The Helen Bamber Foundation and Asylum Aid state the public order disqualification under the Nationality...
Conclusion
The Helen Bamber Foundation and Asylum Aid state the public order disqualification under the Nationality and Borders Act 2022 is already broad and is catching levels of behaviour that fall below the appropriate threshold for depriving a victim of protections. … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
109 Conclusion
The Law Society notes that there is limited ability to challenge decisions to disqualify someone...
Conclusion
The Law Society notes that there is limited ability to challenge decisions to disqualify someone from modern slavery protections: “there is no formal route to appeal or request reconsideration and so a challenge can only be brought by judicial review, … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
110 Conclusion
ILPA notes that “[t]his provision disproportionately impacts survivors who were forced to commit crimes as...
Conclusion
ILPA notes that “[t]his provision disproportionately impacts survivors who were forced to commit crimes as part of their exploitation and who have received convictions. Analysis conducted in 2024 clearly demonstrates that, of the 338 people disqualified (including 40 children): 70% … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
111 Conclusion
In oral evidence to the Committee, Dr Marija Jovanovic told us: “[v]ictims are losing trust...
Conclusion
In oral evidence to the Committee, Dr Marija Jovanovic told us: “[v]ictims are losing trust in the system. There is some evidence that since 2016 the proportion of those who refuse to engage with support services has soared by 630%. … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
112 Conclusion
Article 13 of ECAT requires state parties to provide a “recovery and reflection period” of...
Conclusion
Article 13 of ECAT requires state parties to provide a “recovery and reflection period” of at least 30 days to potential VOTs, i.e. when there are reasonable grounds to believe that the person concerned is a victim of trafficking. During … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
113 Conclusion
There is no definition in ECAT of what could be considered as “grounds of public...
Conclusion
There is no definition in ECAT of what could be considered as “grounds of public order”. GRETA notes that “the grounds of public order should always be interpreted on a case-by-case basis, and it is not possible to automatically disqualify … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
114 Recommendation
recommendation We agree with our predecessor Committee that section 29 IMA, which broadens the public...
Recommendation
recommendation We agree with our predecessor Committee that section 29 IMA, which broadens the public order disqualification in section 63 of the Nationality and Borders Act, is not compatible with the UK’s obligations under ECAT and Article 4 of the … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
115 Conclusion
Section 59 IMA (partially in force)149 amends section 80A of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum...
Conclusion
Section 59 IMA (partially in force)149 amends section 80A of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002, which provides that asylum claims and human rights claims from nationals of listed states must be declared inadmissible. Section 59 IMA principally does … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
116 Conclusion
Inadmissibility procedures allow a State to declare claims “inadmissible” when the claim is made by...
Conclusion
Inadmissibility procedures allow a State to declare claims “inadmissible” when the claim is made by nationals of countries that are deemed safe. Section 80A(5) provides two non-exhaustive examples of exceptional circumstances. These are narrowly construed: first, where the listed state … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
117 Recommendation
Our predecessor Committee concluded that that whilst the listed States may be considered to be...
Recommendation
Our predecessor Committee concluded that that whilst the listed States may be considered to be safe ‘in general’, this does not guarantee their safety for all individuals, particularly those who are members of a particular social group. It must be … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
118 Conclusion
The implications for Albanian women and children are particularly concerning.
Conclusion
The implications for Albanian women and children are particularly concerning. For example, an Albanian woman who has been trafficked to the UK and faces a real risk of reprisals and re-trafficking upon return to Albania, could be returned to Albania … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
119 Conclusion
Section 59 includes a Henry VIII clause that permits the Secretary of State to add...
Conclusion
Section 59 includes a Henry VIII clause that permits the Secretary of State to add to the list of safe countries by regulations. This power is in force and has already been used to add Georgia and India to the … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
120 Conclusion
In relation to Georgia, the Refugee Council notes that “in December 2024 the current Government...
Conclusion
In relation to Georgia, the Refugee Council notes that “in December 2024 the current Government sanctioned five Georgian officials for serious human rights violations. This included the Minister for Interior and the Director of the Tbilisi Police Department. The press … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
121 Conclusion
In relation to India, Rainbow Migration shared two examples of clients who have been granted...
Conclusion
In relation to India, Rainbow Migration shared two examples of clients who have been granted asylum in the UK: a. “A trans woman from India came out to her parents at age fourteen. They reacted very negatively, locking her in … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
122 Conclusion
In its observations on the Bill, the UNHCR states: “while designation of safe countries may...
Conclusion
In its observations on the Bill, the UNHCR states: “while designation of safe countries may be used as a procedural tool to prioritise or accelerate the examination of applications in carefully circumscribed situations, it does not displace the requirement for … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
123 Recommendation
recommendation We share the concerns of our predecessor Committee that, whilst the states listed may...
Recommendation
recommendation We share the concerns of our predecessor Committee that, whilst the states listed may be considered safe in general, this does not guarantee the safety of all individuals from these states, especially those who are members of particular social … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
124 Conclusion
The Bill does not repeal section 62 IMA.
Conclusion
The Bill does not repeal section 62 IMA. This means that if a person making a human rights or asylum claim does not allow the Home Office to look at everything (including private information) on their phone, then the Home … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
125 Conclusion
In respect of this provision, the previous JCHR concluded in its report on the Illegal...
Conclusion
In respect of this provision, the previous JCHR concluded in its report on the Illegal Migration Bill: “we remain concerned that an asylum or human rights claimant’s credibility should not be damaged by conduct that may be explained by something … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
126 Recommendation
recommendation Section 62 IMA should be amended, as recommended by our predecessor Committee, to make...
Recommendation
recommendation Section 62 IMA should be amended, as recommended by our predecessor Committee, to make clear that the credibility of a claimant who has provided a reasonable excuse for their failure to provide a password or other methods of access … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
127 Conclusion
Clause 41 amends the current powers contained in paragraph 2(2) to Schedule 3 of the...
Conclusion
Clause 41 amends the current powers contained in paragraph 2(2) to Schedule 3 of the IA 1971, which permits the Secretary of State to detain individuals liable to deportation on the grounds that their presence in the UK is not … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
128 Conclusion
The clause also amends section 141 of the Immigration Act 1999 (fingerprinting) and regulation 2...
Conclusion
The clause also amends section 141 of the Immigration Act 1999 (fingerprinting) and regulation 2 of the Immigration (Collection, Use and Retention of Biometric Information and Related Amendments) Regulations 2021 (photographs) to clarify that fingerprints and photographs can be taken … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
129 Conclusion
The clause also amends section 51(2) of the Immigration Act 2016 (power to direct prison...
Conclusion
The clause also amends section 51(2) of the Immigration Act 2016 (power to direct prison officer or prison custody officer to search for nationality documents) to “clarify” that the Secretary of State may direct a prison officer or prisoner custody … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
130 Conclusion
Despite the Government’s characterisation of this clause as clarificatory, the Impact Assessment makes clear that...
Conclusion
Despite the Government’s characterisation of this clause as clarificatory, the Impact Assessment makes clear that this involves retrospectively making it lawful to have detained persons (liable to deportation on the ground it was considered conducive to the public good) at … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
131 Conclusion
We note that the House of Lords Constitution Committee has frequently raised concerns about retrospective...
Conclusion
We note that the House of Lords Constitution Committee has frequently raised concerns about retrospective provisions, arguing that retrospective legislation “is unacceptable other than in very exceptional circumstances” and that, when used, “measures with retrospective effect must have the strongest … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
132 Conclusion
These provisions raise issues under Articles 5, 8, and 13 of the ECHR.
Conclusion
These provisions raise issues under Articles 5, 8, and 13 of the ECHR. Article 5 is engaged by this clause as those liable to deportation will be deprived of their liberty. Any interference with Article 5 is justified where it … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
133 Conclusion
However, Clause 41’s purpose is to provide a legal basis for the Home Office’s current...
Conclusion
However, Clause 41’s purpose is to provide a legal basis for the Home Office’s current practice of detaining people early in the deportation process, i.e. after a “Stage 1” deportation decision has been made, while the Secretary of State considers … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
134 Conclusion
This clause also engages Article 8 because it gives powers to obtain biometrics and search...
Conclusion
This clause also engages Article 8 because it gives powers to obtain biometrics and search documents. An interference with this right must be in accordance with the law and proportionate to the pursuit of a legitimate aim. It is the … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
8 Conclusion
135.
Conclusion
135. The denial of a remedy for unlawful detention also risks violating Article 5(5) and Article 13 ECHR (the right to an effective remedy). If individuals have been detained pending deportation between Stage 1 and Stage 2 171 UK Home … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
136 Recommendation
recommendation The Government’s position is that clause 41 “clarifies” the law.
Recommendation
recommendation The Government’s position is that clause 41 “clarifies” the law. However, the operational effect would appear to amount to retrospectively making it lawful to have detained persons liable to deportation. This does not comply with Article 5 ECHR, which … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
137 Conclusion
Clause 57 of the Bill also has retrospective effect.
Conclusion
Clause 57 of the Bill also has retrospective effect. It “establishes retrospective power for the charging of fees for services related to the comparability, recognition or assessment of qualifications obtained outside and within the United Kingdom”.176 Such fees have been … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
138 Conclusion
There may be a breach of Article 1 of Protocol 1 if legislation deprives potential...
Conclusion
There may be a breach of Article 1 of Protocol 1 if legislation deprives potential claimants of the value of their claim. To constitute a property right protected by the ECHR, the claim must have a sufficient basis in national … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
139 Conclusion
The ECHR memorandum suggests that a claim to recover fees would not meet this test,...
Conclusion
The ECHR memorandum suggests that a claim to recover fees would not meet this test, because its legal basis would be too uncertain.179 The Government argues that the relevant case law180 only covers claims wrongly levied by the State, and … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
140 Conclusion
The Government maintains that in any event it is justified for legislation to take away...
Conclusion
The Government maintains that in any event it is justified for legislation to take away these claims, because it is fair and in the public interest that service users should pay a reasonable fee for the service, and it is … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
141 Recommendation
conclusion The Government has provided for the retrospective validation of fees charged without any statutory...
Recommendation
conclusion The Government has provided for the retrospective validation of fees charged without any statutory basis. We ask the Government to clarify its justification for the retrospective validation of these fees. 181 Ipswich Town v Suffolk Chief Constable [2017] EWHC … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
142 Conclusion
At Committee stage in the Commons, the Government added clause 43.
Conclusion
At Committee stage in the Commons, the Government added clause 43. This introduces an extension of the existing conditions that may be applied to any grant of limited leave to enter or remain in the UK under section 3(1) (c) … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
143 Conclusion
The current restrictions, set out in section 3(1)(c) of the Immigration Act 1971, permit restrictions...
Conclusion
The current restrictions, set out in section 3(1)(c) of the Immigration Act 1971, permit restrictions to be placed on individuals such as restrictions on the right to work and study, requirements to report to immigration officers, and residency requirements. The … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
144 Conclusion
The safeguards are limited to a prohibition that these powers cannot be used in relation...
Conclusion
The safeguards are limited to a prohibition that these powers cannot be used in relation to a British citizen or settled person. Other than this, they can be used by immigration officers with no threshold and no time limit. The … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
145 Conclusion
The Minister for Border Security and Asylum, Dame Angela Eagle MP, said during the Bill’s...
Conclusion
The Minister for Border Security and Asylum, Dame Angela Eagle MP, said during the Bill’s passage through the House of Commons that: “The powers will be used only in cases involving conduct such as war crimes, crimes against humanity, extremism … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
146 Conclusion
Amnesty describes this as an “extraordinary overreach of power”.190 Public Law Project notes that these...
Conclusion
Amnesty describes this as an “extraordinary overreach of power”.190 Public Law Project notes that these restrictions are akin to those imposed on national security grounds (Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures), and that the same types of restrictions would be used … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
147 Recommendation
Following an analysis of clause 43, the House of Lords Constitution Committee, in its report...
Recommendation
Following an analysis of clause 43, the House of Lords Constitution Committee, in its report on the Bill, concluded: “[w]e draw the attention of the House to the broad and subjective power in clause 43. We recommend narrowing the power … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
148 Recommendation
We note the Minister’s comments that these powers are intended to be used in cases...
Recommendation
We note the Minister’s comments that these powers are intended to be used in cases involving, amongst other things, serious international crimes. Where there is sufficient evidence that persons have been involved in serious international crimes such as genocide, such … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
149 Recommendation
recommendation The requirements in clause 43 for imposing conditions such as electronic monitoring, geographical exclusions,...
Recommendation
recommendation The requirements in clause 43 for imposing conditions such as electronic monitoring, geographical exclusions, and curfews, should be set out clearly on the face of the Bill and adequately circumscribed. In order to reflect the Government’s intentions as stated … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
150 Conclusion
Clause 48 was added by way of Government amendment at Report stage in the Commons.
Conclusion
Clause 48 was added by way of Government amendment at Report stage in the Commons. It provides for the classification of certain sexual offences as “particularly serious” when determining exclusions from the protection against refoulement, regardless of period of imprisonment. … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
151 Conclusion
The Refugee Convention, in its Article 33(2), allows for refugees to be excluded from non-refoulement...
Conclusion
The Refugee Convention, in its Article 33(2), allows for refugees to be excluded from non-refoulement protections where there are reasonable grounds for regarding them as a danger to the security of the UK or where if, having been convicted of … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
152 Conclusion
For these purposes, a particularly serious crime, in domestic law, is a crime for which...
Conclusion
For these purposes, a particularly serious crime, in domestic law, is a crime for which a person is sentenced to a period of imprisonment of at least 12 months.197 The threshold is therefore amended by this provision in the Bill … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
153 Conclusion
However, in practice, the lowering of this threshold may have very little effect.
Conclusion
However, in practice, the lowering of this threshold may have very little effect. Professor Sarah Singer told us: “the Nationality and Borders Act introduced a new interpretation of Article 33(2) [Refugee Convention]… It would be highly unlikely to have a … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
154 Conclusion
In the supplementary ECHR memorandum published by the Government, it is noted that an individual...
Conclusion
In the supplementary ECHR memorandum published by the Government, it is noted that an individual affected by this amendment “would still be able to rely on Article 2 or 3 rights, if they faced a real risk of persecution, but … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
155 Conclusion
The rebuttable presumption is an important safeguard to give refugees the opportunity to argue against...
Conclusion
The rebuttable presumption is an important safeguard to give refugees the opportunity to argue against the seriousness of their offence and the danger they pose to the community. The Convention also provides a safeguard as the principle of non-refoulement under … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
156 Conclusion
conclusion Exclusions from the protections of the Refugee Convention are permitted in circumstances where individuals...
Conclusion
conclusion Exclusions from the protections of the Refugee Convention are permitted in circumstances where individuals have committed “particularly serious crimes”. We acknowledge that the exclusion of individuals who pose a danger to the community is an important measure, and we … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
157 Conclusion
The Bill provides power to impose electronic monitoring as a requirement of a Serious Crime...
Conclusion
The Bill provides power to impose electronic monitoring as a requirement of a Serious Crime Prevention Order (SCPO). It also provides for the power to impose interim SCPOs whilst an application for a final order is pending. SCPOs, introduced by … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
158 Conclusion
SCPOs can be obtained from the High Court in a stand-alone application or from the...
Conclusion
SCPOs can be obtained from the High Court in a stand-alone application or from the Crown Court by application following a person’s conviction for a serious crime. Only the DPP, the Director of the Serious Fraud Office and (in respect … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
159 Conclusion
Clause 52 provides the courts with the power to impose electronic monitoring200 as part of...
Conclusion
Clause 52 provides the courts with the power to impose electronic monitoring200 as part of SCPO requirements. Electronic monitoring can be imposed where there are “reasonable grounds to believe that the [overall] order would protect the public” and that this … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
160 Conclusion
Open Rights Group note that “the Bill’s provisions offer limited procedural safeguards (for instance, reliance...
Conclusion
Open Rights Group note that “the Bill’s provisions offer limited procedural safeguards (for instance, reliance on “reasonable grounds” rather than rigorous independent judicial oversight). Such a low threshold can lead to overly broad applications of state power.”201 Migrant Help states … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
161 Recommendation
The power to impose electronic monitoring engages Article 8, which requires that any interferences with...
Recommendation
The power to impose electronic monitoring engages Article 8, which requires that any interferences with the right to private and family life are in accordance with the law, in pursuit of a legitimate aim and necessary and proportionate to that … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
162 Recommendation
recommendation Given the severe infringement on the right to privacy posed by the imposition of...
Recommendation
recommendation Given the severe infringement on the right to privacy posed by the imposition of electronic monitoring, the threshold test for electronic monitoring should be one of “necessity and proportionality”, not whether it is “appropriate”. Clause 52 should be amended … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
163 Conclusion
Clause 53 introduces a new interim SCPO (ISCPO) which would allow the High Court to...
Conclusion
Clause 53 introduces a new interim SCPO (ISCPO) which would allow the High Court to impose requirements on the subject while the full application is pending. The test for imposing an ISCPO is whether the court “considers it just to … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
164 Conclusion
ISCPOs could be obtained without notice being given to the subject if the High Court...
Conclusion
ISCPOs could be obtained without notice being given to the subject if the High Court accepts that “the outcome sought by the applicant” (presumably protecting against serious crime) is likely to be prejudiced by notice being given. Where an order … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
165 Conclusion
The provision is sufficiently clear and accessible.
Conclusion
The provision is sufficiently clear and accessible. The aim of preventing serious crime is legitimate. As to whether it is necessary and proportionate, it is notable that the threshold for imposing an ISCPO is merely that the court considers it … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
166 Recommendation
conclusion Given that the threshold for imposing interim SCPOs is substantially lower than for full...
Recommendation
conclusion Given that the threshold for imposing interim SCPOs is substantially lower than for full SCPOs, there is a risk that they could be imposed in circumstances that do not justify a full SCPO. recommendation To ensure respect for Convention … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
1 Recommendation
We are concerned that the breadth of these precursor offences poses a risk of unintended...
Recommendation
We are concerned that the breadth of these precursor offences poses a risk of unintended harms to those who are most vulnerable. To mitigate this risk, we consider that the precursor offences would benefit from greater circumscription and more robust … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
2 Recommendation
We support the Government’s intention to disrupt and deter organised immigration crime and to safeguard...
Recommendation
We support the Government’s intention to disrupt and deter organised immigration crime and to safeguard life. However, we are concerned that the precursor offences, as currently drafted, create uncertainty, extend beyond the Government’s stated legitimate aim, and risk inadvertently criminalising … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
3 Recommendation
In relation to clauses 13 and 14: a.
Recommendation
In relation to clauses 13 and 14: a. The Government should give consideration to amending the scope of the offences to ensure that they only apply to persons involved in the smuggling of persons for direct or indirect financial or … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
4 Recommendation
Clause 15 should be amended to ensure that the list of exempted “relevant articles” includes...
Recommendation
Clause 15 should be amended to ensure that the list of exempted “relevant articles” includes items commonly used by asylum seekers. At a minimum, this must include items such as hygiene kits. (See Amendment 8, Annex). (Recommendation, Paragraph 52)
Ministry of Justice
View Details
5 Recommendation
In relation to clause 16: a.
Recommendation
In relation to clause 16: a. The Government should give consideration to amending the scope of the offences to ensure that they only apply to persons involved in the smuggling of persons for direct or indirect financial or material gain. … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
6 Recommendation
More broadly, we agree with our predecessor Committee that the Government should fully incorporate Article...
Recommendation
More broadly, we agree with our predecessor Committee that the Government should fully incorporate Article 31 of the Refugee Convention into section 31 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999. Section 31 should include the new offences in this Bill … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
7 Recommendation
The Government should ensure that clause 18 is sufficiently clear and circumscribed, reflects the legitimate...
Recommendation
The Government should ensure that clause 18 is sufficiently clear and circumscribed, reflects the legitimate aim it is intended to achieve, and is proportionate to that aim. In particular, a mental element should be introduced to ensure that only conduct … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
9 Recommendation
We are concerned that clause 35(7) and (8), deeming transfer of personal data to third...
Recommendation
We are concerned that clause 35(7) and (8), deeming transfer of personal data to third countries and international organisations to be necessary for important reasons of public interest, inappropriately disapplies the normal safeguards in data protection legislation when data is … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
10 Conclusion
Clause 37 of the Bill would repeal SORA in its entirety.
Conclusion
Clause 37 of the Bill would repeal SORA in its entirety. This is consistent with the current Government’s manifesto commitment to abandon the Rwanda policy. Repeal of SORA will remove the significant incompatibilities identified in the predecessor JCHR’s report. (Conclusion, … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
11 Recommendation
Section 12 of the Illegal Migration Act modifies the common law position, making it for...
Recommendation
Section 12 of the Illegal Migration Act modifies the common law position, making it for the Secretary of State, and not the courts, to determine what is a reasonable period of detention. We agree with our predecessor 62 Committee and … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
12 Recommendation
We agree with our predecessor Committee that section 29 IMA, which broadens the public order...
Recommendation
We agree with our predecessor Committee that section 29 IMA, which broadens the public order disqualification in section 63 of the Nationality and Borders Act, is not compatible with the UK’s obligations under ECAT and Article 4 of the ECHR. … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
13 Recommendation
We share the concerns of our predecessor Committee that, whilst the states listed may be...
Recommendation
We share the concerns of our predecessor Committee that, whilst the states listed may be considered safe in general, this does not guarantee the safety of all individuals from these states, especially those who are members of particular social groups … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
14 Recommendation
Section 62 IMA should be amended, as recommended by our predecessor Committee, to make clear...
Recommendation
Section 62 IMA should be amended, as recommended by our predecessor Committee, to make clear that the credibility of a claimant who has provided a reasonable excuse for their failure to provide a password or other methods of access requested … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
15 Recommendation
The Government’s position is that clause 41 “clarifies” the law.
Recommendation
The Government’s position is that clause 41 “clarifies” the law. However, the operational effect would appear to amount to retrospectively making it lawful to have detained persons liable to deportation. This does not comply with Article 5 ECHR, which requires … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
16 Recommendation
The Government has provided for the retrospective validation of fees charged without any statutory basis.
Recommendation
The Government has provided for the retrospective validation of fees charged without any statutory basis. We ask the Government to clarify its justification for the retrospective validation of these fees. (Conclusion, Paragraph 141) 63 Conditions on leave and bail Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
17 Recommendation
The requirements in clause 43 for imposing conditions such as electronic monitoring, geographical exclusions, and...
Recommendation
The requirements in clause 43 for imposing conditions such as electronic monitoring, geographical exclusions, and curfews, should be set out clearly on the face of the Bill and adequately circumscribed. In order to reflect the Government’s intentions as stated by … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
18 Conclusion
Exclusions from the protections of the Refugee Convention are permitted in circumstances where individuals have...
Conclusion
Exclusions from the protections of the Refugee Convention are permitted in circumstances where individuals have committed “particularly serious crimes”. We acknowledge that the exclusion of individuals who pose a danger to the community is an important measure, and we support … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
19 Recommendation
Given the severe infringement on the right to privacy posed by the imposition of electronic...
Recommendation
Given the severe infringement on the right to privacy posed by the imposition of electronic monitoring, the threshold test for electronic monitoring should be one of “necessity and proportionality”, not whether it is “appropriate”. Clause 52 should be amended accordingly. … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details
20 Recommendation
Given that the threshold for imposing interim SCPOs is substantially lower than for full SCPOs,...
Recommendation
Given that the threshold for imposing interim SCPOs is substantially lower than for full SCPOs, there is a risk that they could be imposed in circumstances that do not justify a full SCPO. (Conclusion, Paragraph 166) To ensure respect for … Read more
Ministry of Justice
View Details