13
Rejected
The Spending Review 2021 confirmed an additional £4.7 billion of funding for the core schools...
Conclusion
The Spending Review 2021 confirmed an additional £4.7 billion of funding for the core schools budget in England by 2024–25.28 However, this followed real-term reductions in the two years to 2018–19, and a period of virtually unchanged average per-pupil funding in real terms between 2014–15 and 2020–21.29 We received written evidence from the Catholic Education Service, which told us that while funding had increased, it may not be meeting the increasing pressure of rising costs. It explained that one Catholic diocese reported an increase in funding of 16% since 2015/16, but an increase in staff costs of 20% over the same period.30 The 2019/20 SARA reported a similar trend, with General Annual Grant (GAG) funding from the Department, the primary form of grant funding to academy trusts, increasing by 8% while staff costs increased by 12% compared with 2018/19.31 The Department recognised that the pandemic has resulted in increased 23 Committee of Public Accounts, Financial sustainability of schools in England, Forty-Second Report of Session 2021–22, HC 650, 4 March 2022 24 Academy schools sector in England: Consolidated Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 August 2020, page 28 25 C&AG’s report, Financial sustainability of schools in England, HC 802, November 2021, para 1.22 26 Academy schools sector in England: Consolidated Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 August 2020, page 13 27 Q 38 28 HM Treasury, Autumn budget and spending review 2021, December 2021, para 2.20 29 C&AG’s report, School funding in England, HC 300, July 2021, paras 7, 17 30 AAR0001 – Academies Sector Annual report and Accounts 2019–20, Catholic Education Service, 24 January 2022 31 Academy schools sector in England: Consolidated Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 August 2020, page 15 Academies Sector Annual Report and Accounts 2019/20 13 schools’ costs in certain categories, such as ICT resources, caretaking and cleaning, and that some areas that generated inc
Government Response Summary
The government explicitly disagrees with the committee's implicit recommendation, defending the national funding formula and reiterating that financial management is the primary responsibility of academy trusts. It notes that the 2021-22 SARA is finalised but commits to undertaking research into the impact of financial pressures on schools, with outcomes to be included in the 2022-23 SARA.
Government Response
Rejected
Government Response
Rejected
HM Government
Rejected
2.1 The government disagrees with the Committee’s recommendation. 2.2 The national funding formula, introduced in 2018-19, distributes funding to schools fairly, regardless of geographical location. The formula does not discriminate between maintained schools and academies. The formula is updated annually based on schools’ and pupils’ characteristics. 2.3 The primary responsibility for the financial management of academy schools rests with their academy trust, with a clear framework set out in academy trusts’ Funding Agreements, the Academy Trust Handbook and Academies Accounts Direction. Academy trusts’ accountability is rigorous, with trusts’ audited accounts providing information on the financial health of the trust and individual academy costs. 2.4 The department is not able to introduce significant new analysis into the 2021-22 Academies Sector Annual Report and Accounts (SARA), as its contents are already being finalised. The department has committed to undertake research into the impact of financial pressures on schools, in its response to recommendation 3 of the Committee’s Forty-Second report on the Financial Sustainability of Schools in England. The 2022-23 SARA will include the outcomes of this research. 2.5 The department already has an effective assurance programme for academy trusts: trusts must submit their audited accounts and auditor reports, three-year budget forecasts, information about related party transactions and new trusts financial management and governance self-assessments. 2.6 The department uses this information, along with other local intelligence to monitor academy trusts’ overall financial health. Given the complexity of these factors, this is undertaken on an individual basis. In each case, the department takes a risk-based approach, working with the individual academy trusts to support and intervene proportionately on the rare occasions when needed.
Source
Committee
Public Accounts Committee
Report
Forty-Seventh Report - Academies Sector Annual Report and Accounts 2019/20
25 Mar 2022
HC 994
Addressee Bodies
HM Treasury
Timeline
Recommendation age
4.3 yrs
Report published
25 Mar 2022