Twenty-Second - Improving the performance of major defence equipment contracts
Select Committee
Public Accounts Committee
HC 185
3 November 2021
Government Response (AI assessment · 21 of 24 classified)
Accepted
14
Government response
Treasury minutes: Government response to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Twenty Second report from Session 2021-22 · published 21 Jan 2022
Recommendations & Conclusions
14 results
2
Recommendation
Accepted
We are deeply concerned about departmental witnesses’ inability or unwillingness to answer basic questions and...
Recommendation
We are deeply concerned about departmental witnesses’ inability or unwillingness to answer basic questions and give a frank assessment of the state of its major programmes. The Department is not sufficiently open about programme progress and risks. A few weeks …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees with the Committee’s recommendation for greater transparency, committing to ensure future Accounting Officer Assessment letters include more detailed evidence on value for money and that the Permanent Secretary issues annual reminders to SROs by January 2022.
HM Treasury
View Details
3
Recommendation
Accepted
The Department does not make enough demands of its suppliers to share the financial risks...
Recommendation
The Department does not make enough demands of its suppliers to share the financial risks as well as the rewards of contracting for major equipment capabilities. The Department is dependent on a limited supplier base to deliver its major equipment …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government accepted the recommendation and committed to writing to the Committee by the end of May 2022. This letter will set out evidence of how it holds suppliers to account and fairly apportions risk and reward across its contracts.
HM Treasury
View Details
6
Recommendation
Accepted
The Department continues to be unclear about what additional capability the taxpayer will get from...
Recommendation
The Department continues to be unclear about what additional capability the taxpayer will get from the extra £16.5 billion in the 2020 Spending Review. We remain to be convinced that the government’s substantial uplift to the Department’s budget will not …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government accepted the recommendation, committing to provide further detail and a breakdown of the £16.5 billion funding in the upcoming Equipment Plan report in February 2022, clearly distinguishing between new capabilities and existing shortfalls.
HM Treasury
View Details
7
Conclusion
Accepted
Cost increases or cuts to funding on the Department’s programmes can have a profound impact...
Conclusion
Cost increases or cuts to funding on the Department’s programmes can have a profound impact on the level of military capability that can be achieved. For example, it is procuring considerably fewer Ajax armoured vehicles and Challenger 3 tanks than …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government disagrees with the Committee's conclusion regarding the impact of cost increases on military capability, asserting new funding will address threats. It commits to providing further detail and a breakdown of this £16.5 billion in an upcoming equipment plan report for publication in February 2022.
HM Treasury
View Details
10
Conclusion
Accepted
The Department has spent nearly £4 billion of its budget by March 2021—including payments to...
Conclusion
The Department has spent nearly £4 billion of its budget by March 2021—including payments to GDUK of £3.1 billion—out of budgeted whole-life costs of £5.5 billion.26 It has so far received 14 vehicles, 2% of its contractual fleet requirement.27 Witnesses …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledges the importance of managing supplier performance and risk, citing existing measures such as CAAS, firm price contracts, and liquidated damages. It commits to writing to the Committee by May 2022 to provide evidence of how it holds suppliers to account.
HM Treasury
View Details
11
Recommendation
Accepted
HM Treasury directs that Accounting Officers should confirm to Parliament that procurements remain value for...
Recommendation
HM Treasury directs that Accounting Officers should confirm to Parliament that procurements remain value for money (VFM) where there are significant changes to costs and schedules. The Accounting Officer had assessed eight of the projects examined by the NAO for …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government accepted the recommendation, committing to ensure future letters to the Committee contain more detailed evidence for value for money assessments and that the Permanent Secretary will remind SROs of their obligations by January 31, 2022.
HM Treasury
View Details
12
Conclusion
Accepted
We asked witnesses about the process for determining value for money and whether it monitors...
Conclusion
We asked witnesses about the process for determining value for money and whether it monitors whether programmes remain so. The Department told us that there are routine ‘touchpoints’ through a capability’s life, but acknowledged that it does not routinely take …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government, while disagreeing with the Committee's conclusion on VFM evaluation, agrees with the implied recommendation for transparency and commits to ensuring future letters to the Committee contain more detailed evidence and that the Permanent Secretary issues annual reminders by 31 January 2022.
HM Treasury
View Details
14
Conclusion
Accepted
The Department spends significant sums on the developmental stages of programmes while suppliers may not...
Conclusion
The Department spends significant sums on the developmental stages of programmes while suppliers may not be paying their fair share. The Department argued that it is standard practice to pay for work against agreed milestones across areas such as development, …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledged the Committee's concerns regarding supplier contributions and risk apportionment. While disagreeing with the specific conclusion, it committed to writing to the Committee by May 2022 to provide evidence on how it manages supplier accountability and risk.
HM Treasury
View Details
17
Conclusion
Accepted
The Department’s willingness and ability to systematically record its learning from existing programmes is critical...
Conclusion
The Department’s willingness and ability to systematically record its learning from existing programmes is critical to securing improvements in the future. There have been at least 13 formal reviews of defence procurement policy over the last 35 years, which have …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government states that systems are already in place to identify and share lessons, with ongoing efforts to standardise LfE information. It highlights existing Strategic Partnering and Category Management Programmes and an Acquisition and Approvals Transformation Programme aimed at embedding continuous improvement.
HM Treasury
View Details
18
Conclusion
Accepted
The same lessons have been identified again and again across programmes, including underestimation of programme...
Conclusion
The same lessons have been identified again and again across programmes, including underestimation of programme complexity at the design stage, users being unclear about their requirements, the need to have sufficient resources and skills in place, and shortcomings in delivering …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government states that systems are in place to identify and share lessons, with ongoing work to standardise LfE information. It also points to existing Strategic Partnering and Category Management Programmes and an Acquisition and Approvals Transformation Programme for improving delivery.
HM Treasury
View Details
19
Conclusion
Accepted
In 2018, the Department established a Strategic Partnering Programme (SPP) to maximise commercial leverage with...
Conclusion
In 2018, the Department established a Strategic Partnering Programme (SPP) to maximise commercial leverage with its 19 most important suppliers by improving contract performance and managing strategic risks.45 The Department told us that the 38 C&AG’s report, para 3.16 39 …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government responded by describing its existing Strategic Partnering Programme (SPP) and Category Management, stating these are based on good practice and are already in place to deliver cashable savings.
HM Treasury
View Details
20
Conclusion
Accepted
The Department has relatively more ambitious savings targets of £628 million over the next 10...
Conclusion
The Department has relatively more ambitious savings targets of £628 million over the next 10 years for its ‘category management’ programme. Category management involves grouping together related products and services into market ‘segments’ to generate efficiencies. The Department’s earlier attempt …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government confirms that category management is in place to deliver £628 million in savings through more efficient ways of working. It also mentions existing systems for learning from experience and the implementation of an Acquisition and Approvals Transformation Programme.
HM Treasury
View Details
23
Recommendation
Accepted
Senior responsible owners (SROs) have responsibility for ensuring a programme meets its objectives.
Recommendation
Senior responsible owners (SROs) have responsibility for ensuring a programme meets its objectives. SROs oversee governance of programmes and steer them through key decision points, assisted by a delivery team. The NAO’s analysis showed that the median time in post …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government accepted the recommendation, committing to build on existing leadership training, introduce specific talent and career management for MOD SROs, and investigate options to reduce SRO turnover, including minimum tour lengths.
HM Treasury
View Details
24
Conclusion
Accepted
The Department secured an additional £16.5 billion in funding over the next four years in...
Conclusion
The Department secured an additional £16.5 billion in funding over the next four years in the 2020 Spending Review. Given the Department’s track record of short-term financial management, and schedule delays and cost growth across its programmes, we asked the …
Read more
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledged the Committee's observation regarding the lack of clarity on the £16.5 billion funding. While disagreeing with the Committee's conclusion, it committed to providing a detailed breakdown in the February 2022 equipment plan report, distinguishing between new capabilities and existing shortfalls.
HM Treasury
View Details